1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meeting the AT Needs of Preschool Students Under The IDEA Ronald M. Hager, Esq., Senior Staff Attorney, National Disability Rights Network, Washington,
Advertisements

Transition from Early Intervention RIDE Winter Leadership Conference February 2007.
Student Performance Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 3 – State Assessment Performance, 7 – Early Childhood Outcomes.
Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN School District Meetings September and October.
Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN Delaware Special Education Meeting September.
Erik McCormick Former OSEP Part B Data Manager September 29, 2006 Special Education Data – The Old, the New and the Huh?
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Using the Early Childhood Outcomes Summary Form
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Wednesday January 29, :30am-11:50am The Education Center Rm 210
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Promoting Quality Child Outcomes Data Donna Spiker, Lauren Barton, Cornelia Taylor, & Kathleen Hebbeler ECO Center at SRI International Presented at: International.
C ontent of the IFSP Produced by NICHCY, In this module, you’ll learn:  Why the IFSP is so important in early intervention  The 8 types of information.
1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
Wisconsin Departments of Health and Family Services (DHFS) And Public Instruction (DPI) OSEP Child Outcomes.
Preschool Outcomes Measurement System (POMS) Design and Implementation.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
Iowa Educational Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired (IESBVI)Conference October 8 th and 9 th, 2012 WELCOME!
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
Child Outcomes: Understanding the Requirements in order to Set Targets Presentation to the Virginia Interagency Coordination Council Infant &
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress 2007.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Sarah Geldart – MA ESE – Additional Contact:
Early Childhood Outcomes Workgroup Christina Kasprzak and Lynne Kahn ECO and NECTAC July 2009.
Early Intervention Colorado TA Call December 5, 2013 Annual Performance Report.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October

2 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes Purpose: Develop and Implement a Statewide Accountability System to Measure Outcomes for Infants and Toddlers in Early ACCESS and Preschoolers in Early Childhood Special Education

3 The Essential Question Are students with disabilities entering school ready to learn at high levels?

4 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: Target Population Early ACCESS Infants and Toddlers All infants and toddlers that have an IFSP Include children when transitioning at the age of 3 Early Childhood Special Education Preschoolers All preschool children that have an IEP Include children when transitioning from ECSE services to kindergarten Include children receiving ECSE services and Kindergarten services (Part-Time/Part Time) Do NOT include children that begin receiving special education services in kindergarten

5 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: Descriptions of ECO Areas ECO Areas Represent Critical Skills that: Promote positive outcomes for young children Support active and successful participation in everyday activities and routines, now and in the future Integrate all areas of development Prepare children to enter school ready to learn at high levels (The Essential Question) Refer to: Alignment of ECO, IFSP Outcome/IEP Goal Codes and Iowa Early Learning Standards, February 2006, Iowa Dept. of Education

6 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes How will data be summarized? All IFSP and IEP Teams will reach consensus on the results reported on the: Early Childhood Outcomes Summary Form February 2006 – June 30, 2006: ECO Summary form dated January 2006 Beginning July 1, 2006: ECO Summary form dated October 2006

7 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: ECO Summary Form October 2006 Comparison to peers or standards: To what extent does this child show age- appropriate functioning in the area of positive social-emotional skills across a variety of settings and situations

8 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: ECO Summary Form Comparison to peers or standards 7-Point Rating Scale Rating is based on: Current level of functioning demonstrated across a range of situations and settings that make up the childs day Typical functioning, not his/her capacity to function under ideal circumstances Functioning using assistive technology or special accommodations Skills and behaviors compared to age appropriate expectations based on child development research

9 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: ECO Summary Form Comparison to peers or standards Rating is NOT based on: A single behavior or skill Discrete behaviors Demonstration of skills under ideal circumstances that not does not reflect everyday situations or settings

10 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: ECO Summary Form Progress: Has the child shown any new skills or behaviors related to positive social-emotional skills since the last IEP meeting?

11 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: ECO Summary Form Childs Progress is based on any of the following: Acquisition of a new skill or behavior since the last IFSP or IEP meeting More independently demonstrates mastery of a skill or behavior Progress made toward achieving IFSP Outcomes or IEP Goals Improve skills and behaviors to a level nearer to age-appropriate functioning

12 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: ECO Summary Form Supporting Evidence for Outcome Rating and Progress in Positive Social-Emotional Skills Information gathered from various procedures and multiple sources of data RIOT Progress monitoring data IFSP and IEP Results data Age appropriate expectations Other relevant information regarding childs functioning across a variety of settings and everyday situations

13 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: ECO Summary Form Completing the ECO Summary form Complete for each ECO area, despite services receiving or areas of concern Initial IFSP or IEP meeting for infants, toddlers or preschool children Annually as a part of the IFSP or IEP meeting, Complete ECO Summary form until the child no longer receives Early ACCESS or ECSE services MUST complete when child leaves services (i.e. exits services, transitions at age 3 or into kindergarten)

14 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: Timelines Beginning February 1, 2006 Initial IFSP or IEP Meetings a. Comparison to Peers or Standard Beginning July 1, 2006 Annual IFSP and IEP Meetings; Exit Meetings, and Re-evaluation IEP Meetings a. Comparison to Peers or Standard b. Progress c. Supporting Evidence * SPP – Baseline and Targets will be based on these data!

15 Iowas Early Childhood Outcomes: Timelines IFSP and IEP Meetings held between July 1 to November 10, 2006 – Teams have until Friday, December 1 to complete the new ECO Summary form Beginning November 10, 2006 – Teams complete the new ECO Summary form at the time of the IFSP and IEP Meetings

16 AEA 10 Administrator Responsibilities Decide which LEA/AEA staff need to receive this information. Decide how you will share this information. Please try to complete trainings before Thanksgiving Break.

17 What questions or comments do you have about ECO?

18