2009-2010 Project Evaluation. Your Evaluators Carol Combs – Matt Courser – Paul.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objectives: The Secondary Social Studies Department will implement STEPS in Time, which is a program designed to 1) improve teachers knowledge, understanding,
Advertisements

Computing Basics Understanding the components, history and impact on todays life. Krista Sweckard, Newell High School.
Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.
Pre and Post Assessments A quick and easy way to assess your Student Learning Outcomes.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
Teacher Evaluation in Henrico County Public Schools Secondary Teachers Please organize into like groups – birds of a feather sit together!
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
Magia G. Krause Ph.D. Candidate School of Information University of Michigan Society of American Archivists Annual Meeting August 14, 2009 Undergraduates.
Basic Skills and Career and Technical Education Lin Marelick & Valerie Carrigan August 11 & 13, 2008 BSI August Institute.
DYNAMIC PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Strategies to Guide and Assess Teacher Growth Jane Gawronski, Nadine Bezuk, and Steve Klass National Council of Teachers.
Aligning Assessments to Ohio Social Studies Standards Teaching American History Grant Presentation.
The Professional Certificate Program in Washington State January 8, 2008.
See How Faculty/Staff Rate the UWP Follow-up University Writing Project Satisfaction Survey Results
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Using What Faculty Say about Improving Their Teaching Thomas F. Nelson Laird, IUB Jennifer Buckley, IUB Megan Palmer,
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
By: Annie La ED 7202, Spring Table of Contents Research Design Threats to Internal Validity Threats to External Validity Proposed Data Pre-Test/
Coaching for School Improvement: A Guide for Coaches and Their Supervisors An Overview and Brief Tour Karen Laba Indistar® Summit September 2, 2010.
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
1 Classroom-Based Research: How to Be a Researcher in Your Classroom Basic Skills Initiative Teaching and Learning Workshop October 2009 Darla M. Cooper.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
PICKING OUT A PICTURE Go to my blog: blogs.reeths-puffer.org/schoepfk You can also get here through Middle School.
Annotated Bibliography Presentation April 17, 2013 Carol Redmond ED 521: Educational Research and Analysis Flipping Literacy and Improved Reading Levels.
Robert Reid Torri Ortiz Lienemann.  Session I: ◦ Introductions of group members, facilitators, and text ◦ Review format for the book study ◦ Choose partners/small.
Are We making a Difference
1 Our Approach to Lesson Study María E. Torres Summer, 2004.
University Writing Project Faculty Feedback
Course Timeline October 7 th : Project description October 14 th : Paperwork and Budget October 21 st : Successful Grant Writers (Project description due)
Writing FRQ’s for the APHG Exam Robert Cox Pearland High School.
Evaluating Outcomes Across the Partnerships Tom Loveless Director, Brown Center on Education Policy The Brookings Institution Saturday,
Ranita Ghosh Dastidar Implementing active learning by stimulating critical thinking and having targeted research goals in a lab Rita Egekenze, Raul F.
Setting Higher Expectations Creating Successful Transitions from High School to College Language Programs Dygo Tosa, Department of Classics
Service-Learning and Grant Writing Workshop Tennessee Technological University February 23, 2010 Presented by: Shelley Brown Department of Sociology and.
Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.
Sharing Our Success: Preparing Teacher Quality (TQ) Program Participants to present their final assignments in poster format Kathy Lee Sutphin, Scientific.
Project Director – Dr. Mark Lung Dept of Natural & Environmental Sciences Western State College of Colorado Project Evaluator – Dr. Dave Shannon Educational.
Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation
Accessing and Reporting State Student Achievement Data for GPRA Purposes Amy A. Germuth, Ph.D. Compass Consulting Group, LLC.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES Kimberly Gargiulo, Coordinator of Assessment Office of Institutional Research and Assessment.
Ice Breaker! 1. On your name tag, please write the name that you wish to be addressed by throughout this course. (First, Last or Nick name) 2. What word.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Measuring Effectiveness in Mathematics Education for Teachers Heather Hill University of Michigan School of Education Learning.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Professional Learning in Action.  What separates a good teacher from a great teacher?
MSP Annual Performance Report: Online Instrument MSP Regional Conferences November, 2006 – February, 2007.
Rachel Wing DiMatteo 1 Daniel Heck 2 Mark Driscoll 1 Johannah Nikula 1 Research-based Professional Development Materials Increase Geometric Thinking 1.
Biology Scholars Program Amy Chang American Society for Microbiology Goal: Develop faculty expertise in evidenced-based science education reform Seven.
Educational Action Research Todd Twyman Summer 2011 Week 1.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Second Language Classroom Research (Nunan, D. 1990) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sehnaz Sahinkarakas.
Welcome to the San Francisco Mathematics and Science Partnerships Regional Meeting March 21-23, 2011.
Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
The Lesson PlanningProcess The BLaST IU17 Liberty Fellowship September 20, 2011 Dr. Fran Macko
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 2 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
A WebQuest about WebQuests (For Teachers). Introduction The Web is filled with fabulous teaching and learning content. How do you get students to use.
Constructing History: Using Primary Sources to Create Historical Narratives DANIEL A. COWGILL II- UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FLORIDA COUNCIL FOR THE.
Mathematics and Science Partnership APR Updates apr.ed-msp.net.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES WELCOME Differentiation Strategies: How to Meet the Instructional Needs of Each Student in Your Classroom DOE# IS Brandman.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Applied Instruction Project Presentation Carolyn Vance-Hicks EDU605 Differentiated Instruction Professor Susan Shaw.
Cluster Cycle 3: Inference Strategy Meeting 6: using THIEVES to infer main idea and important details.
+ Montgomery College Program Assessment Orientation Spring 2013.
Creating Alternative Pathways for Students to Achieve Academic Credit in School The contents of this PowerPoint were developed under a grant from the US.
Assessment and Evaluation of CAREER Educational Components Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment Research.
Focus Element Helping Students Elaborate on New Content
Measuring Teaching Practices
Coordinator of Field Placements
What are Tutorials? Tutorials are a time for students to collaborate and help one another with questions they are having in academic classes.
Presentation transcript:

Project Evaluation

Your Evaluators Carol Combs – Matt Courser – Paul Ditterline – Brent Garrett –

Introduction The Connecting to the Past Project is funded through a grant awarded to Tri- County Educational Service Center by the U.S. Department of Education. The project is a funded under the ED “Teaching American History” (TAH) Grant program ED requires that the project evaluate the project’s impact on teachers and students.

Project Goal At the end of each project year, classes taught by participating teachers will demonstrate improved student achievement in American history, as measured on a qualitative, spiral-based pre-post writing/analysis exercise.

Project Objectives 1.Increase participating teachers’ knowledge and understanding of traditional American History. 2.Increase skills and frequency with which teachers access and use primary source materials in the classroom. The U.S. Department of Education hopes that achieving these three objectives will result in improved student achievement in American History.

Evaluation Objectives To evaluate the impact of the Connecting to the Past Project on: –Teacher content knowledge –Teaching practices –Skills with primary sources, –Skills with technology, and –Student achievement To make sure that the project is meeting your needs as teachers and providing useful materials and information To collect feedback from you that can be used to improve program activities

Evaluation Design Quasi-Experimental Evaluation Design—we are comparing the cohort of participating teachers to a similar cohort of teachers who are not in the program Pre-post design—we will field a teacher content knowledge assessment and a student performance measure twice—once in the fall and once in the spring and look at changes from the first to the second.

Evaluation Details We will achieve our evaluation objectives by asking you to complete a number of evaluation surveys. These include: 1.Annual Knowledge Survey (pre-post at the beginning and end of the project/school year) 2.Seminar Surveys (pre-post at the beginning and end of each seminar and during the Summer Institute) 3.Annual Satisfaction and Impact Survey (at the end of the school year)

Evaluation Details, cont. We also will ask for your help with the following evaluation activities: 1)Lesson Plans: Providing us with a lesson plan at the beginning of the program and at the end of the program 2)Student Performance Measure: Implementing a spiral writing assignment with students from one of your classes —at the beginning of the program (this fall) and next spring (April-May 2009)

Important Things to Remember About the Evaluation 1.The evaluation is required by the U.S. Department of Education—we have to have it 2.We are not evaluating your performance as individual teachers—we are evaluating the performance of participating teachers as a group, compared to a separate group of teachers who are not in the program 3.We are unable to share your individual scores on the evaluation instruments. These scores and other evaluation data are confidential. Evaluation reports will be posted on the project website.

Important Things to Remember About the Evaluation, cont. 4.The evaluation provides useful information—information that we will use to improve the program. It also gives you a chance to share your thoughts and input. 5.We are required to send the evaluation findings to the U.S. Department of Education 6.We need your help to make this successful

Important Things to Remember About the Evaluation, cont. 7.Most project activities you participate in this year will have time devoted to completing evaluation instruments. Here’s what we ask: Please take the evaluation seriously--it is critical to the success of the project Please fill out the evaluation instruments honestly—without using notes or asking your colleagues to help with answers Please avoid talking to your colleagues and ensure that the evaluation environment is quiet and orderly until everyone has completed the instrument(s). 8.We have worked hard to minimize the burden and time imposed by the evaluation

Connecting to the Past Project Evaluation—Current Needs 1.Annual Content Knowledge Assessment (today) 2.Pre-test and post-test for the today’s seminar (today) 3.A lesson plan you used prior to the start of the project (we will you about this).

Evaluation—What’s Coming Up Student Performance Measure—pre-test –Writing assignment for one class of your students to complete –Based on the spiral questions methodology –Grade-level/standards specific –We are providing these today—all copies have been made for you –We need them completed as soon as possible (see Matt or if you need more time). –We are providing a postage-paid return mailer for these.

Middle School (Courtesy of the Ohio Historical Society, Photo Number AL06095) Level I: Description 1. Describe the people in the picture. 2. What clues does the photograph give about where they are? Level II: Interpretation 1. What time period was this photo taken? What clues help you answer this? 2. What can you tell about their social or occupational status? Level III: Analysis 1. Why do you think this group is assembled? What are their goals? 2. What does the picture tell you about the expectations American society had for men and women at the time?

Questions and Comments?