SAC Needs Assessment. Background A goal of the Massachusetts State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care (SAC) Identify the needs of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap International.
Advertisements

JACK OCONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Draft for Advisory Committee discussion on Californias Early Learning Quality Improvement.
Guideposts --Quality Work-Based Learning Programs
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
Policy and Programs Committee CSEFEL Proposal
1 Board of Early Education and Care April 14, 2009 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011.
SAC Needs Assessment. Background One goal of the Massachusetts State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care (SAC) Identify the needs of.
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Overview of revised standards and initial pilot design.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care: Draft Strategic Report April,
1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Response to Recommendations by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) The Massachusetts Child Care Resource & Referral.
1 GRANT REVIEW PROCESS EEC Fiscal Committee January 9, 2012.
1 Board Meeting June 14, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Early Education and Care Assessment Systems – Panel Discussion
1 Child Care Resource and Referral (CCR&R): FY 13 Contract Renewal Proposal Summary Presentation January 2012.
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Eight Week Intervention Program for Preschool Children Prior to Kindergarten Entry Board of Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
1 Early Childhood Assessment: Information for Parents.
EEC Annual Legislative Report February 12, 2013
Early Childhood Resource Centers 1. 2 Created in 1991 – lead agencies were originally public schools, community agencies and libraries. FY09 Competitive.
1 Early Childhood Assessment: Information for Early Childhood Program Administrators.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding Board Presentation April 10, 2012.
Early Childhood Assessment: Information for Educators
1 The Massachusetts Early Learning Guidelines for Infants and Toddlers.
1 The Massachusetts Early Learning Guidelines for Infants and Toddlers.
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) December 2009.
Review of Family & Educator Survey Results Summary Presentation SAC Needs Assessment: Survey Results Board of Early Education and Care January 10, 2012.
Addition Facts
Cross-National Survey of School Principal Daniel Pop Education Support Program Open Society Institute.
Child Care Subsidy Data and Measurement Challenges 1 Study of the Effects of Enhanced Subsidy Eligibility Policies In Illinois Data Collection and Measurement.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
1 Transitional Services Certification Minnesota Rules
Hawaiis Early Learning System Looking at… ECE Task Force: Governance Committee.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Interpretation, Further Analysis and Dissemination Workshop Child Development 1.
Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
Addition 1’s to 20.
5 by 5: Growing Healthy Learners An early childhood system of care designed to prepare vulnerable children for success in school and in life. Sylvia Echols.
1. 2 Easy-to-Use Administrator Features 3 Customisable Screen Cutoff Scores.
1 Educator and Provider Support Grant Policy and Research Committee EEC Board October 6, 2014.
1 Shortchanging Teachers, Shortchanging Children Marcy Whitebook Center for the Study of Child Care Employment University of California, Berkeley.
About the Child Care Workforce. 2 Presentation Overview The Institute The Myths The Truths The Research My Knowledge.
1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Reaching for the Stars: Building State Systems for School Readiness.
Bill Buchanan Ready Kids Conference Louisville June 2014 Count Down to New Eligibility Requirement for Kindergarten.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Community Input Discussions: Measuring the Progress of Young Children in Massachusetts August 2009.
Kenley Branscome Applied Policy Analytics Massachusetts SAC Needs Assessment Board of Early Education and Care September 13, 2011.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care Grant Application May
1 The Early Childhood Family Engagement Framework: Maryland’s Vision for Engaging Families with Young Children Jeffrey Capizzano President Maryland State.
Background Supplement
Core Drivers of Early Childhood Systems Change.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
1 Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment. Common Core Pre-K Standards Mounting evidence supports that a child’s earliest years, from birth to age eight,
State Advisory Council Birth to Age 8 Alignment through the Rural Opportunities Initiative Summary Presentation for the Board of Early Education and Care.
Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Phase-In Planning and FY08 Expansion EEC Board Meeting Tuesday, October 9, 2007.
1 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Scope of FY08 Evaluation Activities December 11, 2007.
1 June 11, 2013 Board Meeting Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
Early Childhood Profiles: Joe Roberts & Elizabeth Whitehouse Governor’s Office of Early Childhood.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
1 Massachusetts’ Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS): Overview and Update.
K-12 And Early Childhood Data Connections NCES Forum February 2011 Presented by: Kathy Gosa Kansas State Department of Education.
EEC Annual Legislative Report January Context Legislative language requires EEC to submit an annual report on Universal Pre- Kindergarten (UPK)
Diapers to Diplomas Preschool Study Group April 10, 2014.
Infrastructure (State Advisory Council for Head Start and EEC Advisory Council Appointments) Board of Early Education and Care April 14, 2009.
SAC Needs Assessment Overview June 3, 2011
Presentation transcript:

SAC Needs Assessment

Background A goal of the Massachusetts State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care (SAC) Identify the needs of young children birth to age eight, assess the quality and availability of early childhood education and development programs and services for children from birth to school entry. 2

Purpose of Needs Assessment To inform the Board of Early Education and Care and EEC of the resources that will best serve families and communities in supporting the holistic development of children and youth families. To build our knowledge and understanding of critical issues facing families. 3

Where are we now? EEC has contracted with Wellesley College Center for Women to develop a statewide needs assessment. The researchers have been meeting with the Planning and Evaluation Committee monthly. The researchers have developed research questions, a logic model, sampling plans and two types of surveys, one for the early education and care workforce and one for families. 4

