CPED Meeting At aera Denver, Co May 2, 2010 10:00am-2:00pm David Imig& Jill Perry David Imig& Jill Perry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PORTFOLIO.
Advertisements

Leading by Convening: The Power of Authentic Engagement
Frameworks for Assessment of Student Learning: Questions of Concept, Practice, and Detail Christine Siegel, Ph.D. Associate Professor of School Psychology.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
College of Engineering Engineering Education Exploring Engineering Education Heidi Diefes-Dux, ENE Graduate Chair ASEE Student Chapter – November 15, 2005.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Dr. Jill Alexa Perry, Duquesne University Dr. Debby Zambo, Arizona State University Dr. David Imig, University of Maryland Susan Wunder, University of.
Doctorate in Education in Educational Leadership Ed.D.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
A Project Sponsored by the McCormick Foundation Lisa Hood, LINC Project Director Center for the Study of Education Policy Illinois State University Presentation.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Project-Based Learning
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Translating the Core Competencies for Public Health into Action September 23, 2009 “Relationship between the Core Competencies for Public Health and PHN.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Valerie A. Storey 2 nd International Conference on Developments in Doctoral Education & Training Examination Schools, University of Oxford March 30 th.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
How do we go about program assessment? What we are doing and why? Robert Gabriner, San Francisco State University Debby Zambo, Arizona State University.
Narrowing the Gap between Evaluation and Developmental Science: Implications for Evaluation Capacity Building Tiffany Berry, PhD Research Associate Professor.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Reclaiming Education’s Doctorates: What’s the story? (and how will we tell it?) Toward an Accounting of CPED Nashville Convening: 25 October 2007.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
HOW TO EXECUTE OUR RESEARCH AGENDA FIPSE – CPED PHASE II.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate AACTE, Atlanta, GA February 19, 2010.
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Social Studies Standards for the Next Generation.
Guiding Principles We, the members of CPED, believe "The professional doctorate in education prepares educators for the application of appropriate and.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
ML evi ne CP ED Co nv en in g Ju ne  The Purpose  The People  The Process.
1 Rossier School of Education Defining Excellence in Urban Education.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
April 25 th Classrooms for the Future Facts 08’  358 High Schools in PA  12,100 Teachers  83,000 Laptops  101 Million Statewide Spent  3.75.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
CPED Convening at the University of Central Florida June 9-11, 2010.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
How might The Science of Learning transform educator preparation? Education Writers Association 69 th National Seminar May
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
District of Innovation Update: International School Development
Early Childhood Leaders Ready to Change the World:
~ WELCOME ~ 2017 October Convening Hosted by
NJCU College of Education
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

CPED Meeting At aera Denver, Co May 2, :00am-2:00pm David Imig& Jill Perry David Imig& Jill Perry

Agenda TimeActivity 10:00amWelcome Understanding FIPSE & CPED David Imig 10:10amRationale for CPED as distinct Jill Perry 10:25am Why is our work important? Group Work 11:00amReport out 11:15am How are we developing new programs? Group Work 12:00- 1:30pm Working Lunch What are our research questions? 1:30pmReport out & next steps

Understanding fipse& how cped fits Jackie Edmondson (PSU) & David Imig have discussed CPED with Ralph Hines, Director FIPSEJackie Edmondson (PSU) & David Imig have discussed CPED with Ralph Hines, Director FIPSE 36 grants at $750K each36 grants at $750K each Looking for innovation  how do our programs show student improvement? What models and outcomes can we demonstrate?Looking for innovation  how do our programs show student improvement? What models and outcomes can we demonstrate? Interested in evaluation & dissemination as part of studyInterested in evaluation & dissemination as part of study May cover protocol developmentMay cover protocol development Deadline mid-late June; Awards in SeptemberDeadline mid-late June; Awards in September

It is a Problem of National SignificanceIt is a Problem of National Significance It is an Unsolved ProblemIt is an Unsolved Problem It is a Widely Felt ProblemIt is a Widely Felt Problem It is an Emerging ProblemIt is an Emerging Problem It is a Practical ProblemIt is a Practical Problem It is a Problem Shared by Many Colleges & UniversitiesIt is a Problem Shared by Many Colleges & Universities It is a Problem Demanding Bold ThinkingIt is a Problem Demanding Bold Thinking What is the Problem?

