EU Regional Workshop 27-28 March 2014 Transparency and Monitoring Immigration Detention.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUROPEAN INSTRUMENT FOR DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS (EIDHR)
Advertisements

1 EU/UNICEF project to end torture and ill-treatment against children.
National Human Rights Institutions in the OSCE area and the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention Against Torture Ms Mary Murphy and Ms Saule Mektepbayeva,
National Preventive Mechanism for the Republic of Kazakhstan- the examination of the existing mechanisms in the light of the obligations arising from the.
The mandate of preventive monitoring- what does it mean? Dr Elina Steinerte Human Rights Implementation Centre University of Bristol.
1. Key issues 2. Child rights in governance assessments2. Child rights in governance assessments 3. Strategies3. Strategies 4. Regional examples4. Regional.
Thematic inspection on the welfare of vulnerable people in police custody Heather Hurford Lead Inspector.
Domestication and Implementation Package B The duty to prevent torture and other ill treatment © The Article 5 Initiative, 2013.
NHRIs and OPCAT ICC meeting, March 2012 Association for the Prevention of Torture Association pour la prévention de la torture Asociación para la prevención.
NSA Final Review Meeting Brussels - June 2013 Advocating and lobbying for the adoption of the OPCAT and the NPM’ Presented by: Dalal Khawaja.
THE ROLE OF NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS IN DETENTION MONITORING Harvard Law School’s Human Rights Program (HRP) in partnership with OHCHR March.
Torture Prevention: Deconstructed Dr Elina Steinerte Human Rights Implementation Centre University of Bristol Regional Conference ‘Prevention of Torture:
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
PRISON HEALTH in EUROPE the CPT experience European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Marzena Ksel.
REPUBLIC OF SERBIA PROTECTOR OF CITIZENS Protector of Citizens (Ombudsman) European NPM Project Roundtable discussion on the establishment of the NPM in.
Cross-border cooperation is our way to take responsibility for refugees Reception Conditions for Asylum Seekers in Europe materials for a better practice.
Implementing article 33 of the Convention: cases, positions and lessons Linnéa Arvidsson Regional Office for Europe UN Human Rights.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Monitoring immigration detention policy and practice in Norway Opportunities and dilemmas.
THE EUROPEAN NPM PROJECT CHILDREN RIGHTS IN PLACES OF DETENTION Víctor Rodriguez-Rescia SPT member European NPM Project’s 6th NPM Thematic Workshop: “The.
Guardianship for children deprived of parental care A handbook to reinforce guardianship systems to cater for the specific needs of child victims of trafficking.
UNICEF Turkey Country Programme
2014 Europe Regional workshop Brussels – 27 & 28 March 2014.
1 Critical issue module 6 Separated children in emergency settings.
National Preventive Mechanism in the United Kingdom Laura Paton UK NPM Coordinator Kyiv, 18 October 2011.
NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW GREG HEESOM LEGAL COUNSEL ASIA PACIFIC FORUM OF NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS.
The European NPMs: facts, figures and trends Association for the Prevention of Torture Association pour la prévention de la torture Asociación para la.
Dr Silvia Casale NPMs in Europe Combining complaints handling and preventive visiting.
INTERACTION WITH THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM
Company LOGO National Human Rights Institutions – history, purpose and functioning–
ISS Conference, 21 August ISS Conference August 2013.
Monitoring of Forced Returns in the Czech Republic The Implementation of the Return Directive: challenges and good practices from the perspective of the.
Ombudsperson of the Republic of Macedonia
Monitoring for human rights in places of detention: NPMs and IMBs – how effective are they in securing human rights? An ARC-funded project Cambridge University,
MIGRATION and ASYLUM NETWORKING INITIATIVES Olga Ozernaya Research and Networking Officer/Söderköping Process Secretariat * The Cross-Border.
Pretrial Detention and Torture Moritz Birk, Julia Kozma and Debra Long MULTI-DISCIPLINARY MEETING THE GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR PRETRIAL JUSTICE 19th-20th November.
1. Key issues  Definitions of governance  International investments 2. Child rights in governance assessments 3.3. Strategies to ensure governance.
Monitoring Immigration Detention and Forced Return standards and Swiss experiences Seminar «Practical Aspects of monitoring immigration detention and forced.
NHRI Models Is there a magic formula? Challenges and Practical Aspects.
ICRC Head of Operations for Latin America & the Caribbean
National Preventive Mechanisms Against Torture in Ukraine: What was it? What is it? What should it be?
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Parliament of the Republic of South Africa 19 June 2013 South African Human Rights Commission.
UK National Preventative Mechanism NPMs’ experiences of allegations of active ill-treatment Rachel Lindsay Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland.
NPM: Framework of technical modalities and criteria Kiev, October 2011 © APT.
Politics and human rights  Kathalijne Buitenweg  Laurien Koster.
Ensuring Participation in Legislative Processes: European Principles and Practical Considerations Katerina Hadzi-Miceva European Center for Not-for-Profit.
SEMINAR ON THE STRUCTURED DIALOGUE ON THE INVOLVEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN EC DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION Penal Reform International (PRI)
By Dr. Otiende Amollo, EBS, Chairperson of the Commission on Administrative Justice A Presentation to the Regional Conference for East Africa NHRIs on.
COLLECTING INFORMATION: FOR WHAT PURPOSE? Tallinn, Estonia, June 2011.
EU human rights policy on indigenous peoples International expert Dialogue on MDG7 8 April 2010.
NPM annual report Strasbourg, November 09. Content of the presentation  1. Obligation to produce an annual report  2. Who is the target audience? 
The UK National Preventive Mechanism 1 Maneer Afsar Team Leader –HMI Prison January 2017.
Uniting Nations by Learning Together UPR as a process of accountability: Opportunities for inclusiveness Regional Governance Week Social Accountability.
What is Preventive Monitoring ? The European NPM Project Padua January 2010.
OVERSIGHT MECHANISM OPERATIONAL PRISONS MANAGEMENT COURSE NOVEMBER 2013 HPSS,Embakasi, Kenya By Solomon Aina.
Review of the Judicial inspectorate of prisons of SA By Prof Saras Jagwanth, UCT.
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW. Ahmed T. Ghandour.. HUMAN RIGHTS IN EUROPE II. OTHER INSTRUMENTS AND PROCEDURES.
 International non-governmental organization founded in 1979 (International Year of the Child)  Forefront.
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights
Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture (OPCAT)
A case study of the implementation of the 2009 & 2013 universal periodic review recommendations to nigeria on torture prevention & rehabilitation of torture.
Information Session European Instrument for Democracy & Human Rights Country Based Support Scheme – Papua New Guinea RESTRICTED Call for Proposals EuropeAid/151170/DD/ACT/PG.
Seeking Asylum BA International Relations Yang Ha Lim
EU –OPCAT PROJECT The 4th regional network workshop Manila
Statutory participatory mechanisms
Rights of Migrants in a Multicultural Society
Towards full participation of ageing persons with disabilities
ПОСИЛЕННЯ ПОТЕНЦІАЛУ ІНСТИТУЦІЇ УКРАЇНСЬКОГО ОМБУДСМЕНА:
South African Human Rights Commission
European Standards for Equality Bodies An Equinet journey
Presentation transcript:

EU Regional Workshop March 2014 Transparency and Monitoring Immigration Detention

Objectives What is the value added of monitoring? What are the different types of monitoring? Who monitors? What can NGOs/civil society do?

What is the value added of monitoring visits? Transparency, accountability & strengthening public confidence Deterrence effect and reduce the risk of human rights violations First hand observations & regular contact with detainees Impact through constructive dialogue

What are the different types of monitoring visits? «Photographic visits» (few hours to half a day) to get an overall picture of the place. Monitoring for the purpose of investigation -individual case work Monitoring for the purpose of prevention – seeks to averts HRs violations at a systemic level before they happen > document the situation thoroughly, analyse risk factors, identify both problems and good practice. Service providers….

PREVENTIVEINVESTIGATION At any timeIn response to an allegation Human Rights basedBased on claimed violations Forward lookingLooking backwards (past acts and omissions) Focus on systemFocus on individual CollaborativeResolving a case/situation HolisticIndividualised Long termShort term Both approaches are key to protecting rights of detainees and can be complimentary

Elements of in-depth preventive detention monitoring Regular and unannounced visits to all places of detention By independent, multi-disciplinary teams To look at all aspects of treatment, conditions, administration of detention Making recommendations to improve practices and conditions Through constructive dialogue (ongoing follow-up)

Methodology - Key characteristics Multidisciplinary team Frequency and length of visits Listening and speaking with detainees and others (prison and medical staff) > interviews Observation: vigilance and being open minded Importance of cross checking and triangulating

Basic principles of monitoring Do no harm Respect authorities, detainees Be credible Be objective and impartial Display sensitivity Respect confidentiality

Some examples of what to look at Access to information in an accessible format Contact with outside world (lawyer, family) Access to culturally appropriate food? Leisure activities Unaccompanied children – not detained with adults Are staff trained in dealing with migrants / asylum seekers?

