Introduction to the Environment Rating Scales

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mano a Mano 3 Phase II Internet Course Week 5 - Topic III Early Childhood Program Structure Drs. Ellen Marshall and Cathy McAuliffe.
Advertisements

Rubrics for Transition IV: for Students with Severe Disabilities by Dr
1 Social and emotional problems can impair early learning and competence Roughly 10% of children in kindergarten show disruptive emotional or behavioral.
1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
Collaborating with Families: Partnering for Success
The ECERS-3 Thelma Harms, Richard Clifford, Debby Cryer ECERS-3
Judith J. Carta, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas with help from Elaine Carlson, WESTAT.
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE SCHOOL READINESS:. WHERE DID WE START? 1999 : KSDE began working with Kansas Action for Children to define School Readiness 2000:
LearningGames and Early Childhood Curriculum Connecting Center-Based and Home Learning Using a Comprehensive Curriculum Hilary Parrish Product Development.
Making the ITERS-R come to LIFE
EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF DUVAL Helping parents choose, preparing children to learn QUALITY CONNECTIONS Presentation at the Board Meeting August 31,
The Creative Curriculum Developmental Continuum Assessment System
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Childcare Quality and Early Learning Gail E. Joseph, Ph. D
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
CHILD DEVELOPMENT - INGRID SCHOON (CITY).
© CCSR Stacy B. Ehrlich, Julia Gwynne, Amber Stitziel Pareja, and Elaine M. Allensworth with Paul Moore, Sanja Jagesic, and Elizabeth Sorice University.
UNDERSTANDING THE CLASS
Early Middle Childhood Self Esteem, Friendships and Social Skills: What You Need to Help Your Child CHEO Connects, November 28, 2011 Dr. Simone Kortstee,
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Environment Rating Scale Professional Development Seminars SACERS: School-Age Care Environment Rating Scale (Used with permission of the authors and the.
The Evaluation of Quality of NJ’s Preschool Classrooms 2014 NJ Division of Early Childhood Education.
Community Input Discussions: Measuring the Progress of Young Children in Massachusetts August 2009.
Government Programs and Initiatives Impacting Early Childhood Ed. Objective 9.02.
WHAT IS QUALITY ?. Why is Quality Important? The importance of quality after school care cannot be underestimated as today’s children face more risks.
Coaching for School Readiness
New Jersey Department of Education Division of Early Childhood Education March 3, 2009.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Early Childhood Education The Research Evidence Deborah Lowe Vandell December 11, 2003.
The End of the School Year Responsive Classroom® Principals Meeting – June 1, 2010 The End of the School Year Responsive Classroom® Principals Meeting.
Indiana’s Early Learning Development Framework
CHANGES EXPLAINED STIMULATING MINDS (22/10/13). In 2012 the framework was revised to make it clearer and easier to use, with a clear focus on developing.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
CLASS Overview Partner Meeting March 24, CLASS is the: CLassroom Assessment Scoring System.
Where Excellence is a Tradition. Preparation for first grade. Preparation for the future. Community Presentation January 30, 2014.
1 Quality of Play: Progress and Challenges. 2 Introduction Key Sure Start objective: Improving the ability to learn Core Sure Start service: Support for.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
The Evaluation of Quality of NJ’s Preschool Classrooms 2009 NJ Office of Preschool Education.
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale
13-1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Nutrition, Health, and Safety for Young Children: Promoting Wellness, 1e Sorte, Daeschel, Amador.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Activity Planning and Assessment
The Evaluation of Quality of NJ’s Abbott Preschool Classrooms 2006 NJ DOE Office of Early Childhood Education Rutgers University The College of New Jersey.
Standards in Mathematics EDN 322. Standards in Mathematics What do you think about when you hear the term “standards?” What do you think about when you.
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Key Messages and Implication.
Project WILD Kathy Kraften, Amy Canales Cille D’Ascenzo,
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRST What We Are Learning Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!
Mano a Mano 3 Phase II Week Four Topic Three Early Childhood Program Structure Drs. Ellen Marshall and Cathy McAuliffe.
Lass Pre K The Madison City School System philosophy of Early Childhood Education for four-year olds is based on the belief that a commitment to children.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices. Five Guidelines For Developmentally Appropriate Practices.
11 PIRLS The Trinidad and Tobago Experience Regional Policy Dialogue on Education 2-3 December 2008 Harrilal Seecharan Ministry of Education Trinidad.
WELCOME! 4-H 101. Basic Needs for Healthy Growth 1. safety & structure 2. belonging and membership 3. closeness & several good relationships 4. experience.
THE ECERS DEFINITION OF QUALITY AND ITS INTERNATIONAL USE DEBBY CRYER, PH.D. ENVIRONMENT RATING SCALES INSTITUTE, CHAPEL HILL, NC, USA.
FEC Preschool Board Presentation February 18th, 2016
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Dr. Amber Reed, School of Educational Leadership
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
NAEYC Early Childhood Standards
Using Standards and Assessment in Early Childhood Education
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Beaufort County Preschool Program
Session V: Environment Rating Scales
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Environment Rating Scales

