Mickey Pierce DTSC February 9, 2006 Determining Penalties for HW violations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Personnel Background Investigations. Introduction The interests of the national security require that all persons privileged to be employed in the departments.
Advertisements

Jim Rudeen Waste Reduction, Compliance and Enforcement Section Chief KDHE, Bureau of Waste Management
GASB 49 –Accounting & Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations An Overview.
Managing Hazardous Solid Waste and Waste Sites
Michael Seereiter Director of Planning, NYS Office of Mental Health and EO #38 Implementation Lead 1.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Atlantic Bus Sales would like to advise all ground transportation providers of this most recent FMCSA rule changes that may impact your business.. You.
Provisional Billing Rates
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
Violation Classification Guidance
Sanctioning Guidelines Carm Phillips Compliance and Dispute Resolution Division Market Assessment and Compliance Division.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
Vincent Mendes, R.E.H.S. Supervising Environmental Health Specialist Fresno County Environmental Health Division February 15, 2007 Penalty Calculations.
Laboratory Accumulation of Hazardous Waste Presented By: Richard Smith Environmental Health & Safety Administrative Office Research and Extension Centers.
ANSI/EIA -748 EVMS 32 Guidelines National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Statutory Violations Identification Procedure Avoidance CCIT Presentation – July 20, 2011 (rev 3/17/14)
Process Safety Management
FHSAA Eligibility and Compliance Allegations And Investigations Florida High School Athletic Association.
Cal-OSHA and Labor Code Understanding the Law And Its Consequences
February 2007 Commercial Vehicle Drivers Hours of Service Module 24: Daily Log Audits.
Carol L. Sohn Senior Nuclear Safety Advisor, Office of Science, SC-33 1 May 5, 2011 Review of Science Sites Hazard Categorization.
1 ELEMENTS OF A 5(a)(2) OSHA STANDARD VIOLATION (Prima Facie) n The standard applies to the cited working conditions. n The terms of the standard were.
Imperial Ship Management AB “2.0”
Lisa Brown, Cal/EPA February 2007 Penalty Calculations For Non-Hazardous Waste AEOs.
Administrative Penalty Program SB Regulatory Item California Air Resources Board Enforcement Division Public Hearing December 12, 2002 Sacramento,
Nuclearsafety.gc.ca Joint Congress on Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences May 28, 2015 e-Doc CNSC Administrative Monetary Penalties Overview.
Notices to Comply (NTC) and Notices of Violation (NOV) March 22, 2006 Peter Moore Yorke Engineering, LLC x24
Determining and Citing Violations - A Basis for Enforcement Mickey Pierce DTSC February 7, 2006.
Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2005 Bill Torrey UST/LUST Regional Program Manager US EPA – New England EBCNE April 19, 2006.
Jim McCammon DTSC February 15, 2007 Determining Penalties for Hazardous Waste Violations.
1 Enforcement Options and Case Studies Lisa Brown Assistant Counsel for Enforcement Cal/EPA CUPA/UST Conference February 8, 2006 February 8, 2006.
MSHA Part 100 Overview. Reformulates the process of assigning points to arrive at an assessment. Adds a provision to an operator’s history addressing.
Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Pertaining to Enforcement of all M/NM Mines. New ombudsman within the Office.
WATER QUALITY TOPICS ENFORCEMENT – ARE FINES BECOMING A WAY OF LIFE AT THE DEQ By:Donald D. Maisch Supervising Attorney, Water Quality Division Office.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC SERVICES 13 FEBRUARY 2008 BY NOSIPO SOBEKWA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT OF.
STATE TANF PROGRAMS TIP For additional advice see Dale Carnegie Training® Presentation Guidelines.
Oregon Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Liquor Laws Linda Ignowski Oregon Liquor Control Commission October 2008.
Enforcement What to Expect From the Water Boards, and What to Look for Locally ENTS Workshop August Mark Bradley Office of Enforcement CA State.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
December 2015 Detailed Presentation STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS CALIFORNIA Water Boards.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Top 10 Series Changes to HIPAA Devon Bernard AOPA Reimbursement Services Coordinator.
© 2005 Powell Goldstein LLP. All rights reserved. Practical Pointers for Using EPA’s Audit Policy Matthew Mattila
COST TRANSFERS AT-A-GLANCE THE FOLLOWING IS PROVIDED AS A BRIEF OUTLINE OF THE BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR EMORY’S COST TRANSFER POLICY. FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION,
ork ork Work – Part 261 ä Individual Responsibility ä State Accountability ä Work Activities ä Caseload Reduction Credit ä Work Penalties ä Waivers ä.
Chapter 11 Contingency. Contingent 1.concept: past transactions or events of a situation, the results by the occurrence of uncertain future events occur.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
Evidence and Enforcement Tools For Prosecuting Waste Tire Cases Wendy Breckon CIWMB Senior Staff Counsel
M S H A PART 100 RULING. 30 CFR PART 100 ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES; FINAL RULE.
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 6 Provisions and contingencies.
Streamlined Penalty Enforcement Program Board approved Waste Tire Hauler Streamlined Penalty Enforcement Program implementation in January 2009 Approval.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Creative Use of Administrative Order Authority Expedited Settlement Agreements.
Storage, Labeling, Controlled Medications Guidance Training CFR § (b)(2)(3)(d)(e) F431.
Choosing the Appropriate Enforcement Mechanism Enforcement Response Policies.
WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU HAVE AN “ALLEGED” VIOLATION Keith W. Turner Watkins & Eager.
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
California’s E-waste Efforts
The Solid Waste Disposal Act and the Superfund Act
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
What happens if it all goes wrong?
Administrative Enforcement Process
Hazardous Waste Generator Improvements Rule
Liability Under CERCLA
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS CERTIFICATION AND ENFORCEMENT
UNUSUAL INCIDENT REPORTS AND MAJOR UNUSUAL INCIDENTS
Charles Case Hunton & Williams LLP (919)
Administrative Penalties
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
A PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT
Presentation transcript:

