Stewardship Oversight Committee Project Delivery Design & Construction Performance Measures May 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

LEUCEMIA MIELOIDE AGUDA TIPO 0
1. 2 Partners in Procurement Steve Hagar Deputy Director Central Purchasing Division Department of Central Services August 24th, 2009.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OLA Library Building Award Architectural Design and Transformation Ottawa Public Library Sunnyside Branch submitted May 2012 BiblioOttawaLibrary.ca.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
NSAA/NASC Joint Middle Management Conference Kansas Taxpayer Transparency Act April 20, 2009.
Combining Like Terms. Only combine terms that are exactly the same!! Whats the same mean? –If numbers have a variable, then you can combine only ones.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
Critical Approval Commissioner/ State Board of Education Commissioner/ State Board of Education Concept Conference s Concept Review Review and Approval.
1 Solicitations/Advertisements Solicitations/Advertisements
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
Addition Facts
1 MAXIMIZING PUBLIC INVESTMENT Ohio Department of Transportation Highway Funding Overview Julie Ray, Deputy Director Division of Finance & Forecasting.
1 23 CFR Supervising agency (c) When a project is located on a street or highway over which the STD does not have legal jurisdiction, or when special.
Disputes/Claims 2009 Overview Division of Construction Management.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, fractions, decimals, proportion & probability.
ZMQS ZMQS
Construction Engineering 221
Claims Timeliness Requirements Effective January 1, 2013.
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
1 Item 11, Presentation to the TPB, September 15, 2010.
Spring 2008, King Saud University Cash Flow Analysis Dr. Khalid Al-Gahtani 1 Payment schedule Materials Mobilization Monthly payments Final Payment Contract.
ABC Technology Project
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
© S Haughton more than 3?
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Opioid-Related Deaths and Mortality Rates by County, Wisconsin Residents Office of Health Informatics and AIDS/HIV and Hepatitis C Program Bureau.
Linking Verb? Action Verb or. Question 1 Define the term: action verb.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Energy & Green Urbanism Markku Lappalainen Aalto University.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Figure Essential Cell Biology (© Garland Science 2010)
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
Emissions to date as a % of 09/10 emissions (minus 10%) Percentage of 09/10 emissions (minus 10%) not yet used Pan Government emissions PAN GOVERNMENT.
Joe Nestler, P.E. Bureau of State Highway Programs Division of Transportation Investment Management WTBA / WisDOT Contractor Engineer Conference January.
City of Eugene Certification Project Case Study. Why Did Eugene Get Certified? Can’t do fund exchange ODOT's Local Agency Program More project control.
 Coordinating construction related training  Following and gathering info for construction related performance measures  Follow Contract Modifications.
2 nd Quarter SFY 14 1 PDLT Measures & Information October - December 2013.
OTC Pres Project Del P5 12/08 Page 1 Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Jeff Gower, State Construction.
Pre-Construction Services
Presentation transcript:

Stewardship Oversight Committee Project Delivery Design & Construction Performance Measures May 2012

3 rd QTR SFY 12 2 % of Projects On Time for PS&E Acceptance (Statewide) Metric Definition: Project no greater than 90 days over the target PS&E Acceptance date. Target PS&E acceptance date is currently defined as the target bid let date minus 45 days.

3 rd QTR SFY 12 3 % of Projects On Time for NTP (Statewide) Metric Definition: Percentage of projects which reached NTP before their target bid-let date days. (Actual NTP < (target bid let date + 90 window + 57 days for NTP) = on time)

3 rd QTR SFY 12 4 % Preliminary Engineering (PE) (Statewide) Metric Definition: Percentage of Preliminary Engineering = Design Cost divided by Total Project Cost

3 rd QTR SFY 12 5 % of Projects Awarded Within Engineering Estimate (Statewide) Metric Definition: % of Projects awarded at no greater than or less than 10% of the Engineering Estimate.

3 rd QTR SFY 12 6 Project Delivery Performance Measures -- Bid

3 rd QTR SFY 12 7 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT VOLUME 1.How much has ODOT's construction program paid contractors per calendar year?

3 rd QTR SFY 12 8 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT VOLUME 2.What is the value of ODOT's construction program awarded to Contractors to build construction projects per calendar year?

3 rd QTR SFY 12 9 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT VOLUME 3.What is the number of construction program projects with on site work (2nd Note) completed during the calendar year?

3 rd QTR SFY TIMELINESS 4.What percent of ODOT construction program projects completed on-site work before the original contract completion date, and before 90 days after the original contract completion date ?

3 rd QTR SFY QUALITY 5.For construction projects involving pavement that were completed during the calendar year, what was the final average pavement smoothness index? (Smaller is better)

3 rd QTR SFY ENVIRONMENTAL 7.How many letters of non-compliance did ODOT receive from regulatory agencies on ODOT construction contracts? (Source: Statewide Permits Program Coordinator)

3 rd QTR SFY CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 10.At what level are the Construction claims being settled based on the number of claims?

3 rd QTR SFY CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 11.For projects with final payment during the calendar year, what is the percentage of total project expenditures vs. original construction authorization?

3 rd QTR SFY CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 12a.For projects with final payment during the calendar year, what percent of total project costs were [CE / (TOTAL - CE)] construction engineering expenses on all projects?

3 rd QTR SFY CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 13.For projects with final payment during the calendar year, what was the average number of days per project between on site work complete and final payment for normal Contracts? Year Final# PM# LPM# PM w/CExcluded Excludes projects with plant establishments, unusual labor compliance disputes and projects with non typical disputes preventing final payment.

3 rd QTR SFY Contract Administration 13. Average No of CCOs/EWOs Processed per Project for Projects Finalized (Third Note)

3 rd QTR SFY Contract Administration 13. Average No Materials Exceptions Processed per Project for Projects Finalized (Third Note) NO DATA GATHERED PRIOR TO 2012

3 rd QTR SFY 12 19

3 rd QTR SFY Percent NHS Mileage with IRI < 95 in/mi Data based on FHWA Highway Statistics Series Table HM-47 as collected and reported under the HPMS program data from Oregon HPMS submittal.