Proteomics Informatics – Protein Characterization II: Protein Interactions (Week 11)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protein Quantitation II: Multiple Reaction Monitoring
Advertisements

Proteomics Informatics – Protein characterization I: post-translational modifications (Week 10)
Breaking the Diffraction Barrier: Super-Resolution Imaging of Cells Edgar Ferrer-Lorenzo, Nicole Gagnon, Anna Torre 1.
Proteomics Informatics – Protein characterization: post-translational modifications and protein-protein interactions (Week 10)
Novel labeling technologies on proteins
Quantification of low-abundance proteins in complexes and in total cell lysates by mass spectrometry Bastienne Jaccard and Manfredo Quadroni Université.
1.SHRIMP – Super High Resolution IMaging with Photobleaching 2a. PALM – Photoactivated Localization Microscopy b. STORM – Stochastic Optical Reconstruction.
GTL Facilities Characterization and Imaging of Molecular Machines Lee Makowski.
Review of FIONA/PALM/STORM How to make photoactivatable fluorophores How to get 3-D Measurements Intro to STED (?)
Proteomics Informatics Workshop Part I: Protein Identification
Previous Lecture: Regression and Correlation
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Course Director David Fenyö Contact information
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Course Director David Fenyö Contact information
Proteomics Informatics Workshop Part III: Protein Quantitation
Fa 05CSE182 CSE182-L9 Mass Spectrometry Quantitation and other applications.
Proteomics Informatics Workshop Part II: Protein Characterization David Fenyö February 18, 2011 Top-down/bottom-up proteomics Post-translational modifications.
Proteomics Informatics – Overview of Mass spectrometry (Week 2)
PALM/STORM How to get super-resolution microscopy.
Proteomics Informatics – Protein Characterization II:
A highly abbreviated introduction to proteomics
Proteomics I Mass Spectrometry Functional Genomics by Mass Spectrometry (Andersen and Mann, 2000) FEBS Letters 480, optional.
Research Methodology of Biotechnology: Protein-Protein Interactions
Last Class 1.Junctions: Occluding Junctions, Anchoring Junctions, Communicating Junctions 2. Occluding Junctions: Tight Junction 3. Anchoring Junctions:
Fluorescence Techniques
Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM)
Finish up array applications Move on to proteomics Protein microarrays.
Proteome and interactome Bioinformatics.
Protein-protein interactions “The Interactome” Yeast two-hybrid analysis Yeast two-hybrid analysis Protein chips Protein chips Biochemical purification/Mass.
Quantification of Membrane and Membrane- Bound Proteins in Normal and Malignant Breast Cancer Cells Isolated from the Same Patient with Primary Breast.
High throughput Protein Measurement Techniques Harin Kanani.
Lecture 9. Functional Genomics at the Protein Level: Proteomics.
Genome of the week - Enterococcus faecalis E. faecalis - urinary tract infections, bacteremia, endocarditis. Organism sequenced is vancomycin resistant.
Genomics II: The Proteome Using high-throughput methods to identify proteins and to understand their function.
Proteomics What is it? How is it done? Are there different kinds? Why would you want to do it (what can it tell you)?
1.HW on rough-draft of your 5 minute oral presentation due today at 5pm. 2.Another HW (regular, written assignment due Wednesday in class). “The students.
Today’s Announcements
Fluorescence You can get beautiful pictures
Overview of Mass Spectrometry
Proteome and Gene Expression Analysis Chapter 15 & 16.
Announcements: Note that there will be presentations and associated paper summaries for both Thursday and Tuesday classes. The Exam II mean is 81.6 and.
Proteomics I Mass Spectrometry Functional Genomics by Mass Spectrometry (Andersen and Mann, 2000) FEBS Letters 480, optional.
How many interactions are there? ~6,200 genes ~6,200 proteins x 2-10 interactions/protein ~12, ,000 interactions Yeast.
Isotope Labeled Internal Standards in Skyline
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Instructor David Fenyö Contact information
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Course Directors David Fenyö Kelly Ruggles Beatrix Ueberheide Contact information
Protein quantitation I: Overview (Week 5). Fractionation Digestion LC-MS Lysis MS Sample i Protein j Peptide k Proteomic Bioinformatics – Quantitation.
Previous Lecture: Signal Processing A general strategy for separating signal from noise: 1.Characterize the signal and the noise 2.Make a model of the.
Presented by: Ziah Dean Date: November 30, 2010 Course: EE 230.
Ho-Tak Lau, Hyong Won Suh, Martin Golkowski, and Shao-En Ong
Molecular techniques for the study of the interaction between……..
Protein/Peptide Quantification
Posttranslational regulation of self-renewal capacity: insights from proteome and phosphoproteome analyses of stem cell leukemia by Matthias Trost, Martin.
V. Protein Chips 1. What is Protein Chips 2. How to Make Protein Chips
Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő
Protein Complex Discovery
Interpretation of Mass Spectra I
A perspective on proteomics in cell biology
A Photoreactive Small-Molecule Probe for 2-Oxoglutarate Oxygenases
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Polina Iakova, Samir S Awad, Nikolai A Timchenko  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Jun Xu, Roger W. Hendrix, Robert L. Duda  Molecular Cell 
2D-LC-MS/MS analysis of tryptic digest of HEK293-SUMO3 cells (2 μg inj
Example of MS/MS spectrum of peptide FPTLTGFNR (hypothetical protein with signal peptide EAK88888; N77) from a protein digestion mixture prepared by labeling.
Protein Complex Discovery
Methods for the Elucidation of Protein-Small Molecule Interactions
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Proteomics Informatics – Protein Characterization II: Protein Interactions (Week 11)

