به نام خداوند بخشنده و مهربان. MAXILLARY FRACTURES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bones of the Skull.
Advertisements

Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures
Nasal-Septal Fractures
Here are the bones and regions you will need to know for lab...
Skull BY: DR.Yahya Alfarra
Bones of the Skull.
Chapter 7: The Axial Skeleton part 1
Human Anatomy & Physiology
6_Maxillofacial and Ocular Injuries
Lisa Publicover August 2005
Major Midface Trauma Steven Edlund DDS Lecturer Dept of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Facial Trauma Joseph Lang, MD April, Objectives Discuss relevant anatomy and physiology Discuss identification and emergent treatment ocular injuries.
Maxillofacial Trauma Brief Overview
Clerk Mary Angeli A. Conti. Treatment Priorities 1. Maintain airway 2. Maintain reasonable cardiac output 3. Evaluation and therapy of any CNS injury.
SKULL BONES.
PG TUTORIAL MAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA DR. AHMED AL-ARFAJ Asst. Professor / Consultant ORL Department, KAUH.
Pediatric Facial Trauma Ravi Pachigolla, MD May 12, 1999.
1 Supralaryngeal Anatomy. 2 Supportive Framework Facial Skeleton Mandible Cervical Vertebrae.
FRACTURES OF MAXILLA AND MANDIBLE
©2014 Delmar, Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in.
Head and Facial Injuries
Temple University School of Medicine
Maxillofacial Trauma.
Babak Saedi MD Otolaryngologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Evaluation and Management
Themes  Key landmarks Clinically relevant “Gotcha” injuries ○ Easy-to-miss, land you in trouble  Simplify approaches to classification, where possible.
Jaw-facial orthopedic. The aim, task. Classification of jaws fractures. General characteristic of apparatus.
Facial Fractures – Mandible and Frontal Bones
Department of Neuroradiology. Speciality Hospital. Rabat. Morocco S.BELABBES, M.FIKRI, M.R.EL HASSANI, M. JIDDANE HN9.
The peak incidence of midfacial trauma is between the ages of fifteen and thirty. Males make up 60-80% of those sustaining these injuries. The most common.
Zygomaticomaxillary ( ZMC ) Fracture. Anatomy Similar to a 4- sided pyramid It has Temporal, Orbital, Maxillary & Frontal processes The Zygoma is the.
Features of the maxillofacial area (MFA) injuries
Skull Usually consists of 22 bones, all of which (except the lower jaw) are firmly interlocked along lines called “sutures”. Cranium = 8 bones Facial skeleton.
NOE: Complications and Treatment
1 IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST BENEFICENT, THE MOST MERCIFUL.
Facial Bones Nasal Bones (2) Maxilla Bones (2) Lacrimal Bones (2) Zygomatic Bones (2) Palatine Bones (2) Inferior Nasal Conchae (2) Vomer Mandible.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Intern’s Hour Maxillofacial Trauma Preceptor: Dr. Germar BLOCK R.
Zygomatic complex fractures
Copyright restrictions may apply Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures Meslemani D, Kellman RD. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Arch Facial Plast.
Bones of the Face Nestor T. Hilvano, M.D., M.P.H..
Condylar injury.
Maxillary Fractures  LeFort Fractures  I – Transverse  II – Pyramidal  III – Craniofacial Dysjunction  Signs  Facial Swelling, malocclusion, midface.
The Skull.
By Daniel Cerbone D.O. St. Barnabas Hospital Emergency Department
The Skeleton P A R T A. The Axial Skeleton Eighty bones segregated into three regions Skull Vertebral column Bony thorax.
Miranda Kadis, Divya Agarwal, Max Lee. ^ click me ^
The Face: A BONEFIED presentation of the facial bones Aditi G, Indira M, George H Pd. 7.
8 bones of the cranium: 1 frontal bone 2 parietal bones
SKULL.
طب اسنان \ خامس اسنان جراحة فم \ د. وفاء م(10) condylar injury.
Julianna Pesce October 29, 2014
Maxillofacial Trauma.
Dr.YASIR NAIF QASSIM F.I.B.M.S(PLASTIC & RECONSTRUCTIVE)
Fractures of the zygomatic complex
The upper jaw (maxillae)
Functional structure of the skull
Facial and Mandibular Fractures
Facial Skeleton Maxillae (2) Form the upper jaw
A. Introduction 1. A human skull usually consists of 22 bones. 2. The moveable bone in the skull is the mandible. 3. Some cranial and skull bones together.
CLASSIFICATION OF FRACTURES AFTER LE FORT
Facial trauma.
Maxillofacial Trauma By Daniel Cerbone D.O. St. Barnabas Hospital Emergency Department.
Presentation transcript:

به نام خداوند بخشنده و مهربان

MAXILLARY FRACTURES

LEFORT - AP VIEW Midface Fractures

4 Le Fort ’ s fractures  Le Fort I (low level or Guerian fracture)  Unilateral/ bilateral Horizontal fracture through the maxilla above the level of the nasasl floor and alveolar process Horizontal fracture through the maxilla above the level of the nasasl floor and alveolar process  Piriform rims  Anterior maxilla  Zygomatic buttresses  Ptrygoid laminae

5 Signs and symptoms  Slight swelling of upper lip  Ecchymosis in upper lip sulcus  Hematoma intra-orally over zygoma and in palate  Disturbed occlusion  Mobility of teeth of the involved segment of maxilla  Combination of soft tissue laceration  Impacted type of fracture is oftenly not mobile and teeth cusps may be damaged

