Technical Classes Online: A Different Breed of Learning? Paula San Millan Maurino, Ph.D. Francine Federman, Ph.D. Lorraine Greenwald, Ph.D. Farmingdale.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Advertisements

Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
General Studies Areas Core Areas –Literacy & Critical Inquiry (L) –Mathematical Studies (MA/CS) –Humanities & Fine Arts (HU) –Social & Behavioral Sciences.
Bridging the Sophomore Gap: A Developmental Model of Information Literacy Shawn Bethke, Head of Library Public Services George Loveland, Library Director.
Learning Community II Survey Spring 2007 Analysis by Intisar Hibschweiler (Core Director) and Mimi Steadman (Director of Institutional Assessment)
Specialized Understanding of Mathematics: A Study of Prospective Elementary Teachers Meg Moss.
Preparing Elementary Teacher Candidates for the edTPA Prior to Student Teaching: Documenting Experiences in a Math Methods Course Dr. Erica Kwiatkowski-Egizio.
Mathematics for Middle School Teachers: A Program of Activity- Based Courses Portland State University Nicole Rigelman Eva Thanheiser.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. The difference between a course, curriculum, and syllabus. 2.
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
Everglades College Student Orientation by: EC Department of Professional Development.
Student Centered Learning
Dangers of Implementation of Year 7 into the Secondary School The SevenUP Journey Mrs C Mills, Director of Teaching and Learning and Mrs Monique White,
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
RATING THE PROFESSOR TA & PFF Workshop– Spring 2011 Artze-Vega.
Improved Performance and Critical Thinking in Economics Students Using Current Event Journaling Sahar Bahmani, Ph.D. WI Teaching Fellow INTRODUCTION.
Teaching and Learning Presented by Susan S. Silver Director of Curriculum and Instruction.
DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY The Faculty Role in Student Retention
Integrated Approaches to Teaching in the Residence Halls Presented by: Bridget Burrell, University Housing Services Kim Hilsenroth, University Housing.
Curriculum Design. A Learner Centered Approach May, 2007 By. Rhys Andrews.
Math 20: Basic Mathematics and Math 5: Math Learning Strategies Prepared by Ilva Mariani, Math LC Coordinator.
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
Online Information Competence Tutorials: Influencing Change in Traditional Library Classrooms Pamela Jackson and Charity Hope San José State University.
Investigating K-12/University Partnerships: A Case Study Analysis Zulma Y. Méndez, Ph.D. Rodolfo Rincones, Ph.D. College of Education Department of Educational.
Different approaches and experiences at the University of Parma (Italy) Embedding information literacy into subject learning Fabrizia Bevilacqua Monica.
Data analysis was conducted on the conceptions and misconceptions regarding hybrid learning for those faculty who taught in traditional classroom settings.
Challenges For Transfer Students at the College of William and Mary Luanna Martins EPPL751: Sociology of (Higher) Education Summer 2011.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
Content Area Reading Nakia Gardner Grand Canyon University RDG 583 The Role of Reading in Content Area Classrooms November 4, 2009.
Educational Objectives
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
AN INNOVATIVE & INTEGRATED TESTING FORMAT COMBINING ANATOMY, PRIMARY CARE SKILLS, AND OMM IN A SIMULATED PATIENT ENCOUNTER Gail Dudley, DO, Francine Anderson,
Differentiation PLC.
Information Literacy: Assessing Your Instruction Texas Library Association District 10 Fall Workshop October 15, 2005 Michelle Millet Information Literacy.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
The New Standards: Impact on the Audiology Curriculum Stephanie Davidson The Ohio State University.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Title Page and Introduction Gregory A. Thomas, PhD Coe College Action Research I.
Using TESOL’s Standards to Guide Instructional Design
Taeho Yu, Ph.D. Ana R. Abad-Jorge, Ed.D., M.S., RDN Kevin Lucey, M.M. Examining the Relationships Between Level of Students’ Perceived Presence and Academic.
Instructional Plan Template | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan Cultural Diversity in Health Science Barry L. Rimpsey.
Advising 101: Putting the CORE into Context Professor Amy Nawrocki Senior Lecturer in English Advisor, First Year Studies Program.
By: Brittany Cochran, Lindsey King, and Justin Blanton.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Terry Mouchayleh, Ph.D. Tarrant County College District
Advanced Placement Programming
TA & PFF Workshop– Spring 2011 Artze-Vega
New York State Learning Standards 2011 (Common Core State Standards)
6 Technology, Digital Media, and Curriculum Integration
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
The first Year experience:
Building Relationships for UNLV Students’ Success
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
Distance Learning Facilitator Skills
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
Taking a Giant Leap Using the Taxonomy of Significant Learning to Inform Instructional Design Ashlynn Kogut Texas A&M University.
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Active Learning A Pedagogic Framework for Bringing Active Learning Into Your Classroom Jason Babcock.
Writing Learning Outcomes
BEKRMAR High School Dual Enrollment
Team Based Learning A Pedagogic Framework for Bringing Active Learning Into Your Classroom Jason Babcock.
Presentation transcript:

Technical Classes Online: A Different Breed of Learning? Paula San Millan Maurino, Ph.D. Francine Federman, Ph.D. Lorraine Greenwald, Ph.D. Farmingdale State College State University of New York.

