EPIC Spinal Function Sort

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NIOSH Lifting Equation submitted by William A. Groves
Advertisements

The Back and Material Handling Issues
Eduardo J Salazar-Vega MHP CPH.  Ergo = work  Nomos = laws  It is an applied scientific/engineering discipline concerned with the interaction among.
Biomechanics of Work Chapter 11. NIOSH Report & Others 500,000 workers suffer overexertion injuries each year 500,000 workers suffer overexertion injuries.
Assessment.
BIOMECHANICS OF WORK Chapter 11 in your text.
Manual Handling. What is manual handling? Manual Handling is….. Any activity requiring the use of force exerted by a person to: Lift Lower Push Pull Or.
Sketch courtesy from Riekes Material Handling. Occupational MH tasks Occupational material handling (MH) can be classified into three broad types: –Pulling/Pushing.
Working at Height Presented by Nic Carstens Health and Safety Officer Tel:
Biomechanics of Lifting Graduate Biomechanics. Biomechanics of Lifting Topics Lifting and Back Injury Biomechanics of Joint Torque and Shear Standards.
1 The Effectiveness of a NIOSH Multimedia Training Program: The Lifting Equation William Bowles Education and Information Division NIOSH Best Practices.
Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) INSY 3021 Spring 2005.
IE 486 Work Analysis & Design II Lecture 13 – Intro to Biomechanics Dr. Vincent G. Duffy Thursday March 1, 2007.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Psyc 552 Ergonomics & Biomechanics Lecture 14. Evaluating Lifting with NIOSH  National Institute of Occupational Health & Safety.  Created Lifting Equation.
Sketch courtesy from Riekes Material Handling. Severity of the problem Manual handling (lifting) is injury prone & expensive –BLS 2007: 140,330 out of.
Manual Materials Handling
Hansen – Managing Safely 1 Manual Handling - The Whole Story! Mark Mallen Health and Safety Manager Fenlock Hansen Ltd.
WORK, ENERGY, POWER. Types (and changes) of Energy.
Health and Safety Adviser
ERGONOMICS :: TRAIN-THE-TRAINER PROGRAM :: TASK ANALYSIS TOOLS Task Analysis Tools.
1 Analysis of Manual Work Objectives –Review traditional job analysis methods –Introduce ergonomic job analysis methods for identifying potential for worker.
A Five Step Process for Finding WMSD* Hazards in Your Workplace
A Five Step Process for Finding WMSD* Hazards in Your Workplace (*Work-Related Musculo-Skeletal Disorders)
Ergonomic Tests Amy, Jayme, Dan, Keri, Will. RMA Maximum Isoinertial Testing – Lifting, Carrying, Pushing and Pulling.
Ergonomics Prepared by Mr Ajith Edirisinghe
Safe Patient Handling.
Ergonomics: F.C.E Presentations Tracy S., J.P. N., Elliot M., Morgan, Mike W. Finger, Hand, Arm Dexterity Tests.
What you will learn in this session  Accessing resources including legislation, local/national policies & guidelines  An organisation’s responsibilities.
PHYSICAL FITNESS LEVEL How many of you think you are physically fit? Well, we are about to find out if you are or if you are not. In the next couple days,
Preventing Musculoskeletal Injuries at KGH. Kingston General Hospital is committed to providing a safe and healthy work environment for you and your coworkers.
Julie Routledge Occupational Health Manager Hampton Knight.
Chapter 8 Manual Materials Handling Limits. Introduction  Robotics has decreased manual labor  repetitive and structured jobs  mostly successful industries.
Ergonomics Maximum Voluntary Effort By: Group 10 - Marcus, Allan, Matt, Andre, and Lance.