Mickey Pierce DTSC February 9, 2006 Determining Penalties for HW violations

You should be able to: 1)Recognize the factors to be considered when calculating a penalty. 2)Use the penalty matrix to determine the base penalty for hazardous waste violations. 3)Recognize factors that allow for adjustment of base penalties 4)Have the basic knowledge to allow you to develop penalty guidelines for non-hazardous waste actions 5) Know who to contact if you still have questions

HSC, Section (a) Authorizes UPAs to assess penalties for each program element that is subject to the Administrative Enforcement Process The section refers you each individual program penalty guidance- only HW has an established matrix with dollar values

HSC, Section (b) - when calculating a penalty, you shall consider: Nature, circumstances, extent & gravity of violation. Violator’s efforts to prevent, abate, or clean up conditions posing a threat to public health or the environment. Violator’s ability to pay. Prophylactic effect of the penalty.

Title 22, CCR sections – Initial Penalty.63– Intent Initial adjustment.64– Multiple Violations.65– Multi-day Violations.66– Minor Violations.67– Base Penalty.68– Adjustments.69– Final Penalty

Statutory Maximum The Statutory Maximum for any individual penalty is $25,000 –This value is the maximum for each day of the violation –This is NOT the maximum for the final penalty

Model for calculating a penalty Initial Penalty Adjusted Initial Penalty Multiple Violations Multiday Violations Base Penalty Total Base Penalty Adjusted Total Base Penalty

#CitationViolationPotential for HarmExtent of Deviation # of Time s Viola tion Occu rred Statu tory Maxi mum Initial Penal ty Inten t Fact or Base Penal ty Addit onal Amou nts for Multid ay Violat ions Econ omic Benef it TOTA L

What are the violations? Upper left –Illegal disposal Right side –Storage without a permit/storage longer than allowed accumulation times Bottom Left –Storage without a permit/storage longer than allowed accumulation times

Step 1: Go to the worksheet Assign a number for each violation Regulatory or Statutory Section Write a brief description of each violation –Tell the reader what the regulatory requirement is –Can add “details” after the requirement (I do it in parenthesis)

#CitationViolation 1 HSC, Section (a) Illegal disposal (sludge to dumpster) 2 HSC, section 25201(a) and T22, section (a) Storage without a permit/ for greater than allowable time limits (301 days) 3 HSC, section 25201(a) and T22, section (a) Storage without a permit/ for greater than allowable time limits

Step 2: Determine the Initial Penalty Determine an initial penalty for each violation, considering actual and potential harm and the extent of deviation from hazardous waste management requirements. “Potential” and “actual” harm shall be treated the same for HW*.

