Budget Setting Process For 2015 Budget Draft 0.1 Member Forum Date of Meeting: 27th May 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
New GSMP Governance Proposal (This recommendation provides the governance approach for the standards development only) ISDP Governance Team 2-September-2009.
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
Oregon State Library Transformation Project Launch
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 5C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Proposed RISC 2014 Deliverables, Activities, and Calendar For Discussion Andy Rodriquez, Director of RRAC January 14, 2014.
The key steps in an annual cycle Produce the annual work programme Create an annual Internal Audit plan for approval by the Audit Committee, typically.
ISO 9001: Countdown to 2015 Preparing for the next revision of the ISO 9001 standard on quality management systems.
Governance and delivery through Opt-In Organisations.
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Project Update Monthly Research Administrators Meeting March 11, 2010.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Family Outreach and Response Program Strategic Plan September 26 th, 2012.
Project Governance Structure
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Robert Fullagar CISSP CISM CRISC Clas CEH “Security is everyone’s responsibility”
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
Creating an Education Destination through Strategic Planning Lodi Unified School District Board Study Session Presentation August 16, 2011.
MAC Committee Update Robert Kondziolka, MAC Chair.
FY14 Budget Process Community Review – March 5 th 2013.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Early Childhood Data Governance: Overview and Implementation
Davenport University Strategic Planning, Goal Development and Budget Process December 15, 2009.
Early Market Briefing Proposed tender for the Australia-Timor-Leste Partnership for Human Development (ATLPHD) 14 September 2015, Dili.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Supporting Industry Change Planning: Risk & Milestone Assessment Process & Tools 07/07/2014.
LEONARDO TRANSFER OF INNOVATION PROJECT “MEDIA TECH: The future of media industry using innovative technologies ” No. LLP-LdV-ToI-11-CY Kick-off.
2011 RTF Projects RTF Input on SOW Outlines: - Deemed Measure Reviews - Measure Life Guidelines -Measure Cost Guidelines Regional Technical Forum April.
A Strawman for Discussion by Dottie Stockstill & Greg Ramon Special ERCOT Board Meeting June 24, 2003.
Develop Project Charter
Devon & Cornwall Police Authority Strategic Review November 2010.
Project Management Project Roles. The number of people involved in a project and the roles they play will vary greatly between different types and size.
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
PSCIOC-PSSDC Workplan Coordination Strategy– Draft Coordination Committee Telecon
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
M ODULE 6 PART 1: Planning and Stakeholder Management GLOBAL FUND GRANT CONSOLIDATION WORKSHOP DATE.
Market Systems Release Update Modifications Committee Meeting 65 December 3rd
WP5 – SEE Cluster Policy Learning Mechanisms 3° Steering Committee Meeting Thessaloniki,
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
Page 1 Emerging Issues and Outreach Working Group Gary Hannaford, Working Group Chair IESBA Meeting September 16-18, 2013 Sydney, Australia.
Objectives: Define and implement a website layout that enables users to find key information efficiently Develop a process to ensure the sustainability.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Managing programs that promote personal effectiveness.
Page 1 Future Strategy and Work Plan IESBA CAG Meeting September 11, 2013 New York Ken Siong, IESBA Technical Director.
Joint BPS and ESS/ITS ATC/AFC Subcommittee Update November 2007 – January 2008 February 5, 2008.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
Progress report of the Working Group on the Value and Benefits of SAIs (WGVBS) 5 th meeting of the INTOSAI KSC Steering Committee 16 September 2013.
Strategic Planning Mapping Process (2014 Example) RTD VisionTo deliver regional multi-modal transportation services and infrastructure improvements that.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
Signalling Programme External Stakeholder Meeting on September 17, 2009.
GNSO Council Restructure Enhance & Support SGs/Constituencies Improve Communications & Coordination Revise the Policy Development Process Adopt a WG Model.
Role of Advisory Groups David Markwell Head of Education E-Learning Advisory Group meeting
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Business / Feedback Loop
Well Trained International
Orientation Overview April 14, 2017
Engaging with global clinical communities (on a day to day basis)
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Mapping Special Interest Group SNOMED IHTSDO
IT Governance Planning Overview
Guidance notes for Project Manager
NATA Foundation Building Blocks Process
Proposed RISC 2014 Deliverables, Activities, and Calendar
Strategic Planning Timeline Overview
Timeline Overview Planned Timescales
Prizmah Day School Conference March 2019
Presentation transcript:

Budget Setting Process For 2015 Budget Draft 0.1 Member Forum Date of Meeting: 27th May 2014