Saving Healthcare Workers From Back Injuries Healthcare Ergonomics Part I – A Case for Implementation Massachusetts Care Self-Insurance Group, Inc. S.
SAFETY PLAY OF THE WEEK Ergonomics in the Work Place.
The Effect of Initial Posture on The Performance of Multi-Joint Reaching Tasks: A Comparison of Joint Excursions Between Individuals With and Without Chronic.
SPACE STATION LEVELLED WORK: HOW SCIENCE WORKS YOUR TASK: Unfortunately, you have lost the written part of the investigation. Your boss needs it by tomorrow.
Occupational Safety and Health Course for Healthcare Professionals.
Miller Function & Participation Scales (M-FUN)
BIOMECHANICS OF WORK.
Manual Handling STAFF BRIEFING – No 3
1 NIOSH Lifting Guidelines n Easy to Apply and Widely Used Guideline n Requires No Special Equipment n Evaluates Two-Handed Lifting or Lowering Only n.
February 25, 2008 Post-Offer/Pre- Employment Testing Programs Dr. Greg Schroeder, DPT Work Injury Prevention Consultant.
Safe Client Handling. Objectives  Ergonomics  Risk factors  High risk client care activities  Conditions that result in high risk environments  Best.
Ergonomic Analysis of Professionals Reception in a private health facility Raquel Machado Cavalca Coutinho PhD, RN Brazil.
King Saud University College of Engineering IE – 341: “Human Factors” Spring – 2011 (2nd Sem H) Manual Materials Handling (Chapter 8) Prepared.
SAFETY LEADERSHIP TRAINING UNIT 12 Manual Material Handling Liberty Mutual Loss Prevention presents… 1 Mechanical Material Handling Accidents ã A Small.
Manual Materials Handling (Chapter 8) Prepared by: Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, PhD 1.
 Ergonomics is the science of fitting workplace conditions and job demands to the capabilities of the working population. Effective and successful "fits"
Central Tendency A statistical measure that serves as a descriptive statistic Determines a single value –summarize or condense a large set of data –accurately.
King Saud University College of Engineering IE – 341: “Human Factors Engineering” Fall – 2015 (1 st Sem H) Manual Materials Handling (Chapter 8)
تهیه کننده : دکتر مسعود مطلبی
What do you have to know to calculate the recommended weight limit (RWL)?
1 ISE Manual handling is associated with 27% of all industrial injuries 670,000 injuries/yr in the United States 60% of all money spent on industrial.
MANUAL HANDLING AWARENESS TRAINING COURSE FOR STAFF.
Manual Handling Presented by Occupational Health.
Timing (minutes) Learning ObjectiveMain tasks / ProcessResources / tools 5TitleStandard Operating Procedures for Power Press Machine Slide 1 5Index 
© Copyright  People at Work Project - Overview  People at Work Project - Theoretical Underpinnings  People at.
MANUAL HANDLING Samuel Nii Tettey (Ergonomist). THE MH PROBLEM COSTS TO EMPLOYERS Case Study 1 Manual handling injury claims cost a company £ over.
IE 366 Chapter 13 Manual Handling. IE 366 Overview ● Background ● Manual handling variables ● Pushing and pulling ● Holding, Carrying ● NIOSH Lifting.
BASIC ERGONOMICS TRAINING PROGRAM. WHAT IS ERGONOMICS? - It is the practice of arranging the environment to fit the person working in it. - Ergonomic.
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT The Ayrshire Hospice
Ergonomics Tips for Talking
Manual Materials Handling Prepared by: Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, PhD
prolonged repetitive motion
Manual Materials Handling Prepared by: Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, PhD
Manual Materials Handling Prepared by: Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, PhD
Comparisons to Isokinetic Strength
Presentation transcript:

EPIC Spinal Function Sort Group 5

What is it? EPIC (Employment Potential Improvement Corporation) Spinal Function Sort A written test including a collection of 50 tasks that is depicted by drawings and simple task descriptions that cover a broad range of spinal demands Based on evaluee’s perceived capability Useful with orthopaedic, neurologic, and rheumatologic impairments.

Purpose To quantify the person with a disability’s perception of his or her ability to perform work tasks that involve the use of the spine in various ways. Also measures progress.

History Started out as the RISC Tool Sort and went through many changes with several variations and today is called the EPIC Spinal Function Sort Began as 500 photographs and condensed down to 48. Two tasks were duplicated to test the reliability check Questions are ordered from least to most demanding

Reliability and Validity Undergone 3 years of reliability testing using rating of perceived capacity through various studies Used the test-re-test procedure Reliability Check built into testing- questions #17 and #49, #6 and #50 (See EPIC questionnaire) Result of test is an RPC( rating of perceived capacity) score (compare to normative data which gives a percentile)

Normative Data Normative data with percentile ranges is available for “employed healthy” and “unemployed patients” Employed healthy data was collected from volunteers as part of a larger study Unemployed patients (disability data) was from 6 rehabilitation centres throughout the USA.

Percentiles 90th and > = Superior 70th-85th= Above average 35th-65th= Average 15th-30th= Below average 10th and < = Inferior

SFS Male RPC Scores

SFS Female RPC Scores

Demonstration Establish Client Profile Instructions Testing Evaluation Interpretation

Client Profile Kim is a student who sits in class and in front of her computer for long periods of time (approx. 50 hrs/wk). Carries her book bag all day (wt 28lb) frequently walking in between the main campus and the fieldhouse. Kim participates in regular physical activity (4-5 times/wk). Came for a clinical assessment regarding her recent lower back pain.

Demonstration

Spinal Function Sort

Evaluation and Interpretation After reliability has been determined, test scores are calculated All columns (ex able 1, restricted 3, etc) are summed and then multiplied by a set value. Columns are then totalled in both section one and section two The sum of each sections will give the RPC value

Alternate Tests This test can also be used to assess job demands

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

What is it? Federal agency responsible for conducting research and making recommendations for the prevention of work-related disease and injury

Mission Statement Provide national and world leadership to prevent work-related illness, injury, and death by gathering information, conducting scientific research, and translating the knowledge gained into products and services.

NIOSH Lifting Equation A tool used to identify, evaluate, or classify some risks associated with a lifting task. An appropriate tool used when: estimating the risk of a 2-handed, manual lifting task Evaluating a job characterized by multiple lifting tasks Evaluating a lifting task that may include trunk rotation Different types of hand coupling, repetitiveness and duration

Cont’d Determining a relatively safe load weight for a given task Determining a relatively unsafe load weight for a given task Deciding the appropriate style of abatement for a job that has been identified as having a lifting hazard Comparing relative risk of 2 lifting tasks Prioritizing jobs for further ergonomic evaluation

The NIOSH Lifting Equation Developed in 1991 RWL= (LC)x(HM)x(VM)x(DM)x(AM)x(FM)x(CM) RWL= Recommended Weight Limit LC= Load constant 23kg HM= horizontal multiplier (25/H) VM= vertical multiplier 1-(.003[V-75]) DM= distance multiplier .82+(4.5/D) AM= asymmetric multiplier 1-(.0032A) FM= frequency multiplier- from table CM= coupling multiplier- from table

RWL The NIOSH equation calculates the RWL (recommended weight limit) Defined for a specific set of task conditions as the weight of the load that nearly all healthy workers could perform over a substantial period of time (eg. Up to 8 hrs) without an increased risk of developing lifting-related lower back pain.

Horizontal component Horizontal component (H) is measured from mid-point of line joining the inner ankle bones to a point projected on the floor directly below the mid-point of the hand grasps (ie. Load centre)- the large middle knuckle of the hand

Vertical Component V is defined as the vertical height of the hands above the floor. V is measured vertically from the floor to the mid-point between the hand grasps- defined by the large middle knuckle.

Distance component The vertical travel distance (D) is the distance of the hand between the origin and destination of the lift. D can be computed by subtracting the vertical location (V) at the origin of lift from the corresponding V at the destination of the lift

Asymmetry Component Asymmetry refers to a lift that begins or ends outside the mid-sagittal plane. It should be avoided if possible. If it cannot be avoided, the recommended weight limits are significantly less than those limits used for symmetrical lifting. It may be required if: - The origin and destination of lift are oriented at an angle to each other The lifting motion is across the body (ie swinging bags or boxes from one location to another) The lifting is done to maintain body balance in obstructed workplaces, on rough terrain, or on littered floors Productivity standards require reduced time per lift.

Asymmetric Angles The asymmetric angle (A), is operationally defined as the angle between the asymmetry line and the mid-sagittal line. Defined as the horizontal line that joins the mid-point between the inner ankle bones and the point projected on the floor directly below the mid-point of the hand grasps, as defined by the large middle knuckle

Frequency Component The frequency multiplier is defined by The number of lifts per minute The amount of time engaged in the lifting activity Vertical height of the lift from the floor

Frequency (F) F refers to the average number of lifts made per minute- measured over a 15-min period In jobs where frequency varies from session to session, each session should be analyzed separately Overall work pattern should always be considered

Coupling Component Refers to the hand-to-object gripping method that can affect the maximum force a worker can/must exert on the object, and the vertical location of the hands during the lift The effectives of the coupling is not static, but may vary with the distance of the object from the ground, so that a good coupling could become a poor coupling during a single lift. Rated on a scale of good, fair or poor for the NIOSH equation (the ratings are standardized)