Common Commitment to Distinguishing and Differentiating Between the Doctorate in Education (154 Colleges & Universities)Common Commitment to Distinguishing and Differentiating Between the Doctorate in Education (154 Colleges & Universities) Research Scholars vs. Scholarly PractitionersResearch Scholars vs. Scholarly Practitioners Practical and Narrative Knowledge vs. Analytic Knowledge Practical and Narrative Knowledge vs. Analytic Knowledge Guided by a Set of Shared PrinciplesGuided by a Set of Shared Principles Work Based on a Shared Language (Shulman)Work Based on a Shared Language (Shulman) Capstones and Decathlons and Signature Pedagogies Capstones and Decathlons and Signature Pedagogies The CPED Initiative

Directed at Real Problems and Real SolutionsDirected at Real Problems and Real Solutions Emphasis is on Preparing Transformational Leaders to Change Schools and Colleges & Other Learning OrganizationsEmphasis is on Preparing Transformational Leaders to Change Schools and Colleges & Other Learning Organizations Enabling Doctoral Programs to Meet the Needs of Practitioners (Part Time Students with Full Time Responsibilities)Enabling Doctoral Programs to Meet the Needs of Practitioners (Part Time Students with Full Time Responsibilities) Doing So in a Rigorous, Responsible, Practical, Transparent, and Ethical MannerDoing So in a Rigorous, Responsible, Practical, Transparent, and Ethical Manner Making the EdD The Degree of Choice

Changes in Knowledge, Skills, Behaviors and/or AttitudesChanges in Knowledge, Skills, Behaviors and/or Attitudes Changes in Organizational Structures to Promote Such Learning and Behavioral ChangeChanges in Organizational Structures to Promote Such Learning and Behavioral Change Changes in the Cost of Preparing LeadersChanges in the Cost of Preparing Leaders Ways of Using Quasi-Experimental Designs to Document Such ChangesWays of Using Quasi-Experimental Designs to Document Such Changes Readiness of CPED to Use Multiple Data Gathering Procedures Across InstitutionsReadiness of CPED to Use Multiple Data Gathering Procedures Across Institutions What We Want to Know

An Established Network of +25 Colleges and UniversitiesAn Established Network of +25 Colleges and Universities 3 Years of Shared Effort in Building Pilots or Proofing Sites (Some Cross Institutional Data & Information)3 Years of Shared Effort in Building Pilots or Proofing Sites (Some Cross Institutional Data & Information) A Common Set of PrinciplesA Common Set of Principles An Agreed Upon Set of OutcomesAn Agreed Upon Set of Outcomes A Shared LanguageA Shared Language Institutional Resources and Institutional “Change Agents”Institutional Resources and Institutional “Change Agents” What We Have to Offer

Beginners Agreed Program Design Student Recruitment In Process Imminent Launch Implementers Program Cohorts Admitted Courses Offered Capstone Defined Matures Program Graduates Practicing Professionals The Challenges

School Leaders Leaders for PK-12 Schools Teacher Educators Leaders for Schools and Colleges Organizational Leaders Learning Organization Leaders Different Purposes: Different Clients

Finding a HomeFinding a Home Identifying a Project EvaluatorIdentifying a Project Evaluator Staffing the ProjectStaffing the Project Building a BudgetBuilding a Budget Creating a Shared Governance DesignCreating a Shared Governance Design Building a Cross Institutional Commitment to Data Gathering and Data SharingBuilding a Cross Institutional Commitment to Data Gathering and Data Sharing Getting Everything Completed SOON!Getting Everything Completed SOON! Organizational & Governance Concerns

Demographic Data on Applicants & Admitted Students, Graduates & Successful PractitionersDemographic Data on Applicants & Admitted Students, Graduates & Successful Practitioners Cohort Data on Knowledge & Skills, Beliefs & Attitudes - Across Program Data Cohort Data on Knowledge & Skills, Beliefs & Attitudes - Across Program Data Information on Course Designs, Labs of Practice, Internships, ApprenticeshipsInformation on Course Designs, Labs of Practice, Internships, Apprenticeships Candidate Course Grades, Portfolios, Other ArtifactsCandidate Course Grades, Portfolios, Other Artifacts Candidate Success on Comps, Proposals & Capstones (Shared Rubrics)Candidate Success on Comps, Proposals & Capstones (Shared Rubrics) Candidate Success in Appointments, Promotions, Supervisor Evaluations, etc.Candidate Success in Appointments, Promotions, Supervisor Evaluations, etc. Candidate Success on Certifying ExaminationsCandidate Success on Certifying Examinations Data – What Do We Want?