Discovering New Protein Interactions with Affinity Capture Mass Spectrometry A B A C D Digestion Mass spectrometry E F Identification

More / better quality interactions Affinity Capture Optimization Screen + Cell extraction Lysate clearance/ Batch Binding Binding/Washing/Eluting SDS-PAGE Filtration

Analysis of Non-Covalent Protein Complexes Taverner et al., Acc Chem Res 2008

Non-Covalent Protein Complexes Schreiber et al., Nature 2011

Over 20 different extraction and washing conditions ~ 10 years or art. (41 pullouts are shown) Molecular Architecture of the NPC Actual model Alber F. et al. Nature (450) Alber F. et al. Nature (450)

Interaction Map of Histone Deacetylaces Joshi et al. Molecular Systems Biology 9:672

Sowa et al., Cell 2009 Protein Complexes – specific/non-specific binding

Choi et al., Nature Methods 2010

Tackett et al. JPR 2005 Protein Complexes – specific/non-specific binding

M/Z Peptides Fragments Fragmentation Proteolytic Peptides Enzymatic Digestion Protein Complex Chemical Cross-Linking MS MS/MS Isolation Cross-Linked Protein Complex Interaction Partners by Chemical Cross-Linking

Protein Crosslinking by Formaldehyde ~1% w/v Fal 20 – 60 min ~0.3% w/v Fal 5 – 20 min 1/100 the volume LaCava

Protein Crosslinking by Formaldehyde RED: Formaldehyde crosslinking BLACK: No crosslinking SCORE: Log Ion Current / Log protein abundance

M/Z Peptides Fragments Fragmentation Proteolytic Peptides Enzymatic Digestion Protein Complex Chemical Cross-Linking MS MS/MS Isolation Cross-Linked Protein Complex Interaction Sites by Chemical Cross-Linking

Cross-linking protein n peptides with reactive groups (n-1)n/2 potential ways to cross-link peptides pairwise + many additional uninformative forms Protein A + IgG heavy chain 990 possible peptide pairs Yeast NPC ˜ 10 6 possible peptide pairs

Cross-linking Mass spectrometers have a limited dynamic range and it therefore important to limit the number of possible reactions not to dilute the cross-linked peptides. For identification of a cross-linked peptide pair, both peptides have to be sufficiently long and required to give informative fragmentation. High mass accuracy MS/MS is recommended because the spectrum will be a mixture of fragment ions from two peptides. Because the cross-linked peptides are often large, CAD is not ideal, but instead ETD is recommended.

