Calculating Numerical Local Limits Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Pretreatment Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamie Petersen Administrative Assistant - Stormwater Front Desk: (402) Michael Crisco Program Specialist – Storm.
Advertisements

LOCAL IPP REGULATIONS SEWER USE ORDINANCES Sandra Diorka Director of Public Services Delhi Charter Township.
Got Capacity? A Case for Special Allocation Limits
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Info Item: Waste Discharge Rules Presented to the Environment Committee September 14,
Engineers scientists architects constructors Case Study UV Disinfection Interference From Industry MWEA Industrial Pretreatment Seminar October 24, 2007.
Industrial Wastewater ENVH 440/545 Fall Outline Regulations governing industrial wastewater discharges King County industrial wastewater limits.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Implementing BMPs as Local Limits Implementing BMPs as Local Limits City of Boise, Boise, Idaho Pretreatment Section Public Works Dept/Environmental Div.
PRETREATMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Draft) 24 th EPA REGION 6 ANNUAL PRETREATMENT WORKSHOP OKLAHOMA CITY 8/14/08 Allen Gilliam ADEQ State Pretreatment Coordinator.
25th Annual U.S. EPA Region VI Pretreatment Association Workshop Liquid Waste Transporter Enforcement Stories August 5, 2009 Ms. Erin La Rue Pretreatment.
2009 ENVIRONMENTAL SEMINAR Boat Bottom Pressure Washing Requirements & General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity.
Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference June 2013 Curtis M. Goodman Marquette Area Wastewater Treatment Facility Jerald O. Thaler, P.E.
GEORGIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION SMALL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -NPDES Permit Process-
Spring Training 2008 IPP INSPECTION. PURPOSE OF INSPECTION The main purpose of an industrial waste pretreatment program is to protect the environment,
Water Treatment Plant General Discharge Permit
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
New Approaches to Developing Local Limits Industrial & Hazardous Waste Committee Meeting July 18, 2001 by Richard W. von Langen, P.E. New Approaches to.
European Commission, DG Environment Brussels, 05 April 2006 Screening of chapter 27 - Environment Dr. Violeta Vinceviciene European Commission DG Environment.
Inspection Records and Reports NC DWR, Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh NC (919)
CENTRALIZED WASTE TREATMENT 40 CFR 437 Lessons Learned.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
403 Streamlining Specifics What’s Up with the Extra Industrial Classifications, General Permits & BMPs?
Industrial Inspections Making Good Inspections Better David Long EPA Region 6.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Regulations that Protect Clean Water Jocelyn Mullen, P.E. PART 2 OF PRESENTATION Presented at The Water Course January 27, 2010 Mesa County Water Association.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
Industrial User Permits: Monitoring Requirements.
How do 210 Water Reuse Authorizations relate to O&G Development? Jaya Zyman-Ponebshek, P.E. Assistant Director Water Quality Division.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Austin, TX. May 6, 2015 David James Santiago.
Paul Novak, Ohio EPA. Committee Meetings/Agenda  March call of full committee  April meeting with IDEM, OEPA, ORSANCO on streamlined variance.
Pretreatment 101 Training Course Sponsored by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, States of Region 6 And the Region VI Pretreatment Association.
EPA REGION VI MINIMUM QUANTIFICATION LEVELS (MQLs) WHAT THE “L” IS GOING ON? 25 th EPA Annual Pretreatment Workshop Addison, TX 8/5/09 Allen Gilliam ADEQ.
Overview of Pretreatment Program Regulations 40 CFR Part 403 Pretreatment 101 Short Course 8/3/09 Addison, Texas David Hardgrave ODEQ State Pretreatment.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Report of the NPDES Subcommittee. Conference Call Meetings July 8 and August 19 Mercury Discharges – Utility Request to Address Permit Requirements for.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
What’s This HWA Design Thing All About??? Design Capacity HWA Info from one POTW CITY OF GREENSBORO North Buffalo POTW.
Point Source Loads and Decision Criteria for Toxics Modeling Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
1 Industrial Waste Data Tracking: Surveys & Other Information Collection Presented by: Melissa Reboul LDEQ Pretreatment MODULE 3.
1 US EPA Straw Proposals for Modifying the 12/2005 draft Policy Statement Jim Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management, OW Expanded Steering Committee.
18/09/2006 Environmental Protection Agency Improvement of the Statistics on Industrial Water Use and Waste-Water Discharges Lithuania Project presentation.
Plan Waste Assessment MWM01A. What is the purpose of a waste assessment?  The main aims of a waste assessment are to:  Identify each waste stream on.
Streamlining Rules for Pretreatment Regulation Requested changes to Chapters 922 & 923 of the City of Zanesville Codified Ordinances Presentation to City.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Water Quality Seminar Austin, TX. September 23, 2015 David James Santiago Velez-Garcia.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
1 HEADWORKS ANALYSIS WORKSHOP 2 Objectives of Pretreatment Program Objectives of Pretreatment Program Purpose of Headworks Analysis Purpose of Headworks.
Commercial, Industrial, and High-Risk Runoff 6/13/20161 Commercial, Industrial and High Risk Runoff.
State Update including Streamlining Jeff Poupart PERCS Supervisor February 7, 2006.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Anticipated Changes to Oklahoma’s Multi-Sector Industrial Permit for Stormwater Discharges (OKR05)
Pollution Prevention & Management DentalBMPs. Overview Amalgam in POTW New EPA Guidelines City of Tulsa Dental BMPs.
Effluents Standards In Pakistan Environmental protection agency (EPA) is responsible for all aspects of the environment; regulation of sanitation and.
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS
2017 Environmental Trade Fair Shannon Gibson
The Nuts & Bolts of TBLL Development
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Multijurisdictional Agreements
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
“How To Ace an Inspection” Russell McLaren – Entergy ARES Water Lead
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Bianca Cooper & David James May 17, 2017 Water Quality Division
2018 Environmental Trade Fair Shannon Gibson
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Quality
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

