The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Advertisements

Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
PORTFOLIO.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Preparing for Learning Objectives Review the TAPS component of the Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness Explore the Teacher Performance Standards.
EDU 250 Roxanne Stansbury  It is important to learn about Danielson’s Domains because they are the framework for how we measure effective teaching.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System An Overview of the System and the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Debie Schelhorn EDUC 290. Be familiar with the ten Idaho Core Standards Understand the knowledge expectations of teachers in relation to the Idaho Core.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Lesson Planning and Preparation
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Educational Performance Incentive Compensation
The Backwards Bike.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation.  Take a few minutes to respond to the following reflection questions:  What brought you into the teaching profession?
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
An Introduction to Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum January 9, 2013.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Delaware Professional Teaching Standards 3.0 Content Knowledge 4.0 Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment.
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Teacher Evaluation: Professional Practice Compass Update April 2012.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System An Overview of the System and the Kentucky Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray PGES Consultant KDE/NKCES.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System An Overview of the System and the Kentucky Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray PGES Consultant KDE/NKCES.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Jenny Ray Professional Learning for Educator Effectiveness Kentucky Department of Education.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
Make It Happen The Power of Communication and Thinking
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Align Combine Design.
The 6 Components of DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?

11 Illinois Teaching Standards Content Knowledge Human Development and Learning Diversity Planning and Instruction Learning Environment Instructional Delivery Communication Assessment Collaborative Relationships Reflection and Professional Growth Professional Conduct Moving to…

The 4 Domains of Danielson Domain One – Planning and Preparation Domain Two – The Classroom Environment Domain Three – Instruction Domain Four – Professional Responsibilities *Each domain has subdomains, with detailed rubrics

Why Danielson? PERA – According to Administrative Code Part 50, Performance Evaluation Plans... all IL districts must "includes an instructional framework developed or adopted by the school district that is based upon research regarding effective instruction; addresses at least planning, instructional delivery, and classroom management; and aligns to the IL Professional Teaching Standards." – The plan must also "contain a rubric to be used in rating professional practice that aligns to the instructional framework developed or adopted." – In other words, we MUST have a researched-based instructional framework that contains a rubric for rating professional practice. Therefore, the IL Professional Teaching Standards in our "old" plan will not meet this PERA requirement. Something new needs to be either 1) created [but based upon research] or 2) selected for your PERA compliant evaluation system.

What impact will this have? (Left is current, Right is new) IL Teaching Standard #1 Content Knowledge Presents facts accurately Uses a variety of instructional strategies to present key concepts Engages all students in generating and testing knowledge Facilitates learning experiences that make connections to other content areas and life/career experiences for all students Designs learning experiences and utilizes devices/technologies to promote access to general curricular content for all students Differentiates instruction to meet academic needs of all students Danielson Framework Components 1a - Demonstrate knowledge of content and pedagogy 1e - Designing coherent instruction 3c - Engaging students in learning

Rubric Example DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION COMPONENT 1A: DEMONSTRATING KNOWLEDGE OF CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY Elements: Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline Knowledge of prerequisite relationships Knowledge of content-related pedagogy ELEMENT L EVEL OF P ERFORMANCE UNSATISFACTORY (Unsatisfactory) BASIC (Needs Improvement) PROFICIENT (Proficient) DISTINGUISHED (Excellent) Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning and practice, teacher makes content errors or does not correct errors made by students. Teacher is familiar with the important concepts in the discipline but may display lack of awareness of how these concepts relate to one another. Teacher displays solid knowledge of the important concepts in the discipline and how these relate to one another. Teacher displays extensive knowledge of the important concepts in the discipline and how these relate both to one another and to other disciplines. Knowledge of prerequisite relationships Teacher’s plans and practice display little understanding of prerequisite relationships important to student learning of the content. Teacher’s plans and practice indicate some awareness of prerequisite relationships, although such knowledge may be inaccurate or incomplete. Teacher’s plans and practice reflect accurate understanding of prerequisite relationships among topics and concepts. Teacher’s plans and practices reflect understanding of prerequisite relationships among topics and concepts and a link to necessary cognitive structures by students to ensure understanding. Knowledge of content-related pedagogy Teacher displays little or no understanding of the range of pedagogical approaches suitable to student learning of the content. Teacher’s plans and practice reflect a limited range of pedagogical approaches or some approaches that are not suitable to the discipline or to the students. Teacher’s plans and practice reflect familiarity with a wide range of effective pedagogical approaches in the discipline. Teacher’s plans and practice reflect familiarity with a wide range of effective pedagogical approaches in the discipline, anticipating student misconceptions.

Current Eval Tool Linear Narrative Administrator led New Eval Tool Rubric Evidence-based Collaborative

Thoughts from Charlotte Danielson