GROOVES OF PHOBOS AS SEEN ON THE MEX HRSC RECTIFIED IMAGES AND COMPARISONS WITH PLANETERY ANALOGS A.T. Basilevsky 1, J. Oberst 2,3, K. Willner 3, M. Waehlisch 3, G. Neukum 4 1 Vernadsky Institute, Moscow, Russia, 2 DLR Berlin, Germany, 3 TU Berlin Germany, 4 Free University Berlin, Germany Contact: or The Second Moscow Solar System Symposium Space Research Institute Moscow, Russia October 2011
Grooves on Phobos, What is their origin? There are considered several hypotheses:
Fractures from crater-forming impacts e.g., Thomas et al., …1978
The younger fractures typically abut against the older ones. Elysium, Mars, HIRISE image PSP_010348_1870.
SW of crater Drunlo, observed in HRSC images of the orbits: 6906 (a, b), 4847 (c, d), and 2813 (e, f), reprojected for central longitude 102 o W. No abuttings, No lateral offsets at intersections of grooves of different trends (different ages) are seen. Phobos groove intersections
Collapsed pits in Cyane Fossae. Pits have no raised rims as some Phobos grooves have. HIRISE image PSP_010345_2150. Martian potential analogs - pits and graben
Graben near Alba Patera.They have no raised rims. THEMIS image V Martian potential analogs - graben
Intersecting graben near Alba Patera. No abuttings, no lateral offsets of the younger faults at intersections are seen. THEMIS image V Young faults Older faults
Scars formed by ejecta from Stickney and other craters e.g., Head and Wilson, …2010, Duxbury, 2010
The HRSC images of craters Drunlo (lower left, D = 4.2 km) and Clustril (upper right, D = 3.4 km). All images are reprojected for central longitude 31 o W. Plates a to f are from images obtained at the orbits 0756 (image a), 2780 (b, f), 2813 (c), 3310 (d) and 5851 (e). Grooves crossing the craters show no gaps at the crater rims in contrast to trails of bouncing boulders seen on slopes of lunar relief (see the next slides).
Boulder trails on the wall of 15 km crater. LROC image M LE Downrange bright marks (white arrows) formed by a bouncing boulder (black arrow). LROC image M R. Lunar analogs
Boulder trail crossing the 100 m crater on the wall of 15 km unnamed crater. LROC image M LE. Details of boulder trail crossing the crater. LROC image M LE Lunar analogs Long jump after crater rim
Boulders reached the crater floor. LROC image M LE. Boulders reaching the floor traveled only m. LROC image M LE. Lunar analogs Inertia is not a powerful mover
Secondary impact craters chains. produced by ejecta from Mars craters e.g., Murrey, …2010
Grooves morphology along 90 o angular distance (left-right). Fragment of image taken during orbit 0756 (central longitude 31 o W). Craters Drunlo and Clustril are in the image right. If grooves were formed by secondary impacts from Mars craters, one would expect a change in groove-forming crater morphology due to change in impact angle.
100 km asteroid Lutetia: No regular source of external secondaries Image taken by the OSIRIS camera. Rosetta, ESA. Lutetian potential analogs - grooves
Grooves and crater chains similar to those observed on Phobos (upper red box on synoptic image) Grooves on Lutetia
Grooves and crater chains similar to those observed on Phobos (lower red box on the synoptic image). Grooves on Lutetia
500 km asteroid Vesta: No regular external source of secondaries (Dawn image main_pia14313-full_full.jpg) Its surface shows many grooves, some very similar to grooves of Phobos. Vestian potential analogs - grooves
Grooves of Vesta looking similar to those observed on Phobos. Phobos grooves 20 km stone is needed to produce this groove
Conclusions: All suggested hypotheses of formation of grooves on Phobos have their strong and weak sides. Further analysis is needed to resolve the problem of the groove formation. Currently it looks that hypotheses of scars from rolling stones and chains of secondary craters produced by ejecta from Mars contradict observations on lunar & asteroidal analogs. Further analysis is needed to resolve the problem of absence of abutting and lateral offset in the fracturing mechanism of the groove formation.
Thank you for your attention