DVCS & DVCS & Generalized Parton Distributions. Compton Scattering “DVCS” (Deep Virtual Compton Scattering) “DVCS” (Deep Virtual Compton Scattering)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deeply Virtual Compton JLab Franck Sabatié CEA Saclay On behalf of the Hall A and Hall B collaborations Pacific Spin 07 - Vancouver August.
Advertisements

Introduction Glasgow’s NPE research Group uses high precision electromagnetic probes to study the subatomic structure of matter. Alongside this we are.
Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.
q=q V +q sea q=q sea so: total sea (q+q): q sea = 2 q Kresimir Kumericki, Dieter Mueller, Nucl.Phys.B841:1-58,2010.
 0, ,  + exclusive electroproduction on the proton at CLAS on the proton at CLAS.
DVCS at JLab Como, 11/06/2013. JLab published 6 GeV results JLab 6GeV analysis in progress JLab 12 GeV program.
K k'k' ** q q'q'  pp'p' e DVCS and DVMP are the key reactions to determine Generalized Parton Distributions (GPDs) experimentally. N Exclusive ep→ep.
Brahim MorenoStudents' seminar at Bosen Workshop ΔVCS and Generalized Parton Distributions
Experimental requirements for GPD measurements at JLab energies. Detector that ensures exclusivity of process, measurement of complete final state Measure.
1 Exclusive electroproduction of the    on the proton at CLAS  Outline: Physics motivations: GPDs CLAS experiment: e1-dvcs Data analysis:   cross.
Roberto Francisco Pérez Benito On behalf the HERMES Collaboration European Graduate School Lecture Week on Hadron Physics Jyväskylä, Aug 25-29, 2008 HERMES.
Why Studying n-DVCS ? Eric Voutier n-DVCS gives access to the least known and constrained GPD, E 0 because F 1 (t) is small 0 because of cancelation of.
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May Goals of this parallel.
2-3D imaging of the nucleon: Generalized Parton Distributions Franck Sabatié Nov. 25th 2008 CEA Saclay - SPhN Why Generalized Parton Distributions ? Properties,
M.Garçon, M. Guidal, C. Hadjidakis, K. Lukashin, L. Morand, S. Morrow, J. Santoro, E. Smith Exclusive  0,  electroproduction on the CLAS on.
J. Roche Ohio University and Jefferson Laboratory Results shown are from the ”DVCS HALL A collaboration” (E and E03-106) First steps toward nucleon.
Real Compton Scattering from the Proton in the Hard Scattering Regime Alan M. Nathan SLAC Experimental Seminar December 2, 2003 I. Compton Scattering from.
Generalized Parton Distribution JLab Franck Sabatié CEA Saclay On behalf of the Hall A and Hall B collaborations APS-DNP mini workshop Newport.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering and Pseudoscalar Meson Electroproduction with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab XII Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics.
Deeply Virtual Exclusive Reactions with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab ICHEP July 22, 2010, Paris, France.
Possibilities to perform DVCS measurement at COMPASS E. Burtin CEA-Saclay Irfu/SPhN On Behalf of the COMPASS Collaboration DIS Madrid - 29 April,
Possibility for Double DVCS measurement in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne SBS Meeting June 4 th 2013.
Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries.
New results on SIDIS SSA from JLab  Physics Motivation  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries  Future measurements  Summary H. Avakian.
DVCS with Positron Beams at the JLab 12 GeV Upgrade
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in JLAB Hall A
Single-Spin Asymmetries at CLAS  Transverse momentum of quarks and spin-azimuthal asymmetries  Target single-spin asymmetries  Beam single-spin asymmetries.
The Quark Structure of the Nucleon Inti Lehmann & Ralf Kaiser University of Glasgow Cosener’s House Meeting 23/05/2007 Nucleon Structure Generalised Parton.
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
Deeply Virtual Meson Production and Transversity GPDs Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab 1 Exclusive Meson Production and Short-Range Hadron Structure January.
GPDs studies at COMPASS DVCS studies for a GPD experiment in 2010 Physics impact Experimental issues Recoil detector prototype Exclusive  0 production.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
Harut Avakian (Jlab) DVCS results with unpolarized and polarized target Introduction Event selection MC simulations and radiative corrections DVCS with.
Probing Generalized Parton Distributions
Studies of OAM at JLAB Introduction Exclusive processes Semi-Inclusive processes Summary Harut Avakian Jefferson Lab UNM/RBRC Workshop on Parton Angular.
Deeply Virtual Compton JLab Franck Sabatié Saclay SPIN’06 - Kyoto October 6 th 2006 From GPDs to DVCS, to GPDs back Onto the DVCS harmonic.
Michel Garçon – SPhN/Saclay – SIR2005 Workshop (Jefferson Lab, May 2005) Generalized Parton Distributions: the present program at Jefferson Lab Generalized.
JLab, October 31, 2008 WACS in 12 GeV era 1 GPDs Wide-Angle Compton Scattering pi-0 photo-production in 12 GeV era B. Wojtsekhowski Outline WACS and other.
Generalized Parton Distributions: an experimenter’s approach Generalized Parton Distributions: an experimenter’s approach Plan :  Nucleon structure GPD.
Time-like Compton Scattering with CLAS12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB) CLAS12 European Workshop February 25-28, 2009, Genova, Italy.
Deeply Virtual ω Production Michel Garçon & Ludyvine Morand (SPhN-Saclay) for the CLAS collaboration MENU 2004, Beijing e-e- e -’ pp’ ω **
Deeply virtual  0 electroproduction measured with CLAS.
Transition region (1) Transition region (2) Scaling (s-, Q 2,…) (3) Generalized Parton Distribution (4) Transition Distribution Amplitude (5) …
General introduction to GPDs From data to GPDs General introduction to GPDs From data to GPDs.
Measurements of Generalized Parton Distributions with COMPASS at CERN (CERN-SPSC , SPSC-EoI-005) Letter of Intent, in framework of the theme /2008.
Envisioned PbWO4 detector Wide-Angle Compton Scattering at JLab-12 GeV with a neutral-particle detector With much input from B. Wojtsekhowski and P. Kroll.
Feasibility studies for DVCS and first results on exclusive  at COMPASS DVCS studies Physics impact Experimental issues Recoil detector prototype Exclusive.
Single Target Spin Asymmetries and GPDs Jian-ping Chen, Jefferson Lab, Virginia, USA SSA Workshop, BNL, June 1-3, 2005 Nucleon structure and GPDs DVCS.
Status report of Hermes Status report of Hermes Delia Hasch Physics Research Committee, DESY Oct 27/ Spin physics:  finalised and new results on:
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
Flavor decomposition at LO
Theory : phenomenology support 12 GeV
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at HERMES
Wide Angle Compton Scattering
Measurement of GPDs at JLab and in Future at Colliders
Nucleon'05, 14/10/05 M. Guidal, IPN Orsay
Beam Spin Asymmetry Measurements from Deeply Virtual Meson Production
Generalized Parton Distributions and the Structure of the Nucleon
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at 11GeV with CLAS12
Shape and Structure of the Nucleon
Generalized Parton Distributions at
Experimental overview on exclusive processes
4th Workshop on Exclusive Reactions at High Momentum Transfer
Deeply Virtual Meson Production
New Results on 0 Production at HERMES
Overview on hard exclusive production at HERMES
Exclusive production at HERMES
First results on Deep Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A
Presentation transcript:

DVCS & DVCS & Generalized Parton Distributions

Compton Scattering “DVCS” (Deep Virtual Compton Scattering) “DVCS” (Deep Virtual Compton Scattering)

Bjorken Sum Rule : 1/4 spin carried by quarks : spin ½ objects 1/2 momentum carried by quarks Bjorken scaling (Q >1 GeV ) : pointlike objects 2 2 DEEP INELASTIC } ( INCLUSIVE ) e  q e’ f, 1 f 2 ( ( ( ) ) ) p

Final state constrained :  New generation of machines : - high energy - high duty cycle + spectrometers : - large acceptance - high resolution }accessible now ! now ! e  p e’ p’  DEEP INELASTIC ( EXCLUSIVE ) ~~ e  e’ p p’  H,E,H,E ~~ x t 

p p’(=p+  )  H,E(x, ,t) ~~ x-  t  x+  GPD formalism  {   [N(p’)  + N(p) + N(p’)i  +    N(p)] {   [H q (x, ,t)N(p’)  + N(p) + E q (x, ,t)N(p’)i  +    N(p)]  5   [N(p’)  +  5 N(p) + N(p’)     N(p)]}  5   [H q (x, ,t)N(p’)  +  5 N(p) + E q (x, ,t)N(p’)     N(p)]} 2M2M2M2M _ ~~ 2M2M2M2M _ _ _ Vector Ms : H,E Large Q 2, small t PS Ms : H,E ~~ (Ji, Radyushkin, Collins, Strikman, Frankfurt)  :  T lead. twist Mesons :  L

