Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program From Efficiency to Quality Service Delivery through the collection and analysis.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.

Advertisements

Presentation of the draft version to the Governance Commission

Evaluation for 1st Year Grantees Shelly Potts, Ph.D. Arizona State University

1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.

State of Washington Improving the Value and Performance of your Pcard Program October 1, 2013.

Constructing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan Presented by: Cindy Banyai, Ph.D. Executive Director, efocus Institute IREX Community Solutions Program September.

Capturing the impact of research Briony Rayfield.

Business Excellence within The University of Bolton Strategic Planning Process 17 th October 2006.

Planning a measurement program What is a metrics plan? A metrics plan must describe the who, what, where, when, how, and why of metrics. It begins with.

COORDINATED AUDITS IN AFROSAI-E Presented By Josephine Mukomba.

Reflections on using indicators and measuring impact in human rights Juan Carlos Martínez and Juan Salgado Fundar, Centro de Análisis e Investigación.

GaBi The contribution of Life Cycle Assessment to global sustainability reporting of organizations J. Pflieger, M. Fischer, T. Kupfer, P. Eyerer University.

UN-Water Water Country Briefs Introduction & Background Frederik Pischke Interagency Water Advisory UN-Water Frederik Pischke Interagency Water Advisory.

African Health Leadership and Management Network (AHLMN) Plenary Overview of Business Plan.

PEFA Performance Measurement Framework A Tool For Budget Reforms THE GEORGIA EXPERIENCE.

Knowledge Management Assessment of an Organization

Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.

Measuring the Impact WP5 & WP9 ECHO Utrecht / KinderUni Wien Hendrik Asper (ECHO)

Development Aid Statistics, Reporting and Aid Effectiveness Misha Belkindas Development Data Group World Bank May 2008.

1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris

WEAVEonline Basics for Academic Assessment Steven H. Wilson, Ph.D. Dean, Academic Assessment Part Two: How to Establish Mission, Outcomes, Objectives,

U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Why a Rule of Law Coalition for Business?

The Exchange, May 2013 Einar Gorrissen, INTOSAI Development Initiative (IDI) Capacity Development to Strengthen Value and Benefits of SAIs.

Independent Monitoring & Evaluation for Accountability Presented to Health Sector Steering Committee, 21 st July 2009.

…and how to give it to them What CEOs Want Patti Phillips, Ph.D.

8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.

UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.

ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.

ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.

Juanita Riaño Transparency International The Empirics of Governance May 1-2, 2008 Washington D.C.

Access to Medicine Index Problem Statement Long-standing debate about: What is the role of the pharmaceutical industry in access to medicines? Where are.

Defining a good governance assessment framework Public sector modernisation Shipra Narang Suri International Consultant, OGC Stakeholders’ Consultative.

Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.

Public Service Commission Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 25 May 2007 Batho Pele Audits and Citizen Satisfaction.

ICT TOOLS AND SOCIETY INVOLVEMENT AMONG THE EUPAN NETWORK HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE SURVEY RESULTS TANYA CHETCUTI AND MARCO FICHERA - WORKSHOP EUROPEAN COMMISSION.

Benchmarking Corporate Responsibility EAUC 12 TH Annual Conference University Exeter 2 nd April 2008  Helps with internal data consolidation.

CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY OVERVIEW REPORT PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION 09 APRIL 2003.

Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

Panel on mainstreaming disability in MDG processes New York, 3 September 2009 Mainstreaming disability in the MDG process Maria Martinho United Nations.

Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission

Governance Indicators at AfDB Stephen Bahemuka May, 2012 African Development Bank.

Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center

Barcelona Declaration of Measurement Principles Presented June 17, 2010 Revised June 20, 2010 Final July 19, 2010 Global Alliance ICCO Institute for Public.

Committee on Governance and Popular Participation II PROGRAMME PREVIEW HIGHLIGHTS Jan 2012 – Dec 2013 Sub-Programme 3: Governance and Public Administration.

SEL1 Implementing an assessment – the Process Session IV Lusaka, January M. Gonzales de Asis and F. Recanatini, WBI

IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007.

REVIEW OF JAR EXPERIENCES MAIN FINDINGS IHP+ Nairobi Meeting December

Mexico’s Experience Monitoring Millennium Development Goals New York, 17 th December, 2013 Enrique Ordaz INEGI 1 Open Working Group.

Lusaka, Zambia April The Dilemma of Measuring Corruption How do you measure something which differ across societies in terms of its definition,

Measuring Institutional Capacity for Sustainability Mark D. Bardini, Ph.D. Chemonics International AEA Webinar September 15, 2011.

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Indicator on Use of Results Framework Seoul GP Annual Workshop Indicator Clinic 6 November 2014effectivecooperation.org.

Evaluation What is evaluation?

USAID’s Data Quality Standards & Conducting a DQA # ? % ?

Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.

Country Level Programs

Biodiversity.europa.eu BISE EEA and ETC/BD Rania Spyropoulou.

Progress on Aid Effectiveness: Monitoring the Global Partnership and the Moldova Partnership Principles Lucreția Ciurea, State Chancellery Jakob Schemel,

I3U Commitment 27 “A – Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard B – Research Programme on Public Sector and Social Innovation“ Venue: Vienna, I3U Project Meeting.

Ghaleb Akari, MA PMP CPT MENADEV LLC. Dead Sea - Jordan March 20° 2017

Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations

Business Environment Dr. Aravind Banakar –

Business Environment Dr. Aravind Banakar –

Business Environment

Business Environment

Business Environment

UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW

SAIs FIGHTING CORRUPTION – INTOSAINT STRATEGY

OECD - MAPS Methodology for Assessment of Procurement Systems - Assessment Tool Arun Kumar Kolsur Senior Procurement Specialist January 13, 2019.

Presentation transcript:

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program From Efficiency to Quality Service Delivery through the collection and analysis of relevant data Patrick Coughlin, PhD, CPT

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program 1.1. The ultimate objective of HICD is to… …”enable organizations to fulfill their mandates and provide the highest level of service to their constituents and stakeholders”… 1.2. HICD focuses on… …“tangible, measurable performance …”along measures established at different levels within the organization”… …”scorecards – for example - enable organizations to establish benchmarks and targets for current and future performance”… Source: USAID E3 HICD Handbook 2011

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program The Rwandan Governance Scorecard (RGS) Description of the RGS Annual publication on Rwandan Governance 2012 edition captures data for 2011 Results reflected on a score of at each relevant performance indicator

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program

2.1.2 Description of the RGS “360” approach to external data sources: – International indexes, assessments and criteria: Worldwide Governance Indicators, Freedom House assessments, the Mo Ibrahim Index of African Governance, Transparency International assessments, Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) criteria, Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and the Global Integrity Index Internal hard data (i.e., planned ouput targets vs. actual results at each Rwandan public institution), plus quantitative perception surveys on representative samples of Rwandan citizens as well as qualitative studies among experts

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program Description of the RGS Reflects continued commitment to evidence-based policies and objective Objectives of survey: – Generate credible and reliable data on governance issues for national and international Stakeholders – Serve as a practical tool that will drive policy reform through the identification of areas for improvement and actionable recommendations – Contribute to current knowledge about governance in Rwanda

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program 3.1. Summary of RGS results

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program 3.2. Performance of RGS indicators

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program 3.3 Identifying improvements and deteriorations in performance

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program 3.4 Looking at indicators in depth: Quality of public service delivery

Good Governance and Public Administration Strengthening (GGPAS) Program

4. From measurable results to analysis of results to action