Day Ahead Market Working Group March 31, 2003. Agenda Review minutes - March 24 Coral Proposal - Working Group Discussion Loads/LDCs and DAM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T&D Losses Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012.
Advertisements

MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
2000, Independent Electricity Market Operator All Rights Reserved 1.
Congestion Management Settlement Credits December, 2002.
Ancillary Services Update NEPOOL Markets Committee October 14, 2003 Jim Milligan ISO-NE Markets Development.
Roles and Responsibilities network owners system operator(s) regulators Infrastructure brokers power exchange(s) Market Places generatorsconsumerssupplierstraders.
The information in this presentation has been collated by ELEXON and while all due care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this information, ELEXON.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Day Ahead Market Working Group Meeting May 1, 2003 Market Evolution Program.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
ERCOT Tool to manage unexpected incremental load November 16, 2006.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
1 Adjusting the “Dispatch Instructions” to the Defined Metering Point (DMP). “Functional Deferral 6 (FD-06)” Market Operations Standing Committee (MOSC)
CMSC Rules Changes under Consideration Market Operations Standing Committee December 3, 2003 PUBLIC.
1 Market Evolution Program Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting September 11, 2003.
Marjket Operations Standing Committee IMO Day Ahead Market Design Update Market Operations Standing Committee September 22, 2003 Market Evolution Program.
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
Bulk Power Transmission System
The Ontario Electricity Market 1 Year in Richard Penn Mgr - Market Assessment The IMO Richard Penn Mgr - Market Assessment The IMO.
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 14, Agenda Discussion of SMD-style DAM review questions posed by the DAM WG and Coral regarding the SMD-
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 7, Agenda March 31 minutes DAM Feasibility Study - Questions? Coral Proposal - Discussion Generators and.
Treatment of Intertie Failures Intertie Trading Subcommittee November 24, 2003.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Hour Ahead Dispatchable Loads Applicable Updates to Procedures Presentation to the Market Operations Standing Committee April 23, 2003
Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO Market Operations Standing Committee April 23, 2003.
Addressing Constrained-Off Payments for Intertie Transactions Darren Matsugu, Supervisor - Markets, IESO Presentation to Technical Panel: June 2, 2015.
1 Market Trials Open Market Participant Call Weekly Kick Off March 01, 2010.
1 Cutover Market Call November 29, :00 AM.
1 IMM Pricing Concerns with PFR and FFR Proposed pricing structure provides incentive for FFR to offer at less than cost. Dual clearing price pricing structure.
Transmission Congestion Rights – Credit Perspective April 17, 2014.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
DAM Design Issues - Participants & Obligations May 12, 2003 Market Evolution Program.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
This slide deck contains animations. Please open this deck in slide show mode (“View” menu, then click on “Slide Show”). To move through the animations,
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
Jun 18, 2003Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO1 Market Pricing Integrated Proposal: Consequences, Trade-Offs & Implementation.
Carrie Tucker Supervisor, Day-Ahead Market DAM data supporting MCWG/CWG credit parameters discussion February 29, 2012.
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
Announcements Homework 8 is 11.19, 11.21, 11.26, 11.27, due now
Transmission Rights. The Markets EnergyForwardTransmissionRightsAncillaryServices Must Run Contracts Energy OperatingReserveCapacityReserve Procurement.
Revisions to the Information Confidentiality Catalogue Presentation to the Market Operations Standing Committee April 23, 2003.
ERCOT CWG/MCWG April 24, 2013 DAM Credit Parameters.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 18: LMP Markets, Symmetrical Faults and Components Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
SAWG Update to WMS September 2 nd, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
1 Tracking Electricity Imports David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Bid Price Ask Price. Market Order When you tell a broker to buy or sell at the current price You don’t specify the price The key is speed of execution.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
NPRR 649 Addressing Issues Surrounding High Dispatch Limit (HDL) Overrides Katie Coleman for Air Liquide (Industrial Consumer) ERCOT Board February 9,
Market Operations Standing Committee MOSC October 19, 2005 Pat Doran.
2% Shift Factor dispatchable rule discussion and alternatives for the 2% rule Kris Dixit 1.
DAM and Nodal Collateral Requirements Concerns and Solutions December 7, 2009.
Electricity Markets Simon Watson. Overview UK as exemplar The state-owned Electricity Supply Industry The Electricity Pool Hedging Your Bets! Deregulation.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Money Transfer Due to Real-Time Irresolvable Constraint Resmi Surendran ERCOT.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
Hourly Offers Schedule Update Examples
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
Principles of Participation in Real-Time Co-optimization
Market Notice Regarding Off-line Units
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Market Pricing Initiatives Update September 9th, 2003
Market Pricing Issues: Update
Presentation transcript:

Day Ahead Market Working Group March 31, 2003

Agenda Review minutes - March 24 Coral Proposal - Working Group Discussion Loads/LDCs and DAM

DAM Design Requirements Design requirements - at a high level what we want the DAM to look like Lead to development of detailed design and how the DAM will be built DAM from the perspective of different classes of MPs ● Financial Market Participants - March 24 ● Loads/LDCs - March 31 ● Generators - April 7 ● Importers/Exporters - April 14

Buy/Sell in DAM - Close out position in RT DA MCP and MCQ set based on DA generation offers and load bid Two Settlement System equation: Q DA (P DA -P RT ) + Q RT P RT can also be expressed as Q DA P DA + P RT (Q RT- Q DA ) If Q DA = Q RT then P RT is not relevant Loads/LDC’s

Non-Dispatchable Load with no Physical Bilateral Contract Bids DAM $100 and $75 DA MCP = $90 Q DA scheduled P DA $90 = Profit of $10/MW If 100MW consumed then load pays: Q DA P DA + P RT (Q RT- Q DA ) = 100MW x $90 + P RT (100MW-100MW) = $ 9,000 Note: when Q RT = Q DA, P RT is not relevant

Non-Dispatchable Load with no Physical Bilateral Contract If 175MW consumed and P RT is $120 then load pays: 100MW x $90 + $120(175MW-100MW) = $18,000 If 175MW consumed and P RT is $60 then load pays: 100MW x $90 + $60(175MW-100MW) = $13,500 If 80MW consumed and P RT is $120 then load pays: 100MW x $90 + $120(80MW- 100MW)) = $6,600 If 0MW consumed and P RT is $120 then load pays: 100MW x $90 + $120(0MW- 100MW)) = -$3,000 that is, the load receives +$3000

Dispatchable Load Submits bids into DAM and RTM (for this example, they submit the same bid curve into both markets) Dispatched according to bid curve in RT market Q RT can be responsive to and consistent with P RT drivers Examples: Bids DAM $40 and additional 50 $30; say DA MCP = $35 and Q DA = 100 MW Say RT MCP = $38, Q RT = 100 MW 100MW x $35 + $38(100MW - 100MW) = pays $3500 Say RT MCP = $50, Q RT = 100 MW (dispatched off) 100MW x $35 + $50(0MW - 100MW) = receives $1500 Say RT MCP = $20, Q RT = 150 MW 100MW x $35 + $20(150MW - 100MW) = pays $4500

Non-dispatchable load with a Physical Bilateral Contract Load has 2 production lines - each consumes 100 MW Load has PBC with another participant to buy $100 Typically operates production line 1: Can stop production line 1 and consume 0 MW Can start production line 2 and consume 200 MW Submits to DAM: Offer to sell $200 Bid to buy $50

Physical Bilateral Contracts Example 1 DA MCP = $250; load is accepted to sell 100MW and chooses to consume 0 MW based upon the DAM result Load pays: Q DA P DA Q RT Q DA -100MW x $250 + P RT ((0MW-100MW PBC ) - (-100MW)) = -$25,000 Load actually receives $25,000 from IMO Load pays $10,000 to PBC counter-party Load receives net $15,000 for not running production line 1

Physical Bilateral Contracts Example 2 Say, DA MCP = $40; Q DA = 100 MW based upon DAM bid In RT load consumes 200MW to run production line 2 based upon PBC and DAM result Q DA P DA Q RT Q DA (100MW)($40) + P RT ((200MW-100MW PBC ) - (100MW)) = $4,000 Load pays IMO $4,000 Load pays PBC $10,000 to PBC counter-party Load pays net $14,000 to run production lines 1& 2 (200 MW)

Discussion Points LDCs Bill 210 Multi-part - Bid/Offer Structure Energy, OR, Intertie trading Ramp Rate impact Positions closed out next day - 5 minute/HOEP Prudentials - Exposure due to P RT not known until next day Settlement - Financial vs. Physical schedule Other Markets - i.e., NYISO

Next Meetings Generators - April 7 Importers/Exporters - April 14