Assignment 5 Purpose: comparison of models and reporting on the conclusions. Models supposed to be correct, so e.g. apparently increased keeper productivity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arena modeling Conceptual model can be converted into Arena model. Arena model: connected building blocks. Building blocks must be parameterized. Arena.
Advertisements

Estimating from Samples © Christine Crisp “Teach A Level Maths” Statistics 2.
Basic Business Statistics, 11e © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 5-1 Chapter 5 Some Important Discrete Probability Distributions Basic Business Statistics.
AP Statistics – Chapter 9 Test Review
ESTIMATION AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Problems with parameterization (example:keeper usage): average duration: 1.27, min: 0.106, max: 6.46 possible outcome for keeper and crane queues? Assignment.
Formal Analytical Reports Ch 24. Analytical reports To answer questions: 1. What are the issues? 2. What are the conclusions we have? 3. What should we.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 17 – March 18, 2008.
The Rational Decision-Making Process
The current situation C and two tentative improvements I 1,2 are assessed by simulation. Some trial runs show that I 1,2 are likely to reduce performance.
Occupation / queue size D/D/1: Constant arrivals, constant duration. M/D/1: Exponential arrivals, constant duration occupation rate queue size.
Variance Reduction Techniques
Lecture Inference for a population mean when the stdev is unknown; one more example 12.3 Testing a population variance 12.4 Testing a population.
© 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J F-1 Operations Management Simulation Module F.
Lecture 10 Comparison and Evaluation of Alternative System Designs.
Control Charts for Attributes
Machine Shop Model. Lecture Two by: Lecturer/ Nada Ahmed.
Experimental Design. Learning Targets I can… Identify the three types of variables in an experiment Identify quantitative and qualitative data Decide.
An importer of Herbs and Spices claims that average weight of packets of Saffron is 20 grams. However packets are actually filled to an average weight,
1 1 Slide Statistical Inference n We have used probability to model the uncertainty observed in real life situations. n We can also the tools of probability.
Verification & Validation
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 9: Testing a Claim Section 9.3a Tests About a Population Mean.
A look at psychological research. General principles The specious attraction of anecdotes The concern for precise measurement Operational definitions.
MS 305 Recitation 11 Output Analysis I
© 2003, Carla Ellis Simulation Techniques Overview Simulation environments emulation exec- driven sim trace- driven sim stochastic sim Workload parameters.
Economics 173 Business Statistics Lecture 7 Fall, 2001 Professor J. Petry
1 N -Queens via Relaxation Labeling Ilana Koreh ( ) Luba Rashkovsky ( )
1 Chapter Two: Sampling Methods §know the reasons of sampling §use the table of random numbers §perform Simple Random, Systematic, Stratified, Cluster,
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Understanding Randomness.
A look at psychological research. General principles The specious attraction of anecdotes The concern for precise measurement Operational definitions.
Normal distributions Theorem: Let X,Y normally distributed independent stochastic variables with mean and variance respectively. Then Y-X is normally distributed.
6.1 Inference for a Single Proportion  Statistical confidence  Confidence intervals  How confidence intervals behave.
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
INF Dec-15INF5150 INFUIT Haugen / Stølen Exercises for Monday
AP Statistics Section 11.1 B More on Significance Tests.
Example Random samples of size n =2 are drawn from a finite population that consists of the numbers 2, 4, 6 and 8 without replacement. a-) Calculate the.
CONFIDENTIAL 1 Algebra1 Point-Slope Form. CONFIDENTIAL 2 Warm Up Write the equation that describes each line in slope-intercept form. 1) slope = 3, y-intercept.
An importer of Herbs and Spices claims that average weight of packets of Saffron is 20 grams. However packets are actually filled to an average weight,
C HAPTER 4  Hypothesis Testing -Test for one and two means -Test for one and two proportions.
Chapter 9: One- and Two-Sample Estimation Problems: 9.1 Introduction: · Suppose we have a population with some unknown parameter(s). Example: Normal( ,
ETM 607 – Putting It All Together Review for MidTerm II Apply Lessons Learned in a Team Lab - Input Modeling - Absolute Output Analysis - Relative Output.
Stat 31, Section 1, Last Time Distribution of Sample Means –Expected Value  same –Variance  less, Law of Averages, I –Dist’n  Normal, Law of Averages,
1 Probability and Statistics Confidence Intervals.
Scientific Method Mr. Chon / Science. Introduction Includes purpose Includes purpose What will you learn from this experiment? What will you learn from.
1 Distributed Vertex Coloring. 2 Vertex Coloring: each vertex is assigned a color.
STEP BY STEP Critical Value Approach to Hypothesis Testing 1- State H o and H 1 2- Choose level of significance, α Choose the sample size, n 3- Determine.
C HAPTER 2  Hypothesis Testing -Test for one means - Test for two means -Test for one and two proportions.
Hypothesis Tests l Chapter 7 l 7.1 Developing Null and Alternative
Unit 4 – Inference from Data: Principles
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Properties of Normal Distributions
Some useful results re Normal r.v
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Lecture 15 Sections 7.3 – 7.5 Objectives:
EVEN Homework ANSWERS p. 483 – 484 # 17, 19-24; p. 496 #27, 31, 32, 33
STATISTICAL INFERENCE PART IV
Stat 217 – Day 28 Review Stat 217.
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Creating Functions with Parameters
Chapter Nine Part 1 (Sections 9.1 & 9.2) Hypothesis Testing
Parts of an Experiment cont.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
TESTs about a population mean
Chapter 9 Testing a Claim
The Structure of your Simulation assessment
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Presentation transcript:

Assignment 5 Purpose: comparison of models and reporting on the conclusions. Models supposed to be correct, so e.g. apparently increased keeper productivity for BF+ model w.r.t. current. Individual models were not uniformly tested. Time unit: hours for current and minutes for others. Make uniform, decide on simulation durations (crash of normal model), and assess confidence. Do not take simulation results for granted, try to explain!

Miscellanous exercises

A job can be executed either by resource R1 (alone) or by resources R2 and R3 in succession. What are the differences in resource handling between the following three conceptual models? How does it affect the performance? How would each be implemented e.g. in Arena? What parameters are needed for an implementation?

Give a choice-free equivalent to the following Arena model, by adding another create block. What are the parameters of the new model?

Choose the appriopriate construction for a simulation model. What are the parameters, how should they be determined? 1. An street ice cream vendor's order arrival process on a warm sunday. It is not constant throughout the day! 2. Processing income tax forms: a choice is made between a superficial or thorough check. The choice depends on a weighted random draw. The weight is based on properties of the form and the current resource capacity. 3. Processing time of a production step with measured average duration and stddev of respectively a. 7.2 minutes / 4.1 minutes, b hours / 0.38 hours, c minutes / 41.5 minutes.

The current situation C and two tentative improvements I 1,2 are assessed by simulation. Some trial runs show that I 1,2 are likely to reduce performance indicator x relative to C, but there is no clear "winner". Confidence from the trial runs of any improvement beating the current situation is less than 90%. Just before the deadline for writing the final report, long simu- lations are carried out for each model, with the following results: C I1I1 IndicatorAverageHalf Width x x I2I2 x How do you report your findings? What do you recommend?

We may safely assume that different simulation runs are independent (at worst). So we can tabulate the differences: C-I 1 Av HW Stdev=HW/1.96 A/S Conf(>0) C-I 2 Z | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Report: Both solutions seem to improve current situation (plm. 90% confidence). No clear winner. Implementation depends on costs I 2 -I 1