Processing of a Fine Sediment Pulse after Dam Removal Sediment Budget and Longitudinal Trends Chiloquin Dam Removal – Sprague River Matt Cox, Desiree Tullos,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the Johnson County Stormwater Management Program Casey J. Lee U.S.

Advertisements

Sediment budget for the 2000 LSSF Experiment, in context of the last half century David J. Topping, David M. Rubin, Nancy J. Hornewer, Gregory G. Fisk,

Application of the Continuous Slope-Area Method for Determining Stream Discharge and Development of Rating Curves in Ephemeral Channels Navajo Nation Hydroclimate.

Effects of Island Park Reservoir on sediment and phosphorus transport in the upper Henrys Fork watershed Rob Van Kirk Senior Scientist Henry’s Fork Foundation.

Streamflow and Runoff The character, amount, and timing of discharge from a basin tells a lot about flow paths within the basin Therefore, important to.

STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLING

Assessment of gravel transport characteristics of the upper Santa Ana River Scott Wright and Toby Minear USGS California Water Science Center Sacramento,

1 Sediment Management for Dam Removal: An HEC-6 Approach.

Multi-scale Analysis of Sediment Yield in a Glaciated Environment Beverley C. Wemple 1 and Rebecca K. R. Ambers 2 1 Dept. of Geography, University of Vermont,

Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Background The USGS is working with the U.S. Army at Fort Bragg to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3). The.

DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.

Reach-scale morphological changes of a braided river following a 15-year flood with multidate airborne LiDAR S. Lallias-Tacon (1,2), F. Liébault (1), H.

Removing Marmot Dam: From Monitoring To Learning Chuck Podolak The Johns Hopkins University Department of Geography & Environmental Engineering The Johns.

A Preliminary Evaluation of the Potential Downstream Sediment Deposition Following the Removal of Four Dams on the Klamath River Yantao Cui 1, Christian.

John M. Buffington Research Geomorphologist US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Boise, Idaho, USA PNAMP Protocol Comparison Meeting February.

ADCP Measurement of Suspended Sediment in the Tidal Hudson River Elizabeth Nystrom Gary Wall New York District.

Fluxes of water, sediment, and elements class 1.Introduce instrumentation and approach for surveying and flow gauging 2.Introduce and understand Manning’s.

Hoover Dam – Colorado River. Reasons for Dams Flood Control 39,000 dams worldwide higher than 15 m (ICOLD, 1988)

Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.

CLASS PLAN RIVER BEHAVIOR FLOW GAUGING MANNING’S EQUATION BANKFULL DISCHARGE DISCUSS MCPHEE.

U.S. EPA: NCEA/Global Change Research Program Jim Pizzuto and students University of Delaware Changing Climate and Land Use in the Mid-Atlantic: Modeling.

ESHMC Meeting 6 May 2008 Stacey Taylor. Overview Model river representation in ESPAM 1 What data is available to make changes for the new stress periods.

1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS with applications to RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS © Gary Parker November, CHAPTER 11: SAMPLE CALCULATION FOR.

Overview of Exercise Module 1 – Geologic Setting Module 2 – Flow Regimes Module 3 – Downstream Effects.

FIELD METHODS IN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY GEOS 3110.

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.

Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.

Map Modernization Management Support Best Practices Project - FEMA State of Idaho Idaho Department of Water Resources Boise, Idaho November 2008.

CHaMP Habitat Protocol

Marmot Dam Removal Predictions and Observations Yantao Cui 1, Bruce Orr 1, Andrew Wilcox 2, Jen Vick 3, Charles Podolak 4, and Peter Wilcock 4 1.Stillwater.

Horse Creek Damolition Presenters: Matt Stoecker, Stoecker Ecological and Thomas B. Dunklin Productions.

Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.

Figure 4. St John's Dam, A week before removal, Nov 10 th, 2003 Figure 3. Breaching West Side of the St. John's Dam, March 18 th 2003 Figure 5. Removing.

Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.

MA BF REFERENCE CURVES Objective Develop bankfull regional curves and equations for estimating bankfull width, mean depth, cross-sectional area, and discharge.

Big Horn Lake Sediment Management Study. US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Study Background Bureau of Reclamation and Omaha District Interagency.

Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Modeling sand transport and sandbar evolution along the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam.

Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.

Basic Hydrology Water Quality: Sediment production and transport.

Ghost River & Waiparous Creek in Waiparous Village on June 21, 2007.

National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.

Hyporheic Zone- area where stream water and ground water intermix.

Libby Dam June 2006 Spill: Total Dissolved Gas Monitoring.

Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.

Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.

Klamath ADR Hydrology Report Modeling Results Historical Record and Instream Claims Model Accuracy Jonathan La Marche KADR Hydrologist3/11/2000.

Jennifer Lee, B.S. Harvey Mudd College Kristen Shearer, Wittenberg University John Vivio, University of California, San Diego Advisors: Matt Cox, M.S.

Prevention and Cure. Contents Introduction to Reservoirs Preventing Siltation Cure Cost Benefit Analysis Conclusion.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Sandbars and Floods in Grand Canyon: Current Research and Monitoring Paul Grams, USGS.

Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay.

Estimating the Volume of Fine-Grained Sediments Behind Four Low-Head Dams, Kalamazoo River, Michigan. In cooperation with the Michigan Department of Environmental.

Describe the features and characteristics of the Three Gorges Dam.

Morphological Modeling of the Alameda Creek Flood Control Channel Rohin Saleh, Alameda County Flood Control District Søren Tjerry, Ph.D., DHI Portland,

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation Integration of Results 6 Month Progress ERDC West Bay.

1. Water Trust Board Grant Agreement Scope and Objectives: Removal of islands below the Isleta Diversion Dam Restore this reach of the Rio Grande to the.

Reservoirs. Various Uses  Irrigation, electricity generation, flood control, water supply (urban), improved navigation, fish culture, recreation, combination.

Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,

Estimating Annual Sediment Yield and a Sediment Delivery Ratio for Red Creek, Utah and Wyoming Paul Grams Department of Geography and Earth Resources.

River Stage and Bottom Elevation

Water-Surface Evaporation in Reservoir

Conclusions & Future Work

Morphodynamic and Sediment Tracers in One-Dimension

photo : Michael Collier

Summary In addition to the oceans, where else is water found on Earth?

Beach use, hrs/wk, last 20 yrs

Streams Hydrodynamics

Hydrotechnical Design Guidelines for Stream Crossings

Module # 7 Field Day 1 – Basic Geomorphic Data Collection

“Characteristics of Suspended Sediment and Flow in Downstream of Mekong River, Southern Vietnam” 5/22/2019 Duong Thai Bang (M2) (Supervised by Prof. Maki.

Presentation transcript:

Processing of a Fine Sediment Pulse after Dam Removal Sediment Budget and Longitudinal Trends Chiloquin Dam Removal – Sprague River Matt Cox, Desiree Tullos, Cara Walter

Map: Mike Neumann, USBR Background: Chiloquin Dam

Objectives Develop a preliminary sediment budget for the Chiloquin Dam removal location from pre removal (2008) to 2 years post removal (2010) Examine longitudinal trends in the processing of the fine sediment pulse.

Topography/Bathymetry 2006,2007, 2008, 2009,2010 ADCP 2008,2009 and 2010 GPS RTK Ground Surveys Sediment riffles - pebble counts SSC collected by Klamath Tribes and USGS Turbidity, discharge, and stage USGS gage (# ) on the Sprague River USGS gage (# ) on the Williamson River Methods: Field Data Collection

Methods: Discharge, Turbidity, and SSC Sampling Upstream – USGS Gauge

Methods: Estimation of Suspended Sediment Concentration Turbidity vs. SSC at Sprague River near Chiloquin (US of reservoir) N = 66 samples T urbidity vs. SSC at Williamson River below Sprague River near Chiloquin (DS of reservoir) N = 48 samples

Methods: Reservoir erosion Repeat cross sections in 2008, 2009 and 2010 Volume change calculated from differences in reoccupied cross-sections

Methods: Surfacing and GCD uncertainty 1.Difference DEMs 2.Filter by uncertainty 3.Filter by spatial coherence 4.Extract cells of erosion and deposition Wheaton, J. M., Brasington, J., Darby, S. E. and Sear, D. A. (2010), Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35: 136–156. doi: /esp

Results:Longitudinal trends in Sediment Deposition

D50 Upstream\D50 Downstream

Results: Reservoir Erosion

Results : Downstream SSC

Results: Suspended Sediment release during drawdown and removal

Results: Annual Suspended Sediment Load Yearly suspended sediment discharge (in metric tons) above and below the site of the Chiloquin Dam removal

Results: Downstream Differenced DEMs Sprague River Analysis Units

Results: Downstream Net Volume Change- Sprague River Analysis Units

Results: Downstream Differenced DEMs Williamson River Analysis Units

Results: Net Volume Change- Williamson River Analysis Units

Results: Sediment Volume deposited in Pool Analysis Units

Chiloquin Dam Removal Sediment Preliminary Sediment Budget Upstream Boundary - SSC from turbidity Downstream Boundary - SSC from turbidity DS Deposition - DEM differencing Reservoir Erosion - Volume change from repeat XS surveys

Conclusions Sprague and Williamson Rivers are still processing the pulse of sediment input by the Chiloquin Dam Removal. Pool filling has been observed in both 2009 and Very little pool scour was observed. Basin wide trends may be partially obscuring the sediment signal of the removal. The suspended sediment signal from the drawdown event was very small compared to annual suspended sediment loads.

Future work – Links to Habitat data Reach scale habitat and invertebrate data (EPA EMAP protocol) collected in 2008, 2009 and Movement of endangered fish – USGS telemetry study ongoing.

Acknowledgements Dr. Desiree Tullos Cara Walter Summer Field Techs – Greg Woloveke, Kaileen Amish, Ryan Caruso, Adam Wyborny, Meredith Cavanaugh

Questions?