On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP 404.463.3275

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using the Parkride2.mac Macro to Model Park and Ride Demand in the Puget Sound Region 22 nd International Emme Users Conference September 15-16, 2011,
Advertisements

Innovations in Multi-Modal Transit Mapping Margaret Carragher E.I.T Advisor: Dr. Kari Watkins P.E. October 16, 2013 GIS in Transit Conference, Washington.
On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
Justifying Rail Bias Factor for Houston METRO’s Transit Model Presentation by Vijay Mahal, HDR Inc Vincent Sanders, Houston METRO May 18, 2009 TRB Applications.
Demand for bus and Rail Analyzing a corridor with a similar Level Of Service 5 th Israeli-British/Irish Workshop in Regional Science April, 2007.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
An Approach for Base Transit Trip Matrix Development: Sound Transit EMME/2 Model Experience Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., Seattle October,
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
METRO Rail Intercept Survey Findings, Data Uses AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group October 1, 2009.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
En Route Surveys Chapter 38 Research Methodologies.
 Travel patterns in Scotland Frank Dixon and Stephen Hinchliffe, Transport Statistics branch, Scottish Executive.
Abstract This study examines the factors that influence the mode choice of students traveling to and from school. A paper survey was developed and conducted.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
National Consumer Agency Market Research: Economiser – Transport Section February 2011 Research Conducted by.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Changes in Daily Travel Patterns 1994 to 2007/2008 Robert E. Griffiths Technical.
Cody Britton Gregory Ortiz Stephano Bonham Carlos Fierro GROUP MEMBERS.
Megan Kanagy Capital Projects Manager. What is Bikesharing? Flickr images: ambimb, infomatique, paytonc, midnightglory Miami: Deco Bike Dublin: dublinbikes.
The Development of a Direct Demand Non-Home Based Model for Urban Rail Travel Rhett Fussell, PE –PB Americas Bill Davidson-PB Americas Joel Freedman-PB.
The First International Transport Forum, May , Leipzig INDUCING TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE BEHAVIORIAL CHANGES IN KOREA: A Quantitative Analysis.
National Survey on Drug Use and Health Current Drinking Among 12 – 17 Year-olds Source: 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, an annual survey representative.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
PresentationA Explore Detroit Region Trip Chaining Behavior Presented by Liyang Feng & Jilan Chen Southeast Michigan Council of Governments The 12 th TRB.
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Social Sector Statistics Department Tourism Statistics Group
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Rochdale Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 998 – GMATS Rochdale Key Centre report Whereas report.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
May 9, 2011 RLS & Associates, Inc. Kent County Transit Needs Assessment Draft Findings and Recommendations.
EFFECTS OF RISING GAS PRICES ON BUS RIDERSHIP FOR SMALL URBAN AND RURAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS Jeremy Mattson 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity.
State of Transportation: Atlanta, GA Chris Clark University of New Orleans 10 February 2011.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
Wigan Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1001 – GMATS Wigan Key Centre report Whereas report.
Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute Ontario Trail Survey Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute Trail Usage in Ontario:
Mary Ross, P.E./Myung Sung. 2 3 Lower Atlantic Regular Gas Price HIGH: $4.03- July 2008 LOW: $1.60- Dec 2008.
2008 Regional Bus Survey Preliminary Results Presentation to the Access for All Advisory Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director April.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING APRIL 22, 2014 CITY OF HIGH POINT, NORTH CAROLINA High Point Short Range Transit Improvement Plan.
Stockport Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 947 – GMATS Stockport Key Centre report Whereas.
Bolton Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 974 – GMATS Bolton Key Centre report Whereas report.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
Oldham Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 997 – GMATS Oldham Key Centre report Whereas report.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Survey Applied Research.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
National Household Travel Survey 2010 Introduction NHTS provides very valuable information for Transport Malta and other entities involved in transport.
Regional On-Board Bus Survey Proposal Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director October 5, 2007.
1 Transit Fare Elasticity – A WMATA Experience Shi (Shelley) Xie* WMATA 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference Daytona Beach,
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
APC University: San Diego’s Use of APCs on Three Six Modes from Three APC Vendors Brian Lane Senior Transit Planner San Diego Association of Governments.
1 Palm Tran Transit Survey Coordination Meeting November 18 th, 2008.
2009 COMMUNITY SURVEY Presentation of Final Results January 21, 2010.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
Manchester Regional Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 996 – GMATS Manchester Regional Key Centre.
The Dutch travel survey Mixed-mode experiences from the Netherlands Ilona Bouhuijs Netherlands Statistics June 17th 2013 Disclaimer: the views expressed.
Measuring road traffic volume through passenger mobility surveys Vasilis Nikolaou AGILIS SA Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle-kilometres),
Transportation for Everyone Community Transportation for the Contoocook River Valley February 2007 Posted 2/14/07.
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
National Consumer Agency Economiser – Transport Section
Districtwide Passenger Origin & Destination (O & D) Surveys 2015 Planning & Development Committee November 01, 2016.
Survey of Potential Overnight Service Passengers
Use of Transportation Network Companies among MARTA Patrons
Presentation transcript:

On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP

Purpose Conduct survey that is significant for its focus on regional travel patterns Results will be used to update data inputs for ARC’s regional travel demand model

Background MARTA, CCT, Clayton, and Gwinnett County transit systems were surveyed between 10/13/01 and 12/09/01. For a “true” picture of ridership characteristics, Clayton and Gwinnett were re-surveyed in February 2002 –Allowing them to “mature” over a three to four month period after service initiation.

Report Includes Data collection: origin and destination, demographics, access and egress modes, and public transit use. Review of Existing Transit Operations. A database interface was created between ArcView and Access to allow the end user to create tables and maps by selecting specific criteria such as route, time-of-day, weekday/weekend.

Sampling Methods (buses) For efficiency, the sampling methodology is based on three principles, stratification, variability, and trip clustering. 1 st stage: Sample of weekday (and some weekend) revenue bus trips – roughly an 80%/20% split among weekday and weekend trips, which matches the actual service split for MARTA overall. 2 nd : Survey of passengers boarding the sampled bus trips.

Survey Questionnaire

Surveys by System Overall response rate was 33% The response rate by system was: –46% for MARTA Rail –29% for MARTA Bus –62% for Clayton –38% for CCT

Trip Origin Region-wide, 48% of trips began at home –MARTA Rail (53%) –MARTA bus (44%) –CCT (53%) –Gwinnett and Clayton (64%) 30% began their sampled trip from work.

Trip Origin (cont’d)

Trip Purpose Weekday: MARTA one-in five & CCT, Gwinnett/Clayton one-in-ten passengers made a discretionary trip. Weekend: twenty-five percent more riders use transit for discretionary (43%) trips

Destinations Weekday: –MARTA: Work and home share similar percentages (36%) –Gwinnett/Clayton Home (17%) Work (63%) –CCT Home (29%) Work (47%) Weekend Overall: –Home 27% (exception CCT 9%) –Work 26% (exception CCT 40%)

Trip Destinations (cont’d)

All Transit and Auto Trips by Time of Day

Transit Trip Duration

Methods of Transit Access During the week and weekend ~60% accessed public transit by walking & 20% transferred from another bus or train. Bus access is dominated by walk mode. MARTA rail: –31% of weekday & 17% of weekend drove a car and parked CCT: –23 % of weekday & 10% of weekend began using private transit, such as taxi or shuttle/vanpool service. Gwinnett and Clayton: –33% of weekday & 70% of weekend walked –42% accessed public transit from a automobile (kiss n’ ride, taxi, etc.)

How did you GET TO where you boarded this bus or train?

