Interchange Ideas for Freeways & Arterials ODOT Roadway Conference April 13, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.
Advertisements

March 1, Why an interchange at this location? TH 15 Corridor Study 2007 Nine Signalized intersections Six in Top 50 High Crash Cost Study outcome.
Great Western Corridor Feasibility Study
Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
Signs, Signals, and Pavement Markings
Chapter 12 Freeway Driving.
Drivers Education Journal # Please pick up all the handouts Get out a sheet of loose leaf paper and something to write with Write the.
CHAPTER 11 EXPRESSWAYS.
Highway & Rural Driving
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY ROUNDABOUTS THERE’S NOTHING MAGIC ABOUT THEM.
M3 - 1 The Road to Skilled Driving April 2006 Chapter 2 Signs, Signals and Roadway Markings.
Chapter 5 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
1 Freeways and Interchanges CE453 Lecture 33 Source : A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (The Green Book). Washington, DC. American Association.
“ Pavement markings can enhance safety since centerlines have been shown to cut crash frequency by 29% compared to roads without them ” Wisconsin Transportation.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY What needs quick thinking and concentration? Intersection, junctions, roundabouts & U turns all require your.
Chapter 5 Signs, Signals, and Markings
February 19, 2015 Design Guidelines to Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclists at Interchanges Draft ITE Recommended Practice: Meghan Mitman, AICP Senior.
Chapter 4 NJ Manual Notes Rules & Regulations for Safe Driving.
At-Grade Intersection
Everyday Driving Skills
MODULE 6 Objectives: Students will learn about using risk reducing strategies to manage multiple-lane roads at speeds up to 65 mph in complex risk environments.
TYPES OF INTERSECTIONS OF ROAD AND DESIGN PARAMETERS OF INTERSECTION
Lec 25, Ch.7, pp : Intersection types and design principles (Objectives) Become familiar with the typical intersection types (See figures 7-1 thorugh.
SR A1A / SR 200 Reconstruction Project
Unconventional Arterial Intersection Design University of Maryland Advanced Transportation Day Aug. 28th 2014 Traffic Safety and Operations Lab University.
Module 5 Displaced Left Turn (DLT) Intersections
CHAPTER 3 SIGNS, SIGNALS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
Signals,Road Markings, Intersections, Sharing the Road
PAVEMENT MARKINGS, TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHTS,
Do you know your signs?.
Driving on Expressways
Expressway Driving. Characteristics of Expressway Driving Roadway Speed Interchanges No cross traffic Median Tollbooths Entrance/exit ramps Limited access.
Martha Moore, P.E. Ghyabi & Associates October 10, 2014
HIGHWAY DRIVING Chapter 6.
Chapter 4. Your number one priority as a driver is to drive your vehicle carefully and safely. Your speed and manner of driving must create a safe environment.
INTRODUCTION Grade separation is an effective way of handling intersecting traffic with greatest efficiency, safety, capacity. An interchange is a system.
Interstate 435 and Front Street Interchange Improvements This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use.
Chapter 11 Driving on Expressways
Interchange Design Wes Mayberry Transportation Engineering Intern
Expressway Driving Some of the East / West interstate expressways.
November 5, 2010 ITSO Trans Talk Vern Swing, P.E. & Steve Manhart, P.E., PTOE, PTP November 5, University of Minnesota DIVERGING DIAMOND INTERCHANGE.
Chapter 9 Driving in City Traffic More Complex!! Why? 1.Traffic is more dense – more cars, trucks, buses and pedestrians per mile than on rural roads.
Grade separation.
1 At-Grade Intersection Design. 2 Objectives Define general intersection design objectives Describe factors that influence curb return design For a nice.
Ramp Count Estimation Procedures Daniel Jenkins, PE Office of Highway Policy Information October 24, 2012.
Ch 11 Driving on Expressways Characteristics of Expressway Driving.
Section 3 (Day 6) Basic Maneuvering Tasks: Low ,
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Office of Traffic, Safety, and Operations 1 Signing by Type of Interchange –Figures 2E-25 through 2E-30 show applications of guide signs for common types.
Intersections.
Driving Environments. Rural Driving  The speed limit on rural roads when not posted is 35 mph.  Many rural roads are two-lane, two-way roadways.  Curves.
Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.
DRIVING THE FREEWAYS ALABAMA DRIVER MANUAL CHAPTER 8.
School Zone, Business or Residential Districts 25mph Non- posted rural roadways 50 mph Interstate highways 65 mph.
WHO HAS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY? Definition of right-of-way The right of one roadway user to go first or to cross in front of another; right-of-way must be.
OBJECTIVES  We will understand the characteristics of expressways  We will apply risk-reducing strategies to enter and exit traffic, steer, establish.
At-Grade Intersection Design
1 Intersection Design CE 453 Lecture Intersections More complicated area for drivers Main function is to provide for change of direction Source.
Right-of-Way Unit 1. What is Right of Way? Legally granted access.
ENVIRONMENTS AND TRAFFIC SETTINGS CHAPTER NINE. FACTORS AFFECTING RES. STREET DRIVING EXPECT SURPRISES, DRIVE THE SPEED LIMIT! PEDESTRIANS HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
Lesson Plan For Day Two Power point presentation 30 min Video– AAA- signs, signals, etc. 20 min Quiz- Signs Etc 10 min Correct 10 min H/O- Signs 10 min.
Integrity - Competence - Service Hogan Road/Exit 187 Proposed Improvements Public Informational Meeting June 9, 2016.
ALABAMA DRIVER MANUAL CHAPTER 8
CHAPTER 3 Signs, Signals, and Pavement Markings
Interchanges Ch. 6.
Double Crossover Diamond Interchange
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE Four exit ramp, split level (SPUI)
D R I V E R S E D G E USA Curriculum Use mouse to advance slides.
Contract 60X10 Informational Meeting Weber I-55
Presentation transcript:

Interchange Ideas for Freeways & Arterials ODOT Roadway Conference April 13, 2010

New Interchange Ideas Many arent actually new – ODOT just hasnt used them up until now. Nor have many others. Many arent actually new – ODOT just hasnt used them up until now. Nor have many others. Sometimes for good reasons. Some ideas are appropriate for freeways only, some for arterial roadways only, and some might work in either context. Some ideas are appropriate for freeways only, some for arterial roadways only, and some might work in either context. If the stars are properly aligned. Its always necessary to look at the specifics of your situation… a reasonable idea plopped down in an inappropriate spot will likely not work well. Its always necessary to look at the specifics of your situation… a reasonable idea plopped down in an inappropriate spot will likely not work well. Many of these ideas are basically an attempt to squeeze more out of the ramp intersections. Many of these ideas are basically an attempt to squeeze more out of the ramp intersections. And stretch $$$$$

Caveat Emptor Not every innovation works out. Sometimes we learn from our mistakes. Its wiser to learn from the ones already made than to create a bunch of new ones trying to be clever. Never stop thinking!

Highway Interchanges Single Point (SPI or SPUI) Single Point (SPI or SPUI) Tight Diamond (TDI) Tight Diamond (TDI) Diverging Diamond – DDI (aka Crossing or Double Crossover) Diverging Diamond – DDI (aka Crossing or Double Crossover) Contraflow Left Contraflow Left Roundabout Ramp Intersections Roundabout Ramp Intersections 3-Level Stacked Diamond – Freeway Only 3-Level Stacked Diamond – Freeway Only Split Interchanges Split Interchanges

Arterial Interchange Ideas Single Loops & Jug Handles Single Loops & Jug Handles Grade Separated Roundabouts Grade Separated Roundabouts Partially Grade Separated Intersections Partially Grade Separated Intersections Echelon Interchange Echelon Interchange Frontage Systems – Usually include U-Turn Provisions (Such as Texas Turnarounds) Frontage Systems – Usually include U-Turn Provisions (Such as Texas Turnarounds)

Interchange Type Freeway Only Arterial Only Could Work for Either Used in OR? Single Point X Yes - 2 Tight Diamond X Yes - 1 Diverging Diamond X Coming Soon - 1 Contraflow Left XNo Roundabout Ramp Intersections X Not Yet by ODOT Stacked Diamond XNo Jug Handle XYes Grade Separated Roundabout X*No Grade Separated Intersection XNo EchelonXNo Frontage Systems X*Limited Split Interchanges X Coming (Maybe)

