Woodcock Johnson Results Before the WJIII test results are discussed, a brief explanation of scores is offered. In order to find out what scores are high,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Monitoring: Data to Instructional Decision-Making Frank Worrell Marley Watkins Tracey Hall Ministry of Education Trinidad and Tobago January,
Advertisements

Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Our World Begins with Reading Robert McCabe Vice President and Chief Education Officer Lexia Learning Systems, Inc.
Progress Monitoring And RtI System
Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer Aimsweb support
OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE
Informational Parent Meeting Cedar Hill School October 22, 2013.
Achievement Tests Designed to measure the skills and abilities acquired through direct instruction or intervention. Can measure both lower order and high.
Reading Assessment: GORT- 4 (Gray Oral Reading Test -4)
The School District of Philadelphia
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Understanding Stanford 10 Results
Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance
Big Ideas About Frequent Formative Evaluation Using General Outcome Measures and the Progress Monitoring Program One of the most powerful interventions.
Individualized Education Program Present Level of Performance Training (General Education Curriculum) Division of Special Education Compliance Support.
Wide Range Achievement Test WRAT4 Authors: Gary S. Wilkinson, PhD Gary J. Robertson, PhD.
Assessment. What are assessments supposed to be used for Group children- reading groups, giving children challenging activities. Group children- reading.
Educational Assessment of Children
AIMSweb and Goal- Setting December 8, 2010 PRTI. Basic goal setting Measurable goals include: Conditions Timeline, materials, difficulty level In 9 weeks.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
Formative and Summative Assessment
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Year 7 Transition Project. AIMS To provide support in literacy and study skills for year 7 pupils. The Helen Arkell Centre are providing twice weekly.
Understanding and Interpreting Standardized Assessment Measures Joe Hannah, Hilary Wilson, and Chris Sowder.
TKS Student Test Results Spring & Fall Tests Kentucky Performance Rating for Educational Progress (K-PREP) Administered May 2012 Kentucky test aligned.
How to Interpret Test Scores. 1. What are standardized tests?  A standardized test is one that is administered under standardized or controlled conditions.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Standardized Test Presentation
SLD Academy 2.0 Houston Independent School District.
Nativity Catholic School IOWA Testing. 70 years of educational research and test development Form E Big Picture student’s classroom work homework projects.
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Understanding ITBS Scores A Guide for Parents Created By: Ginger Psalmonds/CST New Prospect Elementary.
Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Progress Monitoring and the Academic Facilitator Cotrane Penn, Ph.D. Intervention Team Specialist East Zone.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Chapter 2 ~~~~~ Standardized Assessment: Types, Scores, Reporting.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
Dyslexia: To Screen or Not to Screen Wendy Stovall, Ed.S., Keri Horn, Ed.S., Amber Broadway, Ed.S., & Mary Bryant, Ed.S. Crowley’s Ridge Education Service.
Reading in school.
Fluency Assessment and Intervention. Determining the need for intervention Frustrated while reading grade level material Not participating in class Low.
DRA2 and DIBELS Next October 15 th, What is the DRA2? Universal assessment used last year- administered 3 times a year in grades K-3 The DRA2 provides.
Assessment Parents Due Process Title 6 and ELL Using Assessment to Identify Evaluating Formally –IQ –Achievement Evaluating Informally –tying into instruction.
Iowa Test of Basic Skills – ITBS Informational Meeting Spring 2009 Al-Hedayah Academy Assessment.
Easy Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM). What is Easy CBM? EasyCBM® was designed by researchers at the University of Oregon as an integral part of an.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
Assessment Update Wood Acres Elementary February 7, 2006 KPJ 2006.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
First/Second Grade Report Card Addendum More detailed information for Teachers, Students, and Parents By PresenterMedia.comPresenterMedia.com November.
Tutoring Chapter 13. Reflections on Tutoring If your school district is experiencing budget cuts, and the school board wants to end the tutoring program.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Charlton Kings Junior School INFORMATION EVENING FOR YEAR 6 PARENTS.
Understanding ITBS Scores A Parent Guide. Overview ITBS testing is given in the Fall of each year to students in grades 1 – 8 enrolled in Crosscreek Charter.
SAT Parent Night February 1, 2017.
Chapel Hill ISD Reading First Initiative
Understanding ITBS Scores
Data Usage Response to Intervention
Math-Curriculum Based Measurement (M-CBM)
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - III
Understanding ITBS Scores
Specialized Instruction at KMS
TABE II: Using TABE® Results to Inform Instruction
Variability in the skills measured by tests of “reading comprehension across tests and across grade levels Dr. Joseph Torgesen Florida State University.
SAT -10 Parent Night 1st & 2nd Grades.
SAT -10 Parent Night 1st & 2nd Grades.
Relationship between Standardized and Classroom-based Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Woodcock Johnson Results Before the WJIII test results are discussed, a brief explanation of scores is offered. In order to find out what scores are high, average, or low, the test is given to a large number of children across the country. The test is always presented in the same way to all children.The subject’s percentile rank indicates the percentage of the children in the norm group who received the same scores or a lower score on the test. A special feature of the WJIII is the option to use either grade- or age-based norms. A grade equivalent reflects the subject’s performance in terms of the grade level in the sample at which the average score is the same as the subject’s score. An age equivalent score is similar to a grade equivalent, except that it reflects performance in terms of the age level in the sample at which the average score is the same as the subject’s score.

