Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac revised K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV,
Advertisements

Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.
CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
Drive Beam Phase Measurements and Feedback at CTF3 Giulio Morpurgo.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 28-Jan
Compensation of Transient Beam-Loading in CLIC Main Linac
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
Frank Zimmermann, CLIC “Away Day” 28 March 2006  x * Limitations and Improvements Paths Damping Rings Maxim Korostelev, Frank Zimmermann.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
John Adams Institute Frank Tecker Linear Colliders Frank Tecker – CERN Linear Colliders Lecture 3 Subsystems II Main Linac (cont.) Transverse Wakefields.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Collimator wakefields - G.Kurevlev Manchester 1 Collimator wake-fields Wake fields in collimators General information Types of wake potentials.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
P. Urschütz - CTF3 Collaboration Meeting 2007 CTF3 commissioning & operation in 2006 P. Urschütz for the CTF3 operations team  Commissioning of the Delay.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Interface between TAC SR and SASE FEL Possibility for testing CLIC structure Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
Main and Drive Beam Dynamics Working Group Caterina Biscari, Daniel Schulte Attending people ~ 20 ± 5 Presentations ~ 18 (7 from CERN) CL IC 07.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
X-band Based FEL proposal
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
CLIC 09 Workshop - C. Biscari C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, F. Stulle, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
RF-kick in the CLIC accelerating structures
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Wake field limitations in a low gradient main linac of CLIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
NC Accelerator Structures
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Coupler Effects in High Energy Part of XFEL Linac
Evgenij Kot XFEL beam dynamics meeting,
Presentation transcript:

Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 2/22 Introduction The aim of the study is finding best linac optics in order to transport the beam through linac in required tolerances. Currently transverse instabilities have been studied only (which is one of the major task of instabilities in linacs). Multibunch effects have been focused mostly. New designing (which is not fully designed) accelerator structure dimensions have been used for building up lattice layouts. Since we don’t have fully designed structure CTF3 SICA structure have been used in some points PLACET and analytical calculations have been used for calculations

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 3/22 Motivation Beam with 140 μ s pulse length and 4.2 A current is accelerated up to 2.4 GeV in drive beam accelerator. After delay loop and combiner rings initial pulse is divided 24 sub-pulses with 100 A pulse current and 240 ns pulse length. Current CLIC RF power production layout

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 4/22 Motivation One of the major problems with accelerating intense bunches in linac is the instability driven by wakefields. This instability, generated by off-axis beam trajectories, can develop within a single-bunch or along a train of bunches and always leads to a dilution of the emittance. As it can be seen on table the intensity of drive beam is very high due to fully loaded operation which means strong wake field effect… CTF3CLIC DB Energy (MeV) Pulse current (A) Bunch charge (nC) Pulse Length (µs) Bunch separation (cm)2060 No of bunches per pulse

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 5/22 1GHz DBA Structure SICA (Slotted Iris –Constant Aperture) principle like in CTF3 PRF~ 10 to 15 MW power is taken into account In other words optimizing klystron cost Optimizations still being continued (by Rolf Wegner) for optimum efficiency (which requires > %95) for filling time (which requires 245 ns)

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 6/22 1GHz DBA Structure Although it is not finalized we have taken into account –11 Cell –R BP = 41 mm –Varying gap –Cell length= mm –Gradient 2.4 MV/ per structure (10 MW RF power) Which are convenient for – η > 95 % –t fil ≈ 245 ns From Rolf Wegner HOM dampers HOM’s have not been simulated yet

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 7/22 Short range wakes Both ABCI code and Karl Bane’s formulas were used to calculate short range wakes; Since the structure does not have constant gap

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 8/22 Long range wakes –Since the HOM’s of new structure we were not simulated yet –Since one of the goal of this study is determine the damping requirements CTF3 SICA structure transverse modes were scaled and superposition of these modes have been used… 3 GHz SICA (CTF3) f [GHz]QK [V/pCm 2 ] …. ….. 1 GHz SCALED f [GHz]QK [V/pCm 2 ] ….…..…. f : Frequency of mode K: Kick factor of mode Q: damping fact. of mod

