Gary J. Young 1 Designing and Implementing Pay-for-Performance Programs: Ongoing Challenges Gary J. Young, J.D., Ph.D. Boston University Presentation for.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Building a New Payment System: Stakeholder Perspectives on Principles and Elements Robert L. Broadway, FHFMA VP of Corporate Strategy, Bethesda Healthcare.

Advertisements

Pay-for-Performance Programs: the U.S. Experience Eric Schneider, M.D., M.Sc. Harvard School of Public Health Brigham and Womens Hospital Boston, MA.

1 National Evaluation Team (NET) Boston University School of Public Health and Department of Veterans Affairs Dan Berlowitz, MD, MPH Matthew Guldin, MPH.

The High Value Healthcare Collaborative (HVHC) Model for Driving Innovation/Spread in Care & Payment Reform Lucy Savitz, Ph.D., MBA Director of Research.

Young 2004 Evaluation of the Rewarding Results Program Gary Young, J.D., Ph.D. Boston University School of Public Health and Department of Veterans Affairs.

Lise Rybowski The Severyn Group Yale CAHPS Team AHRQ Annual Meeting September 10, 2012.

Quality-Based Purchasing: Challenges, Tough Decisions, and Options R. Adams Dudley, MD, MBA Support: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, California.

Alexander 2004 CMS-Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project Stephanie Alexander Senior Vice President Premier Inc. Healthcare Informatics.

Improving Health Care Quality While Slowing Spending Growth: The Alternative Quality Contract (AQC) Dana Gelb Safran, Sc.D. Senior Vice President Performance.

View from the Top – Healthcare and Medical Professional Liability Issues.

What will it Take to Improve Care for Chronic Illness for the Population? Ed Wagner, MD, MPH MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation Center for Health.

Value & Coverage Issue Brief Slides A Closer Look at Evidence-Based Performance Measurement.

One Health Plan’s Initiatives to Improve Patient Experiences: What the Physicians Had to Say Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Professor of Medicine, UCLA CAHPS PI, RAND.

Key Findings : Paying for Self-Management Supports as Part of Integrated Community Health Care Systems July, 2012.

California Pay for Performance: Understanding the Impact of Provider Incentives for Quality Tom Williams Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association.

Medicare’s Physician Performance Agenda: Understanding Next Steps and Shaping the Future Course Debra Ness Co-Chair, Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure Project.

Collaborative Learnings from the School of Hard Knocks Melinda Karp Director of Strategic Planning and Development, MHQP AHRQ Annual Meeting September.

The Relationship Between Organizational Factors and Performance Among Pay-for- Performance Hospitals Vina ER, Rhew DC, Weingarten SR, Weingarten JB, Chang.

Marshaling Data to Improve Patient Safety Michelle Mello, JD, PhD Harvard School of Public Health.

Neurosurgery and Quality Improvement: A Pay for Participation Model PFP Summit Concurrent Sessions III Robert E. Harbaugh, MD, FACS, FAHA University Distinguished.

Pay-for-Performance: A Decision Guide for Purchasers Guide Prepared for: Agency for HealthCare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human.

1 Addressing Racial & Ethnic Disparities in Health Care AHRQ 2007 Annual Conference September 28, 2007.

1 IMPROVING HEALTH CARE QUALITY THE ROLE OF PAY-FOR-PERFOMANCE TOM DEAN M.D.

Dr. Lai Fong Chiu Senior Research Fellow Institute of Health Sciences and Public Health Research University of Leeds Critical Engagement The Community.

Rewarding Performance: Three-Year Results from California's Statewide Pay-for-Performance Experiment Cheryl L. Damberg, PhD, Kristiana Raube, PhD, Stephanie.

How to Achieve Cost Savings and Patient Satisfaction Through Clinical Best Practices James Cox-Chapman, MD February 18,

Pay for Performance

Step 1: Linking Quality and Equity. Linking Quality and Equity Agenda Overview of the Training Series Linking Quality Improvement and Equity Exercise.

Measuring and Rewarding Physician Performance: A National Movement David S. P. Hopkins, Ph.D. Pacific Business Group on Health Provider Reimbursement Web.

Pay-for-Performance in Safety Net Settings: New Evidence from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Gary Young, J.D., Ph.D., Bert White.

Pay-for-Performance: A Decision Guide for Purchasers Guide Prepared for: Agency for HealthCare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human.

Living School and Daily Physical Activity Partners for Life? Results of a Research Study Funded by The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario Martin Shain.

August 27, 2007 Partners for Quality Darnell Dent Chief Executive Officer.

Pay for Performance in BCBS Plans Nationally June 22, 2005 National Press Club Bruce E. Landon, M.D., M.B.A.

Assessing Quality of Care AHRQ State Healthcare Quality Improvement Workshop January 17, 2008 Rhonda Jaster Prevention Specialist.

Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.

Using the Electronic Health Record to Encourage Evidence-Based Practice Jonathan S. Einbinder, MD, MPH Partners HealthCare

Pay-for-Performance in Safety Net Settings: New Evidence from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Gary Young, J.D., Ph.D., Bert White.

The California Pay for Performance Program Stephen Shortell, Ph.D., MPH Dean, School of Public Health University of California at Berkeley National Pay.

Assessing a Practice Coaching Intervention for Improving Chronic Care in Safety Net Organizations Shinyi Wu, PhD Assessing a Practice Coaching Intervention.

The CDHP Implementation Experience Briefing for 2 nd National Consumer Driven Healthcare Summit September 26, 2007 Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin, Ph.D. The RAND.

Community Quality Collaboratives: Accomplishments, Challenges and Opportunities Gary J. Young, J.D., Ph.D. Director and Professor Center for Health Policy.

1 The Effect of Primary Health Care Orientation on Chronic Illness Care Management Julie Schmittdiel, Ph.D., Stephen M. Shortell, Ph.D., Thomas Rundall,

QualityIncentivesJune Paying for Quality in Integrated Health Systems Douglas Conrad, PhD Barry Saver, MD, MPH Beverly Court, MHA Sarah Heath, MA.

Public Health Accreditation Learning from Others Paul K. Halverson, DrPH, FACHE.

Accountable Care: The Challenge of the Decade Michigan’s Premier Public Health Conference October 13, 2011 Kim Horn President and CEO Priority Health.

Montana Health CO-OP: Who We Are. 2 Goals To create value through quality outcomes, efficiency and service Move from silo health care delivery to integrated.

Changes in racial disparities under public reporting and pay for performance Rachel M. Werner.

Louisiana’s Vision for Health Information Technology Joshua Hardy State Health IT Coordinator.

1 The Relationship between Pay-for- Performance Incentives and Quality Improvement: A Survey of Massachusetts Physician Group Leaders Ateev Mehrotra, Steven.

Factors Influencing Non-Primary Care Physicians’ Views on P4P Karen M. Murphy, Ph.D. The Sixth Annual Quality Colloquium Cambridge, MA August 20, 2007.

Issues in the Design and Implementation of Pay-for-Performance Programs Issues in the Design and Implementation of Pay-for-Performance Programs Gary J.

Thomas B. Valuck, MD, JD Medical Officer & Senior Adviser Center for Medicare Management Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CMS’ Progress Toward.

Paying for Performance Gary J. Young, J.D., Ph.D. Boston University School of Public Health and Center for Organization, Leadership and Management Research,

Measuring and Reporting Performance Data Through Health IT AHRQ Annual Meeting Wednesday September 26, 2007 A. John Blair, III, MD President, Taconic IPA.

Manatee County Utilities Department Manatee County Administrator’s Office Carrots and Sticks : Approach to Controlling Health Care Costs and Creating a.

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Melinda Abrams, MS The Commonwealth Fund Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative Stakeholders Workshop Meeting Washington, DC.

PAYMENT REFORM: THE QUALITY INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM Kenneth Goldblum, M.D.

/ ©2015 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1 TERRANCE GOVENDER MD CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION INTEGRITY.

1 A Pay-For-Performance Program for Diabetes Care T.T. Lee, S.H. Cheng* Institute of Health Policy and Management, National Taiwan University, Taiwan,

Geographic Variation in Healthcare and Promotion of High-Value Care Margaret E. O’Kane November 10, 2010.

Resolving Challenges in Physician-Level Measurement David S. P. Hopkins, Ph.D. Pacific Business Group on Health Pay for Performance Summit February 28,

Disease Management Colloquium Using Registries to Manage Patient Care Art Sprenkle, MD Medical Director: McKesson Health Solutions; Washington State Medical.

Healthy patients. Healthy hospitals. Early Results from the Premier-CMS Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Program Stephanie Alexander Senior Vice.

Thomas B. Valuck, MD, JD Medical Officer & Senior Adviser

The Promise of Pay For Performance:

A Case Study from California: Pay for Performance Incentives and the Adoption of Information Technology Tom Williams Integrated Healthcare Association.

