© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Edward Walker IMS Global Learning Consortium www.imsglobal.org IMS: Status Report February.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
18 March 2004 Colin Milligan funded by. © RELOAD 2003, funded by Workshop Structure Session I Introduction: Interoperability and Reload Session II Content.
Advertisements

1 The Networked Learning Environment. 2 Blackboards Product Strategy Leading institutions are harnessing the power of information networks to connect.
DRIVER Building a worldwide scientific data repository infrastructure in support of scholarly communication 1 JISC/CNI Conference, Belfast, July.
The e-Framework Bill Olivier Director Development, Systems and Technology JISC.
Copyright © 2001 Bolton Institute Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards CETIS an introduction and overview Lisa Corley CETIS Pedagogy.
Enabling Access to Sound Archives through Integration, Enrichment and Retrieval WP1. Project Management.
© 2001 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 Interoperability: future- proofing CAA Niall Sclater CETIS Manager,
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Report to Plugfest 9 Prepared by Robby Robson Chair, LTSC February 23, 2005 LTSC This work.
Trends & Issues: Breakout Session Robby Robson Standards Evangelist.
Distributed Learning and New Learning Communities ARL Conference, Eugene 1998.
Thomas D. Wason IMS Project Feb IMS Meta-Data Thomas D. Wason, Ph.D. IMS Project & GEM
IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.
© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Edward Walker IMS Global Learning Consortium Copyright Edward Walker,
E-Learning: No Standards; No Coalitions - No Boom Ed Walker 7 December 2000.
A sustainable approach to developing e- learning technologies Howard Noble University of Oxford, Learning Technologies Group 16 th June 2004.
Thee-Framework for Education & Research The e-Framework for Education & Research an Overview TEN Competence, Jan 2007 Bill Olivier,
OKI Focus Groups at Educause, October 2002 Page 1 Open Knowledge Initiative Educause Focus Group Geoff Collier and Robby Robson, Eduworks Educause 2002,
May 18, 2004SCORM/NSDL Technical Meeting SCORM/NSDL Technical Meeting Alexandria, Virginia May 18, 2004 Reusability & Persistence: Talking Points -Robby.
Organizational Update: The Next IMS/GLC Ed Walker NLII 2005.
IMS Learning Design A new standard for eLearning Professor Rob Koper, July 2003 Director of RTD into Learning Technologies Open University of the Netherlands.
Modeling Units of Assessment for Sharing Assessment Process Information: towards an Assessment Process Specification Yongwu Miao, Peter Sloep, and Rob.
Open Knowledge Initiative ITAG Luncheon 1/8/03 Scott Thorne.
© 2001 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 An eejit’s guide to IMS Question and Test Interoperability Niall.
ELearning Frameworks: What, Why and Who, Where & When Daniel Rehak, Learning Systems Architecture Lab, USA Kerry Blinco, Dept. Education Science and Training,
Why E-Learning Standards?
Update: © Copyright 2002, Carnegie Mellon University All Right Reserved 1/59 ADL/SCORM - What Does it Mean for Developers of ICT Projects? Daniel.
IT Standards for Learning
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Page 1 Open Knowledge Initiative CSG - Princeton, 05/07/03.
Accelerating e-Learning Interoperability Introducing the CLEO Lab Tyde Richards IBM Mindspan Solutions Daniel R. Rehak Carnegie Mellon University.
LCMS: What is thriving the Dutch, hype or need? Jocelyn Manderveld Educational Technology Expertise Centre Open University of the Netherlands.
EPortfolio – an update Stephen Parsons Curriculum Consultant School of Applied Arts & New Media NSCC February 2006 Student Success | Accessibility | Service.
IMS Europe Kevin Riley IMS, European Development
SAKAI Project (Synchronized Architecting of Knowledge Acquisition Infrastructure) Sakai is intended to deliver open source CMS and research collaboration.
