CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Abuse: Now That You’ve Found Data, What Are You Going to Do With It? Barbara.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Call to Action Wednesday, December 1st 9:00am-12:00pm 1000 W. Tharpe Street, Tallahassee.
Advertisements

Session IV: Making Data Informed Decisions (Ramblings from the Right Coast) Larry Brown, MSW PA Roundtable - Pittsburgh November 21, 2009.
US Berkeley 2/12/2013 linking population-based data to child welfare records: a public health approach to surveillance Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD University.
2012 PATH Data Reporting Tison Thomas Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Rachael Kenney & Amy SooHoo SAMHSA Homeless and.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
Prove It! New Tools To Measure Camp Outcomes Deb Bialeschki, ACA Jim Sibthorp, University of Utah.
Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications Fred Wulczyn, Ph.D Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago International.
Using Publicly Available Data to Engage IV-E Students in Research and Statistics: Instructional Modules MODULE 2 SLIDE DECK: LESSONS IN USING (AND MISUSING)
Minnesota Dream Fund Advance September 20, 2007 Collaborative Presentation: Brown Power Base Project Partner Organizations: African American Family Services.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Use vs. Misuse: The challenging nature of publicly available data Emily.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data 201: The Empirical Data Strikes Back* Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center.
California’s Child Welfare Outcomes & Accountability System: Using Performance Measures to Encourage Improvement Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
The C-CFSR or Some of My Best Friends are Outcome Measures National Resource Center for Child Welfare Data and Technology 8th National Child Welfare Data.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Building a Better Child Welfare System for Fresno's Children: Using Data as Our Foundation (and Friend!) Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social Services.
Reunification for Siblings in Out-of-Home Care Using a Statistical Technique for Examining Non-independent Observations Presented by: Joseph Magruder,
California Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability Legislation: Evolving Toward System Improvement with Longitudinal Data & Analysis Panel on Increasing.
The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.
Data 101: Numbers, Graphs, and More Numbers
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Making the Most of Your Composite Computational Spreadsheet: Tools from California.
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara.
Taking Research to Practice: Rethinking Outcomes and Performance Measures for the Child and Family Service Reviews John D. Fluke, Child Protection Research.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Race/Ethnic Disparities in Child Welfare New Research Synthesis from Fluke et.
Foster Care Reunification: The use of hierarchical modeling to account for sibling and county correlation Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center for Social.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Foster Care in California: What the Data Tells Us Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Black/White and Black/Hispanic Racial Disparity in Child Welfare: Controlling.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Pro Bono Publico: Avoiding Child Welfare Data Abuse Panel on Meaningful Measurement.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley The Child and Family Services Review Composite Scores: A “Great Start” Barbara.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
EDCO 215, Fall 2011 Getting Former Foster Youth into College: A Group Presentation by.
Child Welfare in North Carolina: Ethnic and Racial Disproportionality and Disparity by D. F. Duncan UNC-CH School of Social Work June 10, 2009.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Predictors of Child Welfare Contact Between Birth and Age Five: An Examination.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: A Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Black/White Racial Disparity in Child Welfare: Findings from Linkages to Birth.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF RACE AND POVERTY AS RISK FACTORS FOR MALTREATMENT Barbara Needell, PhD Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Bryn King, MSW January.
Child Welfare Administrative Data: The UCB Performance Indicators Project cssr.berkeley.edu/CWSCMSReports Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services.
Presentation originally created by William C Dawson & Amy C Nuñez The Performance Indicators Project & the Administrative Office of the Courts: Toward.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts Children’s Roundtable Summit.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
When permanency remains elusive: A longitudinal examination of the early foster care experiences of youth at risk of emancipating Joe Magruder, MSW Emily.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
A Valuable Bridge How Linkages Can Advance Other Initiatives Leslie Ann Hay, MSW Hay Consulting (206)
MOVING FROM DATA TO ACTION ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS THROUGH A RBA FRAMEWORK POINT-IN-TIME COUNTS.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Pennsylvania Post School Outcome Survey (PaPOS) Utilizing the Data Results for Longitudinal Planning.
Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron.
Overview of California’s Child Welfare Indicator Data Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University.
What the data can tell us: Evidence, Inference, Action! 1 Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Data Trends & Child Outcomes Center for Social.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Longitudinal Dynamics of Youth in Foster Care Joseph Magruder Emily Putnam-Hornstein.
AB 636 presented at the joint hearing between the ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES and the ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE ON FOSTER CARE Sacramento, CA.
703: Data, Outcomes and Practice: Connecting the Dots CWTP Leadership Academy Conference September 29, The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Applying Data for System Improvement: Probation Agency Staff Daniel Webster,
USING DATA TO INSPIRE PROGRAMMATIC CHANGE EARLY DEVELOPMENT INDEX (EDI) & DRDP/ASSESSMENTS.
Advocates for Children of New Jersey Kids Count: Mercer County
Advocates for Children of New Jersey Kids Count: Mercer County
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Answer Questions about Key Child Welfare Outcomes Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP August 19, 2016.
Denver Office of Children’s Affairs
BARBARA NEEDELL, MSW, PhD
Presentation transcript:

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Abuse: Now That You’ve Found Data, What Are You Going to Do With It? Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Larry Brown, MSW Center for Social Services Research Casey Family Programs University of California at Berkeley Presented to Children's Roundtable Summit Philadelphia, PA September 23, 2010 CSSR Slides created by Emily Putnam-Hornstein

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics Abused Statistics ^

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Six Ways to Abuse Data 1)Rank Data 2)Compare Apples and Oranges 3)Use ‘snapshots’ of Small Samples 4)Rely on Unrepresentative Findings 5)Logically ‘flip’ Statistics 6)Falsely Assume an Association to be Causal

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley 1) Rank Data Two streets in Anytown, PA…. It’s all relative… And SOMEONE will always be ranked last (and first) Poverty Blvd $$ Ave “Jane Doe is the poorest person living on Moneybags Avenue.” “Joe Shmoe is the wealthiest person living on Poverty Blvd.”

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley 2) Compare Apples and Oranges Two doctors in Anytown, PA… Doctor #1Doctor #2 What if the populations served by each doctor were very different? 2/1000 mortality rate 20/1000 mortality rate Doctor of the Year?

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Number of Crimes Period 1: 76 Period 2: 51 Period 3: 91 Period 4: 76 3) Data snapshots… Crime jumped by 49%!! No change. Crime dropped by 16% Average = 73.5 Crime in Anytown, PA…

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley 4) Unrepresentative findings… Survey of people in Anytown, PA… 90% of respondents stated that they support using tax dollars to build a new football stadium. The implication of the above finding is that there is overwhelming support for the stadium… But what if you were then told that respondents had been sampled from a list of season football ticket holders?

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley 5) Logical “Flipping”… Headline in The Anytown Chronicle: 60% of violent crimes are committed by men who did not graduate from high school. “Flip” 60% of male high school drop-outs commit violent crimes?

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley 6) False Causality… A study of Anytown residents makes the following claim: Adults with short hair are, on average, more than 3 inches taller than those with long hair. Finding an association between two factors does not mean that one causes the other… Hair LengthHeight Gender X

Now What Are You Going To Do With It? (Con’t) Larry Brown, MSW Consultant to: Casey Family Programs PA Roundtable - Philadelphia September 23, 2010 Larry G. Brown, MSW – Improving Outcomes for Children, Families and Communities TM

How Do I Use My Existing Data More Productively? A Quick Review - Stock and Flow Unpack the Data Connect the Dots / Tell the Story / Look from the Balcony / Use Multiple Indicators Compare with A Purpose (and with Caution) Data Soup: When Is It Ready to Use? It Takes Time To Change (2-4 years!) Larry G. Brown, MSW – Improving Outcomes for Children, Families and Communities TM

“Stock and Flow” Model Courtesy of Chapin Hall Center for Children, University of Chicago Placement Rate Case Mix Placement Setting LOS Visits Stability Discharge Planning/Prep Discharge Location Educational Status Vocational Status Medical Insurance Re-Entry Rate Employment Housing Stability Permanent Connections

Unpack the Data AdmissionsAge At Admission Decrease of Admissions of 20% over the last five years Numbers going down, but is who’s coming through the front door changing?

