New Drug Application 22-275 Tolvaptan for the Treatment of Hyponatremia Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 25, 2008 Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Labeling claims for patient- reported outcomes (A regulatory perspective) FDA/Industry Workshop Washington, DC September 16, 2005 Lisa A. Kammerman, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Patient-reported Measures: KCCQ and CHF outcomes Aanand D. Naik, MD Houston Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence.
ASSESSING RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH MEASUREMENTS. Link validity & reliability testing to purpose of the measure Some examples: In a diagnostic instrument,
Individual Treatment Plan Putting Together the Pieces of the Puzzle Gayla Oakley RN, FAACVPR Boone County Health Center Albion Nebraska Presented by Mark.
Psychological Assessment
Methods used to assess and report pain-related endpoints in NDA Ethan Basch, MD, MSc Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Approach to Outcome Measure Development or Selection: A Regulatory Perspective Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials.
1 Epoetin Alpha: FDA Overview of Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Claims Ann Marie Trentacosti, M.D. Study Endpoints and Labeling Office of New Drugs Food.
Gayla Oakley RN, FAACVPR Boone County Health Center Albion Nebraska
1 Efficacy of Testosterone Transdermal System (TTS) for Treatment of HSDD in Surgically Menopausal Women on Concomitant Estrogen Daniel Davis, MD, MPH.
Tony WAEGEMANS, MD UCB Pharma, Belgium. TW/ll/ Washington/MCI 2 MCI as implemented in our study MCI is a very early stage of dementia with as main.
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Introducion and Overview Pythia Nieuwkerk, PhD Department of Medical Psychology Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam.
Cross-Cultural Use of Measurements: Development of the Chinese SF-36 Health Survey Xinhua S. Ren, Ph.D. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston,
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Heart rate reduction with ivabradine and health related quality of life in.
ACT on Alzheimer’s Disease Curriculum Module VI: Screening.
Self-Report Measures of Functional Status and Quality of Life: Adults Sandra A. Mitchell, CRNP, M.Sc.N., AOCN National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD.
Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials Adapted from Introduction to Clinical Trials Biostatistics.
…patient reported outcome (PRO) measure for your clinical study Dr Keith Meadows, DHP Research & Consultancy Ltd.
Patient-reported outcome measures for sleep-wake function Daniel J. Buysse, M.D. Jean Miewald, B.A. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine PMBC Sleep.
Patient Reported Outcomes in Oncology Trials Virginia Kwitkowski Clinical Reviewer-- FDA Division of Drug Oncology Products Member OND Patient Reported.
1 Tolvaptan for the Treatment of Hyponatremia Aliza Thompson, MD Medical Officer Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 25, 2008.
National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop
Dr Keith Meadows, DHP Research & Consultancy Ltd.
LifeSpan. Function Natural, required, or expected activity of a person based on stage of development Ability to exist with in environment Related to a.
Selection of a Survey Instrument for a Heart Failure Disease Management Study Lee R. Goldberg, MD, MPH Heart Failure/Transplant program University of Pennsylvania.
FDA Approach to Review of Outcome Measures for Drug Approval and Labeling: Content Validity Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in.
EPE C for VE T E R A N S EPE C for VE T E R A N S Education in Palliative and End-of-life Care for Veterans is a collaborative effort between the Department.
PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES Albert W. Wu, MD, MPH Joseph Finkelstein, MD, PhD, MA, CCRP ICTR Clinical Registry Workshop, 10 November 2010.
Introduction Patients with tumors affecting the spine have significant impairments in Quality of Life domains that include physical function, neural function,
CLAIMS STRUCTURE FOR SLE Jeffrey Siegel, M.D. Arthritis Advisory Committee September 29, 2003.
#1 STATISTICS 542 Intro to Clinical Trials Quality of Life Assessment.