H, H, E, E (x,ξ,t) ~~ “Ordinary” parton distributions H(x,0,0) = q(x), H(x,0,0) = Δq(x) ~ x Elastic form factors  H(x,ξ,t)dx = F(t) (  ξ) x Ji’s sum rule 2J q =  x(H+E)(x,ξ,0)dx (nucleon spin) x+ξx-ξ t γ, π, ρ, ω… GPDs are not completely unknown -2ξ

y x z Transverse localisation of the partons in the nucleon (independently of their longitudinal momentum) Form Factors y x z Longitudinal momentum distribution (no information on the transverse localisation) Parton Distribution (Belitsky et al.)

y x z The GPDs contain information on the longitudinal AND transverse distributions of the partons in the nucleon Generalized Parton Distributions 3-D picture of the nucleon (femto-graphy of the nucleon)

GPDs probe the nucleon at amplitude level q(x)~ q(x)~ H(x,  )~ H(x,  )~ pp’ x+  x-  z 0101 z p p’ x+  x-  x<  : x>  : DIS : DES : pp’ x xx x x xx x pp’ x+  x- 

0 t=0 1 DDs « D-term » k GPDs Pion cloud Trans. Mom. of partons F (t), G (t) 1,2 A,PS q(x),  q(x) R (t),R  (t) A V J q  (z)

e  e’ p p’  H,E,H,E ~~ Access experimentally the GPDs through the measurement of the angular and energy distributions of EXCLUSIVE reactions q’q H,E,H,E(x, ,t) : GPDs ~~ H E q spin average H E q spin diff. ~~ p spin no flip p spin flip

 p p’  H,E,H,E ~~ x t Deconvolution needed ! x : mute variable  x  H q (x, ,t) but only  and t accessible experimentally dd dQ d  dt 2 B ~A H (x, ,t,Q ) 2 q x-ix-i dxdx +B+B E (x, ,t,Q ) 2 q x-ix-i dx +… == x B 1-x /2 B t=(p-p ’) 2 x = x B ! /2

GPD and DVCS Cross-section measurement and beam charge asymmetry (ReT) integrate GPDs over x Beam or target spin asymmetry contain only ImT, therefore GPDs at x =  and  (at leading order:) (M. Vanderhaeghen)

- “Trivial” kinematical corrections - Quark transverse momentum effects (modification of quark propagator) - Other twist-4 …… DES: finite Q 2 corrections (real world ≠ Bjorken limit) DES: finite Q 2 corrections (real world ≠ Bjorken limit) GPD evolution O (1/Q) O (1/Q 2 ) Dependence on factorization scale μ : Kernel known to NLO - Gauge fixing term - Twist-3: contribution from γ* L may be expressed in terms of derivatives of (twist-2) GPDs. - Other contributions such as small (but measureable effect). (here for DVCS)

The actors JLab Hall AHall BHall C p-DVCS n-DVCS Vector mesons p-DVCS d-DVCS Pseudoscalar mesons DESY HERMESZEUS/H1 Vector & PS mesons DVCS CERN COMPASS Vector mesons DVCS + theory (almost) everywhere

JLab(E e =6 GeV):CLAS/Hall B ( ) and Hall A (2004) HERA (E e =27 GeV) : HERMES and ZEUS/H1 (up to 2006) CERN (E  =200 GeV) : COMPASS (2007 ?) « DES » in the world

e  p e’ p’  The ep  ep  process The ep  ep  process DVCS e  p e’ p’  e  p e’ p’ Bethe-Heitler GPDs

Energy dependence BH DVCS Calculation (M.G.&M.Vanderhaeghen)

e  p e’ p’  The ep  ep  process The ep  ep  process DVCS e  p e’ p’  e  p e’ p’ Bethe-Heitler Interference between the 2 processes : if the electron beam is polarised => beam spin asymmetry GPDs

First experimental signatures Magnitude and Q 2 dependence of DVCS X-section (H1/ZEUS) First observations of DVCS beam asymmetries CLAS HERMES DVCS First observations of DVCS charge asymmetry (HERMES) All in basic agreement with theoretical predictions Phys.Rev.Lett.87:182002,2001