Some research findings-validity Children in classrooms that score higher on the ERS do better on a wide range of developmental outcomes This has been found by many researchers, in many studies, across children of varying backgrounds, cultures, and in other countries. For example…

Head Start FACES Study p.6, FACES Findings (June 2000) 40 Head Start programs; 518 classrooms; 3,200 children p.6, FACES Findings (June 2000)

Children’s Language Skills over Time by Quality of Child Care Classroom Practices Cost, Quality & Outcomes Study, 1999 4

Validity: CQO Children’s Math Skills over Time by Quality of Child Care Classroom Practices and Maternal Education Cost, Quality & Outcomes Study, 1999 5

Children in classes with higher ECERS scores have repeatedly been found to do better on outcomes that are considered very important Language ability Pre-academic skills (math and reading readiness) Attitudes towards child care, distress levels, and perceptions of their own competence Relationships with teachers Social skills (in US, UK, Germany) Attention deficit disorder (lower for school-agers who were in higher quality) (Study from United Kingdom) These differences are lasting 7

Note that some important child outcomes have not been studied, but they are still important in terms of what the ECERS evaluates and children’s developmental needs Accident rates Health status (illness, physical condition) Self-help skills Creativity in thinking and the arts Science knowledge and scientific thinking Social Studies 8

Understanding new research findings We are more likely to find differences in outcomes when there is more variation in ERS scores, (more lower and higher scores present). If there is not much difference in scores, then outcomes may not differ across classrooms. It is important to understand this, because in some studies ERS scores do not predict child development outcomes because of a lack of variation in scores One example… 9

NC More At Four Classroom Scores Evaluation of the North Carolina More at Four Pre-kindergarten Program: Children’s Longitudinal Outcomes and Classroom Quality in Kindergarten (2004-2005) 10

Reliable use of the ERS requires… Observers who are trained to acceptable levels of reliability Observers who are not biased Observers who score for the children; not for the provider A 3 or more hour assessment of the regular daily program—not quality for a day.

The effect of “fads” in early childhood assessment New measures of quality, with a narrow perspective, are developed as interest in specific area of development become popular Because the ERS assess quality from a broad perspective, the ERS are comprehensive quality measures that will withstand the test of time-- and remain meaningful as our priorities for children come and go. 12

How the Environment Rating Scales measure quality Global Process Quality: the environment that children really experience, that has a direct effect on their development. The ERS use hundreds of indicators of quality, none of which is important by itself. It is the combination of indicators (average total or factor score) that is important, not any one detail. It is not realistically possible to get a perfect score on the ERS. A score of 5 is considered the benchmark for high quality.

Subscales in each scale Space and Furnishings Personal Care Routines Language and Reasoning Activities Interactions Program Structure Parents and Staff

Sample item Item 4. Room arrangement for play 1 3 5 7

What the ECERS really measures: what all children need for quality of life Chances for children to a strong sense of self and build positive relationships with other children, and with the adults who care for and educate them Appropriate learning opportunities that meet their wide range of developmental needs Protection of children’s health and safety

Positive relationships ECERS evaluates whether a child’s sense of value and competence have a good chance of being positively set during the early years, because once set, it is difficult to change these perceptions. Also assesses whether young children can develop the social/emotional skills of empathy, sympathy, independence, cooperation, and self-discipline under positive conditions or society pays a high price later.

Appropriate learning The ECERS considers child development and what is required for long-term academic success, as well as life-long success. The ECERS helps us see whether developmental pre-requisites can be accomplished, and if each child can progress as they should. It allows us to evaluate whether the teaching strategies are effective and appropriate for use with each child.

Protection—Health ECERS assesses how well we meet the health and safety needs of children, based on national standards of excellence which often differ from state standards, in content and/or assessment procedures. As the medical field requires, early childhood programs are evaluated as public health environments, considering their effects on the people in those environments as well as on the greater community.

Protection—Safety Attention to safety issues is more important for children cared for in groups because of numbers of children. ECERS helps us determine how well we protect children, minimizing hazards and supervising for safety, based on national standards and rigorous assessment procedures.

Any questions?