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 9/22 Single Bunch analysis If only the particles inside a single bunch are taken into account equation of motion of each particle For constant offset the displacement of the trailing slices in bunch will be proportional of L: Linac length E: energy β: betatron functions inside structure Plots for spoiled beam due to short range wake effect with large betatron W ┴ : point like dipole wake per unit length ρ : charge distribution

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 10/22 Multi bunch analysis For multi bunch case point-like bunches with distance in a train are considered. Similarly the equation of motion of each bunch Here wake function is sum of modes of structure ω m : frequency of mode K m : kick factor of mode Q m : damping factor of mode The displacement of each bunch in train is given with matrix A where and D.Schulte, “Multi-bunch Calculations In The CLIC Main Linac”, PAC09

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 11/22 Lattices Minimum deflection of particles from their ideal path requires small betatron oscillation which means strong lattice Four different lattice types were taken into account Quadrupoles were considered to has length between 22 cm to 35 cm Maximum quad field is considered to be 1 T for 40 mm quad aperture at 2.4 GeV

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 12/22 Short range wake effects Plots shows normalized final phase space of the sliced bunches injected with an offset (PLACET) The short range wake effect seems acceptable for all lattices.

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 13/22 Long range wake effects Calculations were done using PLACET and analytical equations for Plots shows normalized amplitudes of the bunches at the end of the linac for an offset of incoming train. Good agreement with analytical calculations and PLACET The amplitudes (for 2xQm and 1xKm of CTF3) seems agreeable for all lattices

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 14/22 Long range wake effects Calculations were done for Again good agreement with analytical calculations and PLACET For FODO-1 TRIPLET and DOUBLET amplitudes seems acceptable

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 15/22 Coherent jitter Coherent jitter of all bunches of the incoming beam causes scattering of the trailing bunches. Coherent jitter is given with Calculations was done analytically with scaling damping factor and kick factor of CTF3 structure For all lattices coherent jitter is acceptable in green and yellow areas. FODO-1 lattice allows larger Q and K

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 16/22 Bunch to bunch jitter Random bunch-to- bunch jitter of the incoming beam also leads to scattering of the final bunches and it is given with For all lattices the limit of acceptability is the area of green and yellow Again FODO-1 lattice allows larger Q and K

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 17/22 Emittance growth Misalignment for all Quads Err_x,y=0.2 mm Err_px,y=0.2 m.rad Misalignment for all BPMs Err_x,y=0.2 mm Err_px,y=0.0 RF structures and other pieces are perfectly aligned 1 to 1 corrections were performed Since quadrupole strengths are weaker in FODO2 alignment is easier than other lattices. Triplet lattice the emittance growth is huge due to strong quadrupoles and alignment difficulty

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 18/22 An example for off-crest acceleration Plots shows various results for FODO-1 lattice Energy spread and emittance growth can be reduced but transverse single bunch instability occurs even in strongest lattice

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 19/22 CLIC DB time structure CLIC DB pulse consist of 24x24 sub pulses which fills even-odd RF buckets At an exact time sub pulse switches and starts to fill odd (-even) bucket On that point the wake will change due to timing of bunches. This chance can cause not only amplitude change but also beam losses.. This condition was not taken into account this situation in all calculations above

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 20/22 Conclusion We have 4 different type lattices to make calculations for DB linac after the structure fully designed However the simulations give some ideas about damping requirement for the structure incase the kick factors of new structure are close values to CTF3 The beam was considered to be without any phase or energy error and we didn't make any calculation about longitudinal stability DB pulse time structure was not taken into account for all calculations as well …

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 21/22 Further work plan Using same lattices with final design of structure and with DB time structure Checking longitudinal stability with various injection errors Checking if bunch compressor is necessary on DB linac Simulating off-crest acceleration in order to reduce energy spread and emittance growth F.Stulle Last Beam Phy. meeting Wake potentials for different bunch length for designing structure (ABCI result)

CLIC Workshop A.AKSOY 22/22 thank you for your attention And Special Thanks to Daniel Schulte