Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stacking it Up Experimental Observations on the operation of Dual Stack Services in todays Network Geoff Huston APNIC R&D February
Advertisements

Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston APNIC R&D August
Stacking it Up Experimental Observations on the operation of Dual Stack Services Geoff Huston IETF-80 March
Measuring IPv6 Geoff Huston APNIC Labs, February 2014.
IPv6: Application perspective Zaid Ali Chairman/President SFBAY ISOC
Project by: Palak Baid (pb2358) Gaurav Pandey (gip2103) Guided by: Jong Yul Kim.
10/6/116Watch Project 1 6Watch: Gauging the Global Rollout of IPv6 Dan Massey Dave Meyer Lixia Zhang Colorado State U. Oregon UCLA.
Implementing IPv6 Module B 8: Implementing IPv6
IPv4 Run Out and Transitioning to IPv6 Marco Hogewoning Trainer, RIPE NCC.
17/10/031 Summary Peer to peer applications and IPv6 Microsoft Three-Degrees IPv6 transition mechanisms used by Three- Degrees: 6to4 Teredo.
Comparing IPv4 and IPv6 from the perspective of BGP dynamic activity Geoff Huston APNIC February 2012.
IPv6: The Future of the Internet? July 27th, 1999 Auug.
BGP in 2009 Geoff Huston APNIC May Conventional BGP Wisdom IAB Workshop on Inter-Domain routing in October 2006 – RFC 4984: “routing scalability.
Geoff Huston Chief Scientist, Asia Pacific Network Information Centre IPv6 Workshop European Digital Agenda Assembly June 2011.
May 2015 Update on Measuring IPv6 Geoff Huston, George Michaelson APNIC Labs March 2015.
IPv6 end client measurement George Michaelson
IPv4/IPv6 Translation: Framework Li, Bao, and Baker.
Allocations vs Announcements A comparison of RIR IPv4 Allocation Records with Global Routing Announcements Geoff Huston May 2004 (Activity supported by.
Lecturer : Ms.Trần Thị Ngọc Hoa Chapter 2 Methods Configuring Name Resolution Methods.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional Internet Registries s do not make forecasts or predictions.
George Michaelson, Geoff Huston APNIC Measuring IPv6 Users.
/dev/urandom Barry Britt, Systems Support Group Department of Computer Science Iowa State University.
IP Version 6 COMT 222. © 2005 Hans Kruse & Shawn Ostermann, Ohio University 2 Why change IP Number of addresses Routing Table Size Client configuration.
A One Year Study of Internet IPv6 Traffic Haakon Ringberg Craig Labovitz Danny McPherson Scott.
1 IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji Geoff Huston.
Chapter 13 Microsoft DNS Server n DNS server: A Microsoft service that resolves computer names to IP addresses, such as resolving the computer name Brown.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
IPv6 – What You Need To Know Tom Hollingsworth CCNP,CCVP,CCSP, MCSE.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
An overview of IP addressing history and policy issues Leo Vegoda Number Resources Manager, IANA.
APNIC Update The state of IP address distribution and IPv6 deployment status Miwa Fujii Senior IPv6 Program Specialist APNIC.
Advanced Networking Lab. Given two IP addresses, the estimation algorithm for the path and latency between them is as follows: Step 1: Map IP addresses.
IPv6 for ISP Industry Sify Technologies Ltd Somasundaram Padmanabhan Network Engineering IPv6 Awareness Workshop.
IPv4 Unallocated Address Space Exhaustion Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC November 2007.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
BGP in 2011 Geoff Huston APNIC. Conventional (Historical) BGP Wisdom IAB Workshop on Inter-Domain routing in October 2006 – RFC 4984: “routing scalability.
Vytautas Valancius, Nick Feamster, Akihiro Nakao, and Jennifer Rexford.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston November 2004 APNIC.
Happy Eyeballs for the DNS Geoff Huston, George Michaelson APNIC Labs October 2015.
DNSSEC – Issues and Achievements Geoff Huston APNIC Labs.
IPv4 Address Lifetime SANOG IV Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
What if Everyone Did It? Geoff Huston APNIC Labs.
George Michaelson, Geoff Huston APNIC Measuring IPv6 Users.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston August 2004 APNIC.
17/10/031 Euronetlab – Implementation of Teredo
PacINET 2011 The state of IP address distribution and its impact Elly Tawhai Senior Internet Resource Analyst/Liaison Officer, Pacific, APNIC 1.
IPv6 Matrix Project - Page 1 IPv6 Matrix Project Tracking IPv6 connectivity Worldwide Dr. Olivier MJ.
شركت ارتباطات زيرساخت آبان 1393
IPv4 shortage and CERN 15 January 2013
Top-Down Network Design Chapter Six Designing Models for Addressing and Naming Copyright 2010 Cisco Press & Priscilla Oppenheimer.
More Specific Announcements in BGP
Routing 2015 Scaling BGP Geoff Huston APNIC May 2016.
Measuring IPv6 ISP Performance
Addressing 2015 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment
Are we there yet? Measuring iPv6 in 2016
Addressing 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
BGP update profiles and the implications for secure BGP update validation processing Geoff Huston PAM April 2007.
Geoff Huston APNIC Labs May 2018
IP Addresses in 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
More Specific Announcements in BGP
IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation
Beyond the IPv4 Internet
IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation
Routing Table Status Report
2005 – A BGP Year in Review February 2006 Geoff Huston
Routing Table Status Report
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy
When Can We Start Dropping IPv4 on the DNS Root Servers?
Presentation transcript:

Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson

Available data sets We have access to dual stack data for:

Available data sets We have access to dual stack data for: – BGP Route table – DNS server traffic – WEB Server access and the data sets go back over the past 4 years

The BGP view of IPv

The BGP view of IPv4 120K 280K 200K

BGP: IPv6 and IPv K 150K

BGP IPv6 : IPv4 0.3% 0.45% 0.6%

What’s this saying? IPV6 is 0.5% of IPv4 in terms of routing table entries

What’s this saying? But the routing domain of IPv4 is heavily fragmented, while IPv6 is not, so this figure is not a good reflection of relative deployment

Let ’ s refine the question: How much of the Internet today is capable of running IPv6? One way to answer this is to look at the BGP table on a per AS basis

IPv6 AS Count

IPv4 AS Count 16K 30K 24K

AS Count IPv6 : IPv4 2.2% 3.0% 3.8%

What’s this saying? The number of AS ’ s announcing IPv6 routes has risen from 2% to 4% in 4 years

That 4% is not uniform 15% of IPV4 Transit AS ’ s also announce IPv6 routes 2% of IPV4 Stub AS ’ s also announce IPv6 routes

Capability vs Actual Use If 15% of the number of transit AS ’ s are announcing IPv6 address prefixes, does this mean that 15% of the Internet ’ s “ core ” is running IPv6 right now?

DNS Reverse Query Load Examine the average query load for reverse PTR queries for IPv6 and IPv4 zones for each of these server sets

Relative DNS Query Load 1% 2%

What’s this saying? Reverse DNS queries for IPv6 addresses are around 0.2% of the IPv4 query load AsiaPac IPv6 query load is higher than for other regions Query load has increased since 2007 The interactions of forwarders and caches with applications that perform reverse lookups imply a very indirect relationship between actual use of IPv6 and DNS reverse query data

What’s this saying? Reverse DNS queries for IPv6 addresses are around 0.2% of the IPv4 query load AsiaPac IPv6 query load is higher than for other regions Query load has increased since 2007 The interactions of forwarders and caches with applications that perform reverse lookups imply a very indirect relationship between actual use of IPv6 and DNS reverse query data Interpretation of DNS reverse resolution data is really tough!

Web Server Stats Take a couple of dual-homed web servers: Count the number of distinct IPv4 and IPv6 query addresses per day – Not the number of ‘ hits ’, just distinct source addresses that access these sites, to reduce the relative impact of robots and crawlers on the data and normalize the data against different profiles of use Look at the V6 / V4 access ratio

Web Server Stats Take a couple of dual-homed web servers: Count the number of distinct IPv4 and IPv6 query addresses per day – Not the number of ‘ hits ’, just distinct source addresses that access these sites, to reduce the relative impact of robots and crawlers on the data and normalize the data against different profiles of use Look at the V6 / V4 access ratio What proportion of end host systems will prefer end-to-end IPv6, when there is a choice?

APNIC Web Server Stats % 0.5% 1.0%

RIPE NCC Web Server Stats % 0.5% 1.0% 2007

Combined Stats % 0.5% 1.0%

Combined Stats % 0.5% 1.0% APNIC Meetings RIPE Meetings

What’s this saying? Relative use of IPv6 has slowly increased over four years to reach 0.4% today Is interest in IPv6 slowing picking up again? Or Are we seeing Increased use of auto- tunnelling of IPv6 on end host stacks?

Use of V6 Transition Tools % 50% 100% 6to4 Teredo

Use of V6 Transition Tools % 50% 100% 6to4 Teredo

What’s this saying? Around 25% of IPv6 clients appear to use tunnels to reach IPv6 servers And that hasn ’ t changed much over time

Where are we with IPv6? 15%, or around one in six, of the transit ISPs of the IPv4 Internet are playing with IPv6 in some fashion

Where are we with IPv6? The “ size ” of the IPv6 deployment in terms of end host IPv6 capability is around 4 parts per thousand Internet end hosts at present

Where are we with IPv6? Buts that ’ s probably overstating it! – Widespread NAT use in IPv4 undercounts IPv4 host counts – These web sites are tech weenie web sites. More general sites may have less IPv6 clients

Where are we with IPv6? The “ size ” of the IPv6 deployment in terms of end host IPv6 capability is around 2 parts per thousand Internet end hosts at present

Where is IPv6? IPv6 Deployment IPv4 Pool Size Size of the Internet IPv6 Transition Today Time ? 0.2%