Elkhorn Slough Tidal Marsh Plan: Possible Lessons from the Bay Area Wetland Ecosystem Goals Project Joshua N. Collins San Francisco Estuary Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Advertisements

EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Sustaining Regional Partnerships for Conservation: Sharing the Future Joshua N. Collins San Francisco Estuary Institute
ASSESSMENT ISSUES An EU Perspective Ladislav Miko Director, Protecting the Natural Environment, DG Environment, European Commission.
Key Characteristics of Climate-Smart Conservation Dr. Leigh Welling Chief, Climate Change Response Program US National Park Service Dr. Bruce A. Stein.
Planning for Our Future:
Suwannee Basin Workshop 2004 Final Session Summary Friday, September 24, 2004 Cedar Key, Florida E. Raabe.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Approaches to Establish Minimum Flows to Bays and Estuaries Paul Montagna Marine Science Institute University of Texas at Austin Port Aransas, Texas.
Possible Geomorphic Effects Of Invasive Spartina alterniflora in the San Francisco Estuary Joshua N. Collins, Ph.D San Francisco Estuary Institute
Elkhorn Slough Tidal Wetland Plan Barb Peichel October 13, 2004 Tidal Wetland Plan Coordinator Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve.
WRP and Water Quality Monitoring Council: Synergy April 1, 2015 Josh Collins Chief Scientist, SFEI and ASC Co-Chair, CWMW WRP Science Advisor Jon Marshack.
EcoAtlas: A Technology Tool for Wetland Protection and Management Data Management Workgroup June 6, 2012 Meredith Williams Cristina Grosso.
Lecture(2) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Restoring Great Lakes Basin Waters Through the Use of Conservation Credits and an Integrated Water Balance Analysis System Institute of Water Research,
Monitoring by NGOs for marine conservation management – examples from Indonesia “The big Grouper in the room”
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study Background to the study Terms of reference announced in January 08 Aim of the study: To enable Government to decide.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
WETLANDS WORK AT SFEI. Basic Conceptual Model e.g., juvenile fish, organic carbon, contaminants, detritus e.g., salt, intertidal fishes, suspended sediment.
Measures Measures Matter! Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
OPTIMAL STRATEGIES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Koel Ghosh, James S. Shortle, and Carl Hershner * Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology,
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
Texas Bay and Estuary Study Program Cindy Loeffler Flows for the Future October 31, 2005.
Biological Aspects of OTC Compliance in California October 15, 2013 John Steinbeck Tenera Environmental San Luis Obispo, CA 1.
Historical Sedimentation in the San Francisco Estuary Bruce Jaffe 1, Theresa Fregoso 1, Amy Foxgrover 1, Shawn Higgins 2 1 United States Geological Survey.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange - Thursday Sessions - Sponsored by Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update-June 2004 Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research.
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
Goals of CRAM program –Roles of Teams –Need and Intended Uses Summary of Science of Rapid Assessment Conceptual Model Development Process and Schedule.
Climate Change Impacts in the Interior Columbia Basin.
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
System Dynamics Simulation Slobodan P. Simonovic.
North Bay Climate Adaptation Initiative
Nitrogen Case Study EARTH activities Fall Summary from website This activity uses realtime data from the MBARI LOBO ocean observatory project to.
THE ARS WATERSHED RESEARCH PROGRAM Watershed Processes National Program Component AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED RESEARCH History Facilities.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
WATERS Network MISSION STATEMENT: To transform understanding of the Earth’s water and related cycles across spatial and temporal scales to enable forecasting.
BDCP, Interfacing with Conservation Plans Habitat Conservation Planning from Tahoe to the Bay 7 th Annual Workshop November 18, 2009 Carl Wilcox California.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
JWMP Update Draft Report Bosworth Botanical Consulting Team.
Lessons from Water Accounting for the Energy Statistics Compilers Manual Michael Vardon 6 th Olso Group Meeting 2-6 May 2011 Canberra.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
Watershed Council June 25, DWR Funding and Bay Area IRWMP Project Selection Background Regional Acceptance Process (RAP) Regional Projects North.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Delta Stewardship Council Delta Plan Performance Measures Council Briefing July 25, 2014.
Measures Measures Matter!. Key Points to Introduce This Step Measures Matter! –Often seen as last step or too challenging, so neglected –Provide transparency.
ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ICES cooperative research report.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
Harwich High School Environmental Studies. an interdisciplinary course that addresses real world an interdisciplinary course that addresses real world.
Landscape Change in the Napa River Watershed, 1800–2002: Implications for the Restoration of In-Stream, Floodplain, and Valley Floor Habitat Grossinger,
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration-- Challenges to Ecological Restoration.
Watersheds, Baylands and the Bay: Putting Landscapes Back Together or Rethinking Drainage around SF Bay Josh Collins, San Francisco Estuary Institute.
Josh Collins, Ph.D. San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center A Vision of Watershed Monitoring and Assessment.
CABY and WEAP: Modeling to Support the IRWMP Process David R. Purkey, Ph.D. Natural Heritage Institute David N. Yates, Ph.D. National Center for Atmospheric.
DELAWARE NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Promoting stewardship of the nation’s coastal areas through science and education …
Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) The key and only legislation completely focused on the marine environment Clear ecosystem based thinking.
Todd Petty, Mike Strager, and Michael Hasenmyer
AIM-NAMF Project Evolution
Expert Panel on Diversion Planning and Implementation: Meeting #3
Geography Matters… to All of Us
WRAP Regional Haze Grant Status, Technical Project Priorities, & Proposed Technical Analysis Forum Tom Moore WRAP Technical Coordinator Attribution.
The City of Los Angeles and The Los Angeles River
Presentation transcript:

Elkhorn Slough Tidal Marsh Plan: Possible Lessons from the Bay Area Wetland Ecosystem Goals Project Joshua N. Collins San Francisco Estuary Institute

Serious Work & Abundant Help Carl Wilcox, Ca Dept. of Fish and Game Peggy Olofson, SF Bay Water Board Mike Monroe, EPA Region 9

Basic Tenets There will be as much change in the future as there was in the past. The question is what do we need? The answer keeps changing. 2

Basic Tenets The answer keeps changing. All natural resources are actively managed or passively impacted by people to some extent. 1 Management priorities change.

Basic Tenets The answer keeps changing. Goals and expectations need to be adjusted for new information about changing conditions.

Basic Tenets The answer keeps changing. The effects of people may have become so pervasive that the past is no longer the key to the future.

Basic Tenets Landscapes are dynamic; the uncertainty needs to be managed. The answer keeps changing.

Basic Tenets Call it a project, but it’s really a program. The product is not a plan, it’s a process.

Basic Tenets Ecosystem management is an ongoing public debate based on enough empirical data to provide adequate certainty about management effects. The product is not a plan, it’s a process.

Basic Tenets Technical questions that are too large to answer now and too important not to ever answer must be addressed through special studies. The product is not a plan, it’s a process.

Basic Tenets Ecosystems don’t care; people do. Knowledgeable people care, and caring people can change the world. Eco-system management is Ego- system management.

Basic Tenets Get Real Decide what to change and how to measure progress (define the x-axis). Design a process for converting data into management response, and test the process with real data.

Basic Questions What do we need to do? “Protect the best; restore the rest!” The best and rest of what? What are the tradeoffs? What are the most important eco-services and how can they be managed?

Basic Questions How do we measure progress? Inventory habitats, monitor their selected services (compare management actions to ambient conditions), and survey public sentiment.

Basic Questions How do we proceed? 4 Steps to Ecosystem Management

Landscape restoration guidelines should address the ideal form, structure, distribution, and associations of major habitat types, with reference to their interactions and formative processes. 1.Develop principles and guidelines.

4 Steps to Ecosystem Management 1.Develop principles and guidelines. Landscape restoration guidelines should be based on quantitative studies of the effects of people and natural processes on historical habitat change.

