PSY 2005 Week 10 – Simple Effects. Factorial Analysis of Variance Simple Effects.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Statistics for the Social Sciences

Advertisements

FACTORIAL ANOVA. Overview of Factorial ANOVA Factorial Designs Types of Effects Assumptions Analyzing the Variance Regression Equation Fixed and Random.

Factorial Designs Passer Chapter 9

2  How to compare the difference on >2 groups on one or more variables  If it is only one variable, we could compare three groups with multiple ttests:

Chapter Fourteen The Two-Way Analysis of Variance.

PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Chapter 20 – Tests for Ranked Data, Choosing Statistical Tests.

Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Two-Way Between-Groups ANOVA

11. Experimental Research: Factorial Design What are factorial experimental designs, and what advantages do they have over one-way experiments? What is.

Dr George Sandamas Room TG60

Two Factor ANOVA.

FACTORIAL ANOVA.

FACTORIAL DESIGNS F Terms for Factorials F Types of Factorial Designs F Notation for Factorials F Types of Effects F Looking at Tables of Means F Looking.

C82MST Statistical Methods 2 - Lecture 7 1 Overview of Lecture Advantages and disadvantages of within subjects designs One-way within subjects ANOVA Two-way.

Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Spring 2005 Factorial ANOVA.

Introduction to Multivariate Research & Factorial Designs

Complex Design. Two group Designs One independent variable with 2 levels: – IV: color of walls Two levels: white walls vs. baby blue – DV: anxiety White.

Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900

Factorial Designs More than one Independent Variable: Each IV is referred to as a Factor All Levels of Each IV represented in the Other IV.

Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA.

Lecture 13: Factorial ANOVA 1 Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.

2x2 BG Factorial Designs Definition and advantage of factorial research designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial.

Repeated Measures ANOVA Used when the research design contains one factor on which participants are measured more than twice (dependent, or within- groups.

1 Two Factor ANOVA Greg C Elvers. 2 Factorial Designs Often researchers want to study the effects of two or more independent variables at the same time.

Understanding the Two-Way Analysis of Variance

Psy2005: Applied Research Methods & Ethics in Psychology Lab Week 7: Using Simple Effects to investigate the effects of type of session and type of therapy.

Leedy and Ormrod Ch. 11 Gray Ch. 14

Part IV Significantly Different: Using Inferential Statistics

Factorial Design Two Way ANOVAs

1 of 46 MGMT 6970 PSYCHOMETRICS © 2014, Michael Kalsher Michael J. Kalsher Department of Cognitive Science Inferential Statistics IV: Factorial ANOVA.

Lecturer’s desk INTEGRATED LEARNING CENTER ILC 120 Screen Row A Row B Row C Row D Row E Row F Row G Row.

Shavelson Chapter 14 S14-1. Know the purpose of a two-way factorial design and what type of information it will supply (e.g. main effects and interaction.

Slide 1 Two-Way Independent ANOVA (GLM 3) Prof. Andy Field.

Factorial Analysis of Variance One dependent variable, more than one independent variable (“factor”) 1 2.

Lecturer’s desk INTEGRATED LEARNING CENTER ILC 120 Screen Row A Row B Row C Row D Row E Row F Row G Row.

Review of Results From data analysis to presentation.

Multivariate Analysis. One-way ANOVA Tests the difference in the means of 2 or more nominal groups Tests the difference in the means of 2 or more nominal.

 Slide 1 Two-Way Independent ANOVA (GLM 3) Chapter 13.

Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.

Psychology 3051 Psychology 305A: Theories of Personality Lecture 1 1.

1 Analysis of Variance ANOVA COMM Fall, 2008 Nan Yu.

Psych 5500/6500 Other ANOVA’s Fall, Factorial Designs Factorial Designs have one dependent variable and more than one independent variable (i.e.

Department of Cognitive Science Michael J. Kalsher Adv. Experimental Methods & Statistics PSYC 4310 / COGS 6310 Regression 1 PSYC 4310/6310 Advanced Experimental.

Factorial Analysis of Variance

Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)

Assignment 1 February 15, 2008Slides by Mark Hancock.

Mixed ANOVA Models combining between and within. Mixed ANOVA models We have examined One-way and Factorial designs that use: We have examined One-way.

ONE-WAY BETWEEN-GROUPS ANOVA Psyc 301-SPSS Spring 2014.

Research Methods and Data Analysis in Psychology Spring 2015 Kyle Stephenson.

Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Fifteen Inferential Tests of Significance III: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with Multiple Independent.

Research Methods and Data Analysis in Psychology Spring 2015 Kyle Stephenson.

Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 11 Testing for Differences Differences betweens groups or categories of the independent variable.

Research Methods and Data Analysis in Psychology Spring 2015 Kyle Stephenson.

ANOVA Overview of Major Designs. Between or Within Subjects Between-subjects (completely randomized) designs –Subjects are nested within treatment conditions.

© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 11 Testing for Differences Differences betweens groups or categories of the independent.

Complex Experiments.

Factorial BG ANOVA Psy 420 Ainsworth. Topics in Factorial Designs Factorial? Crossing and Nesting Assumptions Analysis Traditional and Regression Approaches.