Cloning nanobodies for GFP pullouts Atypical heavy chain-only IgG antibody produced in camelid family – retain high affinity for antigen without light chain Aimed to clone individual single-domain VHH antibodies against GFP – only ~15 kDa, can be recombinantly expressed, used as bait for pullouts, etc. To identify full repertoire, will identify GFP binders through combination of high-throughput DNA sequencing and mass spectrometry VHH clone for recombinant expression

Cloning llamabodies for GFP pullouts

Identifying full-length sequences from peptides

Sequence diversity of 26 verified anti-GFP nanobodies Of ~200 positive sequence hits, 44 high confidence clones were synthesized and tested for expression and GFP binding: 26 were confirmed GFP binders. Sequences have characteristic conserved VHH residues, but significant diversity in CDR regions. FR1 CDR1FR2 CDR2CDR3FR3FR4

HIV-1 gp120 Lipid Bilayer gp41 MA CA NC PR IN RT RNA Particle Genome env rev vpu tat nef 3’ LTR 5’ LTR vif gag pol vpr CAMANC p6 PRRTIN gp41gp120 9,200 nucleotides

Digestion & Ligation R7/3 + Kan r PmeI Site Kan r Random insertion of 5 amino acids (PmeI) within specific viral coding region Random Insertion of 5 Amino Acids in Proviral DNA Clone

Fitness Landscape of Targeted Viral Segment Day 1 Day 3 Day 6

Specific and Non-Specific Interactors 3xFLAG Tagged HIV-1WT HIV-1 Infection LightHeavy ( 13 C labeled Lys, Arg) 1:1 Mix Immunoisolation MS I-DIRT = Isotopic Differentiation of Interactions as Random or Targeted LysArg (+6 daltons) Modified from Tackett AJ et al., J Proteome Res. (2005) 4,

Specific and Non-Specific Interactors Env-3xFLAGVif-3xFLAG

300 nm 3 nm Limitation of Light Microscopy

Fluorescent Imaging with One Nanometer Accuracy (FIONA) Yildiz et al, Science X axis Y axis CCD image of a single Cy3 molecule: Width ~ 250nm Center is localized within width/(S/N) (S/N) 2 ~ N N = total # photon (for N ~ 10 4 center within ~ 1.3 nm) Paul Selvin

Limitation of Light Microscopy 3 nm

Limitation of Light Microscopy 3 nm

Limitation of Light Microscopy 3 nm

Limitation of Light Microscopy 3 nm

Limitation of Light Microscopy 20 nm

Super-Resolution Localization Microscopy Huang, Annu. Rev. Biochem, 2009 Bates, 2007 Science STORM: STochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy Using doubly labeled (Cy3-Cy5) Ab Betzig, 2006 Science PALM: PhotoActivation Localization Microscopy Using fluorescence proteins (mEOS, etc) Using two lasers for interchangeable activation and excitation of probes

Molecular Organization of the Intercalated Disc Saffitz, Heart Rhythm (2009)

Molecular Organization of the Intercalated Disc Connexin43 (Cx43) Gap junctions Plakophilin-2 (PKP2) Desmosome What is the interaction map of ID proteins? Agullo-Pascual E, Reid DA, Keegan S, Sidhu M, Fenyö D, Rothenberg E, Delmar M. "Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy of the cardiac connexome reveals plakophilin-2 inside the connexin43 plaque“, Cardiovasc Res. 2013

Regular Microscopy v. Super-Resolution Cx43 PKP2

Cx43 PKP2 Regular Microscopy v. Super-Resolution

Cx43 PKP2 Regular Microscopy v. Super-Resolution

What Do We Mean by Colocalization?

Characterization of Cx43 Clusters Two distinct size populations corresponding to hemi- channels and full channels. Predominantly circular Scale =200 nm

Cx43-PKP2 Overlap Analysis A correlation between overlap and Cx43 cluster area 100% overlap 50% overlap Cx43

Effect AnkG Silencing on Cx43 AnkG silencing results in increase of Cx43 cluster size and loss of circularity. AnkG Sil 100% overlap 50% overlap

Monte-Carlo Simulations

Experiment Simulation Experiment Simulation Cx43 PKP2

Is the Observed Overlap Random? UntreatedAnkG Silencing Cx43 Area Colocalization Area Cx43 Area Colocalization Area UntreatedAnkG Silencing Uniform Non-uniform Experiment

Proteomics Informatics – Protein Characterization II: Protein Interactions (Week 11)