If you care about Wildland Recreation… Protect the Recreation Experience! HOW? Monitor your SOCIAL and PHYSICAL INDICATORS. Pam Foti, Ph.D. Parks and Recreation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brussels, May 2009 Awareness and Public Opinion results from: Evaluation of the means used by national Data Protection Authorities in the promotion.
Advertisements

Survey design. What is a survey?? Asking questions – questionnaires Finding out things about people Simple things – lots of people What things? What people?
Collecting Citizen Input Management Learning Laboratories Presentation to Morrisville, NC January 2014.
SEM A – Marketing Information Management
2.06 Understand data-collection methods to evaluate their appropriateness for the research problem/issue.
Conducting Income Survey’s Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs “Serving Indiana’s rural communities through technical, financial and personal.
Welcome to RAI, the future of collaborative Project Risk Management Overview of Project Risk and Issue Management RAI for the Project Manager RAI for the.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
Satisfacts Customer/Employee Evaluation Program Do you want to learn about what your clients, customers, members and employees are really thinking?
This document is contained within the Visitor Use Management Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be of interest,
A brief overview What is program evaluation? How is an evaluation conducted? When should it be used? When can it be used? Used with Permission of: John.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Selecting Your Evaluation Tools Chapter Five. Introduction  Collecting information  Program considerations  Feasibility  Acceptability  Credibility.
Midterm Review Evaluation & Research Concepts Proposals & Research Design Measurement Sampling Survey methods.
Principles of Marketing
Knowledge is Power Marketing Information System (MIS) determines what information managers need and then gathers, sorts, analyzes, stores, and distributes.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Studying treatment of suicidal ideation & attempts: Designs, Statistical Analysis, and Methodological Considerations Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Understanding the Recruiting Process: Techniques for Success.
REC 375—Leadership and Management of Parks and Recreation Services Jim Herstine, Ph.D., CPRP Assistant Professor Parks and Recreation Management UNC Wilmington.
Business and Management Research
SCORP Statewide Population Survey OREGON SCORP AND STATE PARK PLANNING  Many Oregon communities need assistance with park system planning.  Many communities.
NJAIS/Middle States Accreditation For Kent Place School Presented by: James Palmieri & Kathy Zagorski August 31, 2010.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
Experiments and Observational Studies. Observational Studies In an observational study, researchers don’t assign choices; they simply observe them. look.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
MARKETING AT THE NEXT LEVEL CREATING A REFERRAL MILL.
Too expensive Too complicated Too time consuming.
1 Evaluation Overview and Findings From An Interim Evaluation of Grants to Green Presented by: Highland Communications, LLC Jennifer Ballentine, MPH October.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
FUNCTION 2 – ‘INFORMING STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING’: Needs assessment and response gap analysis across sectors and within the sector MODULE 2 – S1.
MAC Fall Symposium: Learning What You Want to Know and Implementing Change Elizabeth Yakel, Ph.D. October 22, 2010.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
Prof Max Munday The E4G Toolkit. What is an E4G project expected to do/collect in terms of visitor numbers and related information? When you need to deliver.
Wetland Monitoring What Do We Need? Integration of Wetland Monitoring and Wetland Management Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Dept. of the Environment.
1 MODEL ACADEMIC CURRICULUM MODULE 13 Assessing and Evaluating Responses.
IPMA Executive Conference Value of IT September 22, 2005.
Thoughts on the Role of Surveys and Qualitative Methods in Evaluating Health IT National Resource Center for HIT 2005 AHRQ Annual Conference for Patient.
13 Step Approach to Network Design Steps A Systems Approach 8Conduct a feasibility Study 8Prepare a plan 8Understand the current system 8Design.
Get Your "Party" Started: Establishing a Successful Third-party Evaluation Martha Thurlow, Ph.D. & Vitaliy Shyyan, Ph.D.—National Center on Educational.
CHAPTER 12 Descriptive, Program Evaluation, and Advanced Methods.
Quality Assurance Programme of the Canadian Census of Population Expert Group Meeting on Population and Housing Censuses Geneva July 7-9, 2010.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Hosted Voice & Hosted Contact Center
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
CAHPS PATIENT EXPERIENCE SURVEYS AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2012 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS Project Officer.
Mass Media and Public Opinion Chapter 8. MEASURING PUBLIC OPINION Section 2.
The effects of Peer Pressure, Living Standards and Gender on Underage Drinking Psychologist- Kanari zukoshi.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
Sampling Procedure for Performance-Based Road Maintenance Evaluations by Jesús M. de la Garza Juan C. Piñero and Mehmet.
Session VI Evaluation & Wrap Up. Evaluation Activities directed at collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information about the effectiveness.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
1 Information Systems Use Among Ohio Registered Nurses: Testing Validity and Reliability of Nursing Informatics Measurements Amany A. Abdrbo, RN, MSN,
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011.
Getting Public Agencies Started on Fund Mapping evidence2success Strategic Financing.
Sports Market Research. Know Your Customer How do businesses know their customers needs and wants?  Ask them/talking to customers  Surveys  Questionnaires.
How do you know your product “works”? And what does it mean for a product to “work”?
Copyright 2010 by CH2M HILL, Inc. Company Confidential Getting More Bang for the Buck: Improving Efficiency Approaches and Tools Kristin M. Howlett, PMP.
How to Demonstrate the Value of Contract Education Jack J. Phillips, Ph.D. Chairman ROI Institute, Inc. May 11, :00 AM- 12:00 PM 5 Levels of Evaluation.
Planning a Customer Survey Part 1 of 3 Elaine Carlson, Westat Anne D’Agostino, Compass Evaluation & Research.
Cindy Tumbarello, RN, MSN, DHA September 22, 2011.
The Crash Course for Municipal Planning Commission Members in Cumberland County 1.
Business and Management Research
Business and Management Research
The Best Contact Center Indonesia 2019
Presentation transcript:

If you care about Wildland Recreation… Protect the Recreation Experience! HOW? Monitor your SOCIAL and PHYSICAL INDICATORS. Pam Foti, Ph.D. Parks and Recreation Management Northern Arizona University

My Background in Wildland Recreation

The Foundation  The Limits of Acceptable Change (1) Specification of acceptable and achievable resource conditions. (What do you want on site?) (2) Analysis of the relationship between existing conditions and those judged acceptable. (What do you have on-site?)  BASELINE DATA & INVENTORIES.

The Foundation  The Limits of Acceptable Change (3) Identification of management actions judged to best achieve desired conditions. (What will you do to get to where you want to be for your desired conditions?) (4) A program of monitoring and evaluating management effectiveness. (How do you know if change occurs if you don’t go out and look in a systematic manner?)  MONITORING

Social Indicator Assessment Protecting the Recreation Experience!

Social Indicator Assessment  There are many ways to gather social indicator information: SurveysCitizen Task Force Scoping MeetingsWorkshops Public MeetingsRegional/Local Offices Presentations to GroupsCitizen Reps on Boards Site Visits w/GroupsPublic Interest Center Citizen Advisory Boars Citizen Interest Advocates

Focus on Social Surveys  Social Survey Project Timeline: 6-8 months preparation of study/survey 3-6 months administration of survey …(or more) 3-4 months analysis/reporting TOTAL: 1-2 Years

Focus on Social Surveys  Basic Question: What do you want to know? Who are your visitors? (Socio-Economic/Demographics) What do they want? (Benefits) Where are they from? (In-State/Out-of-State/International) Why do they visit your site? (Activities/Resources) How long do they stay? Are they a new visitor or returning? How much will they pay? (Also…Fee satisfaction) Are they satisfied with their visit? What problems did they perceive? What do they want YOU (as management) to do? Specific site/activity/user questions.

Focus on Social Surveys  Basic Question: What population do you want to survey? General Population  Rare, Difficult to Access, Low Response Rate Field Office/State Office Mailing List  Common, Easy Access, Low to Moderate Response Rate Site Users  Common, Easy Access, Moderate to VERY High Response Rate Example: Climbing Study - 95%+ Response Rate.

Focus on Social Surveys  Basic Question: How will you conduct your survey? On-Site (Bothersome to visitors and time consuming to you) Mail Survey (Poor response rate…unless targeted) Phone Survey (Nobody is answering) On-Line Survey (New and upcoming…could be effective) On-Site Contact with Follow-Up Mail or On-Line (Can be very effective!)

Focus on Social Surveys  Basic Question: Who will you survey? SAMPLING Universe (Everyone…but, why?) Random (Easy with a list; difficult in the field) Purposeful (Good for field application; Example: every 5 th person) “A sample cannot be considered representative of a population unless all members of that population have a known chance of being included in the sample.” (Dillman)

Focus on Social Surveys  Basic Question: Who can implement your survey? In-House  Time, Prep Work, Perceived Bias Contract w/Private Enterprise or University  Effective and efficient, but…$$$$ Always Consider: OMB Involvement  Add 4-6 months onto the Survey

Focus on Social Surveys  Costs: Extremely Variable! $10,000-$300,000 (included multiple social input methods) Standardization across the BLM can DECREASE costs, however, it may limit the information you want!

