CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice Class 3 March 14, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Office of Curriculum, Instruction and School Support 2012 Mathematical Practice 3: Construct Viable Arguments and Critique the Reasoning of Others Mathematics.
School Year Session 5: November 6, 2013 Planning for Reasoning, Reasons for Planning 1.1.
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Using Number Talks and Frayer Models Susan Ritchie Michelle Armenta
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
THE VISION OF THE COMMON CORE: EMBRACING THE CHALLENGE UCDMP SATURDAY SERIES SECONDARY SESSION 5 MAY 3, 2014.
Effective Math Questioning
Designing a Continuum of Learning to Assess Mathematical Practice NCSM April, 2011.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Correlating Go Math & Standards for Mathematical Practices
ADAPTED FROM A WORKSHOP PREPARED FOR THE RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BY KRISTINA SPARFVEN The Rigors of Ratio and Proportional Reasoning in the.
Grade 3-5 Fraction Development in the Common Core State Standards Wisconsin Mathematics Council, Inc. Leading quality mathematics education in Wisconsin.
California Mathematics Council WORKING WITH PARENTS AND FAMILIES TO SUPPORT THE COMMONCORE MATH STANDARDS.
A Look at Standards for Mathematical Practice, Grades K-2
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Victor Scott School. Learning Objectives In this session, Mathematicians will: O Learn about geometric symmetry O Explore rotation and line or reflection.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. Today’s Agenda Stipends SCECH’s Sign-in and out! Moodle
NYC Schools Task Alignment Project The Common Core State Standards Aligning and Rating Math Tasks April 28, 2011.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
I NSTRUCTIONAL S HIFTS IN M ATHEMATICS D EVELOPING P ERSEVERANCE & P ROBLEM -S OLVING S KILLS Shanon Cruz Jenny Kim Amber Hardy-Soto Kate Jenkins.
Brandon Graham Putting The Practices Into Action March 20th.
K-1 TIPM3 Dr. Monica Hartman Cathy Melody and Gwen Mitchell November 2, 2011.
Standards of Mathematical Practice
School Year Session 10: February 19, 2014 Geometry? Algebra? We Couldn’t Decide. What the Heck, We’ll do Both! 1.1.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
T1PM3 4 th and 5 th grade Math Institute Focus on Geometry, Measurement and Data & The Eight Mathematical Practice September 27, 2011.
Implementing the Mathematical Practices through TEAMwork Amy Hunter, PhD LEAD Public Schools.
9.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 17 SEPT 2014 TAKING CHANCES (IN CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY)
Examining the CCSS in Practice through lesson plans and student work Class 3 Part 1 March 14, 2011.
A Look at Standards for Mathematical Practice Gr. 3-5 Class 1 January 31, 2011.
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
The World of Exemplars and Implications for SRBI Sharon Keegan – Secondary Math Curriculum Specialist CREC Magnet Schools.
Standards of Mathematical Practice.
Implementing the CCSS 3 rd – 5 th Grade Kristin Frang, Mathematics Consultant.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS MATHEMATICAL PRACTICES OBJECTIVE: APPLY BEST MATH PRACTICES TO SOLVE PROBLEMS TO BECOME A MATHEMATICALLY PROFICIENT STUDENT.
Beyond Slope and Points David Harris, Escondido USD/K12 Alliance Susan Gomez Zwiep, CSU Long Beach/K12 Alliance CMC Palm Springs Oct, 2013 Lesson Available:
Implementing Common Core Standards in Math Wednesday, March 7th - 4pm Eastern Time Reasoning & Explaining in the Practices Presented by Sara Delano Moore,
4.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 4 29 OCT 2014 DECISIONS, DECISIONS.
Professional Growth Systems And Nevada Academic Content Standards Strengthening teacher capacity through powerful feedback March 20, 2015.
MATH COMMUNICATIONS Created for the Georgia – Alabama District By: Diane M. Cease-Harper, Ed.D 2014.
SOUTH DAKOTA COUNTS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE Brookings, SD
Math Fellows January 22, Setting Goals and Selecting Tasks 1.Anticipating 2.Monitoring 3.Selecting 4.Sequencing 5.Connecting The Five Practices.
Bestpowerpointtemplates.com Points of View – Telling a Story with Data Exploring Computer Science – Lesson 1-5.
CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice Class 3 March 14, 2011.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
USING VIDEO TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THE MATH PRACTICES LOOK LIKE IN K-5 CLASSROOMS.
Standards for Mathematical Practice 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable.
Common Core State Standards: The Wisconsin State Standards Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, Grades 6-8 January 31, 2011.
The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), Using Properties to Reason through Tough Questions.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
PUTTING THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS INTO ACTION Sandy Christie Craig Bowman 2012.
Curriculum Leadership Council Elementary Mathematics Break-Out Session November 21, 2013.
Welcome! Please arrange yourselves in groups of 6 so that group members represent: A mix of grade levels A mix of schools 1.
Curriculum Leadership Council High School Model Lesson Functions and Everyday Situations June 20, 2013.
Mathematical Practice Standards
5th Grade Math Content Training Session 1
Mathematical Discourse: An Example
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2016.
Mathematics and Special Education Leadership Protocols
Cultivating Math Conversation Through Questioning
STEM Teacher Knowledge in the Common Core Era: Building the Standards for Mathematical Practice into Professional Development Kevin McLeod, UW-Milwaukee.
CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice
Understanding the Common Core State Standards in Practice
4.M.NBT.05 IEEI Task.
Mathematical Practice 4:
Presentation transcript:

CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice Class 3 March 14, 2011

Journal Review by Your Peers Read and react to each other’s journal entries about the Standards for Mathematical Practice Use Post-it-Notes to record your comments in each journal Pass the journals to the right until you get your own journal back Discuss as a group – What stands out after reading all the journals?

