Shaping Society APMR Briefing Zulkefli Bin Mansor Pusat Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Program Akademik Bahagian Hal Ehwal Akademik.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.
Head of Learning: Job description
Commission for Academic Accreditation 1 Accreditation and Academic Quality King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Faculty Workshop Accreditation,
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
BENGKEL PERSEDIAAN AUDIT PEMATUHAN & OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
SESSION 1 Introducing the Code of Practice for Programme Acceditation (COPPA)
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
Performance management guidance
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Quality assurance for e- learning Dr Tim Brown (formerly) Deputy Director, Validation Services, Open University UK.
UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF MASTER’S DEGREES IN SPAIN 1.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
Involving Students Effectively In Quality Assurance Nik Heerens Head of sparqs.
POLICY ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN STANDARD FOR PRINCIPALSHIP EMASA CONFERENCE PRESENTATION JAMES NDLEBE 1.
Outcome-based Education – From Curriculum to Classroom practices
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS A TOOL FOR QUALITY CULTURE EMBEDMENT: VILNIUS UNIVERSITY APPROACH Inga Milisiunaite, Roma Adomaitiene, Juozas Galginatis Vilnius.
EU/CoE PROJECT “STRENGTHENING HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS IN SERBIA”
JAZAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Asst. Prof. Thapanee Thammetar, Ph.D. Director of Thailand Cyber Univ. Quality Assurance, e-Learning content development and operation ASEAN-ROK Session.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
Dr Vladimir Radevski Ohrid, 4 April 2012 National Frameworks and their associated Quality Assurance.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación Methods and approaches for a management and evaluation of research at the Higher Education.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
1 ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT AREA 4, 5 AND 6 Prepared by: WAN ARIF BIN WAN AHMAD EXAM & RECORD DEPARTMENT ِ
SESSION 4 EVALUATING FOR FULL ACCREDITATION USING COPPA EVALUATION INSTRUMENT 1.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Training Seminar on Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Systems in Romanian Higher Education Institutions Sinaia, April 1-3, 2009 ARACIS’ policy.
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
What is ISO Certification? Information is a valuable asset that can make or break your business. When properly managed it allows you to operate.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Experiments in Careers Subject Design and Delivery: The Bond University Professional Practice Program.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
NCEQE Conference 6 December 2016
Competency Based Learning and Development
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
European Style Pilot Evaluations in Azerbaijan Higher Education Baku 20 June 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Project Leader.
Competency Based Learning and Development
February 21-22, 2018.
Istanbul University, Department of Economics BEYAZIT-FATIH ISTANBUL
Presentation transcript:

Shaping Society APMR Briefing Zulkefli Bin Mansor Pusat Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Program Akademik Bahagian Hal Ehwal Akademik

Shaping Society Area 1 – Vision/Mission/Educational Goal/LO 1.Programme aims, objective and learning outcome are well define 2.Programme aims, objective and learning outcome are well disseminated to stakeholder. 3.Programme aims, objective and learning outcome are consistent with HEP’s vision and mission 4.Programme objectives are reflect to the outcomes of higher education framework (MQF) 5.Involvement of stakeholders in developing the programme aims, objective and learning outcome.

Shaping Society Area 1 6.The programme clearly shows how the students is able to demonstrate the achievement of learning outcome (summative assessment) 6.The programme clearly specifies the link between competencies expected at completion of studies and those required during career undertakings and further studies.

Shaping Society Area 2 – Curriculum Design/Delivery Academic Autonomy 1.Autonomy in designing the curriculum. 2.Autonomy in allocating the resources for implementing the programme to ensure LO is achieved. 3.Autonomy in focusing on areas of expertise in development and implementation of curriculum 4.The policy: What?

Shaping Society Area 2 – Curriculum Design/Delivery Programme Design and Teaching Learning Method 1.Clear defined process by which the curriculum is established, reviewed and evaluated. 2.Involvement of stakeholders: Who? How? 3.Content of programme, approach and teaching methods are consistent and supportive to achieve LOs 4.The use of variety of teaching learning methods –Suit or not? 5.Inclusion of extra curricular activities in the programme

Shaping Society Area 2 – Curriculum Design/Delivery Curriculum Content and Structure 1.MQA guidelines: Comply or not? 2.Review of the program content: Who? When? How?

