© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Clinical Trials Track: Key Compliance Risks FDA Overview Meredith Manning November 8, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. How We Get to Where We Want to Be – Managing GCP Inspections Pre-Approval Robert F. Church, Partner Hogan &
Advertisements

What FDA Looks for When Inspecting IRBs and Sponsors Marian J. Serge Nurse Consultant Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Pharmaceutical Compliance Forum Clinical Trials Case Study Stephen J. Immelt Thursday, November 8, 2007.
How to Survive an FDA Inspection
Art. 6 – 8 of the draft Unitary Patent Regulation Prof. Dr. Winfried Tilmann.
February 12, 2014 Life Sciences Enforcement Year in Review: Examining Hot Button Areas for FDA & Related Government Enforcement Peter Spivack, Hogan Lovells.
The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. What.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. NACD Capital Area Chapter Washington, DC September 9, 2008 Activist Hedge Funds in the Board Room: What Public.
Wireless Access Code: Download the agenda PDF at:
16 July 2011 The Business Case for Mediation (for “ICC Arbitration & Amicable Dispute Resolution – Focus on India”) Jonathan Leach, partner, Hogan Lovells.
April 8, 2013 NPE litigation in Japan Activities and impact of FRAND commitments Eiichiro Kubota, Hogan Lovells Tokyo.
Understanding the GRAS Process Martin J. Hahn Hogan Lovells US LLP Date: July 16, 2013 Food and Agriculture Group.
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
January 2012 Workshop on competition law aspects International Legal Expert Meeting, January 2012 Leiden University, The Netherlands Jacques Derenne.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
MAGI's Clinical Trial Agreements, Budgets & Regulatory Conference FDA Inspections of Investigator Sites Paul Below Clinical Research Consultant P. Below.
"The Role of Arbitration in the Dispensal of Justice" Does Arbitration Maintain the Advantages it Traditionally Enjoyed? Nathan Searle, Senior Associate.
Investing in Hotels in China: What You Need to Know The China Hotel Investment Summit 2005 April 2005 IMAGE HERE.
© 2009 Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Joseph A. Levitt Hogan & Hartson April 21, 2009 FDA Regulation of Bottled Water An Overview.
© 2009 Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Meredith Manning Partner May 20, 2009 FDA’s Internet Ad Warnings: Implications for Social Media National.
© 2009 Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. ACCA-SoCal Chapter Roundtable “The Year that Privacy and Data Security Become Priority Risk Management.
January 2012 Workshop on Radio Frequencies International Legal Expert Meeting, January 2012 Leiden University, The Netherlands Gerry Oberst.
Protection of Intellectual Property in the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan By Natalia Gulyaeva.
27 October 2011 Competitive dialogue in UK PFI PPP Forum Perspective Andrew Briggs, Partner.
December 8, 2014 Healthcare/Privacy Current Law Affecting Uses of Health Data Melissa Bianchi Partner.
Hogan Lovells The solicitor's role Gathering the evidence –Disclosure in most cases: –Disclosure in most fraud cases: 1.
27 September 2013 Promoting Russia as a Seat of Arbitration: What Are the Best Ways Forward? Peter Pettibone.
International Human Subject Research Legal and Ethical Considerations for Investigators Theresa J. Colecchia, Esq. Associate General Counsel May 8, 2006.
Legal Issues Impacting Clinical Trials Medical Device Clinical Trials Update June 19, 2009.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Transatlantic merger enforcement Catriona Hatton November 28, 2007 Brussels.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. The Evolving Standards For Defining “Exclusionary Conduct” in the United States Philip C. Larson November 28,
Device Clinical Trials and More… Michael E. Marcarelli, PharmD Director, Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for Devices and.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Key Compliance Risks in Clinical Trials Kathleen Meriwether Principal, ERNST & YOUNG, LLP Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services.
Read the SMALL PRINT of the 1572 The Essential GCP Document.
KEY ENFORCEMENT ISSUES - The Government's Perspective Kathleen Meriwether Assistant United States Attorney Eastern District of Pennsylvania UNITED STATES.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Alice Valder Curran, Partner Tuesday, October 17, 2006 Private Prices, Public Markets: The Evolution of Price.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: RECOGNITION AND MANAGEMENT Judith L. Curry Associate General Counsel NC State University March 5, 2007.
Mutuals' Forum 2010 Regulators & Legislators: Appreciating the Mutual Difference John Gilbert, Consultant 4 November 2010.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. National Pharma Audioconference Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007 Settlement Stephen J. Immelt, Esq. November 26, 2007.
Alice Valder Curran, Partner October 28, 2008 Assessing Future Regulatory and Compliance Developments – The Current Landscape and Future Legislative Changes.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE TOKYO WASHINGTON D.C. What Pharmaceutical.
Managing Sponsor/Investigator Relationships 5 th National Conference on Managing Legal Risks in Structuring and Conducting Clinical Trials American Conference.
Russian response to US sanctions: what has been done and what to expect? 14 August 2014.
Agenda for Session Compliance in Clinical Research
Copyright FDA Inspections: Where Do Things Go Wrong? Diana Naser RN, MS, CCRP Executive Director Clinical Research Administration Clinical Research.
Conducting a Clinical Compliance Risk Assessment in the Pharmaceutical Industry Presentation to: The 2 nd Annual Medical Research Summit March 25, 2002.
November 2015 Presentation to South African Diamond Producers Organisation on Legal Liability Awareness – Introduction to the Mine Health & Safety Act.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. US Compliance Risks and Strategies: An Overview Stephen J. Immelt June 6, 2007 International Pharmaceutical.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Cartels Fines, Leniency, Settlement John Pheasant November 28, 2007 Brussels.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Catriona Hatton, Partner 26 May 2008 Medical Device Companies Antitrust Compliance Programmes.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Monopoly Power: Getting it and keeping it US Perspective Sharis Pozen, Partner ACCE Seminar 13 May 2008.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Reprints.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. How We Get to Where We Want to Be – Managing GCP Inspections Pre-Approval Robert F. Church, Partner Hogan &
Cancer Clinical Trials Office Clinical Trials & Research Training Oct2014.
ClinicalTrials.gov Requirements
Current trends in EU single firm conduct policy and case law
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Action Items: Monitoring Off-Label Promotion Do’s and Don’t’s
FSMA Enforcement: Focus on Inspections
Personal Liability and Risk Management for
Single Firm Conduct: EU / US convergences and divergences
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRIES
Timothy B. Cleary, Esq. Meredith Manning, Esq.
The Zyprexa and Bextra Settlements
Presentation transcript:

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Clinical Trials Track: Key Compliance Risks FDA Overview Meredith Manning November 8, 2007

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Agenda This session kicks off the R&D and Clinical Trials Track We would like to give you an overview of the law and the perspective of – the government – a large regulated company Kathleen Meriweather recently joined E&Y from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Philadelphia Julie Kane is the Chief Compliance Officer at Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. FDA Legal Considerations FDA regulations govern clinical investigations of products that are subject to review and approval by FDA – some Phase IV studies are exempt but the requirements for IRB oversight and informed consent remain in place FDA imposes very specific responsibilities on sponsors and investigators Sponsors must: – select only qualified investigators – ship drug only to participating investigators – submit voluminous information about the investigators and the sites to FDA, including the protocol and financial disclosure forms for investigators – monitor sites

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. FDA Legal Considerations Investigators must do even more: – follow the protocol – assure proper IRB review and approval – communicate drug information to patients – keep adequate records and make them available to monitors – file reports, including safety alerts Investigators often make mistakes – big mistakes! – “[Y]our failure to adequately supervise the study resulted in the submission of false information to FDA or the sponsor in required reports.” – “Review of the times recorded on the study subject enrollment form … document that eleven samples collected on January 29, 2004 … were tested in the lab before they were received by the lab.”

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. FDA Legal Considerations Consequences can be substantial – data is disqualified – the investigator can risk debarment – relationships with the investigator and the site can be imperiled FDA enforcement tools include – Warning Letters – Imposition of Restrictions Informal Agreement/Corrective Actions Disqualification (NIDPOE, NOOH process) Debarment – Section 306 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act – Injunction – Publicity

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. FDA’s Park Doctrine The FDCA is a strict liability statute – government need not prove intent to obtain a misdemeanor conviction In the 1970s, Mr. Park faced prosecution despite his lack of knowledge or intent about the rats in his food warehouse The Supreme Court held that he could be held liable and convicted Today, Park is seeing a resurgence – CEO of Purdue Pharma pled guilty to a misdemeanor and paid $35M in penalities – NuMed pled guilty to allegations involving irregularities of a clinical trial And, the government’s focus is expanding to include clinical investigations

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Other Gov’t Enforcement Options HHS – Office of Human Research Protections – Assurances of Compliance (Human Subject Protections Requirements) – Corrective Actions Including Suspension of Studies, Withdrawal of Assurance and/or Debarment HHS - Office of Research Integrity – Assurances of Compliance – Corrective Actions Office of Inspector General – HHS – Investigator agreements must fall within an AntiKickback statute safe harbor – False Claims Act/Corporate Integrity Agreements Qui Tam/False Claims Litigation – Private parties may blow the whistle – Government may join – Enforcement tool of the future?

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. FCA Case United States ex rel. Sanford Gross v. AIDS Research Alliance, et. al. 415 F.3d 601 (7th Cir. 2005) – Gross was patient in NIH-funded AIDS trial – Alleged significant violations of protocol, Good Clinical Practices recordkeeping requirements and failure to obtain proper informed consent – Alleged that annual filings to NIH were therefore false certifications – Case dismissed for inadequate factual pleadings

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Baltimore Beijing Berlin Boulder Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Geneva Hong Kong London Los Angeles Miami Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Shanghai Tokyo Warsaw Washington, DC For more information on Hogan & Hartson, please visit us at