BOLOGNA PROCESS and LEARNING OUTCOMES THE BIGGER PICTURE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)
Advertisements

1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
Official BFUG Bologna Seminar ENHANCING EUROPEAN EMPLOYABILITY July 2006 University of Wales Swansea.
Faculty of Health & Social Work Using Credit for Good Curriculum Design Presentation Revisit original objectives Impact of Credit on the Curriculum Who.
Towards 2010 – Common Themes and Approaches across Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training in Europe - New and emerging models in vocational.
«Bologna Structural Reforms: History, Problems and Perspectives» INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Astana February 13-14, 2014.
What is the relationship between the HE qualifications framework and quality assurance? Stephen Adam, June 2011.
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS: Challenging technical questions!
 The Bologna Declaration was signed by the Ministers of Education of 29 European countries on the occasion of the Confederation of EU Rectors’ Conference,
Employability in context of the Bologna Process Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat Yerevan, May 2014.
Carolyn Bew Anne Boddington University of Brighton
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
COIMBRA GROUP ANNUAL CONFERENCE Anita Lehikoinen.
ECTS – The European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System Michael Hörig European University Association Moscow, 12 December 2007.
The “Bologna Process” and the European Higher Education Area in the global setting. Donatella Palomba - Università di Roma “Tor Vergata ” YICGG 2008 –
UAB adaptation to the European Higher Education Area Office of the Vice-Rector of Students and Culture January 2006.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
11 CEIBAL:Capacity Enhancement for Implementing Bologna Action Lines in Georgia Regional Academic Summit „New trends in Medical Education & Bologna Process.
The Bologna Process The UK HE Europe Unit Tish Bourke.
The UK Credit Framework and the Bologna Process Tim Cobbett Director of Quality and Governance.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 European qualifications framework Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis,
Emerging Multinational Initiatives in Tertiary Education SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference August 13, 2010 Maureen McLaughlin.
Higher Education as a Generator of Strategic Competencies Kick-off meeting: Maastricht, November 12-13, 2007 ANALYSIS OF THE EUROPEAN, NATIONAL AND UNIVERSITIES.
The Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area Ensuring Worldwide Competitiveness of Master’s and PhD Programmes at European Universities of.
The Qualification Frameworks Pros et Contras Sigmund Grønmo University of Bergen SIU Seminar Gardermoen June 17, 2011.
Bologna Process and Developments in the Netherlands, 9 May 2005 Robert Wagenaar Director of Undergraduate and Graduate Studies Faculty of Arts / Chair.
Doctoral education through students’ eyes Juuso Leivonen The 21st century doctorate – sharing European developments Scotland House Conference.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
Learning Outcomes – What are they all about? Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork 1 1 Dundalk Institute of Technology 8.
Unit 1 The Bologna process and its impact on the Russian system of higher education.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
The European Credit system The European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET)
Bologna Process Information Briefing Tbilisi, Georgia 22 July 2008  Cynthia Deane  Ireland (With thanks to Prof Andejs Rauhvergers, Chairman of Stocktaking.
ECTS Users’ Guide 2015 Approved at Yerevan Ministers’ Meeting May 2015.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY? CEENQA WORKSHOP FRIDAY, 23 MAY 2014 Hotel Sirius-Pristina.
ECVET AIMS AND KEY DOCUMENTS DARKO MALI (CPI, LJUBLJANA) BLED, 17 SEPTEMBER 2013.
Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.
European Higher Education in Flux – challenges for the next decade - Lesley Wilson Secretary General, EUA EAIR, Vilnius, 24 August 2009.
Tuning of Higher Education Programmes on the Basis of Profiles, Competences and Learning Outcomes WHYHOWWHAT.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
After the Bologna Bucharest Conference: What is new on the way to Bologna New Developments in European QA CEENQA-Workshop in Sarajevo 11 and 12 May 2012.
STEPHEN ADAM SEEC CONFERENCE: CREDIT CHANGES AND CHALLENGES LONDON, 10 TH DECEMBER 2010 CURRENT ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE THE TWO.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
Website: Bologna Secretariat Synergies between the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and the EIT Ligia.
Council of Europe Seminar: European Trends in teaching and Learning, 25 June 2010 Development of Teaching and Learning Methods in Europe David Crosier,
University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008.
The European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) More details in the site: Dr Michalis Glampedakis Professor Technological Institution (University)
REFORMING HIGHER EDUCATION IN EUROPE – CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND Sjur Bergan Head, Dept. of Higher Education and History Teaching Council of Europe.
The TUNING Russia project outcomes Maria Seninets DSTU Tuning Centre.
Ss Cyril & Methodius University Skopje, June 2009 GUIDE FOR DESIGNING A NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR HE Elizabeta Bahtovska.
Website: Bologna Secretariat The Bologna Process and Student Centered Learning Ligia DECA Head of the 2010.
RECOGNITION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES WORKING GROUP 3.
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
…1… TRENDS V David Crosier, Lewis Purser, Hanne Smidt Trends V Presented by Viera Farkašová, SAAIC.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Erevan, Armenia, 2008 The Three-Cycle System Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, Bologna.
“Defining, translating and assessing learning outcomes “ Course in the framework of the Summer School 2013, Koblenz.
Learning outcomes based higher education: the Scottish experience 21/22 February 2008 Edinburgh Scotland.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
Polish Norwegian Paths Katowice 17 – 18 June 2009 Sigrid Ag.
European Higher Education Area: focus from structures to better learning Head of Higher Education Unit Helka Kekäläinen, PhD.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Quality assurance, learning outcomes and qualification frameworks Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
1 Presentation 2 Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland. Ireland.
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
International Information Seminar Seminar, Minsk October 2016, Minsk State Linguistics University MODULE BASED EDUCATION. ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING.
Closing the Gap between Azerbaijan Higher Education and the Qualifications Framework of the EHEA Maiki Udam.
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Yerevan, 8 September.
Presentation transcript:

BOLOGNA PROCESS and LEARNING OUTCOMES THE BIGGER PICTURE

Question What do you associate with Learning Outcomes? The bigger picture

The Bologna Process, launched with the Bologna Declaration of 1999, is one of the main voluntary processes at European level; it is today implemented in 47 states, which define the European Higher Education Area (EHEA).

The bigger picture The three overarching objectives of the Bologna process : introduction of the three cycle system (bachelor/master/doctorate), quality assurance and recognition of qualifications and periods of study.

The bigger picture Detailed priorities for : 1. Ensuring a quality higher education system 2. Adopting a two- or three-cycle system of study (BA, MA, PhD) 3. Promoting the mobility of students and academic and administrative staff 4. Introducing a credit system (ECTS) for the assessment of study performance 5. The Recognition of levels: adopting a system of easily identifiable and comparable levels 6. The Active involvement of higher education institutions, teachers and students in the Bologna Process and student participation in the management of higher education (> teaching and learning experience) 7. Promoting a European dimension in higher education 8. Promoting the attractiveness of the European higher education area 9. Lifelong learning 10. A European higher education area and a European research area – two pillars of a society based on knowledge

The bigger picture Status quo (2009/2010): HE across the EHEA countries looks substantially different from 10 years ago Large difference in the speed of implementation and varying levels of committment Lack of resources and expertise to guide the domestic policy process in some countries Short-term credit mobility > degree mobility (east>west)

The bigger picture Challenges/outlook: LO is a controversial topic Linking allocation of credits to student workload No common understanding of „modularisation“ Integrating the social dimension Recognition of prior learning

Shift in paradigm: from input-oriented to output- oriented

Learning Outcomes The princial question asked of the student/graduate will no longer be „what did you do to obtain the degree?“ but „what can you do now that you have obtained your degree?“ ( Purser, Council of Europe, 2003)

Learning Outcomes... are a statement of what a learner is expected to know, understand, or able to do at the end of a learning process.

Learning Outcomes The alignment between LO, teaching, learning and assessment helps to make the overall learning experience more coherent, transparent and meaningful for learners.

Learning Outcomes Better matching of qualifications with labour market expectations Greater openess of education and training systems to recognise learning achievement Enhanced flexibility and accountability of education and training systems

Where LO can be found Learning Outcomes Occupational standards Assessment criteria Qualifications Qualifications framework Curricula

The bigger picture Learning Outcomes/Competences Teaching methods; learning experience; assessment ECTS; curriculum development

What do you think are the benefits and potential problems of Learning Outcomes?

The benefits of Learning Outcomes  Help to explain more clearly to students what is expected of them and thus help to guide them in their studies – motivation and sense of purpose  Help teachers to focus more clearly on what exactly they want students to achieve in terms of knowledge and skills.  Help teachers to define the assessment criteriamore effectively.  Help to provide guidance to employers about the knowledge and understanding possessed by graduates of programmes.  Help to start discussion on Teaching and Learning in third level institutions.

Potential problems with Learning Outcomes  Could limit learning if learning outcomes written within a very narrow framework – lack of intellectual challenge to learners.  Learning outcomes should not be reductionist but rather expansive and intended to promote the higher order thinking skills.  Danger of assessment-driven curriculum (oбразовательная программа) if learning outcomes too confined.  Could give rise to confusion among students and staff if guidelines not adhered to when drawing up learning outcomes, etc.

Learning Outcomes (summary I) LO complement other/traditional ways of curriculum design, teaching, learning and assessment and do not replace them: Focus on teaching – aims and objectives and use of terms like know, understand, be familiar with. Focus on learning - outcomes: what we want the student to be able to do - use of terms like define, list, name, recall, analyse, calculate, design, etc.

Learning Outcomes (summary II) Discussions at European and national level highlight the need for common ground with respect to LO – this does not imply that their need to be a common approach to defining and using LO.

Literature Using Learning Outcomes. European Qualifications Framework Series. Note 4. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union Declan Kennedy, Áine Hyland, Norma Ryan: “Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide”, article C in Eric Froment, Jürgen Kohler, Lewis Purser and Lesley Wilson (eds.): EUA Bologna Handbook – Making Bologna Work (Berlin 2006: Raabe Verlag) (available on line) The Bologna Process Independent Assessment. The first decase of working on the European Higher Education Area. Volume 1 Detailed assessment report. CHEPS, INCHER- Kassel, ECOTEC; - education/doc1290_en.htmhttp://ec.europa.eu/education/higher - education/doc1290_en.htm