Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY11 Annual Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY10 Annual Report.
Advertisements

July CPOC Meeting. Key Changes to AB 109 AB 109 is modified by AB 117 Realignment is now operative on October 1, 2011 (budget also establishes the community.
Budget and Caseload Update Policy and Fiscal Committee December 6, 2010.
Davidson County General Sessions Mental Health Court Justice A. A
1 Implementation of HB 1736 September 1, OVERVIEW H.B. 1736, enacted during the 81 st Legislative Session, provided the following support for.
Reentry Division Update To: Reentry Task Force April 20, 2010.
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Senate Criminal Justice Committee October 7, 2009 Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections.
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
1 Florida Department of Corrections Presentations to the Senate Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice Appropriations December 13, 2007.
Community-Based Reentry Programs Using Electronic Technology
AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Chief Justice Led Mental Health Task Force. Chief Justice Led Mental Health Task Force Members Judge Sharon Keller, Presiding Judge, Texas Court of Criminal.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
Association of County Commissioners of Alabama (ACCA) August 20, 2014 Perdido Beach Hotel and Resort Orange Beach, Alabama.
REGIONAL REENTRY CONFERENCE JULY , 2013 PARENTING SENTENCING ALTERNATIVE SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6639.
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Ten and Eleven.
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Background The Sentencing Commission is a public governor and legislature- appointed body whose purpose is to study Louisiana sentencing and incarceration.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Overview Review of Existing Processes –Intake and Admissions Evaluation –Analysis of Intake Forms Collaboration.
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY12 Annual Report.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
Virginia’s Geriatric Release Provision. 2 Geriatric Release Provision & Truth-in-Sentencing  The Geriatric Release Provision was adopted as part of the.
Hamilton County Veterans’ Treatment Court Structure, Process, and Purpose.
Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.
Pre-Sentence Investigation Proposal Purpose: To gather and provide information to the Courts and to other Criminal Justice stakeholders that will aid at.
Texas Department of Public Safety DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Texas Silver Alert Program How Prepared Are You?
Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109) Impacts on San Francisco County Wendy S. Still Chief Adult Probation Officer Association for Criminal Justice.
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
State of CT Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division Major Initiatives Update Presented to the Criminal Justice Policy Advisory Commission September.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Basic Supervision Funding We will receive the following amounts in basic supervision: FY 2008 FY 2009 $105,744,392 $107,326,403 Currently we are receiving.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
The Use of Criminal Records Reconsidered Alan Rosenthal, Esq.
November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Michigan Department of Corrections Institutional and Community Corrections.
Higher Education and Second Chances Center for Community Alternatives, Justice Strategies.
Chapter 2 Sentencing and the Correctional Process Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Define community corrections and discuss its role in the criminal justice system  LO2 Describe.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Mental Health Diversionary Program Purpose: To reduce the number of mentally ill clients incarcerated or insufficiently served while aiding in recovery.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Early Release Schemes in Hong Kong Mr. Kenneth LEUNG Principal Officer Hong Kong Correctional Services Department.
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY13 Annual Report.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
PRESENTATION ON CORRECTIONAL MATTERS AMENDMENT BILL-2010 Policy overview.
OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION AR’s 503, 521 & 523. Learning Objectives What is objective classification? What is objective classification? What is the purpose.
Educational training on Voting Rights for people currently or previously involved in the criminal justice system.
Reentry: A Successful Return Home TDCJ Reentry and Integration Division.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Davis April 8 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
The Criminal Justice System Chapter 12. Elements of the Criminal Justice System  Criminal Justice Law  Texas criminal justice system: The system of.
Chapter 11 Criminal Justice
Summit County Probation Services
Social Justice Aspects of Proposition 64: Adult Use of Marijuana Act
SMI Determination Form Clinical Guide
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Parole.
Chapter 11 – Criminal Justice
Washington State Three Strikes Law
Assertive community treatment webinar
Department of Children and Families
The United States has the highest incarceration rates of
Presentation transcript:

Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY11 Annual Report Texas Department of Criminal Justice Reentry and Integration Division

Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) provides for the early parole review and release of certain categories of offenders who are mentally ill, mentally retarded, elderly, terminally ill, long term care or physically handicapped. The purpose of MRIS is to release offenders, who pose minimal public safety risk, from incarceration to more cost effective alternatives. 1 Legislative Updates (Effective September 1, 2007) As the result of HB 1670, offenders with a reportable conviction or adjudication under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, were previously ineligible for MRIS consideration. During the 80 th Legislative Session, HB 2611 was passed allowing MRIS consideration for such offenders if in a persistent vegetative state or being a person with an organic brain syndrome with significant to total mobility impairment. HB 431, also enacted during the 80 th Legislative Session, allows MRIS consideration for defendants convicted of a state jail felony. Legislative Updates (Effective September 1, 2007) As the result of HB 1670, offenders with a reportable conviction or adjudication under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, were previously ineligible for MRIS consideration. During the 80 th Legislative Session, HB 2611 was passed allowing MRIS consideration for such offenders if in a persistent vegetative state or being a person with an organic brain syndrome with significant to total mobility impairment. HB 431, also enacted during the 80 th Legislative Session, allows MRIS consideration for defendants convicted of a state jail felony. Legislative Updates (Effective September 1, 2007) As the result of HB 1670, offenders with a reportable conviction or adjudication under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, were previously ineligible for MRIS consideration. During the 80 th Legislative Session, HB 2611 was passed allowing MRIS consideration for such offenders if in a persistent vegetative state or being a person with an organic brain syndrome with significant to total mobility impairment. HB 431, also enacted during the 80 th Legislative Session, allows MRIS consideration for defendants convicted of a state jail felony.