Single Point Market St. in Salem

SPI Intersection

Tight Diamond

Sylvan Interchange Tight Diamond Configuration US Scholls Ferry/Skyline in Portland

Diverging Diamond

Contraflow Left

Roundabout Ramp Intersections I-70 in Avon, CO

3-Level Stacked Diamond Lubbock, TX US 82/US 289

Split Interchanges

Single Loop/Jug Handles Greeley Going St. NE Portland

Single Loop/Jug Handle Examples Greeley Going St. (Portland)- Greeley Going St. (Portland)- East End of Ross Isl. Br. (Portland)- < East End of Ross Isl. Br. (Portland)- < OR OR 204 (near Weston) OR OR 204 (near Weston) US Colorado Ave. (Bend) US Colorado Ave. (Bend) OR Biddle Rd. (Medford) OR Biddle Rd. (Medford) OR N. Front St. (Woodburn) OR N. Front St. (Woodburn)

Grade Separated Roundabouts Uncommon in US – Ubiquitous in UK

Intersection Grade Separation

Echelon Interchange Only known example – US Biscayne Blvd. in Aventura, Florida – near Miami

Frontage Road Systems Fairly common in Texas & some major Midwest cities – mostly on freeways – both rural and urban Fairly common in Texas & some major Midwest cities – mostly on freeways – both rural and urban ODOT stuff tends to be connections or extensions of cut-off roadways, not directly integrated to the mainline, except for a few spots in Portland ODOT stuff tends to be connections or extensions of cut-off roadways, not directly integrated to the mainline, except for a few spots in Portland AASHTO Chapters 7 & 8 (Arterials & Freeways) have some discussions on frontage systems AASHTO Chapters 7 & 8 (Arterials & Freeways) have some discussions on frontage systems

Frontage Examples I-35 in San Marcos, TX

Frontage Examples Detroit, MI Freeways – Incl. a wide variety of U-turn provisions Detroit, MI Freeways – Incl. a wide variety of U-turn provisions Many Texas Rural Freeways Many Texas Rural Freeways Texas Turnarounds another U-turn variation. Texas Turnarounds another U-turn variation.

And Now Heres Something We Hope Youll Really Like… The Diverging Diamond Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat.

Fern Valley Interchange – I-5 Exit 24 Image Stolen From Bob Branchs Design – March 2010

SR 13 – Springfield, MO Photos Courtesy of Don Saiko, MoDOT First Completed DDI in the US – Opened to Traffic in Late June 2009 (Before Construction was completed in July)

Main – American Fork, UT Photos from UDOT Project Website Rendering of Final ProductFebruary 2010 Const. Photo Currently Under Construction – North of Ogden

Diverging Diamond – The Tradeoffs Advantages include: Very effective in moving heavy LT demands - esp. compared to other diamond types – Two phase signals at intersections – Less vehicle queuing. Very effective in moving heavy LT demands - esp. compared to other diamond types – Two phase signals at intersections – Less vehicle queuing. Usually has a narrower X-Section on X-Road – extra LT lanes, etc. not needed – but the median area may be fairly wide anyway (for other reasons). Usually has a narrower X-Section on X-Road – extra LT lanes, etc. not needed – but the median area may be fairly wide anyway (for other reasons). Probably will work for either Freeways or Arterials – assuming that downstream intersections dont back up to the ramps. Probably will work for either Freeways or Arterials – assuming that downstream intersections dont back up to the ramps.Disadvantages No up and over movement is possible at the ramp intersections – U-turns necessary on X-Road. No up and over movement is possible at the ramp intersections – U-turns necessary on X-Road. When LT and Opposing thru movements are both very heavy, TPAU analysis has shown some operational issues that crop up. When LT and Opposing thru movements are both very heavy, TPAU analysis has shown some operational issues that crop up. Extensive channelization, signing, markings are required for the ramp intersections – the intersection geometry can be tricky, esp. when the underlying roadway is in a horizontal curve. Extensive channelization, signing, markings are required for the ramp intersections – the intersection geometry can be tricky, esp. when the underlying roadway is in a horizontal curve. Access Management is just as necessary as with any other idea Access Management is just as necessary as with any other idea - Dont overlook it!

Q & aQ & aQ & aQ & a Were ready for grilling.