Research Questions for Families and Educators Family Research Questions What is the demand for resources to support child development for families with children ages 0 to 13? Which children and families have access to the programs that they need including high quality EEC programs, health care and community resources and supports? Are children, birth to age 13, on track to succeed when they enter school and beyond? Educator Research Questions How prepared is the EEC workforce to provide effective education and care for all? How stable is the workforce? What supports are available to educators to become more reflective practitioners? How does the workforce define and understand quality in EEC programs? 5

Surveys The researchers developed a long and short version of the Family and Educator survey. The 2 versions can be used together or independently of one another. For example: Short form can be used with a general sample and long form for the oversample or supplemental sample Long form can be used with general sample and short form for oversample or supplemental sample. Short or long form can be used only with a general sample. Survey questions were compiled from existing national surveys. Additional data sources include EEC Administrative data such as the Educator Registry. 6

Family Survey Questions Family survey questions were compiled from 14 existing surveys. National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand, National Early Head Start Study, Abt National Study of Child Care for Low Income, National Household Education Surveys (NHES), Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (HS FACES), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (NICHD SECCYD), Strengthening Families Minnesota Household Survey FastTrack Project Census Survey of Income and Program Participation Child Well Being, (Census SIPP). National Health Interview Survey MA Early Education Household Survey Boston Public School Needs Assessment Desired Results for Children and Families- Parent Survey (California DOE) 7

Educator Survey Questions Educator survey questions were compiled from 12 existing surveys. National Early Head Start Study, Abt National Study of Child Care for Low Income, National Household Education Surveys (NHES), Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (HS FACES), Boston Ready: K1 teacher survey Strategies for Children National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (NICHD SECCYD), Massachusetts Cost and Quality Study National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NORC NSCCSD), New Teacher Support, Teaching, Empowering, Leading and Learning Survey (TELL Maryland) Teacher Reflective Attitude Survey National Prekindergarten Study Questionnaire (NPSQ) 8

Sampling Recommendations Family Statewide Sample: Random digit dialing and/or online and paper surveys Random sample of families with or without oversampling of low income families. Convenience sample from CFCE outreach. Survey of all families served through CFCEs. Educator Statewide Sample: Online and paper surveys. Random sample of educators All registered educators in the EEC Registry Can include optional oversample of kith and kin providers 9

Determining whats useful for Policy and Planning? To help EEC determine which themes from the Needs Assessment surveys would be most useful for policy and planning, EEC asked various groups (EEC staff, CCR&Rs, CFCE grantees, Board Members and the Advisory Council) to complete a short questionnaire. Respondents were asked to rank the themes by what would be most useful for policy and planning with the middle ranking being neutral. 162 people responded to the questionnaire. 10

EEC Family Questionnaire Results and Board Committee Discussions The following themes were considered most useful for policy and planning. Work flexibility/needs Parent/Guardian Definition of child care quality Strengthening Families/Protective factors Child Health/Health Care Special Needs Early Education and Care use Information/Knowledge of child care resources School attendance/Adjustment Relative Neighborhood Housing Community Resources Home Activities/Family Involvement outside of school Demographics Future Education Family Stresses Quality of care received Child Care Satisfaction 11

Linking the Family Survey Questions to risks in the Developmental Domains Though the Needs Assessment looks at all children and families, the needs assessment also links to child development risk. Of those the questionnaire determined would be most useful, some are linked to the 5 developmental domains. Work flexibility/needs Parent/Guardian Definition of child care quality Strengthening Families/Protective factors (social emotional) Child Health/Health Care Special Needs (cognitive, physical, approaches to learning, language) Early Education and Care use Information/Knowledge of child care resources School attendance/Adjustment (cognitive, social emotional) 12

Linking the Family Survey with Child Development Risk Relative Neighborhood (social emotional) Housing Community Resources (physical, social emotional) Home Activities/Family Involvement outside of school Demographics Future Education (cognitive and social emotional) Family Stresses (cognitive, social emotional) Quality of care received (cognitive, physical, approaches to learning, social emotional) Child Care Satisfaction 13

How can the most useful Family themes be used. 14

EEC Family Questionnaire Results and Board Committee Discussions The following themes were considered not as useful. Themes were considered less useful for a variety of reasoning including gathering the data from existing administrative data sources. Family Health Family Mental Health Parent/Guardian Health Family Involvement/Educational Information Family Resources/Income Supports Subsidy Parenting strategies 15

EEC Workforce Questionnaire Results and Board Committee Discussions The following themes were considered most useful in policy and planning. Workforce training Workforce understanding of quality Workforce and ELL and Special Needs children Workforce in the field Workforce leaving the field Workforce Demographics Workforce needs for supports for children and their families Workforce and child expulsion 16

How can the most useful Workforce themes be used. 17

EEC Workforce Questionnaire Results and Board Committee Discussions The following themes were considered not as useful. Themes were considered less useful for a variety of reasoning including gathering the data from existing administrative data sources. Workforce program benefits Workforce job description position, program, hours and salary Workforce interaction with families and attitudes towards family involvement. Workforce communication with families. 18

Feedback from State Advisory Council Research Questions Questions are broad and may need to be more focused before implementation. Possible areas to focus on include strengthening families protective factors, housing and school attendance. Struggle to get the right information. There is so much information EEC would like to know. Sampling Recommendations Random Digit Dialing is difficult as many families no longer have telephone landlines Face to face interviews would be better, otherwise might not get accurate answers. Incentives- to get quantity of responses but need to be aware of creating bias. 19

Next Steps Needs Assessment model and sampling plan presented to Board on June 14. RFR drafted and posted. Educator survey proposed implementation during FY12 1 st quarter. 20