Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control 7Cs ComponentsEngagement Targets.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
The Dynamic Trio of Effective Teaching Measures: Classroom observations, student surveys and achievement gains Thomas Kane Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Monica Osborne, presenter KDE Effectiveness Coach 1.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Customizing Professional Development Wall School District 51-5.
The TxBESS Framework Dr. Jan Seiter Ms. Donna Dagar.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Model Refinements School Year.
Tripod Student Surveys
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
The Framework for Teaching: Overview of the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
THE TRIPOD PROJECT STUDENT SURVEYS. What is the Tripod Project? Student voice survey Measures student perceptions and perspectives Captures key dimensions.
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
Growing the Grown-Ups: Models for Improving Teacher Effectiveness and Sustainability.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
What Students Can Tell Us about the Quality of Teaching: Evidence from MET and Implications for Teacher Preparation Ronald F. Ferguson, PhD Harvard University.
1 ©2012 Josephson Institute. Components of a Six Pillar Classroom OrderlySafe EngagingEncouraging Challenging.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
Should Students Have A Voice?
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
1 Control Students in this class treat the teacher with respect. My classmates behave the way the teacher wants them to. Our class stays busy and doesn’t.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
A framework for teaching (Danielson, 1996) Domain 2: The classroom environment – 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport – 2b: Establishing.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
Boot Camp 2014 The 4 Cs in the Common Core. Marta Stirling School Library Coordinator, East River Joan Upell School Library Coordinator, West River.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Lori Cameron from the WI RtI Center/ PBIS Network TALK.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Wall Customized Professional Development TIE Conference 2015.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Effective Instructional Practices for Middle School.
Using Student Surveys: Implications for Leadership and School Improvement Initiatives January 31, #aypfevents.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Comprehensive Planning
Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control 7Cs ComponentsEngagement Targets

Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control 7Cs ComponentsEngagement Targets

Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control 7Cs ComponentsEngagement Targets

Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control 7Cs ComponentsEngagement Targets

5 Student engagement in this district’s secondary schools by deciles of the composite national 7Cs classroom distribution. Standard deviation units are defined on the national student level distribution for the listed engagement indices. Engagement and the Quality of Teaching

Alignment with other frameworks? E.g., Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching

Alignment with Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Creating an environment of respect and rapport. Managing student behavior. Managing classroom procedures. Establishing a culture for learning. Using questioning and discussion techniques. Communicating with students. Engaging students in learning. Using assessment in instruction

Alignment with Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Creating an environment of respect and rapport. Managing student behavior. Managing classroom procedures. Establishing a culture for learning. Using questioning and discussion techniques. Communicating with students. Engaging students in learning. Using assessment in instruction

Alignment with Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Creating an environment of respect and rapport. Managing student behavior. Managing classroom procedures. Establishing a culture for learning. Using questioning and discussion techniques. Communicating with students. Engaging students in learning. Using assessment in instruction

Alignment with Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Creating an environment of respect and rapport. Managing student behavior. Managing classroom procedures. Establishing a culture for learning. Using questioning and discussion techniques. Communicating with students. Engaging students in learning. Using assessment in instruction

Alignment with Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Creating an environment of respect and rapport. Managing student behavior. Managing classroom procedures. Establishing a culture for learning. Using questioning and discussion techniques. Communicating with students. Engaging students in learning. Using assessment in instruction

Alignment with Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Creating an environment of respect and rapport. Managing student behavior. Managing classroom procedures. Establishing a culture for learning. Using questioning and discussion techniques. Communicating with students. Engaging students in learning. Using assessment in instruction

Alignment with Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control Creating an environment of respect and rapport. Managing student behavior. Managing classroom procedures. Establishing a culture for learning. Using questioning and discussion techniques. Communicating with students. Engaging students in learning. Using assessment in instruction

*Presenter’s calculations. From Ferguson with Danielson, forthcoming early in 2014, in an edited volume that builds on the MET project. Between-Classroom Consistency Same-teacher between- classroom correlations are:*  0.38 for value added  0.61 for the Tripod 7Cs composite

Multiple levels of drill down for school and district officials looking to identify needs and set priorities for resource allocation.