4 Steps to Ecosystem Management 1.Develop restoration guidelines. 2.Set quantitative habitat goals. Make maps of possible future conditions based on the guidelines and existing management options.

4 Steps to Ecosystem Management 1.Set regional habitat goals. 2.Set quantitative habitat goals. 3.Adjust policies, programs, and projects as tools to achieve the goals. The process of governance must enable managers to change what they do.

4 Steps to Ecosystem Management 1.Set regional habitat goals. 2.Set quantitative habitat goals. 3.Adjust policies, programs, and projects as tools to achieve the goals. 4.Measure progress toward the goals (and adjust the goals for new ideas). Governance must be informed by a program of systematic observation and modeling.

How to Set Habitat Goals Assemble a team of environmental managers, scientists, and engineers. Scientists need to be mindful of budgets and schedules. Managers need to give scientists time to think.

How to Set Habitat Goals Define the scope of ecosystem goals. Ecosystems have natural and social dimensions that vary between services and over time. In this case, the tidal marsh problem of Elkhorn Slough is the center of the ecosystem of interest.

How to Set Habitat Goals Define the scope of ecosystem goals. These tidal marshes are embedded in watersheds – the linkages must be considered.

How to Set Habitat Goals Understand the environmental past, the present, and change. History can explain the present and help us forecast the future (maybe). History is common ground. The history of a place unites the people who live there.

How to Set Habitat Goals Use everything anyone knows. Consider what is known as fact, can be inferred from fact, or is mostly expert guesswork.

How to Set Habitat Goals It’s OK to think ecologically. Materials cycle and energy flows across jurisdictional lines, fence lines, and even watershed boundaries. Visualize processes that account for the problem that needs to be solved.

How to Set Habitat Goals Make maps of the past, present, and needed future habitats. Maps help us think well together about the land and the life it should support. Map more detail than you think you need.

How to Implement Start planning for implementation before the goals are set. Focus on project performance in context of ambient status and trends. Begin technical review of projects at their conceptual design stage.

How to Implement Report frequently to the public. Interim products (even incomplete answers) keep people interested. Public involvement builds public support.

In summary … Develop principles and guidelines based on historical patterns of landscape change.

In summary … Develop principles and guidelines based historical patterns of landscape change. Answer the question: how much of what habitats are needed where, and why?

In summary … Consider linkages between selected habitats and their supporting processes. Develop principles and guidelines based historical patterns of landscape change. Answer the question: how much of what habitats are needed where, and why?

In summary … Make a map of the answer(s), regardless of jurisdictional boundaries or property lines. Consider linkages between selected habitats and their supporting processes. Develop principles and guidelines based historical patterns of landscape change. Answer the question: how much of what habitats are needed where, and why?

In summary … Make a map of the answer(s), regardless of jurisdictional boundaries or property lines. Turn public policies, programs, and projects into ways to achieve the goals. Consider linkages between selected habitats and their supporting processes. Develop principles and guidelines based historical patterns of landscape change. Answer the question: how much of what habitats are needed where, and why?

Thinking about Elkhorn Slough Tidal Marshes Marsh evolution depends on supplies of inorganic sediment. How have the supplies changed?

Thinking about Elkhorn Slough Tidal Marshes Marsh evolution depends on supplies of inorganic sediment. How have the supplies changed? Marsh evolution depends on depositional environments. How has hydrology changed?

Thinking about Elkhorn Slough Tidal Marshes Marsh evolution depends on supplies of inorganic sediment. How have the supplies changed? Marsh evolution depends on depositional environments. How has hydrology changed? Marsh ecology depends on salinity regimes. How has salinity changed?

Thinking about Elkhorn Slough Tidal Marshes Marsh evolution depends on supplies of inorganic sediment. How have the supplies changed? Marsh evolution depends on depositional environments. How has hydrology changed? Marsh ecology depends on salinity regimes. How has salinity changed? Can changes be managed to improve conditions?

Think Big