The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Advertisements

Innovate Now: Overview and Next Steps February 2007.
1 Educator and Provider Support Grant: FY13 Planning Summary Presentation January 2012.
Response to Recommendations by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) The Massachusetts Child Care Resource & Referral.
1 Educator and Provider Support Continuation Grant FY 2013.
1 Educator and Provider Support Procurement Fiscal Year 2011.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding Board Presentation May 8, 2012.
Competency Based Training Through Online Courses
1 Increasing Access to Higher Education for Early Educators with Limited English Proficiency.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Eight Week Intervention Program for Preschool Children Prior to Kindergarten Entry Board of Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
1 FY2014 Educator and Provider Support Competitive Grant Application EEC Board Meeting December 11, 2012.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
1 Educator and Provider Support Grant Policy and Research Committee EEC Board October 6, 2014.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Northeast Region Group Planning Time July 11, : :30 The New Northeast Team.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
AB 86: Adult Education Technical Assistance Webinar to Focus on Objectives 3, 5, 6 & 7
New York State Workforce Investment Board Healthcare Workforce Development Subcommittee Planning Grant Overview.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
A Project Sponsored by the McCormick Foundation Lisa Hood, LINC Project Director Center for the Study of Education Policy Illinois State University Presentation.
Jennifer K. Foster Associate Vice President of Adult Education and Workforce Development Illinois Community College Board 0.
Strategy Planning: Creating your Roadmap to Success Region 3- Atlanta April 26, 2011 ARRA G RANTEES T ECHNICAL A SSISTANCE P ARTNERSHIP : NGA Center for.
North Carolina Back-to-Work Program Overview. North Carolina Back-to-Work Program Page 2 Legislative Requirements Purpose: The NC Back-to-Work program.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
0 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Continued Initiatives Board of Early Education and Care Policy and Research Committee September 2011.
EEC Board Policy Committee May 6, 2013 Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Grant Performance Measures.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Next Steps Forward LINC Curriculum Module Key Resources Technical Assistance Proposal.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
10/6/20151 David G. Loomis, Ph.D. Professor of Economics Illinois State University Lead Entity, Energy Learning Exchange Illinois Energy Learning Exchange.
Clean, Green, and on the Same Team! How Economic and Workforce Development are Partnering to Serve an Emerging Regional Industry.
1. 2 Collaborative Partnerships It’s that evolution thing again! Adult education has been partnering and collaborating for years.
MT. SAC REGIONAL CONSORTIUM FOR ADULT EDUCATION Overview of AB86 Consortium Information.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
1 FY2014 Educator and Provider Support Renewal Grant Application Policy and Research Committee December 3, 2012.
National Governors Association Policy Academy Building a Foundation for Student Success: State Strategies to Improve Learning Outcomes from Early Childhood.
10/22/2015 5:20:08 PM EEC IT Strategic Plan June Board Meeting June 12, 2007 Quinsigamond Community College Harrington Learning Center 670 West Boylston.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
1 Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment. Common Core Pre-K Standards Mounting evidence supports that a child’s earliest years, from birth to age eight,
An Update on: AVATAR Advisory Committee Education Service Center Region 10 October 9, 2012 M. Jean Keller University.
State Advisory Council Birth to Age 8 Alignment through the Rural Opportunities Initiative Summary Presentation for the Board of Early Education and Care.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Alignment of Course Standards and Assessments Overview of CTE Task Group.
Massachusetts Department of Early Education & Care EEC & WIDA: Early English Language Development (E-ELD): Massachusetts Guidelines to support Dual Language.
1 25 STRONG WORKFORCE RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW #strongworkforce DoingWhatMATTERS.cccco.edu.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
Infrastructure (State Advisory Council for Head Start and EEC Advisory Council Appointments) Board of Early Education and Care April 14, 2009.
Current Activities to Support Dual Language Learners and Early Education and Care and Out of School Time Staff October 2010.
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Presentation transcript:

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Overview of the Initiative Core Functions and Programmatic Priorities Leadership and Governance Activities and Initiatives Next Steps Added Value and Impact 2

In this new phase of education reform…we must work with teachers and education leaders to reshape and align our systems of educator recruitment, preparation, certification, licensure, support, and professional development. Our approach must be inclusive, comprehensive, and innovative. - Governor Patricks Education Action Agenda, June

What are the Readiness Centers? The Readiness Centers are multipurpose and collaborative regional centers that are managed and operated by consortia of partners including institutions of higher education, K-12 institutions, early education and out-of-school-time programs, educational collaboratives, non-profit organizations, and also business and community partners. Core Functions: Provide high-quality professional development and instructional services to educators in early education and out-of-school-time programs, K-12 institutions, and higher education institutions Convene stakeholders to collaboratively address key education priorities, leverage resources, build statewide capacity, and increase integration and coherence across the education continuum 4