4.8 GeV data (G. Gavalian) GPD based predictions (BMK) PRELIMINARY 0.15 < x B < < Q 2 < 4.5 GeV 2 -t < 0.5 GeV 2 PRELIMINARY 5.75 GeV data (H. Avakian & L. Elhouadrhiri) CLAS/DVCS at 4.8 and 5.75 GeV

Resolution Exclusivity Luminosity ep  epX MAMI 850 MeV ep  epX Hall A 4 GeV ep  eγX HERMES 28 GeV N+πN Missing mass M X 2 ep  epX CLAS 4.2 GeV π0π0 γ D.E.S.: an experimental challenge are the key issues for this physics!

e’ p  A typical DVCS event in CLAS

NN Only 2-parameter fit: N  and N  0 ep→epX (CLAS at 4.2 GeV) : X = γ or π 0 ?

e’ p  A typical ep  ep  event in CLAS Add EM calorimeter at forward angles Add solenoid Moller shield around target

Dynamical range : 50 MeV < E  < 5 GeV (  ~5%/sqrt(E  )) Counting rates ~ 1 MHz Magnetic field environment : B~ 1 T ~400 PbWO 4 crystals : ~10x10 mm 2, l=160 mm (18 ’s) Read-out : APDs +preamps JLab/ITEP/ Orsay/Saclay/ UVA collaboration

 0 mass peak σ  21 MeV (with online calibration)

About 380 bins in , x B, t 60 days of beam time in spring’05 Experiment E : V. Burkert, L. Edouardrihi, M. Garçon, S. Stepanyan et al. Run March-May 2005 Projected results

High Resolution Hall A spectrometer for electron detection 100-channel scintillator array for proton detection 132-block PbF 2 electromagnetic calorimeter for photon detection Detection of all 3 final-state particles ensures exclusivity Experiment E : P. Bertin, C.E. Hyde-Wright, R. Ransome and F. Sabatié. To run mid-september DVCS in Hall A to the p-DVCS set-up n-DVCS : Veto detector added Also HERMES & COMPASS

γ* L ρ Handbag diagram calculation (frozen  s ) can account for CLAS and HERMES data on σ L (ep->ep  ) Q 2 (GeV 2 ) CLAS 4.2 GeV data (C. Hadjidakis, hep-ex/ ) W=5.4 GeV HERMES (27GeV) A. Airapetian et al., EPJC 17 σ L (ep->ep  ) Regge (Laget) GPD (MG-MVdh) Mesons

Ludyvine Morand’s thesis Analysis of ω polarization from ep → epπ + π - X configurations (for the first time for this channel above Q 2 ~ 1 GeV 2 ) Evidence for unnatural parity exchange   0 exchange dominating even up to large Q 2 (see also J.-M. Laget, hep-ph/ ) SCHC does not seem to hold → not possible to extract σ L handbag diagram estimated to contribute only about 1/5 of measured cross sections ω more challenging/difficult channel to access GPD Q 2 from 1.6 to 5.6 GeV 2 x B from 0.16 to 0.70 ω peak in MM[epX] for (Q 2,x B ) bins Deeply virtual ω production at 5.75 GeV (CLAS) s

Extensions RCS :  p->  p (intermediate t) (Radyushkin, Dihl, Feldman, Jakob, Kroll)  VCS : ep->e  (Frankfurt, Polyakov, Strikman, Vanderhaeghen) tDDVCS : ep->ep  * (e + e - ) (M.G., Vanderhaeghen, Belitsky, Muller,...) IDVCS : pp->  (Freund, Radyushkin,Shaeffer,Weiss)  tDVCS :  p->p  * (e + e - ) (Berger, Pire, Diehl,...) N-DVCS : eA->eA  (Scopetta, Pire, Cano, Polyakov, Muller, Kirschner, Berger....) Hybrids, pentaquarks,... (Pire, Anikin,Teryaev,...) sDDVCS : ep->ep (Vanderhaeghen, Gorschtein,...) _

The most complete information on the structure of the nucleon : GPDs Summary (f (x), g (x), F (t), G (t),  (z), pion cloud,…)111A Q 2 evolution worked out to NLO, twist-3 contributions to DVCS estimated, first lattice calculations have been recently published,... THEORY : Further higher twists –mesons–, deconvolution issues,.... First experimental signatures very encouraging Up to 2005: definitely sign the validity of the approach (factorization, scaling,...) Beyond : systematically measure and extract the GPDs GeV) EXPERIMENT :