WELCOME! 1. PLEASE GET A DOT – AND PLACE IT ON THE KNOWLEDGE OF ELP STANDARDS CONTINUUM 2. HAVE A SEAT AT THE APPROPRIATE TABLE GROUP 1 GROUP 2 3. TURN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conferences: Helping Students Advance Their Understandings Amanda Branscombe Taylor, J.A., Branscombe, N.A., Burcham J., & Land, L. (2011). Beyond Early.
Advertisements

Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
High School Standards-Based Classroom.
WELCOME!! 1. Please put an X on the “How ADEPTable are you? chart” under the descriptor that closest reflects your experience. 2. Then take a sticky note.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Objective Develop an understanding of Appendix B: CA ELD Standards Part II: Learning About How English Works.
Southern Regional Education Board The will to succeed is only overshadowed by the will to prepare to succeed!
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Welcome!. Looking at Student Notebooks, Goals: Deepen understanding of the nature and purpose of science notebook entry types Deepen understanding of.
White Plains City School District March 9, By the end of the session, you will be able to Describe each component of the lesson plan template Use.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
Say it, learn it, own it! Increasing student understanding through engaging conversations.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
EngageNY.org Meeting the Needs of Challenged Students Session 3, May 2014 NTI.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Model Performance Indicators.
Lesson Plan Cycle. Six Elements in Planning the Delivery of an Effective Lesson 1.Generates students’ language through active student participation 2.Comprehensible.
EngageNY.org Argument Writing: Going Deeper with Teachers.
SKILLS AND TECHNIQUES HOMEWORK DUE IN TODAY Higher/Intermediate 2 Physical Education.
FOCUS TEAM MEETING 3/1/12 EVALUATING LESSON PLANNING PRACTICES I can evaluate a lesson plan for: Alignment Rigor/HOTS Student Engagement Scaffolding/Differentiation.
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION AFTERNOON SESSION: 2/18/13.
Unit 5: Science: A Setting for English Language Development Learning Objectives Learn strategies that incorporate CA CCSS for ELA/Literacy and the California.
Data Team Training February 4, 7, 10, 2014 Data Team Training February, 2014.
1 Chapter 7 Models for Teaching: Direct Melinda Bauer and Shannyn Bourdon.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at Questioning.
A Closer Look I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives.
English Language Arts ERPD September 19, Welcome, Celebrations, & Norms Begin and end on time. Keep the train of thought “on the track”. Actively.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice with the Standards for Mathematical Content Part One – K-5 Math Oct. 23,
Professional Certification Professional Certification October 11, 2007 Standard: Effective Teaching Criteria 1(b) Using a variety of assessment strategies.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 2 Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa Mathematics Specialist Teacher,
Mentor January Forum #3 Mentor Standards and ICF Framework for Mentoring “ It’s all about student achievement.” CIC:
WEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN NEW TEACHER INITIATIVE CONSORTIUM WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, :30 – 8:30 TONI VELURE ABBY JENSEN Evaluating Student Work.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. Summer  Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning?  Using it effectively to promote further learning?
Session Materials  Wiki
+ Operations and Algebraic Thinking Success Implementing CCSS for K-2 Math Day 2.
Ways to Assess Individuals During Group Work. Learning Targets Investigate strategies that promote individual accountability in group work. Discuss difficulties.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
MISD Bilingual/ESL Department
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Instructional Rounds Toby Boss ESU 6. Agenda Develop Common Understanding of Rounds Focus on Details – What do we do to prepare? – What do we do during.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
 Sign In and find your assigned table  Enjoy breakfast items  You will NOT need a computer until much later  Be ready to share at 9 a.m. a check for.
Professional Learning Resources Download presentations and resources from today’s sessions!  Go to BISD homepage  Departments  Professional Learning.
Lesson Planning Session Planning effective, standards-based lessons within the practice teaching classroom.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 2: Engaging in Rigorous CTE Lessons Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Denver Public Schools Illuminating the revised framework Taking a Closer Look at I3 Exploring Instructional Methods and Pacing.
Examining Student Work (using the Tuning Protocol) Jacque Melin – GVSU
Instructional Leadership Planning Common Assessments.
Units of Study :Training for Substitutes Writing Writing Writing Writing,, Writing Writing Writing Writing.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Bilingual/ESL Department
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Sheltered Instruction: What, Why, and How
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Welcome to the Linguistic Instructional Alignment Guide Training
Mapping it Out! Practical Tools to Use Assessment Well
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Session 1, Program Introduction and Overview
Session 2. Learning From Student Work
Presentation transcript:

WELCOME! 1. PLEASE GET A DOT – AND PLACE IT ON THE KNOWLEDGE OF ELP STANDARDS CONTINUUM 2. HAVE A SEAT AT THE APPROPRIATE TABLE GROUP 1 GROUP 2 3. TURN AND TALK TO YOUR NEIGHBOR ABOUT YOUR FAMILIARITY WITH OREGON’S ELP STANDARDS. Because I _____________, I am __________ familiar with Oregon’s ELP standards.

