The IPPC Directive and its implementation Alexandre Paquot European Commission Environment Directorate-General Phare Capacity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Available Techniques (BAT)
Advertisements

© European Communities, 2007 Purpose The European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau (European IPPC Bureau) of the JRC/IPTS was set up.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES of STANDARD MINIMUM EMISSION STANDARD (sometimes known as LIMIT VALUES) UNIFORM EMISSION STANDARD.
HR 09 IB EN 02 – German Proposal, Zagreb, 10 June 2011 Page 1 April 12, Strengthening the Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia.
Industrial Pollution Control - Harmonization and Implementation in Bulgaria Slavitza Dobreva Ministry of Environment and Water Bulgaria Final Seminar.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU
IPPC and Industry By Dr. Ken Macken Dublin Regional Licensing Manager.
Industrial Pollution Control and Risk Management: IPPC Neil Emmott Environment Directorate-General 7 April 2006.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
Grupowa Oczyszczalnia Ścieków Łódzkiej Aglomeracji Miejskiej Fot: U. Czapla Practical aspects of compliance with the Integrated Permit requirements based.
ECENA 4 th Exchange Programme Cluj Napoca, October, 2005 National Updates in the Transposition and Implementation of IPPC directive Ministry of Environment.
1 Towards an improved policy on industrial emissions - Impacts on the waste management industry - Marianne Wenning European Commission, DG ENV.C.4 FEAD.
Authorities role in the assessment of energy efficiency Marianne Lindström, Conference on Energy Efficiency in IPPC Installations, Vienna
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
BAT as a main tool for minimisation of the negative impact of industrial activities Aivi Sissa Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
European Commission - Environment Directorate-General 8 June 2004 Trends and experience so far in implementing the IPPC Directive.
The Sevilla process for supporting the implementation of the IPPC Directive Michael Parth Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
Workshop, 12/3/2004 Banska Bystrica – SLOVAC REPUBLIC “INTEGRATED LICENCE PROCEDURE (Greek case)” Katerina Iakovidou-Anastasiadou Hellenic Ministry for.
Current state on Harmonisation and Implementation/Enforcement of Environmental Legislation - Industrial Pollution Control in SLOVENIA Barbara Bernard Ministry.
Economic and Cross Media aspects Bo Jansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
IPPC Directive state of play and future developements
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
1 Permitting of industrial facilities in Croatia.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU Gabriella Gerzsenyi & Menno Verheij European Commission, DG Environment Industrial Emissions Unit 03.
Energy Efficiency in IPPC Installations, Wienna Oct/2004 Petr Honskus (SPF Group) Chairman of EE TWG CR Vladimíra Henelová, Monika Přibylová Members.
1IndustrialEmissionsDirective. 2 The European Parliament is discussing the Industrial Emissions Directive as adopted by the Council for the second reading.
1th ECENA Plenary Meeting Zagreb, Jan 2006 Recent developments in IMPEL Network By Hilda FARKAS IMPEL SECRETARIATE DG-ENV.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
Implementing legislation for Integrated Permitting Monika Pribylova 1 October 2013 года Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
IPPC vs Emissions Trading Lesley James Friends of the Earth (England, Wales & N.Ireland) and the European Environmental Bureau.
1 Review of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directives Marianne Wenning DG ENV, Head of Unit,
3rd BERCEN Exchange Programme, Prague WASTE CONDITIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS Mrs. Marianne Lindström, Finnish Environmental Institute,
The legal background for implementing the IPPC, EPER, and PRTR Protocol Requirements Orsolya Adamovics Department for Conservation of Environment Ministry.
REVISION OF THE IPPC DIRECTIVE  DIRECTIVE ON INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
Iuliana CHIDU European integration counsellor Ministry of Environment and Water Management Prague - CZECH REPUBLIC April 2005 DIRECTIVE 96/61/EC.
How to start with the implementation of IPPC Directive Czech Republic Czech Environmetal Inspectorate.
1 Short overview of the implementation of IPPC, LCP, Seveso II, Waste Landfill and Incineration directives Short overview of the implementation of IPPC,
CROATIA Country Report IPPC Directive: implementation, problems, constraints, open questions,… Anita Pokrovac Patekar, B. Sc. Pharm. Ministry of Environmental.
Creating the environment for business Streamlining industrial emissions legislation Caspar Corden (Entec) Andrew Farmer (IEEP) IPPC Review Advisory Group.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Czech experience - Use of BREFs and national BAT notes, role of IPPC Agency, Czech TWG Multi-Country Workshop June 8th,
Achievements in IPPC Directive Implementation: problems and constraints Albania Ministry of Environment 3 rd BERCEN Exchange Programme for the Environmental.
The current legal situation
VNPIVNPI 1 IPPC Practice Netherlands Refineries Commission Workshop on IPPC Brussels, July 4, 2008 VNPI Mr. Pieter Thomassen and Mr. Frans Driessen.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
1 Review of the IPPC Directive and related legislation Second Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 17 October 2007 Filip FRANCOIS – DG ENV.
Ministry for Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and Sea in charge of Green Technologies and Climate Negotiations
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 1 The IPPC Directive Introduction to the philosophy Rob Kramers.
IPPC A general overview Nigel Barraclough Policy Adviser Industrial Pollution Control Branch Air and Environment Quality Division. Taiwanese Environmental.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
Introduction to the philosophy
BMRA Legislative Policy Group – Shredder Sub Group
BAT - BREF Their scope Rob Kramers Senior advisor InfoMil.
First position of the Belgian industry about the
INTEGRATED PERMITTING IPPC DIRECTIVE: BEST PRACTICE
EU Water Framework Directive
Aleksandra Antonowicz Green Federation GAJA/CCB
Member States information meeting
Expert Advisory Forum on priority substances
IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing
Reduction of total releases from unintentional production of POPs
Towards an improved policy on industrial emissions Third Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 3 March 2008.
Introduction to the first meeting of the IPPC Review Advisory Group
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
WFD CIS Working Group Meeting Brussels, 4/4/2019
Presentation transcript:

The IPPC Directive and its implementation Alexandre Paquot European Commission Environment Directorate-General Phare Capacity building New MS – Prague workshop 11 April 2005

1- Key elements of the IPPC Directive 2- Key transposition and implementation issues 3 - Next steps

Purpose of IPPC IPPC is about permitting !! Both industry operators and authorities should take an integrated look at the overall environmental impacts of the installation before making decisions on how it should be operated

IPPC: Environmental scope waste prevention and recovery energy efficiency prevention and control of accidents noise vibration heat emissions to water emissions to air emissions to land odour

Key provisions of the Directive l integrated permitting procedure l Emission Limit Values based on Best Available Techniques (BAT) l exchange of information on BAT and associated monitoring l transboundary polluting effects l public access to information (eg EPER) l possible Community emission limit values (incineration and large combustion plants)

May 2004 Future milestones Jan 2003 Oct 2007 June 2003Sep 2006June 2007 Commission reports on implementation of Directive Amendment allowing green- house gas emission trading comes in effect MS implemen- tation reports to be submitted Adoption of IPPC Communica- tion Enlargement June 2004Sep 2003 Jan 2005June 2005Dec 2005 Amendment strengthening public partici- pation comes in effect First edition of all BREFs should be ready Latest com- pliance date for existing installations

BAT most effective in achieving a high general level of protection of the environment as a whole best developed on a scale to be implemented in the relevant industrial sector, under economically and technically viable conditions, advantages balanced against costs the technology used and the way the installation is designed, built, maintained, operated and decommissioned availabletechniques

IPPC and BAT l BAT is a dynamic concept l Integrated approach and BAT definition imply trade-off decisions l Member States and their competent authorities are ultimately responsible for these decisions

From BREF to Permit condition l BAT (in BREFs) l BAT-based permit or General Binding Rules l Local considerations according to Article 9(4) + Legally binding Descriptive MS right to choose how

BAT Information Exchange l required by Directive (Art 16 paragraph 2) l purpose to support licensing authorities l published BAT Reference Documents (BREFs) for each sector l BREFs should be taken into account by the licensing authorities l 21 BREFs finalised / 32 in total to be finalised around the end of 2005

State of transposition l Delays for transposition in EU 15 l 1st Court Case against Austria for incomplete transposition l Infringement procedures against 5 MS (FR, DE, NL, DK, LUX) – more to follow l Difficulties in MS with pre-existing permitting procedure l On-going study of conformity check in new MS

State of implementation Establishment of integrated permitting systems Progress needed to meet full implementation by 30 October 2007

Number of IPPC permits (EU15)

Number of IPPC permits per MS (2002)

Quality of permits ? l In 80 installations under EPER, a particular installation represents 10% of emissions of a particular pollutant !!! l DG ENV to check compliance in a sample of permits (study in 20 installations in 2005)

Other implementation issues Determination of permit conditions based on BAT – use of the BREFs? Monitoring and reporting of emissions - information of the public Regular reconsideration and review of permits Inspection

How to support implementation? BREFs future EU guidelines on list of activities and term “installation” IMPEL (exchange of information – best practice) Capacity building and dissemination strategies

IPPC Review in 2006 l No radical changes to be proposed in short term l Thematic strategies (air, soil, waste) and other EU policies (dioxins) l Technical review (clarification of scope, possible scope extension eg ‘aquaculture’, other issues) l Assessment of possible streamlining of existing legislation on industrial emissions and possible NOx, SO2 emission trading schemes l Incentives to go beyond regulatory compliance

Concluding remarks on the IPPC Directive l Flexible, goal-setting legislation = opportunity for environment + industry l Heavily dependent on “good faith” (on behalf of industry operators and authorities) l Complements other instruments (EQS-based, voluntary / market-based, economic instruments) l High level of protection of the environment l Real challenge for existing and new MS !

/index.htm Commission / Germany IPPC conference : September 2005 (Dresden) More information?