Who monitors?

preventive visits an innovative and proactive system of preventive visits to places where persons are deprived of their liberty by independent bodies : UN Sub Committee for the Prevention of Torture (SPT) National Preventive Mechanism s (NPMs) OPCAT Operational treaty which creates…

OPCAT in global context System of monitoring visits At International and Regional Level: CAT Only in case of ‘systematic torture’ Prior authorisation Regional European CPT (1987) UN Thematic Procedure Prior agreement Reactive, occasional Non binding ICRC Armed conflict, prisoners of war Other situations, prior agreement Permanent and regular visits SPT UNHCR

NPM NHRI Ombusdmans Judicial inspections (prosecutors & judges) Parliamentarians / Commissions Civil Society NPM & civil society in the national context: Internal administrative inspections Place of immigration detention

OPCAT in Europe 32 NPMs State PartiesRatification DateNPM Type AlbaniaOctober 2003People’s Advocate - NHRI NPM Unit ArmeniaSeptember 2006HRs Defender’s Office - NHRI NPM Unit AustriaDecember 2012Austrian Ombudsman Board AzerbaijanJanuary 2009Commissioner for HRs - NHRI NPM Unit BulgariaJune 2011Ombudsman CroatiaSeptember 2006Ombudsperson’s Office CyprusApril 2009Office of the Commissioner for Administration – NHRI NPM Unit Czech RepublicJuly 2006Public Defender of Rights - Ombudsman

State PartiesRatification DateNPM Type DenmarkJune 2004Danish Parliamentary Ombudsman EstoniaDecember 2006Office of the Chancellor of Justice - NHRI FranceNovember 2008General Inspector of Places of Deprivation of Liberty – New Institution GeorgiaAugust 2005Public Defender – Ombudsperson Office GermanyDecember 2008National Agency for the Prevention of Torture – New Institution GreeceFebruary 2014Ombudsperson Office HungaryJanuary 2012Commissioner for Fundamental Rights LiechtensteinNovember 2006Corrections Commission – New Institution

State PartiesRatification DateNPM Type LuxemburgMay 2010Ombudsperson’s Office MaltaSeptember 2003Two Boards: Board of Visitors for Detained Persons; Board of Visitors for Prisons – Multiple Institution MoldovaJune 2006Moldovan Centre for HRs + Consultation Council – NPM + MontenegroMarch 2009Protector on HRs and Freedom - NHRI NetherlandsSeptember bodies – Multiple Institution NorwayJune 2013Parliamentary Ombudsman PolandSeptember 2005HRs Defender’s Officer – NHRI NPM Unit PortugalJanuary 2013Ombudsperson’s Office SerbiaSeptember 2006Protector of Citizens SloveniaJanuary 2007HR Ombudsperson’s Office + NGOs -NPM+ SpainApril 2006Ombudsperson’s Office SwedenSeptember 2005Parliamentary Ombudsman + Chancellor of Justice

State PartiesRatification DateNPM Type SwitzerlandSeptember 2011National Commission for the Prevention of Torture – New Institution TurkeySeptember 2011NHRI UkraineSeptember 2006Parliamentary Commissioner for HRs – NHRI NPM Unit UKDecember bodies designated – coordinator HMIP

What can NGOs/civil society do?  Look at ways of cooperating and sharing information among monitoring bodies  Review of legislation such as immigration or asylum laws  Individual interventions and referrals  Advocacy «give voice to the visiting bodies findings»  Media «be strategic»  UN HRS bodies and mechanisms

APT resources

… a specific Practical Manual on Monitoring Immigration Detention due out later this year.

Thank you Questions and comments?

Thematic Group Work Monitoring Methodology: -what type of monitoring do you do? -what works well and not so well? -what challenges have you faced? -what strategies have been used to address the challenges? which strategies have been the most successful? -collaboration with other actors: Do you work with other actors? Who and how? Has this been successful? -what regional initiatives would be useful?