Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Advertisements

CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Professional Growth and
The Difference Between Assessment and Evaluation
Good Spirit School Division
Professional Growth and
Principles and Indicators for Mathematics Education Leaders.
Consistency of Assessment
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
The Research and Practice of Classroom Assessment Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Descriptive Feedback:
Lesson Planning with Formative Assessment Principles: Sharing Our Stories Pandora Bedford Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Melissa Hedges.
A Coaching Model in the Transformation of Math Teachers to Math Teacher Leaders Presented at NCSM, San Diego, CA April 19, 2010 by Mathematics Teaching.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
SEPT 20 8:00-11:00 WHAT ARE WE MEASURING? HOW DO WE MEASURE? DHS English Department Professional Development.
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Portfolios: A Useful Resource For All Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Beth Schefelker The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Descriptive Feedback and Differentiation: A Natural Connection Astrid Fossum, Mathematics Teaching Specialist, Milwaukee Public Schools,
EVOLUTION OF A CONTINUUM OF MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP
From Compliance to Commitment: Implementing a District- wide Portfolio Initiative Astrid Fossum, Mathematics Teaching Specialist,
Charting the Course for Mathematics Leadership Continuum of Professional Work in a Large Urban District DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
What We’ve Learned About Assessment, Part 4: A Guide to Formative Assessment Astrid Fossum, Mathematics Teaching Specialist, MPS,
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Applying Formative Assessment Principles Astrid FossumMary Mooney Lee Ann PruskeBernard Rahming Laura MalyCynthia Rodriguez Mathematics Teaching Specialists,
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
“How Do We Know They Are Learning?” ACT Meeting October 9, 2007 Ladera Ranch Middle School ACT Meeting October 9, 2007 Ladera Ranch Middle School Enhancing.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Where on the World Are You? Supporting & Developing School Based Math Teacher Leaders NCSM Conference, Washington DC April 21, 2009 Astrid Fossum, Mathematics.
Planning for Equity Laura Maly Astrid Fossum Lee Ann Pruske Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Math Teacher Leader Training January 2011.
HOW ASSESSMENT SUPPORTS RTI 2 AND CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP Clinch-Powell Cooperative Presenters:
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Second session of the NEPBE I in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 22, 2013.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
NC FALCON Training in the use and design of Formative Assessment.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Effective Conversations That Lead To Effective Instruction: Using A Portfolio Process to Structure Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Beth Schefelker,
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Bernard Rahming Lee Ann Pruske Rosann Hollinger Sharonda Harris Assessment Session PRIME Framework: Teaching and Learning Leadership Principle MTL Meeting,
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success MPS Principal Breakfast Milwaukee Public Schools 23 April 2008.
Tracking and Target Setting. Ensuring impact on pupil learning  Identify strand from an area of learning in literacy and mathematics  Identify focus.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
A Guide to Formative Assessment Astrid Fossum & Sharonda M. Harris, Mathematics Teaching Specialists Milwaukee Public Schools
The School Effectiveness Framework
Connections and Actions Utilizing coaching skills to enhance mathematics instruction Astrid FossumLee Ann Pruske Laura MalyCynthia Rodriguez MTL Sessions,
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Leadership Session Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Formative Assessment:
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
Leadership Session Assessment Principle September 2008
Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
Leadership Session Assessment Principle September 2008
Our Leadership Journey
Presentation transcript:

Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin

To understand the system of formative assessment practices.

 Brainstorm various systems you know about.  Choose one system to depict on a 8 by 11 paper.

 A SYSTEM is a collection of parts that interact to function purposefully as a whole.  A collection of auto parts is NOT a system.  A working car IS a system.

 Stiggins said: We can build assessment systems. It is not what we grew up in. It is not the one we see in place. But it is the assessment system we can create.  PRIME Leadership Framework: Stage 1 is a self awareness stage of leadership, a passion for acting upon, modeling; the leaders is respected for his or her own teaching and learning skills.

 Think about Assessment Practices in your classroom.  Do you have an assessment system?  What are the parts?  How are the parts linked?

During WITNESS, think about how the barn raising scene reflects a working system.

 In what ways did the barn raising scene reflect a working system?  What were the parts?  In what ways did the parts interact to function purposefully as a whole?

Imagine what would happen if any of the following were true …  There was no agreement about the units of measurement.  There was no opportunity for the children to learn.  Half the “lifters” decided not to lift.  The whole community decided barns were useless.

 3 Minutes: On your own, think about a formative assessment system. Write down the goal and the parts of the learning team continuum that make up a formative assessment system.  10 minutes: In groups of 4, decide on the parts, draw a graphic, and show relationships to reveal a system.

Alignment of the Principles of Formative Assessments to the Learning Team Continuum of Work for Mathematics Principles of Assessment for Learning (1)Prior to teaching, teachers study and can articulate the math concepts students will be4 learning. (2)Teachers use student- friendly language to inform students about the math objective they are expected to learn during the lesson. (3) Students can describe what mathematical ideas they are learning in the lesson. (4) Teachers can articulate how the math lesson is aligned to district learning targets, state standards and classroom assessments (CABS), and fits within the progression of student learning. (5) Teachers use classroom assessments that yield accurate information about student learning of math concepts and skills and use of math processes. (6) Teachers use assessment information to focus and guide teaching and motivate student learning. (7) Feedback given to a student is descriptive, frequent, and timely. It provides insight on a current strength and focuses on one facet of learning for revision linked directly to the intended math objective. (8) Students actively and regularly use descriptive feedback to improve the quality of their work. (9) Students study the criteria by which their work will be evaluated by analyzing samples of strong and weak work. (10) Students keep track of their own learning over time (e.g., journals, portfolios) and communicate with others about what they understand and what areas need improvement. Learning Team Continuum Stage 1 Learning Targets Stage 2 Align State Framework and Math Program Stage 3 Common CABS Stage 4 Student Work on CABS Stage 5 Descriptive Feedback on CABS Understand importance of identifying and articulating big ideas in mathematics to bring consistency to a school’s math program. Develop meaning for the math embedded in the targets and alignment to state standards and descriptors and to the school’s math program. Provide a measure of consistency of student learning based on standards/descriptors and targets. Examine student work to monitor achievement and progress toward the targets and descriptors. Use student work to inform instructional decisions, and to provide students with appropriate descriptive feedback. Principles of Assessment for Learning

NCSM (2008). Principles and Indicators for Mathematics Education Leaders (PRIME). Stages of Leadership Action Stage 1: Know & Model Leadership of Self Stage 3: Advocate & Systematize Leadership in the Extended Community Stage 2: Collaborate & Implement Leadership of Others

 I use formative assessment practices to inform teacher practices and student learning

Take a different color marker. Add any components or links that were missing from your first version of your graphic. Hang the charts.

 Students cannot articulate what they are learning during the lesson or the unit. They see the lesson as an activity, missing the mathematics they are learning.

 Teachers do not make connections between the mathematics embedded in the CABS, the lessons in the math book, and the mathematics students need to learn.

 Teachers give CABS, write feedback, and don’t make connections to planning and teaching.

 The only feedback given is in the form of grades on homework or tests. The feedback is not integral to the mathematics taught during the lessons.

an assessment system was in place in each classroom?

 Teachers thoroughly plan a lesson and can articulate to the students the objectives they will be learning.

 Teachers think about the mathematics they want the students to learn and align the CABS with the lessons as part of planning for instruction.

 Students use the assessment information given to them by their teachers to think about their own progress.

 Think about Leadership of Self  Reflect back on your first notes on assessment practices. What could you add now?  Implement a Formative Assessment System in your classroom, thus becoming a model for other teachers in your building.