Major Activities reviewing the situation pedagogical knowledge structure2 fertile question and treatment3 research questions and implications4 inquiry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

Research Informed Teaching – a summary Dr Susan Hill and Assoc Prof Tony Fetherston.
Understanding by Design - Stage 1 -
Using the Crosscutting Concepts As conceptual tools when meeting an unfamiliar problem or phenomenon.
Visual Arts Lesson Planning Zoom in…Planning for action One lesson at a time.
Linking the Fairs to the 2013 Ontario Curriculum Social Studies 1 to 6 and History and Geography 7 and 8.
Jan-Marie Kellow. “We only think when we are confronted with problems.” John Dewey “Wisdom begins in wonder.” Socrates.
Curriculum Project Garred Kirk. EARL 1: Civics The student understands and applies knowledge of government, law, politics, and the nation’s fundamental.
The Rainforest Katie Farlow, Whitney McManus, Rita Hill, Quiana Allen & Lauren McCarthy.
Teaching and learning in a community of thinking – challenges and dilemmas Yoram Harpaz and Adam Lefstein August 2004.
NETS Meets Common Core Teresa Knapp Gordon, NBCT
What Mathematics Knowledge is Needed for Teaching Mathematics?
 What is the main difference between psychology and sociology?
Lesson Planning Finding your way…
The IBCC Reflective Project
Lesson Planning Educ 3100.
Creating Good Inquiry-Based Questions. What is Inquiry? Driven by learner’s questions, not teacher lessons Learning is constructivist. We construct meaning.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
University Course “Education for Sustainable Development – Innovations in Teacher Education” (BINE): Reasons, Concept and First Experiences Franz Rauch.
Pragmatism in Education
Teaching Thinking: A Guide for the Perplexed Yoram Harpaz
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
MLC Learning Model Reveal the Big Picture Immersion What do I need to Know and how will I find out? Create it Share Reflection Celebrate Brainstorm.
COETC Grant May 17, 2012 Facilitators: Ruth Brancard and Elaine Baker.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Mapping the Big Picture Curriculum Mapping for Integrating Curriculum and Assessment in K – 12 By Cristiana A. Baggio
Analysis of Student Learning in Global Change Eugene S. Takle 1, Heather Moser 1, and Elsebeth K. Sorensen 2 1 Iowa State University, Ames, IA 2 Alborg.
Dialogue in classrooms – questioning conventional wisdom
Put your name here in Slide Master view.. Main MenuMain Menu | Table of Contents | Professional Credentials | Goals & Standards | Program StandardsTable.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
InterActions Overview This Presentation will touch on the following topics.  Brief Overview  Major Content Themes  Pedagogical Principles  Scaffolding.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
PRESENTED BY: CHASITY LEWIS NOVEMBER 1, 2012 NORTHERN NASH HIGH SCHOOL Using Primary Sources in the History Classroom.
Enquiry learning method. Outline of the presentation 1. What is enquiry? 2. Steps of enquiry learning 3. Definition of enquiry learning 4. Activity 5.
Action Research for Managers
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
VELS The Arts. VELS (3 STRANDS) Physical, Personal and Social Learning Discipline-based Learning Interdisciplinary Learning.
Crafting Essential Questions Adapted from the work of Traci Blanchard North Cobb High School Source: Understanding by Design by Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins,
Technological Literacy For All Students. Manual Training: 1870’s Manual Arts: 1890’s Industrial Arts: early 1900’s to 1990’s Technology Education: Mid.
Teaching Reading Comprehension
UTeach STEP 1- Class #2  Welcome!  Please sign in  Pick up your folder and name card  Find your schedule & sit with your partner  Sign out a computer.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Group Work Induction Workshop School of Electrical Engineering Systems.
Facilitate Group Learning
Concept 2 Conflict 3 Construct 4 Consider The PIT CLARITYCLARITY CONFUSIONCONFUSION
Technological Literacy For All Students. Technology Shapes Our Lives We are all doing things we never imagined We are absolutely “hooked” on technology.
Research for Nurses: Methods and Interpretation Chapter 1 What is research? What is nursing research? What are the goals of Nursing research?
The Middle Years Programme. Middle Years Programme is for students between the ages of 11 and 16 is for students between the ages of 11 and 16 helps develop.
An introduction to CRITICAL LITERACY Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice School of Politics and International Relations The University of.
Project Based Learning: Challenges & Opportunities John R. Mascazine, Ph.D. Ohio Dominican University Science Education Council of Ohio January 25 – 26,
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
How to Apply it in the Classroom Elicit ideas Elaboration & Reconstruc- tion Frequent problem based activities Variety of info. & resources Collaboration.
ART CRITICISM AND FORMAL ANALYSIS OUTLINE. Defining Art Criticism.
Cedric D. Murry APT Instructor of Applied Technology in research and development.
Weaving Global Issues into the Social Studies Curriculum at ISL The process.
Implementation Training
Goals and Objectives  Why Use Questioning Strategies?  Effective Questioning Techniques  Levels of Questioning…Increasing Understanding, Models for.
COUNSELOR EDUCATION PEDAGOGY TRAINING Session One: Significant Learning and Counselor Education.
1 Disciplinary Literacy in the Social Studies Social Studies Department February 11, 2016.
Critical Thinking & Problem- based Learning for Adults Dr. Eli Collins-Brown Week 5 AET520 Instructional Strategies in Adult Education and Training University.
K-3 Student Reflection and Self-Assessment
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
History Matters: Historical Thinking K—16
Presentation transcript:

Major Activities reviewing the situation pedagogical knowledge structure2 fertile question and treatment3 research questions and implications4 inquiry activities, processes and skills5 understanding performances6 initiation activities 7 putting it all together8 adam lefstein & yoram harpaz – august 2004 – / h e u r i s t i c s f o r d e s i g n i n g a c o m m u n i t y o f t h i n k i n g

pedagogical knowledge structure controversiesinsights skillsconcepts controversies: questions, disagreements and disputes that divide (or divided) a discipline; tend to be composed of competing insights. (e.g. can historians be objective? is technology a neutral tool? what are the roles of nature and culture in determining personality?) insights: disciplinary understandings that constitute broad perspectives from which the world makes (more) sense; tend to go beyond our daily experience and contradict folk understandings. (e.g. individual behaviour is shaped by social norms, the conservation of energy, readers’ pre-understandings shape their interpretations.) skills: characteristic tools, methods and practices by means of which disciplines study and think about their objects of inquiry. (e.g. controlled experimentation, statistical analysis, literary criticism, naturalistic observation, ethnography.) concepts: key ideas, processes, events, terms and structures that the disciplines have developed in order to describe, think and talk about their subject matter. h e u r i s t i c s f o r d e s i g n i n g a c o m m u n i t y o f t h i n k i n g adam lefstein & yoram harpaz – august 2004 – /

posing the fertile question and fertility treatment potential fertile questions (brainstorming) criteria of a fertile question open – a question that in principle has no one definitive answer; rather, it has several different and competing possible answers. undermining – a question that undermines the learners’ basic assumptions and casts doubt on the self-evident or commonsensical; uncovers basic conflicts lacking a simple solution; requires the critical consideration of origins. rich – a question that necessitates grappling with rich content that is indispensable to understanding humanity and the world; requires careful and lengthy research. connected – a question relevant to the learners, the society in which they live, and a discipline and field. charged – a question with an ethical dimension; charged with emotional, social and political implications that potentially motivate inquiry and learning. practical – a question that can be researched in the context of the learners, facilitators, and available resources, and from which research questions may be derived. selected and “treated” question adam lefstein & yoram harpaz – august 2004 – / h e u r i s t i c s f o r d e s i g n i n g a c o m m u n i t y o f t h i n k i n g

research questions and implications fertile question (provisional ): potential research questions fertile questionconcluding performances initiation topicsinquiry processes and skills with which questions are we more and/or less pleased? how can we design the program so that we encourage the better questions? specifically, what are the implications for... adam lefstein & yoram harpaz – august 2004 – / h e u r i s t i c s f o r d e s i g n i n g a c o m m u n i t y o f t h i n k i n g

inquiry activities, processes and skills selected research question/s potential research activities (brainstorm) (2) requisite skills & dispositions (1) inquiry process(3) assessment criteria to what extent is this analysis generalizable to other potential research questions? (repeat if necessary for other questions) what are the implications for the fertile question, concluding performances and initiation topics? adam lefstein & yoram harpaz – august 2004 – / h e u r i s t i c s f o r d e s i g n i n g a c o m m u n i t y o f t h i n k i n g

understanding performances and assessment what are potential understanding performances of controversies, insights and concepts? in what activities and/or for what audiences might students’ knowledge be applied? possible activities and formats for communal concluding performances possible activities and formats for team concluding performances possible stagesassessment criteria adam lefstein & yoram harpaz – august 2004 – / h e u r i s t i c s f o r d e s i g n i n g a c o m m u n i t y o f t h i n k i n g

initiation activity design topic / subjectquestions controversiesinsightsskillsconcepts sources / textsunderstanding performances activity outline based on and/or “create” fertile questions involve understanding performances generate potential inquiry questions model skills, dispositions and performances initiate into community learning culture demonstrate potential sources of information and means of analysis and/or interpretation based on pedagogical knowledge structure: lead to controversies and insights; clarify concepts; skills provide informative feedback some elements of successful initiation lessons adam lefstein & yoram harpaz – august 2004 – / h e u r i s t i c s f o r d e s i g n i n g a c o m m u n i t y o f t h i n k i n g

putting it all together dates inquiry process understanding performances assessmentinitiation adam lefstein & yoram harpaz – august 2004 – / h e u r i s t i c s f o r d e s i g n i n g a c o m m u n i t y o f t h i n k i n g