Dissertation Online Threaded Discussions: Purposes, Goals and Objectives Rationale for dissertation Interaction cannot be evaluated until instructor’s purposes, goals and objectives are known first

Methodology Interviewed 30 online instructors at Farmingdale State Analyzed “starter” questions Analyzed database transcripts Focus groups from private colleges

Research Questions Main Research Question: What are the purposes, goals and objectives set by online instructors for the utilization of threaded discussions? Five Sub Questions

Sub Research Questions 1. How do faculty evaluate the success and value of online discussions? 2. Are threaded discussions valued for social or cognitive purposes or both? 3. Do instructor characteristics influence the purposes, goals and objectives? 4. Do student characteristics influence the purposes, goals and objectives of online threaded discussions?

Sub Research Question 5 Do academic discipline and the educational level of students affect the purpose and objectives set by the instructor for threaded discussions within online courses? Lower level vs. Higher level Discipline Technical vs. Nontechnical

Upper and Lower Level Percent of Instructors Teaching Lower Level, Upper Level, and Both Lower and Upper Level Classes Upper Level 33% Both 37% Lower Level 30%

Upper Level vs. Lower Level Lower Level More hand holding needed/supervision Students have more time to participate More enthusiastic Higher Level More experienced, mature More to offer a discussion Classes are so diverse, level does not matter

Discipline/Academic School Did NOT have a strong effect on the goals set or use of discussions Did affect perceptions of quality/success More Arts and Sciences instructors considered their discussions successful

Discipline/Academic School Best courses for discussion liberal arts and humanities courses such as literature, philosophy, history and psychology Worst courses for discussion math classes such as calculus and statistics and business/programming classes such as accounting or database.

Definition of Technical Researcher’s Definition A course devoted to learning a specific skill. Determined by instructor Could be in any academic school/discipline

Technical vs. Non-Technical Percent of Instructors Teaching Technical, Non-Technical and Both Technical and Non-Technical Classes Non-Technical 50% Technical 27% Both 23%

Technical vs. Nontechnical No pattern/relationship between Level and technical nature of class Just as many lower level class rated technical as upper level No relationship between faculty profile and technical nature of class

Technical vs. NonTechnical Technical classes seen as unique and different In interviews & source documents What makes a technical class different? Devoted to learning a specific skill Main focus and objective Students immersed in “doing” or “making” NOT general knowledge foundation Offline Classes may be taught in a lab May not have class discussion or participation

Focus and Objective of the Course Concerns expressed about moving a technical class online May change nature and focus Active to passive learning? Is talking about an activity as important as doing it?

Discussion topics – What to talk about Hard to find topics to discuss Current trends and events most popular Less likely to do so – main objective was making or doing Students see discussion as “busy work” Participate only because it is required

Student Time Constraints Adding discussion increases time students must put in to complete course requirements Alternative Shorten time allocated to hands-on activities Does this affect successful achievement of course objectives and learning outcomes?

Time Delay Delayed response by instructor may be critical Minor correction made by a “live” instructor in minutes may require days to correct online

Time Constraints of Instructors If time lags are more important, must the instructor be accessible more often? Are synchronous meetings necessary? Are online office hours necessary?

Additional Requirements Students may need specific software programs or equipment Students need to be able to successfully load and set up equipment themselves Should the instructor allow extra time at the start of the semester for this setup? Problems with setup? Can results of the technical activity be Transferred between student and teacher Student and other students?

Interaction Shift Current literature points to need for and benefit of group and social interaction Technical classes may have different needs in this area Some students need more one-on-one interaction Some students don’t need any – “they just get it” Need for teacher presence is determined by whether particular students “get it”

Interaction Shift (cont.) More one-to-one interaction for some students, may leave less time for other students and group interaction Group interaction often involves one student asking others for help Change to social dynamics of class? Are stronger students willing to help and provide scaffolding for weaker students?

Administrative Concerns Workload requirements Size of class Can curriculum be modified for online classes? Should curriculum be modified for online classes? Are all classes suited to the online format?

Implications Online technical instructors may need to rethink strategies Can individual learning activities be turned into group activities? Break up hands-on activities into pieces and have the group put them together? Are different textbooks/hand outs/lecture materials needed?

Implications Connect the discussions to the hands on activities Use discussions to decrease work load To answer individual questions To achieve teacher presence To allow one student to help another

Thank you! Paula Maurino Farmingdale State University