Development of Antibiotics for Otitis Media: Past, Present, and Future Janice Soreth, M.D. Director Division of Anti-Infective Drug Products.
The Practical Art of Endpoint Selection: Industry Perspectives A View from the Pharma Industry of the FDA Guidance on PROs Glenn A. Phillips, Ph.D. Director.
Hospice Basics: Palliative Care vs. Curative Care.
1 Assessing the Minimally Important Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine October 25, 2006,
1 Statistical Review Dr. Shan Sun-Mitchell. 2 ENT Primary endpoint: Time to treatment failure by day 50 Placebo BDP Patients randomized Number.
Treating Chronic Pain in Adolescents Amanda Bye, PsyD, Behavioral Medicine Specialist Collaborative Family Healthcare Association 15 th Annual Conference.
TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS INC. June 2, Arthritis Drugs Advisory Committee TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. June 2, 2004.
Questionnaires and Interviews Steven R. Cummings, MD Director, S.F. Coordinating Center.
Another Perspective on PRO Content in Clinical Practice Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. University of California, Los Angeles June 25, 2007.
Regulatory Issues in Outcomes Labeling & Advertising Louis A. Morris, Ph.D. July 17, 2001.
Potential Errors In Epidemiologic Studies Bias Dr. Sherine Shawky III.
OLGA: A nice niche designed to meet your evolving needs Pennifer Erickson, Ph.D. Presented at the Spring meeting of the Special Library Association’s Pharmaceutical.
Overview of Health-Related Quality of Life Measures May 22, 2014 (1:00 – 2:00 PDT) Kaiser Methods Webinar Series 1 Ron D.Hays, Ph.D.
Introductory Statistics Options, Spring 2008 Stat 100: MWF, 11:00 Science Center C. Stat 100: MWF, 11:00 Science Center C. –General intro to statistical.
Regulatory Affairs and Adaptive Designs Greg Enas, PhD, RAC Director, Endocrinology/Metabolism US Regulatory Affairs Eli Lilly and Company.
Do Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Predict Dementia at 1- and 2- Year Follow-Up? Findings from the Development of Screening Guidelines and Diagnostic.
Welcome and Introduction Lee S. Simon, MD Division Director Analgesic, Anti-inflammatory and Ophthalmologic Drug Products ODEV/CDER.
1 Session 6 Minimally Important Differences Dave Cella Dennis Revicki Jeff Sloan David Feeny Ron Hays.
Assessing Responsiveness of Health Measurements Ian McDowell, INTA, Santiago, March 20, 2001.
Depression Management Presentation 1 of 3 Documented diagnosis PHQ tool Depression care assessment.
Striving Towards Excellence in Comprehensive Care: What do Children Need? July 10, 2007 Christopher A. Kus, M.D., M.P.H.
Quality of Life (QOL) & Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) Lori Minasian, MD Chief, Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, DCP, NCI, NIH,
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Assessment in Outcome Studies Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA/RAND GCRC Summer Course “The.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Community Medicine Lec -11-
Patient-reported Outcome Functional Status Assessment (PRO FSA) Heart Failure Measure Testing Project 1.
CoRPS London 26 & 27 October 2010 Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases Understanding PRO in hematological disorders: Do we have a consensus?
Quantification of dyspnea using descriptors: Development and initial testing of the Dyspnea-12 J Yorke, S H Moosavi, C Shuldham, P W Jones (Thorax
Memory and Aging Educational Presentation Presented by Tessa Lundquist, M.S. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
A2 unit 4 Clinical Psychology 4) Content Reliability of the diagnosis of mental disorders Validity of the diagnosis of mental disorders Cultural issues.
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
NIH: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Ron D. Hays Functional Vision and Visual Function November 10, 2016, 8:55-9:15am.
Quality of Life Assessment
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Outcome Studies
Progress Report on the Patient Reported Outcomes Harmonization Team
Concepts of Nursing NUR 212
Development Plans: Study Design and Dose Selection
Interreg-IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Romania-Serbia
Presentation transcript:

New Drug Application Tolvaptan for the Treatment of Hyponatremia Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 25, 2008 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

Tolvaptan for Hyponatremia: FDA Overview of Patient Reported Outcomes Elektra Papadopoulos, M.D. Study Endpoints and Labeling Office of New Drugs Food and Drug Administration June 25, 2008

3 Tolvaptan for Hyponatremia  Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures  FDA Draft PRO Guidance and Concepts  PRO Measurement Issues  Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)  Hyponatremia Disease-Specific Survey  Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures  FDA Draft PRO Guidance and Concepts  PRO Measurement Issues  Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)  Hyponatremia Disease-Specific Survey

4 Proposed Claim Tolvaptan for the treatment of hypervolemic and euvolemic hyponatremia and for the prevention of worsening hyponatremia PRO instruments: to support primary claim Tolvaptan for the treatment of hypervolemic and euvolemic hyponatremia and for the prevention of worsening hyponatremia PRO instruments: to support primary claim

5 Hyponatremia Indication: PRO Endpoints  12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)  Only secondary PRO endpoint  Study (Study 235)  Study (Study 238)  Hyponatremia Disease-specific Survey (HDS)  Only exploratory PRO endpoint  Study 238 only  Added in protocol amendment  12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)  Only secondary PRO endpoint  Study (Study 235)  Study (Study 238)  Hyponatremia Disease-specific Survey (HDS)  Only exploratory PRO endpoint  Study 238 only  Added in protocol amendment

6 Congestive Heart Failure Studies: Other PRO Endpoints  The following PROs were not used for the hyponatremia indication.  Patient assessed global status, Dyspnea Status instrument  The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. These are not further discussed in this presentation because they are not relevant to the hyponatremia indication.  The following PROs were not used for the hyponatremia indication.  Patient assessed global status, Dyspnea Status instrument  The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. These are not further discussed in this presentation because they are not relevant to the hyponatremia indication.

7 FDA PRO Guidance and Concepts FDA PRO Guidance and Concepts

8 FDA Draft PRO Guidance

9 Treatment Benefit  An improvement in how a patient survives, feels, or functions as a result of treatment

10 Patient Reported Outcomes  PRO: Any measurement directly from the patient without interpretation by anyone else  Preferred for measuring aspects of treatment benefit known only to patient (e.g., pain)  Not designed to measure cognitive function:  Not reliable in patients with compromised cognition or mental status  PRO: Any measurement directly from the patient without interpretation by anyone else  Preferred for measuring aspects of treatment benefit known only to patient (e.g., pain)  Not designed to measure cognitive function:  Not reliable in patients with compromised cognition or mental status

11 Content Validity  Crucial for any PRO  Input from target population, instrument is:  Appropriate  Comprehensive  Interpretable  “Fit for Purpose”  Assessed in the context of target patient population and indication  Crucial for any PRO  Input from target population, instrument is:  Appropriate  Comprehensive  Interpretable  “Fit for Purpose”  Assessed in the context of target patient population and indication

12 PRO Measurement Issues

13 Hyponatremia Manifestations Primarily neurologic: Osmotic water shifts  brain edema Symptoms may vary depending on chronicity Range from mild confusion, disorientation to obtundation, coma, seizures Other symptoms include nausea and headache Exam: “careful evaluation of mental status and cognitive function” Source: Harrison’s Textbook/ American College of Physicians Primarily neurologic: Osmotic water shifts  brain edema Symptoms may vary depending on chronicity Range from mild confusion, disorientation to obtundation, coma, seizures Other symptoms include nausea and headache Exam: “careful evaluation of mental status and cognitive function” Source: Harrison’s Textbook/ American College of Physicians

14 SF-12

15  Only secondary PRO endpoint (Version 1: one week recall)  Two summary scores:  Mental Component Summary (MCS)  Physical Component Summary (PCS)  No single total score possible  All questions must be complete  Change from baseline PCS and MCS  Study 235: Week 1 and Day 30  Study 238: Week 2 and Day 30  Only secondary PRO endpoint (Version 1: one week recall)  Two summary scores:  Mental Component Summary (MCS)  Physical Component Summary (PCS)  No single total score possible  All questions must be complete  Change from baseline PCS and MCS  Study 235: Week 1 and Day 30  Study 238: Week 2 and Day 30 SF-12 Endpoint

16 SF-12: Review of Content Validity  Measure of overall health status  Developed for use in the general population  Does not assess the symptoms of hyponatremia  Questionable relevance for target population:  “During the past week, how much did pain interfere with your normal work?”  Measure of overall health status  Developed for use in the general population  Does not assess the symptoms of hyponatremia  Questionable relevance for target population:  “During the past week, how much did pain interfere with your normal work?”

