Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Communicating with Travelers Unit 8: Improving Transit Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

Travel Training Program. Planning Your Trip [Insert Image]
Pre-Wave Survey: Technology Adoption Future Research Experimental Design: Solomon 4 Group How can you access OneBusAway? Pre-Wave Survey: Using OBA Pre-Wave.
Real-Time Passenger Information Systems
ONEBUSAWAY: IMPROVING THE USABILITY OF PUBLIC TRANSIT Brian Ferris, Kari Watkins, and Alan Borning University of Washington.
Transit Capacity & Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition Fixed Route Quality of Service.
Metro Transit Operations Improved Through Technology.
Mobility Management Increasing Independence for Community Members.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Network Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Rail Capacity Unit 3: Measuring & Maximizing Capacity.
TAD T RAVEL A SSISTANCE M OBILE A PP TO H ELP T RANSIT R IDERS Sean J. Barbeau Center for Urban Transportation Research & Department of Computer Science.
Multiple-operator Transit Traveler Information New York State Department of Transportation From TRIPS123 to 511 NY.
Company confidential Prepared by HERE Transit Sr. Product Manager, HERE Transit Product Overview David Volpe.
1 Integrating personal and public transport information Fred Gangemi, Steer Davies Gleave June 21 th 2012.
City of West Covina Green Line Evaluation. Presented By Presented By Joanne Coletta Jim Jobst Leticia Llamas Kelly McDonald Ana Rosales Enrique Salgado.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Understanding Changes in Ridership Unit 7: Forecasting & Encouraging Ridership.
Transit Traveler Information CEE582. Fixed-Route Central ControlCustomer Information Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission.
Craft is what we are expected to do; art is the unexpected use of our craft. Ed Catmull President of Walt Disney Animation Studios.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
Enabling Transit Solutions Open Transit Data for the Atlanta Region Regional GIS Users Group Meeting Transportation Division Regan Hammond, Landon Reed.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida OneBusAway Sharing real-time transit info via open-source software Sean J. Barbeau,
Avoiding Stories Like “The Secret Life of Lemmings” by Hugo First MSTPA Conference Tuscaloosa, AL March 8 – 10, 2010.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Policy In Motion: Route360 Bryce Adams, Elizabeth Joseph, Julie Lindsey, Charles E. Maddox, Lauren Waters 1.
Mitch Skyer President & Senior Transportation Consultant Solstice Transportation Group.
Leveraging Technology to Increase Ridership and The Passenger Experience Jeff Lougheed Regional Manager Trapeze Group Mississauga, Ontario - Canada.
Understanding the Do’s and Don'ts of Customer Relations Scott Wisner Customer Service Manager Valley Metro RPTA.
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
The Role of ITS in Communicating with Transit Riders Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting June 5, 2007.
Let’s take the Bus!. NEED ? 10 CONGESTION In line with our objective 50% more passenger kilometers by bus in 2030 City wants to be carbon neutral by 2025.
 The ability to develop step by step procedures for solving problems  She uses algorithmic thinking by setting up her charts.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Project Update TAC - July 21, 2015 Nick Perfili, FCDOT Department of Transportation.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Types & Sources Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
OneBusAway: Improving the Usability of Public Transit Brian Ferris University of Washington Design Use Build – University of Washington.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
U.S. DOT T3 Webinar Mobile Device Technology TCRP Synthesis 91 April 10, 2012 Case Study LeeTran – Lee County, FL Mike Horsting, AICP 1.
What’s Your Message? Social Media & Technology for Travel Instruction Presented by Louis Hoffman Travel Instructor/Project Manager NJ TIP Inc. ATI Board.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Open Transit Data: Meeting Customer Needs Or – Where the Data Meets the Road Dan Overgaard Supervisor, Systems Development & Operations King County Metro.
EXPERIENCE | Transportation Adding Value for Economic Development Presented to: KCADC Economic Development Alliance September 29, 2006 Mobile Device Technology.
Microsoft Tag for Transit Make your transit stops, printed materials, and transit advertising interactive.
Click to edit Master text styles 12/17/ Click to edit Master text styles 12/17/ Tom O’Neill Technology Department March 13, 2013 Discussion.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Course Overview Unit 1: Introduction.
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Measuring rail accessibility using Open Data Elena Navajas-Cawood.
1 Florida Department of Transportation ITS Performance Measures Breakout Session 2 – Elizabeth Birriel, P.E.
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
S.A.T.U.R.N. Simulation and Analysis Tools for Urban Automated Rapid Transit Networks.
Real-time Bus Information on Mobile Devices Stuart D. Maclean, Daniel J. Dailey ITS Research Program University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
REGIONAL STAKEHOLDER TWG KICKOFF WEBINAR MAY 4 1:30-3:30 PM Next Generation Transit Service Information Portal.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
Transit Communications Accessibility Gaps Madeleine Rothberg Trisha O'Connell Marcia Brooks Geoff Freed WGBH National Center for Accessible Media Katharine.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
Findings of the Petaluma Transit 2014 Onboard Survey
New product demo + real-time update
GTFS-realtime v2.0 Sean J. Barbeau, Ph.D.
Brian Ferris, Software Engineer
Social Media Marketing
INNOVATIVE SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
GREAT TRANSIT RIDER EXPERIENCE
Presentation transcript:

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Communicating with Travelers Unit 8: Improving Transit Quality

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Outline Ways of communicating with travelers Impact of real-time information Service alerts New transit info tools

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood DISCUSSION QUESTIONS As a transit user, what information is important for you to know? How should this information be shared?

