Solar neutrino measurement at Super Kamiokande ICHEP'04 ICRR K.Ishihara for SK collaboration Super Kamiokande detector Result from SK-I Status of SK-II.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
Advertisements

Solar Neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande July
Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.
Results from Daya Bay Xin Qian On behalf of Daya Bay Collaboration Xin Qian, BNL1.
Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics: Understanding Neutrino Oscillations 2-3 neutrino detectors with variable baseline 1500 ft nuclear reactor Determining.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Сессия ЯФ ОФН РАН, г., ИТЭФ Статус экспериментальных работ по измерению магнитного момента нейтрино Старостин А.С. ИТЕФ.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
CP-phase dependence of neutrino oscillation probability in matter 梅 (ume) 田 (da) 義 (yoshi) 章 (aki) with Lin Guey-Lin ( 林 貴林 ) National Chiao-Tung University.
Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
Experimental Status of Geo-reactor Search with KamLAND Detector
1 Evidence of Neutrino Oscillation from Super-Kamiokande and K2K Neutrino physics at Super-Kamiokande –Detector overview –Atmospheric neutrinos –Solar.
Results and Future of the KamLAND Experiment
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
The Importance of Low-Energy Solar Neutrino Experiments Thomas Bowles Los Alamos National Laboratory Markov Symposium Institute for Nuclear Research 5/13/05.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Super-Kamiokande – Neutrinos from MeV to TeV Mark Vagins University of California, Irvine EPS/HEP Lisbon July 22, 2005.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
H.Sekiya, Jul 30 th 2008, Philadelphia, ICHEP2008 Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR, University of Tokyo on behalf of the Super-Kamiokande.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Latest SNO Results from Salt-Phase Data and Current NCD-Phase Status Melin Huang ● Introduction ● Results of Salt Phase (Phase II) ● Status of NCD Phase.
Results from Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Huaizhang Deng University of Pennsylvania.
Present status of oscillation studies by atmospheric neutrino experiments ν μ → ν τ 2 flavor oscillations 3 flavor analysis Non-standard explanations Search.
Michael Smy UC Irvine Solar and Atmospheric Neutrinos 8 th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams & Betabeams Irvine, California, August.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Methods and problems in low energy neutrino experiments (solar, reactors, geo-) I G. Ranucci ISAPP 2011 International School on Astroparticle physics THE.
KamLAND : Studying Neutrinos from Reactor Atsuto Suzuki KamLAND Collaboration KEK : High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Solar Neutrino Experiments A Review The CAP'09 Congress Moncton, 7-10 June, 2009 Alain Bellerive On behalf of the SNO Collaboration Carleton University,
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Bruno Pontecorvo Pontecorvo Prize is very special for us: All the important works done by Super- Kamiokande point back to Bruno Pontecorvo – 1957 First.
Results from Super-Kamiokande Inside of SK detector (April 2006) Super-Kamiokande detector Atmospheric neutrino results Solar neutrino results Yasuo Takeuchi.
TAUP Searches for nucleon decay and n-n oscillation in Super-Kamiokande Jun Kameda (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration Sep.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Solar neutrino results from Super-Kamiokande Satoru Yamada for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration Institute of cosmic ray research, University of Tokyo.
Tests of non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI) Cecilia Lunardini Institute for Nuclear Theory University of Washington, Seattle.
Study of solar neutrino energy spectrum above 4.5 MeV in Super-Kamiokande-I 1, Solar Neutrino Oscillation 2, Super-Kamiokande detector 3, Data set for.
Results for the Neutrino Mixing Angle  13 from RENO International School of Nuclear Physics, 35 th Course Neutrino Physics: Present and Future, Erice/Sicily,
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
J. Goodman – January 03 The Solution to the Solar Problem Jordan A. Goodman University of Maryland January 2003 Solar Neutrinos MSW Oscillations Super-K.
Data Processing for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Aksel Hallin Queen’s, October 2006.
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
N eutrino O scillation W orkshop Conca Specchiulla, September 11 th 2006 Michael Smy UC Irvine Low Energy Challenges in SK-III.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
Supernova Relic Neutrinos (SRN) are a diffuse neutrino signal from all past supernovae that has never been detected. Motivation SRN measurement enables.
APS/JPS Joint Meeting Kapalua, Maui, September 2005 Michael Smy UC Irvine Relic Neutrino Detection in Large Water Cherenkov Detectors.
Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK2  Imaging Water Cherenkov detector  50kt Pure Water  32kt Inner Detector viewed by.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo KIAS, Seoul, Nov Fig: Senda NP-4.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
News from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Simon JM Peeters July 2007 o SNO overview o Results phases I & II o hep neutrinos and DSNB o Update on the III.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
Neutrino Physics II Hitoshi Murayama University of Pisa February 25, 2003.
Solar neutrino physics The core of the Sun reaches temperatures of  15.5 million K. At these temperatures, nuclear fusion can occur which transforms 4.
30th International Cosmic Ray Conference in Merida, Mexico Michael Smy UC Irvine Low Energy Event Reconstruction and Selection in Super-Kamiokande-III.
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Neutrino astronomy Measuring the Sun’s Core
Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Presentation transcript:

Solar neutrino measurement at Super Kamiokande ICHEP'04 ICRR K.Ishihara for SK collaboration Super Kamiokande detector Result from SK-I Status of SK-II Future plan

Super Kamiokande detector 50 k ton water Cherenkov Detector located at 1000 m underground. 41.4m 39.3m Feature of solar neutrino observation  8 B neutrino measurement by  + e - →  + e - Strong directionality Real time measurement. Sensitive to e        e -  =~0.15×  e  e -   High statistics ~15ev./day with E e > 5MeV  Studies on energy spectrum. Precise energy calibration by LINAC and 16 N.