WHERE WE HAVE ARRIVED Phase I of CPED: Why - Belief Statements = Scholarly Practitioner Why - Belief Statements = Scholarly Practitioner How - Design Decisions (signature pedagogies, labs, capstones) How - Design Decisions (signature pedagogies, labs, capstones) What - 6 principles of the professional practice doctorate What - 6 principles of the professional practice doctorate

WHY : Scholarly Practitioners From institutional documents Need for critical consumers of research Need for action research, applied research skills Need for research literary, systematic inquiry, effective data analysis for data-driving decision making Need for combining inquiry and content Need to develop students’ knowledge, competencies, and skills applicable to disciplined inquiry Need to focus on research in action Need for more deliberate and developmental scaffolding for students as they plan for and actually conduct research on problems of practice From October Convening We, the members of CPED, believe “The professional doctorate in education prepares educators for the application of appropriate and specific practices, the generation of new knowledge, and for the stewardship of the profession.”

How : our accomplishments Key program structures : cohorts, three year completion, innovative assessments, attention to adult learners, engagement of workplace, Key features : signature pedagogies, labs, capstones that emphasize inquiry and define cohesive leadership preparation that engages learner and scholar in solving problems of practice Key outcomes : scholarly decisions and solutions to high leverage problems, scholarly products aimed at research and practice, rethinking of doctoral preparation in SOEs

What : 6 principles 1.Is framed around questions of equity, ethics, and social justice to bring about solutions to complex problems of practice. 2.Prepares leaders who can construct and apply knowledge to make a positive difference in the lives of individuals, families, organizations, and communities. 3.Provides opportunities for candidates to develop and demonstrate collaboration and communication skills to work with diverse communities and to build partnerships. 4.Provides field-based opportunities to analyze problems of practice and use multiple frames to develop meaningful solutions. 5.Is grounded in and develops a professional knowledge base that integrates both practical and research knowledge, that links theory with systemic and systematic inquiry. 6.Emphasizes the generation, transformation, and use of professional knowledge and practice.

Why— Justify our claim that Scholarly Practitioner is important? In inter-institutional groups: Discuss & record results

How are we preparing Scholarly Practitioners? In inter-institutional groups: Describe your institutional efforts around one of the following CPED design concepts— Signature pedagogies Laboratories of Practice Capstones

MOVING FORWARD TO PHASE II: WE HAVE LOTS TO DEMONSTRATE NEED EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ACROSS INSTITUTIONS

What — questions to launch Phase II & attract resources In inter-Institutional groups, CONSIDER THE RESEARCH questions &ANSWER: What — questions to launch Phase II & attract resources In inter-Institutional groups, CONSIDER THE RESEARCH questions &ANSWER: a. What do we think of these as research questions? B. how can we word-smith them? C. what are some subquestions? D. What are our hypotheses around these? How has CPED changed Higher Ed/programs?How has CPED changed Higher Ed/programs? How have CPED grads changed their settings?How have CPED grads changed their settings? How does program change impact schools?How does program change impact schools? How have grads transformed their notions of leadership?How have grads transformed their notions of leadership? How are we faithful in our programs to principles?How are we faithful in our programs to principles?

Next steps TimelineAERA: Evaluate RQs Add sub-questions Ideas on how we might collect data (will warrant tool development) May-June: Send out AERA results to all teams Develop two-page description for potential protocol development Write narratives for grant Assemble proposal writing team At UCF June Convening: Question development teams Protocol development teams Discuss division of consortium for research-- inter-institutional June-September June-September Establish institution commitments Work as if we have grant—develop design, products due, convenings Questions to consider: Size, scope, how to group? Products, outcomes, evidence Types of Evaluation How disseminate our products/results? Inclusion of new members as critical friends?

Thanks for participating Share ideas with your home team members We’ll see ya’ll at the University of Central Florida June 9-11th