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TCQSM – Basic Information Passengers need to know – How to use transit service? – Where to go to access it? – How to pay fare and how much? – Where to get off near their destination? – Any transfers required? – When services are scheduled to depart and arrive? Service Alerts

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TCQSM – Means of Info Printed - timetables, maps, service change notices Posted - system maps or notices Audible announcements - stops, train directions, fare zone Visual displays - on-board or in stations Transit agency staff - station agents or tourist info staff Telephone information - info lines, automated menus, SMS Online information Smartphone apps - trip planning, fare info, real-time Transit infrastructure - shelters, signage

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood History of Schedules Schedule Paper SchedulesDigitizationInteractivity 10 9:36

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Moving toward real-time Schedule information is no longer enough Customers need to know when the vehicle is coming to trust the service More passengers have mobile devices to access information

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Smartphone Ownership

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Smartphone Non-Smartphone No Cell Phone n = 51 n = 339 n = 161 n = 148 n = 144 n = 185 n = 249 n = 303 n = 58 Cell Phone Type based on Age

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Cell Phone Ownership

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Filling in the gaps in mobile access

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood How does real time information change user perceptions and behavior? IMPACTS OF REAL-TIME

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Real-time Information

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Real-time Information

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Seattle - Change in Satisfaction “I no longer sit with pitted stomach wondering where is the bus. It's less stressful simply knowing it's nine minutes away, or whatever the case.”

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Seattle - Perception of Safety Perception of Safety – 79% no change – 18% somewhat safer – 3% much safer Safety correlated with gender – χ 2 = – p-value=0.001

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Seattle - Perceived and Actual Wait Time Without real time, perceived wait > actual wait With real time, perceived wait = actual wait Value of real time >> more frequent service GroupReal TimeScheduleDifferenceT-stat (p-value) Mean Typical Wait (0.00) Aggravation Level (0.81) Actual Wait Time (0.03)

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood 18 Method Used panel regression to assess ridership impact in city with gradual roll out of RTI on a route by route or borough by borough basis Conclusions Real-time Information lead to ~2 % increase in ridership In NYC, average increase of ~115 rides per route per weekday (median of 1.6%) Increase in NYC mostly on largest quartile of routes (median of 2.3%) Limitations Too Short Timescale – could take years to see true impacts Aggregate Analysis Chicago and New York City

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood 19 Tampa Method Used before-after control group design to test if individual riders were taking more trips after getting real-time information Web-based survey, participants were asked about experience using real-time information Significant improvements in the waiting experience Decreases in self-reported usual wait times Increases in satisfaction with wait times and reliability Little evidence supporting a change in transit trips Only surveyed existing riders

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood SERVICE ALERTS Telling riders if something goes wrong with service

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Alerts

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Alerts Today Websites s Text- message Facebook Twitter

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Alerts Today

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Ideal Service Alerts Ideally Inform riders about alerts – Real-time – Individually Barriers – Data in standard format – Easy input without human chain of information

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Alerts in apps

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood What should the next transit info tools be? NEW TRANSIT INFO TOOLS

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Google Transit

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood GTFS General Transit Feed Specification routes.txt stops.txt trips.txt stop_times.txt calendar.txt agency.txt shapes.txt

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood HopStop

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood OpenTripPlanner

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Mapnificent

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Walk Score: Apartment Search

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood How does Open Data help? Agency responds to special requests by developers Small subset of riders find this specific tool useful. Transit Agency App Developers Riders DATA Anyone can access data Many riders access a diverse market of tools powered by GTFS. Agency produces data and opens it once.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Open Data Trends (2013)

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Major points from the TCRP Synthesis reading What else did you learn from the TCRP Synthesis on real-time transit information?

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Major points from the TCRP Synthesis reading Critical consideration is agency’s ability to develop, manage, and maintain mobile applications in-house or manage third-party application development and services. Strong relationship between open-data approach and resources to create useful and accurate real-time mobile applications. Real-time transit information on mobile devices more prevalent than use of other traditional media (signs, interactive voice response) Not all existing and potential customers will have mobile devices, and not all applications will satisfy the needs of all customers. Personalization of information is critical to the success of providing information on mobile devices.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Conclusion Real-time information increases the perceived safety and decreases perceived wait time. Service alerts allow agencies to communicate issues and delays to passengers. With the opening of transit data, a plethora of applications have sprung.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Reference The materials in this lecture were taken from: TCRP Report 165, “Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 3 rd edition”, Ferris, B., Watkins, K., and Borning, A. (2010) “OneBusAway: Results from Providing Real-Time Arrival Information for Public Transit.” Proceedings of CHI. Various papers from K. Watkins research group at Georgia Tech Wong, James, et al. "Open Transit Data: State of the practice and experiences from participating agencies in the United States." Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting. No TCRP Synthesis 91, Use and Deployment of Mobile Device Technology for Real-time Transit Information,