“Potential for Harm” Major - The characteristics and/or amount of the substance involved present a major threat to human health or safety or the environment and the circumstances of the violation indicate a high potential for harm. Moderate - …do not present a major threat … and likelihood of harm from non- compliance is not high. Minimal - … threat is low.

Potential for Harm Factors The characteristics of the substance. The amount of the substance. The extent to which human life or health is threatened. The extent which animal life is threatened. The extent to which the environment is threatened.

Something to Note: A violation must involve the actual management of hazardous waste for it to have a major potential for harm. -- paperwork only violations should not be “major”

#CitationViolation Potential For Harm 1 HSC, (a) Illegal Disposal (sludge to dumpster) Minimal? Moderate? (5-10 gallons, zinc waste with low toxicity, was open to elements) 2 HSC, 25201(a) Storage > allowable time limits (301 days) Minimal (30 gallon bag, Cr/Cu/Ni sludge, in containment,good condition) 3 HSC, 25201(a) Storage > allowable time limits (301 days) Minimal (30 gallon bag, Cr/Cu/Ni sludge, in containment,good condition)

“Extent of Deviation” Major - The act deviates from the requirement to such an extent that the requirement is completely ignored or the function of the requirement is rendered ineffective because some of its provisions are not complied with. Moderate - The act deviates from the requirements, but functions to some extent. Minimal - The act deviates from the requirements, but function nearly as intended.

Extent of Deviation Factors For requirements with more than one part, consider the extent of violation in terms of the more significant requirement. For single requirement, the range of potential deviation varies.

#CitationViolationPotential for Harm Extent of Deviation (a) Illegal Disposal (sludge to dumpster) Minimal (5-10 gallons, zinc waste with low toxicity, was open to elements) Major (rule is totally ignored, if unabated, would have ended up at landfill) (a) Storage > than allowable time limits (301 days) Minimal (30 gallon bag, Cr/Cu/Ni sludge, in containment, good condition) Moderate ( Rule ignored, but functions mostly as required only 31 days past due, pick up scheduled for 2/11/06) (a) Storage > than allowable time limits (301 days) Minimal (30 gallon bag, Cr/Cu/Ni sludge, in containment, good condition) Moderate ( Rule ignored, but functions mostly as required only 31 days past due, pick up scheduled for 2/11/06)

Initial Penalty Matrix – HW (in dollars)

#Potential for Harm Extent of Deviation No. of times violation occurred Statutory Maximum Initial Penalty 1 Minimal (5-10 gallons, zinc waste with low toxicity, was open to elements) Major (rule totally ignored, if unabated, would have ended up at landfill) 1$25,000$10,500 2 Minimal (30 gallon bag, Cr/Cu/Ni sludge, in containment, good condition) Moderate ( Rule ignored, but functions mostly as required only 31 days past due, pick up sched for 2/11/06) 1$25,000$4,000 3 Minimal (30 gallon bag, Cr/Cu/Ni sludge, in containment, good condition) Moderate ( Rule ignored, but functions mostly as required only 31 days past due, pick up sched for 2/11/06) 1$25,000$4,000

Steps in calculating the penalty Initial Penalty Adjusted Initial Penalty Multiple Violations Multiday Violations Base Penalty Total Base Penalty Adjusted Total Base Penalty

Initial Adjustments (Intent) Adjust the initial penalty based on violator’s intent in committing violation.

Adjustment Factors for Violator’s Intent

#Potential for Harm Extent of Deviation No. of times violation occurred Statutory Maximum Initial Penalty Intent Factor 1 MinimalMajor1$25,000$10,500 No adjustment 2 MinimalModerate1$25,000$4,000 No adjustment 3 MinimalModerate1$25,000$4,000 No adjustment

Initial Adjustments (Economic Benefit) Increase the initial penalty by the amount of economic benefit gained. Increase to statutory maximum. Include: -Avoided costs. -Delayed costs. -Increased profits. -Avoided interest.