Calculating Numerical Local Limits Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Pretreatment Program

Step 1:Develop a Sampling Plan Step 2:Collect Data for Technically Based Local Limits (TBLLs) Development Step 3:Develop Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings (MAHLs) Step 4:Determine Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL) Step 5: Account for Required Best Management Practices (BMP) Reductions Step 6:Allocate Allowable Industrial Loading Overview of Methodology for Developing Local Limits

The Sampling Plan contains:  The initial influent pollutant scan with Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)  Sample chain-of-custodies (COCs) with the description of the sampling location(s)  Documentation of approved 40 CFR Part 136 analytical methods  A schematic showing the layout for each wastewater treatment plant (WWTP)  Sampling for influent and effluent, will the POTW consider the lag time for treating wastewater (plant retention time  The sampling locations for the seven (7) day sampling events for influent, effluent, and sludge clearly marked on the schematic  A detailed explanation of the location(s), frequency, and number of samples of the Domestic/Commercial background sampling (with no significant industrial user contributions in that part of the WWTP service area)  A definition for identifying a "pollutant of concern" (POC) as any pollutant found at or above 0.1 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and any other pollutant the publicly owned treatment works (POTW) and/or State may designate to be of concern  List the POCs for which seven (7) day sampling events will be conducted and local limits will be developed (including the 15 national POCs) Step 1: Sampling Plan

The Sampling Plan contains:  List of pollutants to be sampled and flows to be measured for those pollutants to be reduced from IUs with the required BMPs  Statement that if hauled waste is accepted, a discussion of the handling procedures and quantities and qualities of hauled waste will be provided with the TBLL submittal  Identification of personnel or positions responsible for technical review, monitoring, laboratory analysis, and administration  Description of sampling equipment or other provisions to conduct necessary sampling  Description of adequate analytical capabilities to perform analyses  A statement that the POTW has all chain-of-custody information on-file and that the records will be maintained on-site as long as the current local limits are in effect  Authorized a representative, i.e. the POTW permit signatory or a consulting firm, to sign and certify the Sampling Plan Step 1: Sampling Plan

Step 2: Collecting Data for Local Limits Development Identify Pollutants of Concern Detemine Applicable Environmental Criteria Collect Site Specific Data from: Conduct Headworks Analysis - Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) - Industrial Users (IUs) - Domestic/Background Sources - Nonsignificant IU with required BMPs