Unpacking Data: Truancy Example Finding: High Truancy Rate Hard to think of this as Actionable. Unpack the Data -- Where’s the variation? Where do I act? Male vs. Female (52-48%) Elementary vs. Middle vs. High School (25% - 25% - 50%) Caucasian vs. Hispanic vs. Black in School: (74% - 7% - 15%) Race and Ethnicity - Truants (32% - 17% - 47%) Where do these kids live? GIS Match Your Plan to Your Evidence: –Two pronged attack: Intervention AND Prevention/Early ID –Focus where the numbers are: Communities, Neighborhoods and Parents Larry G. Brown, MSW – Improving Outcomes for Children, Families and Communities TM

Connect the Dots Entry Rate Length of Stay Both powerful indicators. Together, they tell even more: HighShortFront Door LowLong Front-end Safety & Discharge Planning Entry Rate LOSFocus Larry G. Brown, MSW – Improving Outcomes for Children, Families and Communities TM

Pushing At What It Means; Is There a Story Behind the Numbers? Entering Care: % Chng AgeApr-06Apr ,1511, % ,3582, % Total8, % 0-527%34% %46%

Compare with a Purpose Who Are My Peers? Why am I Comparing Myself to Them? This gives me context, but tells me little about MY system. But if there IS a good idea… …STEAL SHAMELESSLY Larry G. Brown, MSW – Improving Outcomes for Children, Families and Communities TM

Data Soup: CPCMS, PPI, HZA Lots of new data Lots of clean up to do So, what CAN I use this for? And where do I start? Larry G. Brown, MSW – Improving Outcomes for Children, Families and Communities TM

For Starters: Be Active, Informed Users Examine what each item tells you: Is it a point-in-time measure? (Cases Pending on a Date Certain) –Only tells me about that day (e.g., Age of Pending Cases) –Biased toward those that take a long time –Most often cited data; not always best Is it an entry cohort measure? (Cases Filed During a Period/Term: All starting together) –Tells us how the system works as things move through a system –Highly actionable data; highlights places where intervention may make a difference (how long for new cases to reach disposition; milestones between filing and disposition) Is it a discharge cohort measure? (Cases Terminated During a Period/Term: All ending together, but not starting together) –Tells the story from the back end. –Caution in that many influences cloud what this means –Convenient, but not always easy to untagle

Active, Informed Users (Con’t) Repeat process with Child Welfare (HZA) data Compare like data across systems –Entry data to entry data –Point-in-time to Point-in-time –Discharge cohorts to discharge cohorts Reach agreement over which questions these data answer: –How many cases are in my workload? (point-in-time) –How many new filings are made in a quarter? (longitudinal) –How long have these cases been with us? (point-in-time) –How long does it take for cases to reach disposition? (longitudinal) Larry G. Brown, MSW – Improving Outcomes for Children, Families and Communities TM

Urgency vs When Is It Good Enough? Valid and Reliable Data Needed Won’t get better until it’s used Rule Include all stakeholders in using/seeing data Kids Can’t Wait Larry G. Brown, MSW – Improving Outcomes for Children, Families and Communities TM

Implementation: Lots of Moving Parts. © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Adaptive Technical Competency Drivers Organization Drivers Leadership Graphics by Steve Goodman,2009 Implementation Drivers

So, Now What? Examine the inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes. What are the most important pieces of this for your initiative? Match the data to what you need in order to manage (Less IS More -- Mies van der Rohe) Have you looked at the data beneath your indicators? Lots of things hide in a summary variable. Are you connecting the dots across data indicators? What is the explanation that describes the performance you are getting from your system? Do you understand why you look the same or different from others? Different is not necessarily bad!

So, Now What? (Cont) Stay patient and focused; it takes time. Leadership counts. Data champions: not the most technical, but rather the most curious. (Data phobics get to play!)

CSSR.BERKELEY.EDU/UCB_CHILDWELFARE Barbara Needell ______________________________________________________________ Larry Brown Associates (518) (office) (518) (mobile)