Chapter 9 Two-way between-groups ANOVA Psyc301- Spring 2013 SPSS Session TA: Ezgi Aytürk.

Michael J. Kalsher PSYCHOMETRICS MGMT 6971 Regression 1 PSYC 4310 Advanced Experimental Methods and Statistics © 2014, Michael Kalsher.

Oneway ANOVA comparing 3 or more means. Overall Purpose A Oneway ANOVA is used to compare three or more average scores. A Oneway ANOVA is used to compare.

Chapter 14 Repeated Measures and Two Factor Analysis of Variance PowerPoint Lecture Slides Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Seventh.

Two-Way Independent ANOVA (GLM 3)

Review This template can be used as a starter file for presenting training materials in a group setting. Sections Right-click on a slide to add sections.

An Introduction to Two-Way ANOVA

Interactions & Simple Effects finding the differences

What does this problem equal?

Complex Experimental Designs

Chapter 13 Group Differences

Chapter 9: Differences among Groups

Chapter 14 Multiple Regression

Presentation transcript:

PSY 2005 Week 10 – Simple Effects

Factorial Analysis of Variance Simple Effects

Aims Interpretation of interactions To explain, using example data, how an analysis of simple effects allows an interpretation of potential main effects when an interaction is present.

Learning Outcomes Interpret graphical representations of interactions Define simple effects. Explain the steps in an analysis of simple effects. Interpret the results of a simple effects analysis. At the end of this lecture you will be able to :

Definitions 2-way ANOVA – 2 independent variables (IVs) Main Effect – The effects of one independent variable (factor) summed (averaged) over all levels of the other independent variable. Interaction – When the effect of one factor is not constant across all levels of the other factors.

Example Effect of music and alcohol on driving performance IV 1: Music – On vs. Off IV 2: Alcohol – None vs 2 units DV: Mean no. of errors made

offon IV1: Music DV: mean no of errors Possible Outcomes No main effects No interaction 2units no alcohol IV2: Alcohol

Main effect for factor1 No main effect for factor 2 No interaction offon IV1: Music DV: mean no of errors 2units no alcohol IV2: Alcohol Possible Outcomes

No main effect for factor1 Main effect for factor 2 No interaction offon IV1: Music DV: mean no of errors 2units no alcohol IV2: Alcohol Possible Outcomes

Main effect for factor1 Main effect for factor 2 No interaction offon IV1: Music DV: mean no of errors 2units no alcohol IV2: Alcohol Possible Outcomes

No main effects Interaction offon IV1: Music DV: mean no of errors 2units no alcohol IV2: Alcohol Possible Outcomes

Main effect for factor1 Main effect for factor 2 Interaction offon IV1: Music DV: mean no of errors 2units no alcohol IV2: Alcohol Possible Outcomes

Example Data ABC Drug depression Schizo- phrenia Factor 1 Factor 2

Drug A Type of Drug Schizophrenics Depressives Mean improvement score Drug CDrug B Interaction Graph

Interpreting Interactions In order to interpret any potential main effects, an analysis of Simple Effects should be conducted. A Simple Effect is the effect of one independent variable at a particular level of the other independent variable. For our example there are two simple effects for type of drug and three simple effects for type of problem. In order for a main effect to be interpretable, the simple effects for that variable must be the same for all levels of the other independent variable.

Simple Effects for Type of Drug There are two simple effects for type of drug: 1. the effect of drug for schizophrenics 2. the effect of drug for depressives 1. the effect of drug for schizophrenics Conduct a one-way independent groups ANOVA, using the MSerror from the original two-way ANOVA and appropriate degrees of freedom, to assess if there is any difference between the scores of the three drugs for schizophrenics only.

2. the effect of drug for depressives Conduct a one-way independent groups ANOVA, using the MSerror from the original two-way ANOVA and appropriate degrees of freedom, to assess if there is any difference between the scores of the three drugs for depressives only. If the effect of drug is the same for schizophrenics and depressives then there is an interpretable main effect for drug. Is there? The question we are addressing here is: Is the effect for drug consistent (the same) for schizophrenics and depressives?

Simple Effects for Type of Problem There are three simple effects for type of problem: 1. the effect of type of problem for Drug A 2. the effect of type of problem for Drug B 3. the effect of type of problem for Drug C 1. the effect of type of problem for Drug A Conduct a one-way independent groups ANOVA, using the MSerror from the original two-way ANOVA and appropriate degrees of freedom, to assess if there is any difference between the scores of the participants for Drug A only.

2. the effect of type of problem for Drug B Conduct a one-way independent groups ANOVA, using the MSerror from the original two-way ANOVA and appropriate degrees of freedom, to assess if there is any difference between the scores of the participants for Drug B only. 3. the effect of type of problem for Drug C Conduct a one-way independent groups ANOVA, using the MSerror from the original two-way ANOVA and appropriate degrees of freedom, to assess if there is any difference between the scores of the participants for Drug C only.

If differences between schizophrenics and depressives are in the same direction for all three types of drug then there is an interpretable main effect for type of problem. Is there? The question we are addressing here is: Is the effect for type of problem consistent (the same) for all three types of drug?