Determining Pollutants of Concern U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State Requirements 15 National Pollutants of Concern: Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, Zn, As, CN, Ag, Hg, Selenium, Molybdenum, BOD 5, TSS, Ammonia [for plants with sources] Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit Limits Applicable Water Quality Standards Historical Problems (i.e. process inhibition) Sludge Disposal Considerations Worker Health and Safety Considerations Collection System Considerations Other (RCRA, Clean Air Act, CERCLA, Drinking Water Standards)  Criteria

Determining Pollutants of Concern  Data Sources $ TPDES Permit $ Water Quality Standards/Criteria $ Sludge Standards $ Industrial Waste Survey Review $ Industrial User Compliance Monitoring $ Local Limits Monitoring Program IUs POTW Domestic/ Commercial Background Nonsignificant IUs or significant industrial users (SIUs) with required BMPs to reallocate the TBLLs Receiving stream (STORET, State, USGS)  Literature/Default Data

Monitor Domestic Pollutant Loadings Monitor Trunk Lines Receiving Only Domestic/Commercial Wastewaters If site-specific data cannot be obtained, literature values are available Domestic/Commercial Loading

Removal Efficiencies: Mean Influent/Effluent Loadings R.E.= Removal Efficiency, as a decimal ¦ = Mean Influent Loading, lb/day  = Mean Effluent Loading, lb/day

My NPDES permit allows me to discharge x pounds of copper into the stream. How much copper can I allow to enter my plant without violating my NPDES permit? I know from sampling that my treatment plant removes, on average, 70% of the copper that comes in. Step 3: Develop Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings (MAHLs) Conceptually, in order to protect water quality standards, calculating MAHLs is an exercise in back calculation to meet National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements

Development of Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings < MAHLs are typically based on the most stringent of: $ NPDES Pollutant Discharge Limitations and Permit Requirements $ Water Quality Standards or Criteria $ Treatment Plant Process Inhibition Levels/ Operational Problems $ Sludge Disposal Standards

Step 4: Determine Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading Subtract Domestic/Commercial Background Contributions Subtract Safety/Growth Factors - 5 to 20%

Determine Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL) MAIL = Maximum allowable industrial loading, lb/day MAHL = Maximum allowable headworks loading, lb/day SF = Safety Factor, as a decimal C DOM = Domestic/Commercial background concentration (mg/L) Q DOM = Domestic/Commercial flow (MGD) 8.34 = Unit conversion factor Possible Outcomes: - positive MAIL (good) - negative MAIL (bad)

Step 5: Account for Required BMP Reductions At this point in the TBLLs calculations, the POTW will need to decide if they would like to account for BMP loading reductions, from either SIUs or non- significant IUs, according to the October 14, 2005 Pretreatment Streamlining Rule. The BMPs should be designed to reduce concentrations to specified concentrations, domestic/commercial background levels, or below the MALs.

BMP Reductions L BMP = Loading attributed to contributing domestic/commercial and nonsignificant IUs with required BMPs, lb/day C BMP = Estimated or measured average pollutant concentrations of the pollutants being reduced to “Zero” by the BMP from contributing domestic/commercial and nonsignificant IU discharges, mg/L Q BMP = Flow from the contributing domestic/commercial and nonsignificant IUs with required BMPs, MGD 8.34 = Conversion Factor

BMP Reductions L BMP = The loading that may be added to the MAIL due to the contributing commercial and nonsignificant IUs incorporating required BMPs, lb/day C BMP = The reduction in the average concentration from the contributing commercial and nonsignificant IUs incorporating required BMPs down to a specific concentration Q BMP = Flow from the commercial and nonsignificant IUs that will implement the required BMPs, MGD 8.34 = Conversion Factor

Account for Required BMP Reductions If using the TBLL uniform allocation method, calculate the MAIL BMP, accounting for BMP loading reduction, by subtracting the BMP reduction from the Domestic and Dommercial loading to determine the remaining Domestic and Commercial loading (L RDC ). If the contributing commercial and nonsignificant IUs with required BMPs are reducing their concentrations to below the MAL or “Zero”, you may subtract the entire BMP loading reduction.