NUTS AND BOLTS Bathrooms New Job Alike Structure

YOUR SUGGESTIONS FOR PD ° ELP Standards (OCTOBER) ° Newcomer Supports ° Progress Monitoring ° ELPA prep ° Content-based ELD (ELD aligned to Core) ° How to challenge level 4 (early advanced) ° SPELL training (pre-referral) ° Collaborating with classroom teachers ° Common Core Sometimes It Feels Impossible

OBJECTIVE: We will come to a deeper understanding about how to use the Oregon English Language Proficiency Standards to plan instruction so to accelerate Emergent Bilingual students’ success. Think about your student that you are here for this year.

WHAT DO YOU NOTICE? PAIR-WRITE- SHARE: WHAT PATTERNS DO WE SEE? WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR OUR WORK? Think about your student that you are here for this year.

Cause and effect Describing actions Explaining Strengths

FRAMING QUESTION DISCUSSION Let’s come to a deeper understanding about how best to move students forward one level or more in a year using the Oregon English Language Proficiency standards.

FRAMING QUESTION DISCUSSION 1.Form groups of 3-5. Within your small group, number off using your laminated cards. (This will be how you are called on to share.) 2.Discuss the framing question for about five minutes. 3.Report out to whole group by number.

FRAMING QUESTION DISCUSSION Question: How can we use higher level functions to help students use more complex language?

STANDARDS MATCH 1.Review Language Functions and Examples of Forms, based on the ELP standards. Turn and talk to your neighbor: What do you notice about the complexity of forms for various functions? 2.Review Oregon ELP Standards. Match each function card with a corresponding standard. Cause and Effect 6.27 Cause and effect for, feelings, physical conditions 6.28 Cause and effect for, actions 6.29 Cause and effect natural or mechanical processes

STANDARDS MATCH 1.Review Language Functions and Examples of Forms, based on the ELP standards. Turn and talk to your neighbor: What do you notice about the complexity of forms for various functions? 2.Review Oregon ELP Standards. Match each function card with a corresponding standard. Cause and Effect 6.27 Cause and effect for, feelings, physical conditions 6.28 Cause and effect for, actions 6.29 Cause and effect natural or mechanical processes

1.Write two functions on two large post-its and place on the Bloom’s taxonomy chart at the appropriate level of complexity. 2.Discuss at your small group table: What are the functions that we tend to teach at early intermediate through early advanced level? Where do they fall on Bloom’s Taxonomy? What are the functions that we teach less of at those levels? Where do they fall on Bloom’s Taxonomy?

REFLECT: HOW MIGHT ASSESSMENT INFORM YOUR PLANNING? Cause and effect Describing actions Explaining Strengths Think about how you might assess whether your instruction is targeting a function from the standards.

STANDARDS WALK 1.Look through the ELP Standards. Remember a piece of individual student work or a class assignment you taught recently that targeted one of these standards. What function were you focusing on? 2.Now think about what assessment data you have about this assignment. How did you know whether the student(s) were successful in mastering this function? Do the ELP Standards drive our assessment?

POSSIBLE ASSESSMENTS Observation Checklist Learning Log Exit Slip Sketch and Label

EXPERT GROUPS Preparation: 1.In your small group, select a peer facilitator. 2. We will go through the process step by step together the first time, and then the peer facilitator will take the lead for the other presenters in your group. 3.Look at the lesson plan, sample of student work or class assessment you brought with you today, or think about an assignment you recently taught and assessed. What standards and/or functions were you targeting with this assessment?

EXPERT GROUPS Presentation process: 1.The presenter takes ten minutes to present her/his student or class assignment to the other participants. What standards and/or functions were you targeting? What was the context of the assignment? Describe the course, the students, and any other information that will help us understand what we are looking at. Participants listen and take notes, but do not ask questions at this point. 2.Presenter then sits outside the group in order to observe the discussion, “fishbowl” style. She/he will listen and take notes, but not respond at this time.

EXPERT GROUPS Discussion process: 3.Participants review their notes and reflect on what feedback might be helpful to the presenter. 4.Participants share “warm” feedback. Looking at the student work presented, what evidence can they see of the standard and/or function targeted? 5.Participants share “cool” feedback. What did they not see evidence of? How might this assignment better target an ELP standard and/or function? This would be an appropriate time to share constructive suggestions.

EXPERT GROUPS Response process: 6.Presenter takes a few minutes to review their notes on the feedback and to consider her/his response. 7.Presenter rejoins the small group and responds to any of the questions or comments she/he chooses to. Participants are silent. 8.REPEAT! Go through the process with the other presenters, this time led by the peer facilitator.

CLOSURE Think about your student that you are here for this year. How would using ELP standards to increase the rigor of instruction help her/him? Share out with the whole group: _________ would be good for __________ because _____________. Thanks, and have a great rest of your day!