17 SF-12: Item Content Summary 1. In general, would you say your health is: 2. Does your health now limit you in: 2a.Moderate activities (e.g., moving a table, pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling, or playing golf) 2b.Climbing several flights of stairs 3. As a result of your physical health: 3a.Accomplished less than you would like 3b.Limited in kind of work or other activities 1. In general, would you say your health is: 2. Does your health now limit you in: 2a.Moderate activities (e.g., moving a table, pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling, or playing golf) 2b.Climbing several flights of stairs 3. As a result of your physical health: 3a.Accomplished less than you would like 3b.Limited in kind of work or other activities

18 SF-12: Item Content Summary 4.As a result of any emotional problems: 4a.Accomplished less than you would like 4b.Didn’t do work or other activities as carefully as usual 5.How much did pain interfere with your normal work? 4.As a result of any emotional problems: 4a.Accomplished less than you would like 4b.Didn’t do work or other activities as carefully as usual 5.How much did pain interfere with your normal work?

19 SF-12: Item Content Summary 6. How do you feel and how have things been with you during past week: 6a.Felt calm and peaceful 6b.Have a lot of energy 6c.Felt downhearted and blue 7.How much of the time has your physical health or emotional problems interfered with your social activities? 6. How do you feel and how have things been with you during past week: 6a.Felt calm and peaceful 6b.Have a lot of energy 6c.Felt downhearted and blue 7.How much of the time has your physical health or emotional problems interfered with your social activities?

20 SF-12: Scoring/Interpretation  Results described in two summary scores  Mental Component Score (MCS)  Physical Component Score (PCS)  Same 12 items are used to calculate both PCS and MCS scores, but weighted differently  Results described in two summary scores  Mental Component Score (MCS)  Physical Component Score (PCS)  Same 12 items are used to calculate both PCS and MCS scores, but weighted differently

21 SF-12: MCS/PCS  Higher values indicate better health  Scores standardized to general population  Range (0-100)  Mean= 50; SD=10  All 12 items must be complete to generate MCS and PCS scores  Higher values indicate better health  Scores standardized to general population  Range (0-100)  Mean= 50; SD=10  All 12 items must be complete to generate MCS and PCS scores

22 Results

Cardiorenal Drugs Advisory Committee June 25, Study 235: SF-12 MCS/PCS

24 Study 238: SF-12 MCS/PCS

25 SF-12 MCS Data  Interpretation difficult because:  Content validity not established for hyponatremia patients  MCS does not measure cognitive function or symptoms of hyponatremia  Inclusion criteria did not require patients to have symptoms of hyponatremia at baseline  Interpretation difficult because:  Content validity not established for hyponatremia patients  MCS does not measure cognitive function or symptoms of hyponatremia  Inclusion criteria did not require patients to have symptoms of hyponatremia at baseline

26 SF-12: Summary  SF-12 MCS and PCS are not measures of the clinically important manifestations associated with hyponatremia  MCS does not measure cognitive functioning in hyponatremic patients  PCS does not measure physical functioning in hyponatremic patients  MCS and PCS are not appropriate stand-alone measures to support labeling claims of treatment benefit in patients with hyponatremia  SF-12 MCS and PCS are not measures of the clinically important manifestations associated with hyponatremia  MCS does not measure cognitive functioning in hyponatremic patients  PCS does not measure physical functioning in hyponatremic patients  MCS and PCS are not appropriate stand-alone measures to support labeling claims of treatment benefit in patients with hyponatremia

