Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at Questioning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Directions As you view the photos from this teacher-built standards- based classroom, read the accompanying explanation regarding how each depicted artifact.
Advertisements

Elementary School Standards-Based Classroom.
High School Standards-Based Classroom.
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework LE.1 Demonstrates knowledge of, interest in, and respect for diverse students’ communities and.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Task 3 Assessing Student Learning
Learning targets Learning Goals, Learning Targets, Success Criteria,
Beginning Special Education Teachers: Career Ready! Dr. Yvonne Hefner.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Early Release Professional Development NC FALCON Module 3: Collecting and Documenting Evidence February 16, 2011 Kathy Walker.
Panorama High School Professional Development Teaching and Learning Framework January 10, 2013 California Standard for the Teaching Profession Engaging.
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
A UGUST 2012 Elementary Literacy Standards. New Standards for Literacy Key Intended Learnings– Teachers will… Examine capacities of college and career.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Content and Language Objectives.  What is your comfort level with content language objectives?  Place a red dot on the continuum to represent your comfort.
Checking for Understanding: Are You With Me So Far? Presented by Peer Observers Karen Buelow Jennifer Fuerman Marianne Kenney Joe Ladow.
COMPONENT 3A: COMMUNICATING WITH STUDENTS Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction.
School-wide Lesson Study in a Dual Language School Dr. Cathy Kinzer, Math Education Dr. Karin Wiburg, Associate Dean for Research, New Mexico State University.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session: Planning for Improved ELA Learning.
WELCOME! 1. PLEASE GET A DOT – AND PLACE IT ON THE KNOWLEDGE OF ELP STANDARDS CONTINUUM 2. HAVE A SEAT AT THE APPROPRIATE TABLE GROUP 1 GROUP 2 3. TURN.
EFFECTIVE LESSONS = EFFECTIVE TEACHING Fayetteville High School January 2012.
A Closer Look I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
Analyzing a Three-Part Lesson (W2)  GPS Review: Three-Part Instructional Framework (Opening, Worktime, Closing) Instructional tasks for teaching/learning.
Hawaii Department of Education Bridging the Gap: Professional Development Protocols “Tools for Schools”
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Strategies for Implementing the 5D+ Purpose and Student Engagement Dimensions in the Classroom Hosted by Julie Milder.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader CMP3 Professional Development Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204 1.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 8: Standard 2- Instructional Planning Please sit in groups with teachers NOT from your school.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
Peer Observation & Connecting to the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
Blaine and Mount Vernon TWSSP Workshop September 21, 2013.
MISD Bilingual/ESL Department
Fall 2011 Peer Observation Training. Agenda Process for Peer Observations What am I looking for during the Peer Observation and how do I rate it? How.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at I.3 Instructional Methods and Pacing.
THE SIOP MODEL Presented by: Ann Dealy, Principal Brookside School
EdTPA: Elementary Literacy
Creating a Standards-Based Classrooms An Overview of Adapting and Adopting Research Based Instruction to Enhance Student Learning.
Denver Public Schools Understanding the Revised Framework.
A Professional Learning Series for School Teams Dedicated to the Success of ALL Students Module 3: Designing Curriculum with Intention and Rigor.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Denver Public Schools Illuminating the revised framework Taking a Closer Look at I3 Exploring Instructional Methods and Pacing.
» Please grab the packet and read the article, “The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom.” » Take 4 Sticky Notes and label.
REFLECTION ON TEACHING THROUGH VIDEO ANALYSIS. UNDERGRADUATE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives
Instructional Meeting November 3, 2010 Instructional Framework
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Nevada Educator Performance Teacher Framework
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
TAPTM System Overview Teacher Excellence Student Achievement
Presentation transcript:

Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at Questioning

Content/Language Objective 1 Participants will explain orally and in writing the indicators where questioning has been incorporated into the revised Framework using target vocabulary from the revised framework with the whole group.

Content/Language Objective 2 Participants will verbally compare and contrast the purposefulness of questioning within two video taped lessons using language from the framework.

Agenda Overview of revisions Identify references to questioning on revised Framework Apply questioning to two lessons Identify what these revisions to questioning mean for your lesson planning and instruction

Where is Questioning Referenced on Framework? Read through the Effective column on the Revised Framework Note each Indicator that references criteria for Questioning Indicator I.2 – Rigorous Tasks Indicator I.5 – Checks for Understanding Indicator I.6 – Differentiation Indicator I.8 – Communication and Collaboration

Questioning How does the placement of questioning within the framework connect to what you identified as the purposes for questioning? What does this mean for you as you plan for the use of questioning?

Purposeful Use of Questioning What makes questioning purposeful? I.2- Rigor Aligned to objective On higher levels of Bloom’s Students explain their responses/ thinking Students ask questions I.5 - Checks Aligned to objective Most students formulate responses Variety of response methods – not just volunteers Teachers acts on responses I.6 – Differentiation Aligned to objective Use of different questions for different students Use of different question structures Wait time Understandable Clear Concise I.8 – C/C Aligned to objective Students ask questions Students respond to peers’ questions

Masterful Content Delivery The order of Indicators under the Instruction Domain represents the chronological order for how a teacher should effectively plan classroom lessons. I.1 Develop Content / Language Objectives I.2 Select / Create Tasks I.3 Choose Instructional Method I.4 Incorporate Opportunities to Develop and Use Academic Language

High Impact Instructional Moves High-Impact Instructional Moves: During instruction, effective teachers enact essential instructional moves (practices): I.5 Use Formative Assessments to Check for Understanding I.6 Differentiate Data Based on the Checks for Understanding I.7 Provide Academic Feedback Based on Student Responses I.8 Create Opportunities for Students to Communicate / Collaborate While Learning

What Are You Thinking? Take 2 minutes and discuss with others at your table – What are your initial thoughts? Questions? Comments?

Applying Questioning to a Lesson We will view a clip from an elementary math class Your Job: – Script evidence for the use of questioning

Debriefing Lesson Take 5 minutes and record your evidence for questioning based on the four Indicators – I.2, I.5, I.6, I.8 Take 10 minutes and discuss with your group where you placed evidence for questioning. Include the WHY for your decisions.

Was Questioning Purposeful? How did the teacher’s use of questioning connect to the chart we created? What made the teacher’s use of questioning purposeful or not purposeful?

Applying Questioning to a Lesson We will view a clip from another elementary math class. Your Job: – Script evidence for the use of questioning

Debriefing Lesson Take 5 minutes and record your evidence for questioning based on the four Indicators – I.2, I.5, I.6, I.8 Take10 minutes and discuss with your group where you placed evidence for questioning. Include the WHY for your decisions.

Was Questioning Purposeful? How did the teacher’s use of questioning connect to the chart we created? What made the teacher’s use of questioning purposeful or not purposeful?

What Does This Mean for You? How do you plan and implement questioning so that it is purposeful?  What decisions will you need to make when planning?  What actions will you need to take during instruction?

Content/Language Objective 1 Participants will explain orally and in writing the indicators where questioning has been incorporated into the revised Framework using target vocabulary from the revised framework with the whole group by: a)Creating a room chart with the whole group b)Reading the revised Framework, noting locations of questioning c)Discussing with the table group

Content/Language Objective 2 Participants will distinguish the effectiveness category of two teacher’s lessons using comparative adjectives : a)from a word bank b)categorizing evidence on a graphic organizer c)Discussing rationale for category placement with the whole group

Denver Public Schools Feedback for us… What was helpful? What can we do to make this experience even more useful?

Thank you for your time with the revised Framework today!