Solar neutrino observation at SK I Sun e May/31/96 – Jul/13/ events (14.5 ev/day) Event/day/kton/bin Direction to the Sun Solar neutrino events

SK-I day/night difference Cos  Flux in 10^6/cm^3 SK-I (1496 days) MeV 22.5 kton day night

Z mantle core SK Day zz Un-bined day/night analysis Energy and zenith angle dependence of event rate variatoin. (Δm 2 = 6.3×10-5 eV 2, tan 2 θ = 0.55) #B.G. in each energy bin #Signal Events Event “Time" Background Shape Solar signal shape

Energy spectrum of SK-I  m 2 =6.3x10 -5 eV 2, tan 2  =0.55  m 2 =7.2x10 -5 eV 2, tan 2  =0.38 Best fit 8 B flux: 4.84 x 10 6 /cm 2 /sec Energy correlated systematic error Best fit 8 B flux: 5.21 x 10 6 /cm 2 /sec SK only (BP 2000 flux) No distortion Our data is consistent with no distortion. Consistent with LMA within 1 .

Oscillation analysis Spectrum Energy correlated systematic error Time variation Function for energy correlated systematic errors 8 B spec. shape energy scale energy resolution

Michael Smy, UC Irvine SK only (95% C.L.) SSM  Flux Independent SK only (68% C.L.) SSM  Flux Independent SK only (68% C.L.) SSM 8 B  Flux (BP2004) SK only (95% C.L.) SSM 8 B  Flux(BP2004)

Michael Smy, UC Irvine SK only (95% C.L.) SSM  Flux Independent SK only (68% C.L.) SSM  Flux Independent SK only (68% C.L.) 8 B  Flux Constrained to BP2004 & SNO NC SK only (95% C.L.) 8 B  Flux Constrained to BP2004 & SNO NC

Michael Smy, UC Irvine KamLAND SK/SNO KamLAND from hep-ph/ (KamLAND Collaboration) sin 2  is determined by SK/SNO Result form SK/SNO is consistent with that from KamLAND! that from KamLAND! Dose this difference indicate new physics ?

Status of SK-II Period'96-'01accident'03-'05 #PMTs11,1465,182 Photo Coverage 40 %19 % Light yield~6 p.e./MeV~2.8 p.e/MeV Energy threshold5.0 MeV8.0 MeV SK-I SK-II

SK-II 325 days (22.5 kton) MeV Signal = SK-II preliminary result Flux = 2.38±0.09(stat.) × 10 6 /cm 2 /s cf. SK-I 2.35±0.02(stat.) ± 0.08(sys.) Event rate at SK-II is consistent with SK-I! Solar neutrino events Dec.24,2002 – March 25, 2004 Direction to the Sun Systematic error is under study

Day Night Average of SK-I Day/Night Asymmetry and Energy Spectrum at SK-II are also consistent with SK-I! SK-II works well !

Physics motivation in future  Find evidence of matter effect. (Find smoking gun of LMA.) How to do ?

Energy spectrum distortion Recoil electron spectrum reduce sys. error reduce stat. error Lower threshold ~10% upturn should be seen tan 2 (  )  m 2 (eV 2 ) 6.3 x x x x x Assumptions: Correlated systematic error: x MeV background: x 0.3 (same BG as SK-I above 5.5MeV) Significance of shectrum distortion Significance (  ) Live time (year) 3σ

 Reject Background (~50% Radon, ~50% Gamma) ➢ Acrylic cover prevents radon from emitting from PMTs. ➢ Improve vertex fitter to reduce contamination of gamma events. Dependent on CPU power !  Reduce systematic Error Water transparency measurement with 7 laser calibrations. SK tank Lasers for w.t. measurements

Analysis of lower energy region in SK-I (sta.) signals bg events 4.5 – 5.0 MeV data Flux: 3.13±0.63(sta.)±0.16(sys.) /cm 2 /sec Direction to the sun 1496 days 466 days Solar neutrino energy spectrum MeV data is consistent with data with E>5.0 MeV. We've already successed to lower E th to 4.5 MeV !

summary Day/night asymmetry is obtained by un-binned method A DN = -1.8± /-1.2 %. Preliminary results from SK-II are consistent with SK-I. Hope to see definite energy spectrum distortion in SK-III, if it should be there. If not, it indicates new physics  13, CPT violation...