Hyponatremia Disease-Specific Survey (HDS)

28 Hyponatremia Disease-Specific Survey Hyponatremia Disease-Specific Survey  Exploratory endpoint in Study 238 only  12 items; two-day recall period  Baseline, Week 2, Day 30, and Post- treatment  Assessed in a subset of patients  Total randomized: N= 234  HDS Baseline: N~ 85  HDS Baseline + Day 30: N~ 62  Exploratory endpoint in Study 238 only  12 items; two-day recall period  Baseline, Week 2, Day 30, and Post- treatment  Assessed in a subset of patients  Total randomized: N= 234  HDS Baseline: N~ 85  HDS Baseline + Day 30: N~ 62

29 HDS: Item Content Summary 1.In general, would you say your health over the past two days is:

30 HDS: Item Content Summary Has your thinking ability limited you in these activities over the past two days? 2.Concentrating activities, such as reading a paper, watching television, carrying on a conversation? 3.Calculating activities, such as changing money, telling time, simple mathematics? 4.Language activities, such as crossword puzzles, thinking or speaking words or names? 5.Memory activities such as finding misplaced keys, remembering appointments?

31 HDS: Item Content Summary Has your strength and coordination limited you in these activities over the past two days? 6.Endurance activities (walking, carrying bags, standing for long periods)? 7.Strength activities (rising from bed, lifting objects, opening doors)? 8.Gross coordination activities (walking steadily, dancing, driving)? 9.Fine coordination activities (writing, drawing, knitting, putting on makeup, working with tools)? Has your strength and coordination limited you in these activities over the past two days? 6.Endurance activities (walking, carrying bags, standing for long periods)? 7.Strength activities (rising from bed, lifting objects, opening doors)? 8.Gross coordination activities (walking steadily, dancing, driving)? 9.Fine coordination activities (writing, drawing, knitting, putting on makeup, working with tools)?

32 HDS: Item Content Summary 10.Right now, do you think your sodium (salt) concentration is: 11.What has your sensation of thirst been over the past two days without factoring (or considering) the amount of water you drink each day? 12.As an overall assessment of how you have been feeling since therapy with tolvaptan started, please select the box which describes how you (or your physician) believe this treatment has affected your activity, symptoms and emotional well-being. 10.Right now, do you think your sodium (salt) concentration is: 11.What has your sensation of thirst been over the past two days without factoring (or considering) the amount of water you drink each day? 12.As an overall assessment of how you have been feeling since therapy with tolvaptan started, please select the box which describes how you (or your physician) believe this treatment has affected your activity, symptoms and emotional well-being.

33 HDS: Issues  Exploratory endpoint  Development history, evidence of content validity, and scoring information not available  Post-hoc definition of MCS and PCS  Not a measure of cognitive function  Questionable content on inspection of individual items  Exploratory endpoint  Development history, evidence of content validity, and scoring information not available  Post-hoc definition of MCS and PCS  Not a measure of cognitive function  Questionable content on inspection of individual items

34 Summary of PRO Measurement Issues Patient population concerns: – Concomitant underlying illnesses – Inpatient vs. outpatient – Chronicity of hyponatremia ill-defined Missing data Inclusion criteria did not require patients to have symptoms of hyponatremia at baseline Multiplicity without pre-specified analysis plan Patient population concerns: – Concomitant underlying illnesses – Inpatient vs. outpatient – Chronicity of hyponatremia ill-defined Missing data Inclusion criteria did not require patients to have symptoms of hyponatremia at baseline Multiplicity without pre-specified analysis plan

35 Conclusions

36 ConclusionsConclusions SF-12 (MCS, PCS) and HDS are not valid measures of the symptoms of hyponatremia or cognitive function Treatment benefit of tolvaptan— improvement in how patients feel or function—has not been established SF-12 (MCS, PCS) and HDS are not valid measures of the symptoms of hyponatremia or cognitive function Treatment benefit of tolvaptan— improvement in how patients feel or function—has not been established