Sustainability in Quality Improvement

Institute of Medicine Audio-conference Stephanie Alexander, MBA

We wanted to kick-off this meeting by reviewing:

Presentation transcript:

Gary J. Young 1 Designing and Implementing Pay-for-Performance Programs: Ongoing Challenges Gary J. Young, J.D., Ph.D. Boston University Presentation for AHRQ Annual Meeting Session on How Pay-for-Performance Fits with a Value Agenda September 28, 2007 Financial support from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Gary J. Young2 P4P: Will it Work? Recent evidence points to modest gains from P4P in terms of provider adherence. Selected Findings: Rosenthal et al. (2006) Relative increase of 3.6 percentage points for cervical cancer screening Rosenthal et al. (2006) Relative increase of 3.6 percentage points for cervical cancer screening Levin-Scherz et al. (2006) Levin-Scherz et al. (2006) Relative increase of 2-19 percentage points for diabetes measures Relative increase of 2-19 percentage points for diabetes measures Lindenauer et a. (2007) CMS Premier demonstration: Relative increase of 2.6 percentage points for AMI measures; 3.4 points for pneumonia measures; 4.1 points for heart failure measures. Lindenauer et a. (2007) CMS Premier demonstration: Relative increase of 2.6 percentage points for AMI measures; 3.4 points for pneumonia measures; 4.1 points for heart failure measures. Young et al. (2007) Young et al. (2007) Absolute increase of 7 percentage points for diabetes measure (e.g., eye exam)

Gary J. Young3 Key Challenges Provider Engagement Provider Engagement Unit of Accountability Unit of Accountability Quality Measures Quality Measures Provider Capability Provider Capability Incentive Structure Incentive Structure Data Systems and Measurement Data Systems and Measurement Unintended Consequences Unintended Consequences

Gary J. Young4 Supporting Research 7 Demonstration Sites – Rewarding Results Surveys of Physicians (over 4000 surveyed; approximately 1500 responses) Interviews with over 60 Senior Managers of Physician Organizations Focus Groups with Providers and Payers Site Visits to Provider Organizations Findings of Other Researchers

Gary J. Young5 Provider Engagement Physicians appear comfortable with the concept of P4P. Physicians appear comfortable with the concept of P4P. -- Strong preference for incentives linked to quality vs. utilization or productivity

Gary J. Young6 Survey Results

Gary J. Young7 Survey Results

Gary J. Young8 Provider Engagement Physicians do not appear to have a strong understanding of the P4P programs in which they participate. Conventional forms of communicating w/ providers appear inadequate (very Low physician survey scores regarding understanding of programs). Physicians do not appear to have a strong understanding of the P4P programs in which they participate. Conventional forms of communicating w/ providers appear inadequate (very Low physician survey scores regarding understanding of programs). Many physicians appear to feel disenfranchised. Physician involvement in program design can help secure buy-in (e.g., selection/modification of measures). Many physicians appear to feel disenfranchised. Physician involvement in program design can help secure buy-in (e.g., selection/modification of measures).

Gary J. Young9 Unit of Accountability Unit of Accountability Sponsors face difficult choices and possible tradeoffs between selecting individuals versus organizations. Sponsors face difficult choices and possible tradeoffs between selecting individuals versus organizations. -- systems engineering vs. physician initiative -- stimulating investment in QI infrastructure vs. enhancing engagement of front-line providers.

Gary J. Young10 Quality Measures Physicians generally comfortable with standardized measures such as HEDIS and HQA. Physicians generally comfortable with standardized measures such as HEDIS and HQA. --Outcomes vs. Process Measures --Specialists and Non-Acute Care Settings

Gary J. Young11 Provider Capability Providers reveal anxiety about capabilities to perform well on quality measures. Providers reveal anxiety about capabilities to perform well on quality measures. --Hospitals with well developed QI infrastructure appeared to have a distinct advantage in BCBSM P4P With limited provider capability, one-time performance gains may be common. With limited provider capability, one-time performance gains may be common. --In some situations, learning goals should possibly precede performance goals

Gary J. Young12

Gary J. Young13 Incentive Structure Both program sponsors and providers are divided on many issues regarding incentive structure. Both program sponsors and providers are divided on many issues regarding incentive structure. --Attainment vs. Improvement --Bonus only vs. Penalties (e.g., withholds)

Gary J. Young14 Data Systems and Measurement Providers have strong concerns about data reliability and validity. Providers have strong concerns about data reliability and validity. --Claims vs. Charts (appeals process/reserve fund) -- Small Numbers (composite scores multi-payer initiatives)

Gary J. Young15 Unintended Consequences Physician surveys reveal no major concerns about UC. Physician surveys reveal no major concerns about UC. -- Some studies outside healthcare point to negative impact on innovation. -- P4P in safety net settings may pose unique risks.

Gary J. Young16 Concluding Comments P4P can lead to gains in clinical quality, but the magnitude of the gains may be quite modest and time- limited, particularly without substantial improvements in provider infrastructure for quality measurement and improvement. P4P can lead to gains in clinical quality, but the magnitude of the gains may be quite modest and time- limited, particularly without substantial improvements in provider infrastructure for quality measurement and improvement. Physicians do appear comfortable with P4P as a concept, but have certain concerns with the way P4P programs have been designed and implemented. Physicians do appear comfortable with P4P as a concept, but have certain concerns with the way P4P programs have been designed and implemented. Program sponsors face many daunting challenges in designing and implementing programs. Program sponsors face many daunting challenges in designing and implementing programs.