Woodcock Johnson An age equivalent score is similar to a grade equivalent, except that it reflects performance in terms of the age level in the sample at which the average score is the same as the subject’s score. It is important to note that this does not mean that the subject is performing at the same level as that grade or age, only that the average score was the same as the sample. The ranges for the WJIII are as follows. High Average = SS 111 to 120 and % Rank 76 to 91 Average = SS 90 to 110 and % Rank 25 to 75 Low Average = SS 80 to 89 and % Rank 9 to 24 Low = SS 70 to 79 and % Rank3 to 8 Very Low = SS 69 and below and % Rank 0.1 to 2

Oral Language PR--35 RPI (Relevant Proficiency Index)--87/90 SS--(68% band) 94. These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for oral language.

Broad Reading PR--44 RPI (Relevant Proficiency Index)--87/90 SS--(68% band) 96 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for broad reading.

Broad Math PR--41 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--87/90 SS--(68% band) 97 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for broad math.

Broad Written Language PR--69 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--95/90 SS--(68% band) 107 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for broad written language.

Brief Reading PR--56 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--93/90 SS--(68% band) 102 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for brief reading.

Brief Math PR--42 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--86/90 SS--(68% band) 97 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for brief math.

Math Calculation Skills PR--77 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--94/90 SS--(68% band) 111 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for math calculation skills.

Brief Writing PR--60 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--94/90 SS--(68% band) 104 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for brief writing

Written Expression PR--90 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--98/90 SS--(68% band) 129 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for written expression.

Letter-Word Identification PR--63 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--97/90 SS--(68% band) 105. These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for letter-word identification.

Reading Fluency PR--4 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--61/90 SS--(68% band) 73. These scores indicate that Douglas is below average in reading fluency.

Story Recall PR--21 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--84/90 SS--(68% band) 88 These scores indicate that Douglas is below average to average on story recall.

Understanding Directions PR--46 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--89/90 SS--(68% band) 99 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for understanding directions.

Calculation PR--85 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--97/90 SS--(68% band) 115 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for math calculation skills.

Math Fluency PR--42 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--89/90 SS--(68% band) 97 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for math fluency skills.

Spelling PR--31 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--69/90 SS--(68% band) 93 The following scores indicate that Douglas is in the below average average range for spelling.

Written Fluency PR--86 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--97/90 SS--(68% band) 116 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for written fluency.

Passage Comprehension PR--43 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--85/90 SS--(68% band) 97 The following scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for passage comprehension skills.

Applied Problems PR--18 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--54/90 SS--(68% band) 86 The following scores indicate that Douglas is below average for applied problems.

Writing Samples PR--89 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--99/90 SS--(68% band) 118 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for writing samples.

Story Recall-Delayed PR--77 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--88/90 SS--(68% band) 96 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for story recall.

Summary Douglas’ overall performance was in the average range. His strengths are definitely in math and written expression, which are reflected in his scores. His greatest strength was in written expression followed by math calculations. He enjoys doing math problems involving addition and subtraction. He continues to struggle with identifying money, counting money, and telling time. He is below average in reading fluency, applied problems, and spelling. His letter word identification and comprehension were with in the average range. His comprehension is much better when a story or passage is read to him. He listens and can pick up on some details, especially when the story is of interest to him. I believe with continued assistance and direct instruction he will make gains. He would greatly benefit from phonics instruction because he struggles blending and segmenting sounds. In addition, continuing with the curriculum based measurements weekly will also be beneficial to him and help to increase his reading fluency. This will also provide additional information to the teacher to know how to help him.

Summary Accommodations to the General Education Curriculum: Small group instruction, oral administration of tests that require reading, extended time on assignments. Modifications to the General Education Curriculum: Off grade level instruction for reading materials. Accommodations for High Stakes Assessments: Oral administration, frequent breaks, small group testing. Modifications for High Stakes Assessments: N/A.