E-Learning and the Digital Library A Report on Collaboration between IMS and OKI 2002 CNI Fall Task Force Meeting Steve Griffin, COO & co-founder IMS Jeff.
IMS Learning Object Discovery & Exchange David Massart, IMS LODE co-chair EdReNe Expert Workshop 4.1 January 8, London, UK David Massart, IMS LODE.
BRINC Personalized Learning Project DLC/TechMACC Combined Meeting March 14, 2014.
IMS Overview and ePortfolio Specification 3 Nov 2004 Steve Griffin Executive Dir. Int’l Developer and Adopter Support, Co-Founder IMS Global Learning Consortium.
Becta CETIS FE Tools Seminar Steve Jeyes CETIS /Edexcel / Newark and Sherwood College Becta 15 th January 2004 eLearning Frameworks.
THE ADVANCED DISTRIBUTED LEARNING (ADL) INITIATIVE
Learning Technology Standards Status & Direction
1 IMS: From Vision to Reality NLII - New Orleans Frank Tansey IMS Global Learning Consortium
The IMS Project Technology for supporting learning Sandy Britain, UK IMS Centre.
IMS overview CAUSE 98 Mark Resmer Executive Director Steve Griffin Director of Technical Development.
Ask A Librarian and QuestionPoint: Integrating Collaborative Digital Reference in the Real World (and in a really big library) Linda J. White Digital Project.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Niall Sclater, and Lorna M. Campbell,
Learning technology standards and their implication for higher education Eric Kluijfhout Open University of the Netherlands Educational Technology Expertise.
© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. International eLearning Standards Adoption Steve Griffin Executive Dir. Int’l eLearning.
The Educom NLII Instructional Management Systems Project Thomas D. Wason, Ph.D. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Top Issues Facing Information Technology at UAB Sheila M. Sanders UAB Vice President Information Technology February 8, 2007.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards AICC MEETING – FEB 2004.
May 10, 2002 Les Smith, SCT Standards in Distance Education S.
Internet2 Middleware Initiative. Discussion Outline  What is Middleware why is it important why is it hard  What are the major components of middleware.
An Overview of Learning Technology Specifications and Standards Bill Olivier Director, CETIS.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Content and Learning Management Robby Robson Standards Evangelist.
EDUCAUSE LIVE EDUCAUSE/Internet2 Computer and Network Security Task Force Update Jack Suess January 21, 2004.
LTSC Report 6 – February LTSC Status No significant change Next meeting (plenary): March co-located with ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36 and CEN/ISSS TC-Learning.
SCORM Status. 2 Stabilization, Clarification and Issue Resolution Bug Fixes, Corrections & Clarifications SCORM 2004 January 2004 SCORM nd Edition.
Lois Brooks Stanford University 25 January 2005 A Higher Education Initiative.
Overview Collected learning resources Competencies Registry/ Authority Course Delivery system Student Pedagogy Tests/ assessment Activities Communication.
© Copyright 2006 IMS/GLC All Rights Reserved. Page 1 Accelerating Innovation in the Learning Enterprise Course Management AssessmentDigital Content Search.
IMS Developer Briefing ECC Singapore ADL BlackBoard FD Learning DEST.
SCORM-kooskõlaliste õpihaldussüsteemide arendamisest Andres Mellik Tallinna Ülikool Veebruar 2006.
Copyright © 2001 Bolton Institute Copyright © 2001 Bolton Institute Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards CETIS Pedagogy Forum update.
Introduction to Learning Technology Interoperability Standards & CETIS Lorna M. Campbell CETIS Assistant Director Glenrothes College, August 2003.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Lorna M. Campbell and Boon Low CETIS and the University of Strathclyde LMC, SURF Presentation, April 2002.
Third meeting of the Valkenburg Group  Informal network of EML implementers and developers.  Established following the “Developing an EML Authoring and.
IMS Update Content Packaging; InterActive Content SIG
Web Services Interoperability Organization
LETSI The Vision and the Plan
Presentation transcript:

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Edward Walker IMS Global Learning Consortium IMS: Status Report February 2003

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Outline A bit of context Released specifications Plans Discussion starters

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. e-Learning Has Many Faces Labs Test-beds Domain Consortia Teaching and Learning Learning Providers Technology Vendors Researchers Content Providers Policy Makers Teachers and Learners

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Specifications Connect Ends with Means Ends What to do How to do it What happened Means Products Services Policies Experts, Providers Communities of Use

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Specifications Capture Shared Practice Specifications Emerge 0 UniqueShared Pioneers Everyone Practice Infrastructure

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Nobody Gets Everything; But Everyone Does Get Something Labs Test-beds Domain Consortia Teaching and Learning Learning Providers Technology Vendors Researchers Content Providers Policy Makers Teachers and Learners

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Specs are an Outcome, not an Input Requirements and Technology Test and Use Define Refine

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Return on Investment Longer lifetimes for investments of time or money Reduced maintenance cost for content libraries, course portfolios, and learning delivery systems Better cost/benefit metrics for learning outcomes Improved teaching and learning Consolidated basis for further development and future invention Probably not cheaper content and software

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Goals of Interoperability Specs Data Synchronization Enterprise Integration Tool/UI Integration Application Portability Resource Sharing

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Specifications, Best Practice New Products, Pilot Programs, Testbeds R&D Concepts User Needs Technical Trends Spec Consortia Programs Testbeds, Markets Standards Bodies Standard Products and Services SIF oclc COLIS UKeU Ufi ALIC There are Lots of Moving Parts eCC LTSC SC36 AeN UN

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Parts are Moving Together Division of labor Adoption Pressure for coordination

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Released Specifications Data Exchange Meta-data v 1.2 Content Packaging v 1.2 Assessment v 1.2 Learner Information v 1.2 Enterprise Exchange v 1.2 Interaction Sequencing v 1.0 Learning Design v 1.0 Repositories v 1.0 Competencies v 1.0 Accessibility

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Checkpoint on Progress MD, CP, ENT LIP, QTI, SS, DRI, LD, RDC SCORM OKI SIF-ZIS R&D Concepts User Needs Technical Trends LOM CMI

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. What Next? Spec Development evolution new work Adoption maintenance conformance user networks

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Evolution Abstract Framework Next versions “Area” SIGs

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. New Work Active Content Repository/LMS interaction Accessibility/Mobile learning

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Adoption: Maintenance SIGs Spec. Developers IMS Staff Significant change Requirements Committee SIGs Consultation Minor Update Review fails Submission Form (Public Web Site) Maintenance or Errata issues identified by Developer/User Community Technical Advisory Board Editor Technical Advisory Board Review Develop and Approve Revision

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Adoption: Compliance Testing International Conformance Program Product Under Test Testing Organization Test Results Certified Product Certifying Organization Certifying Organization Certifying Organization Certifying Authority Test Suite and Program Compliance Mark

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Adoption: User Networks Application profiles, use scenarios, content resources Test-beds, tools, case data, tests Implementer/User/Buyer SIGs –Communication –Documentation –“member services”

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. An Emergent Coalition

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. World-Wide Participation ADL Co-Lab Apple Artesia Technologies Avaltus BECTA Blackboard Boeing Campus Pipeline CIC Cisco Systems Click 2 Learn Calif. State Universities Cambridge University Can Studios CMU DEST Digital Learning Interactive Digitalthink Docent Oracle PeopleSoft R5 Vision Saba Software SCT SUFI Sun Texas Instruments THINQ Thomson Learning UFI UC – Berkeley UK eUniversity University of Michigan University of Wisconsin US Department of Labor Virginia Tech WebCT Educational Testing Service EDUCAUSE Eduprise FD Learning Fretwell-Downing Group GIUNTI Interactive Labs IBM Corporation Industry Canada JISC Lrng & Tchng Scotland LON LUVIT Miami-Dade Community College Microsoft MIT Open University OU Netherlands

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Coalition Activities Requirements gathering Specifications and Profiles - design, development, and integration Services – Technical conferences, Workshops, Plugfests, Websites Conformance – Interoperability Testing, Compliance Program

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Consolidation and Customization Higher Ed Tech TrainingK-12/Schools Life Long Learning Prof. TrainingPerf. Support Technology: spec development, frameworks, use cases Community of use: testbeds, plugfests, workshops, SIGs Community at large: conferences, libraries, UGs, certif.

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Unifying Assumptions Interoperable components standard services,structures, behaviors Layered framework separated system services, educational services, and learning applications Decomposable content and experiences re-usable aggregations and activities Independence from implementations multiple realizations, multiple use domains

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Take-aways for Discussion The base of e-learning technology and experience already is established Adoptability and user impact will dominate technology and program elegance Specs (and standards) will continue to evolve Too much localization undermines utility

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Final thoughts This has happened before –ARPAnet -> NSFnet -> Internet –FTP-> Gopher-> WAIS -> Web The less unique the technology, the better

© 2003 IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Questions?