#Potential for Harm Extent of Deviation No. of times violation occurred Statutory Maximum Initial Penalty Intent Factor Economic Benefit 1 MinimalMajor1$25,000$10,500No Adjust None, waste was drummed and hauled as HW 2 MinimalModerate1$25,000$4,000No Adjust $300 (Delayed cost of disposal) 3 MinimalModerate1$25,000$4,000No Adjust $ 300 (Delayed cost of disposal)

Steps in calculating the penalty Initial Penalty Adjusted Initial Penalty Multiple Violations Multiday Violations Base Penalty Total Base Penalty Adjusted Total Base Penalty

Multiple Violations A single initial penalty may be assessed for multiple violations. Appropriate when: -The facility has violated the same requirement in different location (e.g., units) within the facility. -The facility has violated the same requirement on different days, unless the facility has been notified of the violation and has had sufficient time to correct the violation. -Violations that are not independent or are not substantially distinguishable.

#CitationViolation 1 HSC, Section (a) Illegal disposal (sludge to dumpster) 2 HSC, section 25201(a) and T22, section (a) Storage without a permit/ for greater than allowable time limits (301 days) 3 HSC, section 25201(a) and T22, section (a) Storage without a permit/ for greater than allowable time limits

#Potential for Harm Extent of Deviation No. of times violation occurred Statutory Maximum Initial PenaltyIntent Factor Economic Benefit 1 MinimalMajor1$25,000$10,500No AdjustNone, waste was drummed and hauled as HW 2 MinimalModerate1212 $25,000 X2 = $50,000 $4,000No Adjust$300 (Delayed cost of disposal) 3 MinimalModerate1$25,000 Rolled into Viol #2

Steps in calculating the penalty Initial Penalty Adjusted Initial Penalty Multiple Violations Multiday Violations Base Penalty Total Base Penalty Adjusted Total Base Penalty

Multiday Violations The initial penalty for the first day of violation shall be determined as provided in Sections and Take your initial penalty and multiply by 2% –Then multiply by the number of days Add this number to your initial penalty

Multiday Penalties- Calculating Viol #1 –Is there a multiday factor? Yes: stated that in the trash for 3 days now –Initial Penalty x 0.02 x no. of days 10,500 x 0.02 x 2 days = $420 Initial date of viol (2/7) x 0.02 x “other” days (2/8 and 2/9) Violation #2 –Is there multiday? If so, how many days?

#Potential for Harm Extent of Deviation No. of times violation occurred Statutory Maximum Initial Penalty Intent Factor Economic Benefit Multiday amounts 1 MinimalMajor1$25,000$10,500No Adjust None, waste was drummed and hauled as HW $10,500 x 0.02 x 2 days = $420 2 MinimalModerate2$50,000$4,000No Adjust $300 (Delayed cost of disposal) $4000 x 0.02x 30 = $2,400 3 MinimalModerate1$25,000Rolled into Viol #2

Steps in calculating the penalty Initial Penalty Adjusted Initial Penalty Multiple Violations Multiday Violations Base Penalty (for each violation) Total Base Penalty Adjusted Total Base Penalty

Base Penalties If a violation is a one day occurrence, the base penalty for that violation is the adjusted initial penalty. The base penalty for multiday violations is the initial penalty for the first day of violation plus the calculated mulitday penalty. This is adding up everything for each violation (adding across a row)

#Potential for Harm Extent of Deviation No. of times violation occurred Statutory Maximum Initial Penalty Intent Factor Economic Benefit Multiday amounts Tota l 1 MinimalMajor1$25,000$10,500No Adjust None, waste was drummed and hauled as HW $10,500 x 0.02 x 2 days = $420 $10, MinimalModerate2$50,000$4,000No Adjust $300 (Delayed cost of disposal) $4000 x 0.02x 30 = $2,400 $6, MinimalModerate1$25,000Rolled into Viol #2 TOTALS

Steps in calculating the penalty Initial Penalty Adjusted Initial Penalty Multiple Violations Multiday Violations Base Penalty Total Base Penalty Adjusted Total Base Penalty