Shaping Society Area 2 – Curriculum Design/Delivery Management of the Programme 1.Understanding / awareness of LO such PO, PEO, program structure, learning methods and assessment. 2.Qualified HoP? 3.Is HoP has full authority to plan and monitor the programme? 4.Resources in implementing T&L activities: Enough? 5.Reviewing content and delivery to ensure quality: What? How? Who?

Shaping Society Area 2 – Curriculum Design/Delivery Linkages With External Stakeholders 1.How? Who – international/local? 2.Feedback: Alumni? Employers?

Shaping Society Area 3 – Assessment of Stud Relationship Between Assessment and Learning 1.Assessments (methods/practices) were aligned with LO and program contents: What?? How? 2.Consistency assessments Vs MQF Vs Program Standard. 3.Involvements of external/internal stakeholders in reviewing the assessment methods: Who?? How??

Shaping Society Area 3 – Assessment of Stud Assessment Methods 1.The processes are well documented. What?? How?? 2.Assessment should consist of summative and formative. What?? How?? 3.Mechanism to improve the assessment methods. What? How?? When??

Shaping Society Area 3 – Assessment of Stud Management of Student Assessment 1.Inform to the student. How?? When?? 2.Establishment of procedures and regulation on changes of assessment. What?? How?? 3.Ensuring security of assessment documents and records. What??How??

Shaping Society Area 4 – Student Selection Admission and Selection 1.Clear criteria and process. What?? How?? 2.Accessibility of the process. What?? How?? 3.Extensive support to assist student. What?? How?? 4.Reviewing of admission policy: How?? Who??

Shaping Society Area 4 – Student Selection Articulation Regulation, Transfer Credit and Exemption 1.Policy. What?? How?? Transfer of Students 1.Policy. What?? How??

Shaping Society Area 4 – Student Selection Student Support Services and Co-curricular Activities 1.Accessibility of resources/support service: What? How? Who? 2.Counselling service: How? Student Representation and Participation 1.HEP policy: What?? Who?? How?? 2.Facilities / Resources: What??

Shaping Society Area 5: Academic Staff Recruitment and Management 1.Recruitment policy and procedure: What? How? 2.Staff ratio: Enough? Part Time? Full Time? 3.Role of staff: Teaching? Publication? Consultancy? Community Services? 4.Reward / Recognition of the staff. 5.Involvement of staff: Local? International?

Shaping Society Area 5: Academic Staff Service and Development 1.Career development: What? How? 2.Mentoring- new staff: What? How? 3.Training: What?

Shaping Society Area 6 – Educational Resources 1.Facilities: What?? Quantity/Quality? 2.Library resources: What? 3.Policy: What? How? Who? 4.Financial Allocation: How much?

Shaping Society Area 7 – Programme Monitoring & Review 1.Analysis of student performance: What? How? 2.Evaluation of programme: What? Who? How? When? 3.Involvement of stakeholders: Who? How?

Shaping Society Area 8-Leadership/Governance Governance 1.Consistency of policy/procedure: How? 2.Clarification of organization: What? How? 3.Integration of organizational functional: How?

Shaping Society Area 8-Leadership/Governance Academic Records 1.Policy: What? Who? How? 2.The implementation: How? 3.Reviewing the policy: Who? How? When?

Shaping Society Area 8-Leadership/Governance Academic Leadership of the Programme 1.Criteria for appointment of HoP: What? How? 2.Evaluation of HoP: What? How? Administrative and Management Staffs 1.Criteria for appointment : What? How? 2.Evaluation: What? How?

Shaping Society Area 9 - CQI 1.Policy: What? Who? How? 2.The implementation: How? 3.Reviewing the policy: Who? How? When? 4.Improvement? How?

Shaping Society Thank You