Focus on Social Surveys  What to AVOID: A survey in newspapers or newsletters where an individual can submit multiple responses.  NOT representative and not a valid and reliable data collection approach.

Focus on Social Surveys  EXAMPLES: Paria Canyon User Survey Variables  Field contact with follow-up mail/on-line survey Questions only. Grand Canyon-Parashant NM Social Indicator Survey  AZ Strip mailing list with mail survey and follow-ups Questions and results.

Let’s take a breathing break!  A question for you: IF you could ask your visitors ONE question, what would it be?  OK… Questions about social surveys? Issues to discuss?

Physical Indicator Assessment Protecting the Recreation Experience BY Protecting the Resource Base.

Physical Indicator Assessment  Physical Impact Project Timeline: 2-3 months preparation of study/survey 3-6 months administration of survey 3 months analysis/reporting TOTAL: 1 Year

Physical Indicator Assessment  Building a System that WORKS! FEASIBILITY IS THE KEY…  Managerial Decision Making What do you want to know? Why do you want to know this? What will you do with the information?  Time to implement  Money to implement  Personnel (how many, how much time)

It’s all about answering QUESTIONS!  What type of questions? Why? How?

Physical Indicator Assessment  Recreation Impact Monitoring: A developed system Validity in data Replicated over time Feasible to implement Records changes over time Provides information for managerial decisions

Physical Indicator Assessment  What is a Recreation Impact Inventory? Universe Sample 90-95% of Sites Rapid Site Inventory (RSI) – minutes/site What have you got on-site? Initial Inventory…then: 5, 7, 10+ years.

Physical Indicator Assessment  What is Recreation Impact Monitoring? Purposeful sampling of selected sites as indicators of change. Includes extreme/heavy impacted sites + % of other sites. How will you know if change occurs or is occurring on-site? Systematic data collection over time: every year, every other year, every third year, etc.

Physical Indicator Assessment  Recreation Impact Monitoring Variables: What should the variables measure?  Measurable/Quantifiable  Sensitive  Reliable (replication over time)  Efficient  Cost-Effective  Significant to Site Problems  May be very SPECIFIC to site!

Physical Indicator Assessment Some Standard Recreation Impact Variables for the Southwest

Recreation Impact Monitoring Variables?  Identify a recreation impact variable that might be UNIQUE to your area.

Physical Impact Assessment  Methods Dynamic Stream of Information… moving with the recreation  Photos, GIS Coordinates, Condition Class, Multiple Parameters Dispersed Recreation  Road Descriptors, OHV Assessment, Recreation Nodes, Climbing Impacts, OHV Climbing Impacts, Shooting Impacts Backcountry  Specific Area Assessment REMEMBER…Recreation impact monitoring is longitudinal trend analysis.  (See GSENM Monitoring Table: Old & New)

Physical Impact Assessment  Analysis Data Base Development Analysis (Making the connections) Reports/Presentations How do you organize all this?

Physical Impact Assessment  Who can do the work? In-House  Time consuming, consistency, long-term commitment, perceived bias Contract with Private Sector, Non-Profit, University  $$$

Physical Impact Assessment  Costs: Depends of the area size and number of impacts. Measuring tool: How many field days and transportation? Paria Canyon (Backcountry Monitoring)  $1,500/year, 36 miles of slot canyon SDNM (Dispersed Monitoring)  $10,500 entire monument (496,000 acres) – every 3 years GSENM (Backcountry Monitoring)  $8,000/year, 12 areas/year, on-going GCNP (Backcountry Inventory)  $37,000 for 32 backcountry zones, 757 sites

Physical Impact Assessment  What to Avoid: One time assessment with no follow-up monitoring. Too much detail or too much site work…too time consuming. Too complicated to understand/implement…poor data. Data collection that is not useful in managerial decision making.

Physical Impact Assessment  Examples: Inventory Form: Indian Creek Climbing Area Monitoring Form: AZ Strip Backcountry w/Standards Monitoring Form: SDNM Dispersed w/Targeted Forms:  Road Descriptor Form  Off Road Impact Form  Recreation Node Form  Climbing Impact Form  OHV Climbing Area Impact Form  Butterfield State Route Interval Form  Shooting Impact Form

Thank You…Questions?