Egress mode Region-wide, weekday/end ridership are similar. 63% walked after the conclusion of their one-way transit trip Second most popular method of egress: –Over 31% of Gwinnett/Clayton transferred to another bus/rail –“Drive a car” is the second most frequent method of egress for weekday MARTA rail users (3 rd for weekend) –MARTA bus users- “Transfer to Marta rail” or bus (tied 13%) –Remaining systems- “Transfer to a bus” CCT (15%), MARTA rail (14%), and MARTA bus (12%) Gwinnett and Clayton (21%)

Transit Usage Passengers who use public transit at least five days/week –Seven-in-ten (weekday) –Six-in-ten (weekend) Increased bus usage: –34% (bus) and 24% (rail) respondents have increased their transit usage over the previous six months –One-in-ten Gwinnett/Clayton passengers were already using public transit before the new systems became operational. 81% of Gwinnett and Clayton riders report an increase. Only seven percent of all riders report a decrease.

Think of your use of public transit over the past six months. Which of the following applies to you?

Did not have a vehicle: –All: weekday (42%) & weekend (47%) –MARTA rail: weekday (25%) & weekend (38%) –MARTA bus: weekday (52%) & weekend (55%) –Gwinnett/Clayton: weekday (31%) & weekend (38%) How many vehicles are in Running Condition & Available to Your Household?

If bus or rail service was not available, how would you MAKE THIS TRIP? No transit available: – The majority would either drive weekday (31%) or catch a ride with someone weekend (30%) –“Weekday (20%) & 22% of weekend respondents would not have made the sampled trip if public transit service were not available. Of those who would not make the trip: –Region-wide, 72% would not take a work or home trip –Weekday (38%) & Weekend (22%) would not go to work

Alternative Method of Travel by Income

Alternative Method of Travel by County

Demographics Both weekday and weekend (~70%) respondents are African- American. Weekday (19%) and weekend (15%) respondents are White. Gender is split almost 50/50 (slightly more males on weekend). Age was the most frequent response. Weekend respondents are slightly younger than weekday respondents with 31% weekend and 26% weekday respondents between the ages of 16 and 24. Nearly one-in-three weekday and weekend passengers have at least three other persons in their household.

Income Weekend & weekday over 55% have an annual household income of less than $30,000. Weekday (20%) weekend (15%) have an income of $60,000 or more. More affluent passengers use the MARTA rail and Gwinnett/Clayton systems.

Household Size and Income Household Size Household Income Total 13,140 18,058 13,350 19,395 63,943 Low ($0 to $29,999) 62% 56% 53% 55% 56% 6,723 8,959 6,055 9,701 31,438 Mid ($30,000 to $59,999) 32% 28% 24% 28% 28% 1,238 3,827 3,515 3,858 12,438 High-Mid ($60,000 to $99,999) 6% 12% 14% 11% 11% 49 1,447 2,302 2,171 5,969 High ($100,000 or more) 0% 4% 9% 6% 5% 21,150 32,291 25,222 35, ,788 Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Trip Chain by Income

Payment Method 50% used a pass to pay for their trip. Weekday: (31%) respondents used a Monthly TransCard, 28% used Weekly TransCard. A higher percentage of weekend respondents used a Weekly TransCard (31%) than a Monthly TransCard (23%).

Conclusions During the week, public transit in the Atlanta region is mainly used for non-discretionary trips. 42% of all weekday respondents (52% of MARTA bus) do not have a vehicle During the week and weekend, nearly 60% access public transit by walking. More than 70% weekday passengers use public transit for their trip at least five days per week (mainly for work purposes).

Incentive Winners Grand Prize (One Year of Monthly Passes -$630 Value) –George Williams of College Park Second Prize (6 Months of Monthly Passes -$315 Value) –Earnest Coer of Atlanta Third Prize (1 Monthly Pass to 5 Winners Value) –Jenea Welch of Atlanta –Julian Brown of Atlanta –Yvonne Riggins of Tucker –Remaining Winners Did Not Want to Be Announced

Thanks For Your Time! Any general ?’s