Decay Phase of Proton and Electron SEP Events E.I. Daibog 1, K. Kecskeméty 2, Yu.I. Logachev 1 1 Skobeltsyn Inst. of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State Univ.,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M.E. Wiedenbeck, JPL/Caltech Thanks to: the ACE/ULEIS &SIS Teams and the STEREO/LET, SIT, & SEPT Teams 9 June 20101ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop.
Advertisements

Investigating the Origin of the Long-Duration High- Energy Gamma-Ray Flares Gerry Share, Jim Ryan and Ron Murphy (in absentia) Steering Committee Overseer.
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal phenomena On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
S. Della Torre 1,2, P. Bobik 5, G. Boella 1,3, M.J. Boschini 1,4, C. Consolandi 1, M. Gervasi 1,3, D. Grandi 1, K. Kudela 5, F. Noventa 1,3, S. Pensotti.
A New Look at the Heliosphere and Solar Modulation
Las Cruces CRS April 21-22, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
SEP Acceleration Mechanisms Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof Johns Hopkins U./Applied Physics Lab. ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop Kennebunkport,
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
GEANT-4/Spenvis User Meeting November 2006 Solar Energetic Particle Modelling Activities at ESA A.Glover 1, E. Daly 1,A. Hilgers 1, SEPEM Consortium 2.
SSL UC Berkeley 2010 June ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop Interplanetary Propagation of Solar Impulsive Energetic Electrons Linghua Wang, Bob Lin and S ä.
CISM SEP Modeling Background The major SEP events come from the CME-generated coronal and interplanetary shock(s) These “gradual”events can have a “prompt”
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology A New JPL Interplanetary Solar High- Energy.
Measuring Proton Energies and Fluxes Using EIT (SOHO) CCDs Areas Outside the Solar Disk Images L. Didkovsky 1, D. Judge 1, A. Jones 1, and J. Gurman 2.
Mike Marsh; S. Dalla; T. Laitinen; M. Dierckxsens; N. B. Crosby Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, University of Central Lancashire, Preston,
Solar Modulation: A Theoretical Perspective Modeling of cosmic ray charge-sign dependence in the heliosphere Marius Potgieter Unit for Space Physics North-West.
Antiprotons of interstellar origin at balloon altitudes: Flux simulations U. B. Jayanthi, K. C. Talavera Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE),
Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona I acknowledge helpful discussions with J. Kόta and J. GIacalone. Presented at the TeV.
Recurrent Cosmic Ray Variations in József Kόta & J.R. Jokipii University of Arizona, LPL Tucson, AZ , USA 23 rd ECRS, Moscow, Russia,
Solar Energetic Particle Events: An Overview Christina Cohen Caltech.
IHY Workshop A PERSONAL VIEW OF SOLAR DRIVERS for Solar Wind Coronal Mass Ejections Solar Energetic Particles Solar Flares.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Energy spectra of suprathermal and energetic ions at low solar activity Károly Kecskeméty Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary 23rd European.
Diagnostics of solar wind streams N.A.Lotova, K.V.Vladimirsky, and V.N.Obridko IZMIRAN.
Long-term prediction of solar extreme events basing on the general regularities of energetic particle generation by the Sun by Rikho Nymmik Skobeltsyn.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
1 20 January 2005: Session Summary SHINE 2006 Zermatt, Utah, 31 July - 4 August Invited Talks Riley: what was the Alfven speed in the corona at.
Project: Understanding propagation characteristics of heavy ions to assess the contribution of solar flares to large SEP events Principal Investigator:
He + Increase in SEP Events with a High Source Temperature and Implication for Acceleration Site ICRC, 2011, Beijing Z. Guo; E. Moebius; M. Popecki Space.
1 SEP “Campaign Events” for SHINE 2003 Question: Can we identify solar/interplanetary factors that drive SEP spectral and compositional variability at.