MRIS Data Comparison (by fiscal year) 2 There were a total of 100 MRIS approvals during FY11. Of those, 91 were CID offenders approved by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. The remaining 9 were State Jail confinees approved by sentencing Judges. **Includes ineligible referrals with no qualifying medical condition

MRIS Offender Data 3 MRIS Referrals1807* Individual Offenders Referred1344 Presentations for MRIS consideration349** Individual Offenders Presented304 * Includes multiple referrals for 332 individual offenders ** Includes multiple presentations for 37 individual offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration

MRIS FY11 Referral Status 4 ELIGIBLE REFERRALSINELIGIBLE REFERRALS Presented to Board/Judge for consideration337*Sex Offender; HB2611 criteria not met361 Clinical Criteria Not Met5753G / Not Long Term Care or Terminally Ill253 Offender referred to unit medical provider138Parole Approved56 Deceased prior to presentation for MRIS consideration39Not an Offender (SAFPF / ISF)7 Pending Presentation to Board/Judge at close of FY1116Pending Discharge5 Active Detainer / Not Legal US Citizen12 Pending response from unit medical provider at close of FY118 Total Eligible1125Total Ineligible682 Total Referrals ** * Includes multiple presentations for 37 individual offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration ** Includes multiple referrals for 332 individual offenders Note: Clinical Criteria Not Met may include offenders who were previously presented and denied MRIS with next review indicating no change in offenders condition.

5 Unit Direct % of Total Referrals 44% 30% 44% 42% * Includes multiple referrals for 332 individual offenders

6 * A total of 100 offenders were approved during FY11. Of those, 99 of those cases were presented for consideration during FY11 and one was pending decision from presentation in FY10.. MRIS Referrals for FY11 Approved by Source

MRIS FY11 Presented for MRIS Consideration by Diagnosis 7 *Includes presentations for 304 individual offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration. Of those, 37 had multiple presentations.

MRIS Approval Rates by Diagnosis (Comparison by fiscal year) 8 There were a total of 100 MRIS approvals during FY11. Of those, 91 were CID offenders approved by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. The remaining 9 were State Jail Confinees approved by sentencing Judges.

Status of FY11 Presentations 9 A total of 349 cases were presented for MRIS consideration during FY11. Of those, 337 were referred in FY11 and 12 were FY10 referrals pending presentation. The following reflects the status of all cases presented for vote during FY11. FY11 TOTALSCIDState Jail Presented FY11:349*33613 Approved99909 Consideration denied219 Denied MRIS16133 Deceased pending decision77 Pending decision at close of FY10981 *Includes presentations for 304 individual offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration. Of those, 37 had multiple presentations Note: One case received two votes during a single presentation with the board approving, withdrawing the approval due to new information, and then denying consideration. The actual number of votes is 1 greater (350) than the actual number of presentations recorded (349).

Status of FY11 Approved Cases 10 Reflects status of approved cases as of 08/31/2011 A total of 100 offenders were approved during FY11. Of those, 99 of those cases were presented for consideration during FY11 and one was pending decision from presentation in FY10. FY11 TOTALSCIDState Jail Approved Released85769 Deceased pending release99 Vote withdrawn33 Pending release at close of FY1133

11 FY11 Offender Deaths Sex Offender – Did not meet criteria as set for by House Bill MRIS Consideration Denied / Denied MRIS22 Deceased after receipt of MRIS medical summary and during processing of case for presentation to Board of Pardons and Paroles / Presiding Judge 14 Deceased after referral – prior to receipt of MRIS medical summary13 Deceased within 48 hours of receipt of MRIS medical summary9 Medical Summary indicated Clinical Criteria Not Met8 Deceased pending decision7 MRIS Approved – Deceased pending release7 No significant change in condition since prior denial – Not presented for vote7 Not eligible (Parole Approved / Pending Discharge / ISF / SAFPF)5 Deceased pending disposition of ICE detainer6 Deceased within 24 hours of referral6 Deceased in voting process on day of Approval1 During FY11 a total of 423 offender deaths were reported to TCOOMMI by TDCJ Health Services Division. This number includes offenders who were not eligible for MRIS (i.e., death row, ISF, SAFPF), those who died as the result of suicide, unit incident, sudden death (i.e., cardiac arrest), etc. Of those reported offenders, 192 had been referred for MRIS one or more times during their incarceration. Of those, 147 received referrals during FY11. The following reflects status of the FY11 referrals.

Current Status of Offenders Released on MRIS Since the programs inception on December 1, 1991, 1448 offenders have been released, seven of whom have released twice for a total of 1455 actual releases. The following chart depicts current status of each offender released. 12