Which entities are currently operating and managing the Readiness Centers? All nine state colleges Most of the community colleges UMASS Amherst, Boston, Dartmouth, and Lowell Private institutions of higher education in multiple regions Early education and out-of-school-time providers, K-12 institutions and networks, educational collaboratives, non-profit organizations, and also business and community partners 5

How are state agencies supporting this initiative? EEC: supports the development of career pathways for early education and out-of-school-time educators, and professional development activities related to agency priorities ESE: supports the operation of the District and School Assistance Centers (DSACs), located at the Readiness Centers, that provide targeted assistance and focused professional development primarily to Level 3 districts and schools DHE: supports collaboration among stakeholders regarding college readiness, increasing alignment of curricula and assessments, STEM initiatives, and other agency priorities, and also guides the development of professional development and research activities for higher education faculty and staff members 6

What are the programmatic priorities for the Readiness Centers? Core Function #1: Provide high-quality professional development and instructional services to educators across the state related to: Addressing persistent achievement gaps among different groups of students Addressing the learning needs of different student populations Improving the quality of instruction in STEM courses Using different types of data more effectively to better assess student progress/performance and continually improve the quality of instruction Improving the quality of early education and out-of-school-time services in Massachusetts 7

What are the programmatic priorities for the Readiness Centers? Core Function #2: Convene stakeholders to collaboratively address key education priorities, leverage resources, build statewide capacity, and increase integration and coherence across the education continuum Develop and implement a rigorous and aligned curriculum from early education through higher education Develop and retain an effective, academically capable, diverse, and culturally competent educator workforce Improve reading proficiency for children from birth through grade three Improve students readiness for college and career success Increase student engagement and success in STEM fields of study 8

What is the organizational structure that will support and sustain this initiative? Readiness Centers Network (RCN): includes all of the regional partners plus state representatives (from EOE, EEC, ESE, DHE, and the State Colleges Council of Presidents), and promotes and supports effective partnerships across the regions by: o Disseminating information about effective professional development models and instructional practices o Developing strategies that address common needs across all six Readiness Centers Readiness Centers Coordinating Committee (RCCC): includes state representatives and regional representatives, and is the leadership team for the initiative 9

What types of activities are taking place at the Readiness Centers? Governing boards that include representatives from multiple sectors have been established in all six regions, and new partners are being added. Several Readiness Centers have offered professional development and instructional services related to increasing students access to college and educator evaluation strategies, among other priorities. Several Readiness Centers are conducting inventories of existing programs and assessing local needs through surveys and other data collection methods. The Readiness Centers are convening stakeholders to discuss educational priorities such as the Race to the Top application. 10

How are Readiness Centers positioned to support early education and care? Define and manage career pathways to higher education and increased competency for the early education and care workforce Make linkages and smooth transitions for the professional growth of the early education and care workforce Provide intentional training that meets the diverse needs of the early education and care workforce and EECs mixed delivery system Provide specific resources in support of key statewide initiatives like QRIS Align existing professional development provided by EEC, ESE, and DHE and expand access to the early education and care workforce Identify and replicate best practices statewide with a train-the-trainer model 11

How are the Readiness Centers addressing early education and care priorities? Partner with EEC to provide professional development; for FY 2011, EEC intends to fund professional development through regional partnerships o This overlap will connect EECs professional development to the larger educational continuum from birth through higher education Convene meetings among stakeholders so that EEC can receive input on initiatives such as the Statewide Advisory Council (SAC) and school readiness Develop and implement initiatives that require both regional resources and statewide strategies such as increased access to higher education for early educators who are English language learners 12

What are next steps for this initiative? Secure funding for short-term support and long-term sustainability o Race to the Top, phase 2 o Other competitive grant opportunities through ARRA o Grants from local and national funders Provide ongoing technical assistance to the regional partners o Coordinating services and activities o Performing the core functions of the Readiness Centers Add stakeholders to build additional partnerships and ensure representation across different sectors Increase the visibility of the Readiness Centers both within regions and across the state 13

What is the added value of the Readiness Centers? Increasing the effectiveness of educators across the continuum and across Massachusetts Increasing the quality, alignment, and coherence of professional development and instructional services Convening local, regional, and state stakeholders to address critical issues in education from school readiness through college readiness Building new mechanisms for sharing information about best practices and effective models Leveraging existing partnerships, building new relationships, and maximizing the power of collaboration Building local, regional, and statewide capacity to create a truly coherent and seamless education system 14

Primary Contacts Phil Baimas, EEC Saeyun Lee, EOE