The spatial and temporal distribution of solar and galactic cosmic rays S. V. Tasenko 1, P. V. Shatov 1, I. A. Skorokhodov 1, I. V. Getselev 1,2, M. Podzolko.
39 th COSPAR Scientific Assembly Mysore, INDIA July 14-22, 2012 F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3, B.C. Heikkila 4, N. Lal.
Modeling particle acceleration at CME-driven shock and transport in the inner heliosphere, A case study SHINE 2004 Bozeman, June 28, 2004 Gang Li IGPP,
Radiation Storms in the Near Space Environment Mikhail Panasyuk, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Cosmic Rays at 1 AU Over the Deep Solar Minimum of Cycle 23/24 Cosmic Ray Transport in the Helioshealth: The View from Voyager AGU Fall Meeting San Francisco,
Tasks: Pasadena, 9/18/08. Exponential Rollovers Origin of double power laws? Need analysis and simulation. Correlating E and Q/A dependence; explore different.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT SIMULATIONS: A PARAMETER STUDY FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF MULTI-SPACECRAFT SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS.
The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.
Solar Energetic Particles (SEP’s) J. R. Jokipii LPL, University of Arizona Lecture 2.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
Multi-spacecraft observations of solar energetic electron events during the rising phase of solar cycle 24 W. Droege 1, R. Gomez-Herrero 2, J. Kartavykh.
Ion Acceleration in Solar Flares Determined by Solar Neutron Observations 2013 AGU Meeting of the Cancun, Mexico 2013/05/15 Kyoko Watanabe ISAS/JAXA,
Correlation of magnetic field intensities and solar wind speeds of events observed by ACE. Mathew J. Owens and Peter J. Cargill. Space and Atmospheric.
Probing Turbulence At and Near CME-driven shocks Using Energetic Particle Spectra Living with a Star Team meeting Sep 18th, 2008 Pasadena, CA Gang Li From.
08/4/2009NAS - SHINE-Suprathermal Radial Evolution (1-11 AU) of Pickup Ions and Suprathermal Ions in the Heliosphere N. A. Schwadron Boston University,
SEPT/STEREO Observations of Upstream Particle Events: Almost Monoenergetic Ion Beams A. Klassen, R. Gomez-Herrero, R. Mueller-Mellin and SEPT Team, G.
Voyager Observations of Galactic Cosmic Ray Transport in the Heliosheath and their Reacceleration at the Termination Shock F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber.
Voyager SSG November 3-4, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.
Breakout Session F: Anomalous and Galactic Cosmic Rays Rick Leske and Maher Dayeh 5 presentations…and lots of discussion.
What is the Origin of the Frequently Observed v -5 Suprathermal Charged-Particle Spectrum? J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona Presented at SHINE, Zermatt,
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
Particle spectra at CME-driven shocks and upstream turbulence SHINE 2006 Zermatt, Utah August 3rd Gang Li, G. P. Zank and Qiang Hu Institute of Geophysics.
Radial Dependence of Solar Energetic Particle Intensities
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
T. Laitinen, S. Dalla Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, UCLan, UK
George C. Ho1, David Lario1, Robert B. Decker1, Mihir I. Desai2,
A Relation between Solar Flare Manifestations and the GLE Onset
Solar Flare Energy Partition into Energetic Particle Acceleration
Karl-Ludwig Klein & Rositsa Miteva
Organizers: Mihir Desai, Joe Giacalone, Eric Christian
Alexei Struminsky1,2  1 Space Research Institute
Relative abundances of quiet-time suprathermal ions at 1 AU
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
On the Spectral Components of the June 2000 Solar Energetic Particle Events J. Torsti, J. Laivola, P. Mäkelä, I-V. Lehtinen and O. Saloniemi Space Research.
SEP EVENTS AND THE ROLE OF FLARES AND SHOCKS
Solar Energetic Particle Spectral Breaks
Presentation transcript:

Decay Phase of Proton and Electron SEP Events E.I. Daibog 1, K. Kecskeméty 2, Yu.I. Logachev 1 1 Skobeltsyn Inst. of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State Univ., Russia 2 KFKI RMKI, Budapest, Hungary