New Budget Process The new budget process aims to take a more structured approach with the following key requirements:  Management Board confirms the vision and strategic priorities  Clear guidelines communicated for project definition and the detail required for project approval e.g. costing, mapping to Member Country priorities  An agreed structure whereby the Management Team work with the Member Forum early in the process to scope, timeline and and cost ‘true’ projects and also identify the business as usual items and budget  All projects, business as usual items and resultant budget to be approved by Management Board

Standing Committees Chaired by relevant MB Member To support MF & MT to scope, cost and timeline projects Standing Committees Chaired by relevant MB Member To support MF & MT to scope, cost and timeline projects General Assembly Informed of decisions by Management Board Budget Approval General Assembly Informed of decisions by Management Board Budget Approval Management Board Create vision for SNOMED CT Confirm strategic direction Define scope of products/services Management Board Create vision for SNOMED CT Confirm strategic direction Define scope of products/services Management Team Define project principles based on feedback from Member Countries Prioritize Projects from MF Set Project Budget Deliver Projects Allocate resource to BAU Management Team Define project principles based on feedback from Member Countries Prioritize Projects from MF Set Project Budget Deliver Projects Allocate resource to BAU Content Implementation Quality Technical Ad-Hoc Committees Ad-Hoc Committees IHTSDO Members Complete survey to help define project principles and priorities IHTSDO Members Complete survey to help define project principles and priorities Member Forum Recommend top Projects in line with project principles and priorities from Management Team and Member Country Define Project Scope and Deliverables Requirements outside of project principles captured as business as usual deliverables (BAU) Member Forum Recommend top Projects in line with project principles and priorities from Management Team and Member Country Define Project Scope and Deliverables Requirements outside of project principles captured as business as usual deliverables (BAU) Vendor Liaison Forum New Budget Process Roles and Responsibilities

IHTSDO Planning and Budgeting Process Timeline Annual Plan April Conference Management Board confirms vision, strategic direction and scope of products and services By 30 th April Member Countries complete survey to help define project principles & priorities By Mid June Management Team & Member Countries (via MF) agree project principles By 31 st July Member Forum (MF) recommend top 10 projects and BAU scope & deliverables By 31 st August Management Team (MT) agree budget By Mid September Management Team resolve queries from MB By 30th September MB and Management team agree final budget October Conference MB inform General Assembly of final plans and budget. GA Approves Budget Standing Committees support MF and MT

Latest Status Report  Budget setting proposal approved in principle at April Conference  Member Forum has created a MF Budget Sub Committee  Management Team has created MT Budget Sub Committee  Definition of Project and BAU is being formulated  Management Team is compiling a list of work items continuing into 2015 (previously agreed as part of strategic objectives and 3 year plan)

Management Team Budget Sub Committee  Support Head of Finance to formulate the 2015 Budget  Agree Project Principles  Agree BAU Definition  Agree Process and Timeline  Agree Documentation  Ensure budget prepared and ready for presentation in October Conference  Support Management Team, Member Forum and Standing Committees to fulfill their obligations in the process

Project Principles 1) Projects must be over USD 150k in costs 2) Projects must be something that the majority of members identify as a top priority 3) Projects will have defined scope, defined start and end dates and deliverables 4) Projects will be managed as such and will have defined risk/issue register reporting requirements 5) Projects will have an assigned responsible business owner 6) Must adhere to the strategic objectives of the organisation

Definition of Business As Usual 1) Normal on going tasks for the organisation in the lines of business 2) Must be related to strategic and business objectives of the organisation 3) Defined as part of the LOB budget for the existing year 4) Will be items that meet the majority of member needs or functional requirements of the LOB 5) Will be considered small items of 150k or less 6) Requires business approval of the Head of Finance, LOB Owner and CEO to be included in the budget process

Member Forum Responsibilities  Agree project principles and priorities with Management Team – by Mid June  Recommend top 10 (approximately) projects, define project scope and deliverables – by 31 st July  Requirements outside of project principles captured as business as usual deliverables (BAU) - by 31 st July

Member Country Project Prioritization  Consider the following principles/criteria when prioritizing projects for IHTSDO:  There is commitment to implement the project deliverables by initiatives in Member Countries  The project can deliver quick wins that will directly benefit Member Countries  The project provides good ROI  International work can benefit more than one country  Will likely benefit suppliers and increase adoption  The project will lead to increased SNOMED CT capacity in Member Countries  The project can articulate measureable benefits and accomplishments  The project can further a high impact and recognized need  Important projects that are not urgent – consider deferring  Important projects that have limited commitment to uptake - consider deferring  Balance workload by limiting number of highest priorities

Next Steps  MT and MF sub committees to agree project/BAU principles  MT sub committee to provide list of work items continuing into 2015 with attributable budget value to Head of Finance  Head of Finance to publish budget value available for new work items (after overhead costs)  MF sub committee to provide list of projects/BAU in line with agreed principles and prioritized in line with Member Forum prioritization principles