Learning Intentions We Are Learning To … analyze students’ thinking on a Continuum of Student Thinking and Understanding. advance students’ thinking by asking good questions and making adaptations and modifications to move students to the next stage or stages.

Success Criteria We will know we are successful when we can understand the components of the Continuum of Student Thinking and Understanding and fill in the form after analyzing student work.

Common Core State Standards Alignment Present your task to the teachers at your table. What did you see and hear when your students worked on this task? Summarize the work that you brought for this task.

A Wisconsin Graphic of CCSS

Return to Chocolate and Cream A candy factory has a large vat into which workers pour chocolate and cream. Each ingredient flows into the vat from its own special hose, and each ingredient comes out of its hose at a constant rate. Workers at the factory know that it takes 20 minutes to fill the vat with chocolate from the chocolate hose, and it takes 15 minutes to fill the vat with cream from the cream hose. If workers pour both chocolate and cream into the vat at the same time (each coming full tilt out of its own hose), how long will it take to fill the vat? Before you find an exact answer to this problem, find an approximate answer, or find a range, such as “between…and…minutes.” Explain your reasoning. Look at packet of student work samples

Return to Chocolate and Cream Continuum of Student Thinking and Understanding Determine the stage of each student work sample Advancing Student Thinking What questions will I ask? What modifications or adaptations will I do? Developing Effective Questions

Common Core State Standards Alignment Examine student work on “Chocolate and Cream”. Sort the student samples according to their stage on the continuum Complete part 2 of the continuum template

Common Core State Standards Alignment Complete part 3 of the continuum template for the “Chocolate and Cream” samples.

Asking Questions Problem Comprehension Can students understand, define, formulate, or explain the problem or task? Can they cope with poorly defined problems?  What is the problem about? What can you tell me about it?  Would you please explain that in your own words?  What do you know about this part?  Is there something that can be eliminated or that is missing?  What assumptions do you have to make? Approaches and Strategies Do students have an organized approach to the problem or task? How do they record? Do they use tools (manipulatives, diagrams, graphs, calculators, computers, etc.) appropriately?  Where would you find the needed information?  What have you tried? What steps did you take? What did not work?  How did you organize the information? Do you have a record?  Did you have a system? A strategy? A design?  Would it help to draw a diagram or make a sketch?  How would it look if you used these materials? Solutions Do students reach a result? Do they consider other possibilities?  Is that the only possible answer?  How would you check the steps you have taken, or your answer?  Is there anything you have overlooked?  Is the solution reasonable, considering the context?  How did you know you were finished?

Summary We Are Learning To … analyze students’ thinking on a Continuum of Student Thinking and Understanding. advance students’ thinking by asking good questions and making adaptations and modifications to move students to the next stage or stages. We will know we are successful when we can understand the components of the Continuum of Student Thinking and Understanding and fill in the form after analyzing student work.

Your Student Work Samples Continuum of Student Thinking and Understanding Determine the stage of each student work sample Advancing Student Thinking What questions will I ask? What modifications or adaptations will I do?

Break

Learning Intentions We are learning to recognize the second and third of the Standards for Mathematical Practices within a chosen Content Standard and identify those standards within a particular math task.

Success Criteria We will know we are successful when we can articulate how both a Content Standard and a Standard for Mathematical Practice are infused in a math lesson in the classroom.

New Common Task A look at the Practice Standards within the content Domain of Geometry Materials: Geo-boards and Dot Paper

What is Area? Turn and talk: what is your answer to this question?

Exploring the Area of Polygons Using Grid Paper, Dot Paper or a Geo-board, determine the area of the given shape.

What did you do? Combining Principle: The total area of two (or more) non-overlapping shapes is the sum of their individual areas. Moving Principle: the area of a shape is not changed if the shape undergoes a rigid motion.

Exploring the Area of Polygons Using Grid Paper, Dot Paper or a Geo-board, determine the area of the given shape.

Exploring the Area of Polygons Using Grid Paper, Dot Paper or a Geo-board, determine the area of the given shape.

Exploring the Area of Polygons Using Grid Paper, Dot Paper or a Geo-board, determine the area of the given shape.

Exploring the Area of Polygons Using Grid Paper, Dot Paper or a Geo-board, determine the area of the given shape.

Standards for Mathematical Practice Standard #2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively. Standard #3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.

Practice Standard Discussion What questions does your group have about these standards?

Linking Practice to the Classroom What would this practice look like in a classroom? Students would be… Teachers would be…

What Content Standard Did We Address? Look for a Content Standard in the CCSS (Grades 6-8) that was addressed by today’s task.

What did we see? What did you as students do to bring the standards alive? What did the facilitator as a teacher do to bring the standards alive? What else might you as teachers in your classroom do to bring the standards alive?

WI CCSS Visual Identify other Standards for Mathematical Practices that you saw as we carried out today’s task. Use specific examples to explain the connection between the content and practice standard you identified.

What other practices did you see?

Understanding Some of the standards start with the word Understand What does that verb mean in these math standards?

Summary We are learning to recognize the second and third Standards for Mathematical Practices within a chosen Content Standard and identify those standards within a particular math task. We will know we are successful when we can articulate how both a Content Standard and a Standard for Mathematical Practices are infused in a math lesson in the classroom.