State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) ACMP Conference Juneau, AK 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Historic Preservation Tax Credits The Process and Avoiding Common Problems National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services.
Advertisements

Historic Preservation Tax Credits The Process and Avoiding Common Problems Charles E. Fisher New York City, June 2009 National Park Service, Technical.
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and Section 106
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: STEP THREE TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office & 106 Reviews
Office of History and Archaeology ACMP Enhancement Grants Program Update Robyn J. Miller - Archaeologist.
ODOT’s Section 106 Training
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Local Government Environmental Training: Archaeology April 2, 2009.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Archaeological Resources Protection Act Steve Perry Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement Region 7
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Historic Preservation in Indianapolis: Government Programs Presentation to Chapters of The Daughters of the American Revolution November 14, 2009 Indianapolis.
Dealing With Section 106: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Review Todd Levine Architectural historian, environmental reviewer, Connecticut Freedom Trail coordinator, Washington- Rochambeau Revolutionary.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. David B. Kessler, AICP Regional Environmental Protection Specialist Federal Aviation Administration – Western-Pacific Region
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Monroe Executed Programmatic Agreement The Army’s Responsibilities Include: Identify Significant Viewsheds (initiated)-18 Months =Oct 2010 Cultural Landscape.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ____________________ Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP Program Projects.
Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director.
Environmental Planning CULTURAL RESOURCES CH 5 - HO # 13
Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division Working Through The S106 Process FY 2015 CDBG Applicant Workshop December 4 th, 2014Meg.
Procedures and Processes Phase II: Evaluation CRM Phases I-III This presentation uses materials taken from Ricardo Elia’s Cultural Resources Archaeology.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Archaeologist Mike Kandasawmi May 8,2000 Period 1.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
3D Technology and the Section 106 Process Matt Diederich Archaeologist Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Oregon Heritage Programs Division.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP.
State Historic Preservation Office Tami Koontz
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Deepwater Horizon (MC 252) Oil Spill: Section 106 Compliance
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Role of FEMA EHP During Response Activities
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
National Historic Preservation Act
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Programmatic Approaches to Section 106 Compliance
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Port of Portland properties and facilities
Presentation transcript:

State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) ACMP Conference Juneau, AK 2007

We Are Unique We are the only State agency within the ACMP process that does not give permits We are the only State agency within the ACMP process that does not give permitsException Archaeological Surveys on State Land Archaeological Surveys on State Land

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act 36 CFR 800 When does Sec. 106 kick in? When there is an undertaking When there is an undertaking Federal Funding Federal Funding Federal Permitting Federal Permittingwww.achp.gov/regs-rev.04.pdf

Section 106 It is up to the lead Federal Agency to take into account potential adverse effects to cultural resources as a result of an undertaking It is up to the lead Federal Agency to take into account potential adverse effects to cultural resources as a result of an undertaking

What does Section 106 say? All proposed projects that are defined as an undertaking under Sec. 106 must be designed to: All proposed projects that are defined as an undertaking under Sec. 106 must be designed to: Avoid Minimize Mitigate

And so how does SHPO figure into the ACMP equation? It is up to the lead Federal Agency to consult with It is up to the lead Federal Agency to consult with SHPO SHPO The Public The Public Tribal Entities Tribal Entities Other Interested Parties Other Interested Parties

However, ACMP reviews are a little different Often SHPO receives the ACMP reviews prior to the lead federal agency reviews Often SHPO receives the ACMP reviews prior to the lead federal agency reviews

What kinds of comments will OPMP receive from SHPO? We have no cultural resources concerns We have no cultural resources concerns OPMP wont hear a thing from our office OPMP wont hear a thing from our office The proposed project is in an area of medium to high archaeological potential The proposed project is in an area of medium to high archaeological potential There are known/reported archaeological sites within the proposed project area There are known/reported archaeological sites within the proposed project area

What happens when SHPO recommends an archaeological survey? The applicant must hire an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of Interior Standards The applicant must hire an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of Interior Standards Must have a Masters Degree Must have a Masters Degree Archaeology Archaeology Anthropology Anthropology History History Background Research Background Research Pedestrian Survey Pedestrian Survey Archaeological Report Archaeological Report Avoid Minimize Mitigate

This takes time! But remember… The ACMP process is really set up for permitting

So…we are trying something new The State Historic Preservation Office finds the project inconsistent with the ACMP unless the following alternative measure is adopted… The State Historic Preservation Office finds the project inconsistent with the ACMP unless the following alternative measure is adopted… The applicant must complete the Section 106 process between the State Historic Preservation Office and the U.S. Army COE The applicant must complete the Section 106 process between the State Historic Preservation Office and the U.S. Army COE

Information that would help SHPO review ACMP projects When a project involves the rehabilitation, repair or demolition of a building or structure (including docks, bridges, ect.). This includes buildings and/or structures that will be removed or demoed as a result of a project. When a project involves the rehabilitation, repair or demolition of a building or structure (including docks, bridges, ect.). This includes buildings and/or structures that will be removed or demoed as a result of a project. The original construction date The original construction date If the building is nearing fifty years of age If the building is nearing fifty years of age Our Architectural Historian steps in Our Architectural Historian steps in Doug Gasek Doug Gasek

Juneau McDonalds

Ground disturbing activities Ground disturbing activities Has the project area been previously disturbed? How? Has the project area been previously disturbed? How? Has there been an archaeological survey specifically conducted for this project? Has there been an archaeological survey specifically conducted for this project? If so, list the name of the report, the author, and the year If so, list the name of the report, the author, and the year

Important! Our office can never stop a project! Our office can never stop a project! However, a project can be temporarily suspended as a result of the lead federal agencys (or applicants) failure to take cultural resources into account in the early stages of project planning However, a project can be temporarily suspended as a result of the lead federal agencys (or applicants) failure to take cultural resources into account in the early stages of project planning

Contact Information Margie Goatley