7 Le Fort ’ s fractures  Le Fort II (pyramidal or subzygomatic) (pyramidal or subzygomatic) Separation of NF suture, medial orbital walls (lacrimal bone), inferior orbital floor and rim (adjacent to infrorbital canal and foramen), anterior maxilla below zygomatic buttress and ptrygoid laminae about halfway up. Separation of NF suture, medial orbital walls (lacrimal bone), inferior orbital floor and rim (adjacent to infrorbital canal and foramen), anterior maxilla below zygomatic buttress and ptrygoid laminae about halfway up. Separation of the block from the base of skull is completed via the nasal septum and may involve the floor of the anterior cranial fossa

9 LeFort ’ s fractures  LeFort III (cranifacial dysjunction, high transverse, suprazygomatic) (cranifacial dysjunction, high transverse, suprazygomatic) Separation of NF suture, medial orbital walls (involve the depth of the ethmoid bone and cribriform plate, pass below optic foramen and cross the inferior orbital fissur), inferior orbital floor, lateral orbital wall, ZF suture, zygomatic arch, suprazygomatic to the root of ptrygoid plate. Separation of NF suture, medial orbital walls (involve the depth of the ethmoid bone and cribriform plate, pass below optic foramen and cross the inferior orbital fissur), inferior orbital floor, lateral orbital wall, ZF suture, zygomatic arch, suprazygomatic to the root of ptrygoid plate.

11 Signs and symptoms although it is possible to distinguish between le fort II and III, the signs and symptoms are almost similar  Gross edema of soft tissue  Bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis  Bilateral subconjunctival hemorrahge  Obvious deformity of the nose  Nasal bleeding and obstruction  CSF leak rhinorrhea  Dish-face deformity  Limitation of ocular movement  Possible diplopia and enophthalmous  Retropostioning of the maxilla with anterior open bite  Lengthening of the face  Difficulty in mouth opening  Mobility of the upper jaw  Occusional hematoma of the palate  Cracked-pot sound on percussion  Step deformity at infra-orbiatal margin  Anasthesia of midface  Nasal bone moves with mid-face as a whole  Tenderness and sepration at FZ suture  Tenderness and deformity of zygomatic arch  Depression of occular level and pseudoptosis

Inspection Palpation Diagnostic Imaging Plain films CT DIAGNOSIS OF MAXILLOFACIAL INJURIES

INSPECTION Sublingual ecchymosis Step defects, ridge discontinuity, malocclusion Step defects, ridge discontinuity, malocclusion

PALPATION “Step” Defect Crepitus Bony segments Subcutaneous emphysema Mobility DIAGNOSIS OF MAXILLOFACIAL INJURIES

FACIAL EXAMINATION PALPATION OF MIDFACE/BRIDGE OF NOSE

FACIAL EXAMINATION ORBITS EVALUATION

FACIAL EXAMINATION Orbits evaluated Periorbital edema and ecchymosis Gross visual acuity determined Diplopia Pupillary size & shape Subconjunctival hemorrhage

FACIAL EXAMINATION Orbits evaluated Lid lacerations Attachment of medial canthal tendon Rounding of lacrimal lake Increased intercanthal distance Epiphora Prompt Ophthamology consult

FACIAL EXAMINATION Evaluate mandibular opening Palpation of buccal vestibule Crepitus of lateral antral wall Occlusion evaluated Absence and quality of dentition noted Ecchymosis common finding Pharynx evaluated for laceration & bleeding

24 Indications for treatment  Physical signs of a fracture of the maxilla.  Evidence of a fractured maxilla on imaging.  Disruption of the occlusion of the teeth.  Displacement of the maxilla.  Post traumatic facial deformity.

25 Indications for treatment  Fractured or displaced teeth.  Cerebrospinal fluid leak.  Abnormal eye movement or restriction of eye movement.  Occlusion of the nasolacrimal duct.  Sensory or motor nerve deficit.  Other evidence of loss of function

26 Aims of treatment  Relieve pain  Restore function.  Restore bone anatomy.  Prevent infection  Restore the dental occlusion  Restore jaw movement at the earliest possible stage  Restore normal nerve function

27 Factors affecting the risk  Association with multiple injuries.  Presence of uncontrolled haemorrhage  Impairment of the airway.  Association with a dural tear.  Association with a base of skull fracture.

28 Factors affecting the risk  Presence of a pre-existing dentofacial deformity.  Time elapsed since the injury.  Presence of a medical or surgical factor which would delay general anesthesia  Presence of any factor which would delay healing. (eg nutritional deficiency or alcoholism)  Stage of dental development (deciduous, mixed or permanent dentition)

29 Factors affecting the risk  Presence of fractured teeth.  Total absence of teeth (edentulous)  Inability of the patient to co-operate with treatment.  Association with fractures of the mandible especially bilateral fractures of the condyles.

31 Principles of treatment Closed reduction may be appropriate in cases  Simple uncomplicated fractures  Complex or comminuted fractures  Medical or surgical contraindications to open reduction  Maxillary fractures in children

32 Open reduction may be appropriate where  Immediate or early jaw function is desirable  Difficulty is encountered in reducing the fracture by a closed method fracture by a closed method  The fracture is unstable

33 Definitive treatment  Reduction Manual manipulation Use of dis-impaction forceps

34 Fixation and immobilization Extraoral fixation Craniomandibular fixation Box-frame (pin fixation) Halo-frame Plaster of paries headcap Craniomaxillary fixation Supra-orbital pins Zygomatic pins Halo-frame

Cont: Management Techniques  Plate Fixation (Miniplates)  Interosseous Wire Fixation  Bone Grafts

Management by Le Fort Classification  Le Fort I: reduced digitally, MMF, fixation of ZM  Le Fort II: stabilization of the ZM buttress, MMF, nasofrontal process and inferior orbital rim.  Le Fort III: usually requires coronal flap for adequate exposure for exploration and miniplate fixation

با تشکر از صبر و حوصله شما