BMP Reductions L RDC = The remaining domestic/commercial loading, lb/day L DC = Domestic/Commercial Loading, lb/day L BMP = Loading attributed to contributing commercial and nonsignificant IUs with required BMPs discharges, lb/day

BMP Reductions MAIL BMP = Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading accounting for BMP loading reduction, lb/day MAHL = Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading, lb/day L SF = Loading attributed to safety factor, lb/day L RDC = Remaining Loading attributed to domestic/commercial Loading, lb/day

BMP Reductions C TBLLBMP = Uniform Concentration TBLL, accounting for domestic/commercial BMP reductions, mg/L MAIL BMP = Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading, accounting for domestic/commercial BMP reductions, lb/day Q SIU = Industrial Flow, MGD 8.34 = Conversion Factor

SIU BMP Reductions QSIU = Flow from SIU facilities [noncategorical SIUs and categorical industrial users (CIUs)] that are subject to numeric TBLLs, MGD QRSIU = Flow from remaining SIU facilities that will have adjusted numeric TBLLs because of the SIU BMP reductions, MGD QSIUBMP = Flow from SIU facilities that will implement required BMPs, MGD

SIU BMP Reductions L BMP = The loading that may be added to the MAIL due to the contributing commercial and nonsignificant IUs incorporating required BMPs, lb/day C BMP = The reduction in concentration from the initial allowable TBLL concentrations of “X” mg/L down to the concentration of “Y” mg/L which is the BMP numeric limit Q SIUBMP = Flow from the SIUs that will implement the required BMPs, MGD 8.34 = Conversion Factor L BMP = (8.34)(Q SIUBMP )( C BMP )

SIU BMP Reductions MAIL RSIU = Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading for the remaining SIUs that will have adjusted numeric TBLLs because of the SIU BMP reductions C TBLL = Initial allowable TBLL concentration of “X” mg/L Q RSIU = Flow from remaining SIU facilities that will have adjusted numeric TBLLs because of the SIU BMP reductions, MGD L BMP = The lb/day loading that may be added to the MAIL due to the SIUs incorporating required BMPs

SIU BMP Reductions C RSIUTBLL = Uniform Concentration TBLLs for the remaining SIUs that are not incorporating SIU BMPs and will be subject to the adjusted TBLLs for each specific BMP pollutant, mg/L MAIL RSIU = Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading, accounting for SIU BMP reductions, lb/day Q RSIU = Industrial Flow from the remaining SIUs that are not incorporating SIU BMPs and will be subject to the adjusted TBLLs for each specific BMP pollutant, MGD 8.34 = Conversion Factor

TBLL Reallocation vs Categorical Pretreatment Standards Required BMPs TBLL Reallocation vs Categorical Pretreatment Standards The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has indicated that management plans required for categorical pretreatment standards are now classified as BMPs notHowever, the BMPs described during the TBLL process are designed to reduce the loading to affect the TBLL allocation, not to fulfill categorical BMP requirements

Step 6: Allocate Allowable Industrial Loading to Industrial Users < Four Allocation Methods: $ Uniform Concentration Method $ Industrial Contributory Flow Method $ Mass Proportion Method $ Selected Industrial Reduction Method

Industrial Contributory Flow Method  Applies only to IUs discharging the pollutant above Domestic/Commercial background levels  IUs discharging less than Domestic/Commercial background levels are considered Domestic/background sources and held to Domestic/Commercial background levels  Industrial contributory flow uses the total flow from the IUs discharging pollutants above Domestic/Commercial background levels  Single concentration limit for IUs contributing in excess of Domestic/Commercial background levels

IU Specific Method Mass Proportion Method  Allocation in proportion to IU loading  Different mass limit for each IU

Selected Industrial Reduction Method  Allocation method is usually remedial in nature  Selected IUs are required to reduce loading on a Case-by-Case basis  Usually based on wastewater treatability potential

Do the Local Limits Make Sense? After developing and allocating TBLLs, the POTW needs to determine whether they make sense Do they pass a “common sense test”?

Local Limits Should... Be reasonable Be at or above sampling detection levels If below detection levels, the POTW must adopt calculated value, but measure compliance at the MAL Not be so lenient as to provide IUs the opportunity to discharged excessive pollutant loadings or encourage hazardous waste to be discharged

BMPs - Timelines A timeline must be established for the implementation of the BMPs Initial estimates of loading reductions are verified through: or  Sampling of selected Users that have implemented BMPs or  Evaluating influent loadings for pollutants being addressed by BMPs

BMPs and Loading Adjustments Loading adjustments may be needed for:  Allowable headworks loadings,  The numeric limits, or  The BMPs for any affected sectors