#Potential for Harm Extent of Deviation No. of times violation occurred Statutory Maximum Initial Penalty Intent Factor Economic Benefit Multiday amounts Total 1 MinimalMajor1$25,000$10,500No Adjust None, waste was drummed and hauled as HW $10,500 x 0.02 x 2 days = $420 $10,920 2 MinimalModerate2$50,000$4,000No Adjust $300 (Delayed cost of disposal) $4000 x 0.02x 30 = $2,400 $6,700 3 MinimalModerate1$25,000Rolled into Viol #2 TOTA LS $17,6 20

Steps in calculating the penalty Initial Penalty Adjusted Initial Penalty Multiple Violations Multiday Violations Base Penalty Total Base Penalty Adjusted Total Base Penalty

HSC, Section (b) - when calculating a penalty, you shall consider: Nature, circumstances, extent & gravity of violation. Violator’s efforts to prevent, abate, or clean up conditions posing a threat to public health or the environment. Violator’s ability to pay. Prophylactic effect of the penalty.

Adjustments to Total Base Penalty Violator’s present efforts to prevent...conditions posing a threat” (Cooperation) Violator’s past efforts to prevent… conditions posing a threat (Compliance History) Deterrent effect that the penalty would have on regulated community (Prophylactic Effect) Ability to Pay

Adjustment for Cooperation ( )- HW

Cooperation Compliance HistoryProphylactic EffectAbility to Pay No Adjustment: (1) Removed form trash that day, now shipping as HW: (2/3) Shipped as scheduled on 2/11. Adjustment: No adjustment Adjustment:

Adjustments Compliance History- HW factors A history of noncompliance over the past five (5) years. Maximum adjustment factor up to 100 percent. Downward adjustments –5% for each prior “no violation” report (up to 10% max) –Up to 15% if ISO certified

Compliance History Factors- HW guidelines Previous violations at the site receive more weight than previous violations at another site owned or operated by the same person. Recent violations receive more weight than older violations. The same or substantially similar previous violations receive more weight than previous unrelated violations.

Cooperation Compliance History Prophylactic EffectAbility to Pay No Adjustment: (1) Removed form trash that day, now shipping as HW: (2/3) Shipped as scheduled on 2/11. Downward 10%: Last two reports show no storage problems, review of manifest shows usually ship every 180 days Adjustment: No adjustment Adjustment: Downward 10% ($17,620 x.1= $1, 762) Adjustment:

Adjustments Prophylactic Effect The total base penalty may be adjusted upward or downward to ensure that the penalty is sufficient to provide a prophylactic effect on both the violator and the regulated community as a whole. [pro-phy-lac-tic: tending to prevent or ward off]

CooperationCompliance History Prophylactic Effect Ability to Pay No Adjustment: (1) Removed form trash that day, now shipping as HW: (2/3) Shipped as scheduled on 2/11. Downward 10%: Last two reports show no storage problems, review of manifest shows usually ship every 180 days No adjustment: penalty has required effect Adjustment: No adjustment Adjustment: Downward 10% ($17,620 x.1= $1, 762) Adjustment: No adjustment Adjustment:

Adjustments Ability to Pay The payment of the final penalty may be extended over a period of time if immediate, full payment would cause extreme financial hardship. If extending the penalty over a period of time would cause extreme financial hardship, the penalty may be reduced.

Ability to Pay Prohibitions- HW note No adjustment for ability to pay may be made if the penalty has been adjusted upward because of failure to cooperate or because of compliance history.

CooperationCompliance HistoryProphylactic Effect Ability to Pay No Adjustment: (1) Removed form trash that day, now shipping as HW: (2/3) Shipped as scheduled on 2/11. Downward 10%: Last two reports show no storage problems, review of manifest shows usually ship every 180 days No adjustment: penalty has required effect Downward 75%: Facility showed accounting noting profit of only $1000 per month for past year. Adjustment: No adjustment Adjustment: Downward 10% ($17,620 x.1= $1, 762) Adjustment: No adjustment Adjustment: Downward 75% ($17,620 x.75 = $13,215

Final Penalty The final penalty consists of the total base penalty with any adjustments made.

Finish it up!! (and off to negotiation and settlement) Total Base penalty = $17,620 Cooperation = $0 Compliance History = -$1,762 Prophylactic Effect = $0 Ability to Pay = -$13,215 Total Calculated Penalty = $2,643