Why decays? the features and conditions in a source of SEPs at the Sun become unessential during decay phase and effects and peculiarities of particle acceleration and losses in interplanetary space become more important. - rising phase and maximum – origin and propagation mechanism - decay phase - propagation mechanism and interplanetary medium conditions

Decay phase Observed flux profile: a mixture of temporal and spatial variations Functional form of the particle flux decline: power-law – predominantly diffusive propagation exponential – adiabatic deceleration and convection Statistical investigation (Daibog et al. 2003): ~ 700 events of 1-5 MeV proton fluxes (3 solar cycles, at 1 AU) IMP 8 (CPME) ~90% of SEP decays are exponential power-law mostly at high energies Exponential decays longer than 24 hrs. >4 MeV flux > 1-2 p/cm 2 ssr Background: instrumental + remnants of preceding events

Exponential form : J  exp(-t/  ) dN/dt ~ N. Neglecting diffusion Lupton and Stone, Model with absorbing boundary and Burlaga, Spherically-symmetric diffusion. The volume limited by a boundary outside of which particles fly away freely.  = R 2 abs /π 2 κ Owens,1979. Convection  = 9  /4V 2 (2 + α  ) 2 Contrary κ and E dependence Ng and Gleeson,  ׀׀ =  0 (1+r 3 ). Gradual transition to free particle escape. Nearly exponential solution.

Forman, 1970; Jokipii, Convection and adiabatic deceleration dominate over gradients, scattering, and drift τ = 3r / 2V (2 + α  ), α = T+2mc 2 /(T+mc 2 ) ≈ 2 at nonrelativistic energies. Lee, adiabatic deceleration Right qualitative dependence on all parameters However diffusion takes place in any case. No scattering → no either convection and adiabatic deceleration!

Electrons (ten keV – MeV) vs protons (MeV – ten MeV) What can be expected? The shapes of proton and electron decays in the event should be the same if particles are subjected to the same mechanisms of propagation and losses. e and p rigidities differ so strong (0.1 – 250 MV) that far distant parts of IMF inhomogeneouty spectra play a role in their scattering. Similar decays → similar spectra

Statistics IMP simultaneous decays of е ( МeV) and р ( МeV). 67- both exponential. 211– p exponential, e power-shaped. Helios 1,2. е MeV, p 4 – MeV. 31 exponential decays (16 -  e =  p ; 15 -  e >  p). SOHO COSTEP EPHIN. 88 decays: p ( MeV, e ( MeV). ACE EPAM DE. Low energy electrons ( MeV). 52 е and р shapes coincide, 30 different shapes, 6? Correlation between  e and  p ?

IMP 8 p MeV, e MeV

SOHO COSTEP EPHIN Major events. Peak flux of MeV protons >10 p/cm 2 s sr MeV

Mutual angular position of the particle origin and the observer Eastern position of the flare relative to the observer’s ftp. Magnetic field lines move toward the observer – prolonged rising and decay phases. Western position. Field lines move away from the observer –accelerated rising and decay phases. Change of the regime at the longitude about degs.

Protons H1, H MeV, IMP MeV  Hel =30 hrs,  IMP = 12 hrs

Electrons  Hel =30 hrs,  IMP = 20 hrs

Conclusions. At late phase of decay 1.In half of clear-shaped events the shapes of electron and proton decays (exponential or power-law) are similar. 2.Most of electron decays with  e = (1 ± 0.25)  p concerns the cases with  р <  e. As a rule the rate of electron decay is similar or slower than proton one. 3.The rate of e and p decay is practically independent from the power and prehistory of event. 4.Indications are obtained of existence of  e dependence on angular and radial location of the origin similar to proton ones. 5.All these show that in a considerable part of events electrons and protons are subjected to the same processes (convection and adiabatic deceleration?) More statistics of clean events needed!