TRAINING EVALUATION WHAT? WHAT? WHY? WHY? HOW? HOW? SO WHAT? SO WHAT?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training Companies are in business to make money, and every business function is under pressure to show how it contributes to business success or face.
Advertisements

Evaluating Training Programs The Four Levels
SNDT Women's University Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments  Presented by Kathleen (Kat) Miller, Senior Consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton  4.
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
Training Evaluation Presentation by Ranjith Menon.
Training Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation Kelly Arthur Richard Gage-Little Dale Munson Evaluation Strategies for Instructional Designers.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management
Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark.
Unit 10: Evaluating Training and Return on Investment 2009.
Kirkpatrick.
Evaluation of Training
Evaluating Training Programs E-learning Assignment Bret (one-t) Painter.
MBA 423: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
1 Evaluation. 2 Evaluating The Organization Effective evaluation begins at the organizational level. It starts with a strategic plan that has been carefully.
1.
Employee perceptions and their influence on training effectiveness
TRAINING AND COUNTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT
Evaluation of Training
Training for Improved Performance
HFT 2220 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS. Development Programs Helps our employees get better every day Helps employees achieve their goals Puts the person in sync.
Product Evaluation the outcome phase. Do the magic bullets work? How do you know when an innovative educational program has “worked”? How do you know.
PLAN AND ORGANISE ASSESSMENT. By the end of this session, you will have an understanding of what is assessment, competency based assessment, assessment.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
1 CHAPTER 5 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL. 2 DEFINITION Performance appraisal involves: –Identification Determining what areas of work the manager should be examining.
Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES Kimberly Gargiulo, Coordinator of Assessment Office of Institutional Research and Assessment.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Dr. Shulagna Sarkar Assistant Professor , Jt. Coordinator – PGDM – HRM
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
Human Resource Management Lecture-23 Staffing HRM FUNCTIONS Employee & Labor Relations Safety & Health Compensation & Benefits Human Resource Development.
TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT Dr. Anil Mehta DEFINITION OF TRAINING “A PLANNED ACTIVITY TO MODIFY ATTITUDE, KNOWLEDGE OR SKILL THROUGH LEARNING EXPERIENCE TO.
Program Evaluation.
Evaluation of Strategic HRD Chapter 11. Why Evaluate ? The Purpose of Evaluation: Viewpoints & Challenges Evaluation is a core part of what makes us compete.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Sociological Research Methods. The Research Process Sociologists answer questions about society through empirical research (observation and experiments)
DAY-5 Evaluation and Control Process 6 Yes Determine what to measure. Measure performance. Take corrective action. STOP No Does perform- ance match.
Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Evaluation
Assessment Ice breaker. Ice breaker. My most favorite part of the course was …. My most favorite part of the course was …. Introduction Introduction How.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Training Employees.
Training evaluation- Ten steps process 1.Determining needs 2.Settings objectives 3.Determining subject content 4.Selecting participants 5.Determining the.
The purpose of evaluation is not to prove, but to improve.
Training and HRD Process Model
Job Analysis and Evaluation. Definition Job - Consists of a group of tasks that must be performed for an organization to achieve its goals Position -
M & E System for MI’s Training Program & Guidelines for MI’s Completion Report Presented by Monitoring and Evaluation Officer Mekong Institute January.
Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
Return on Investment: Training and Development Session 1 ROI and Evaluation.
7 Training Employees What Do I Need to Know?
Training on Infection Prevention and Control
Assessing Young Learners
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Program Evaluation.
Evaluation of Information Literacy Education
FEASIBILITY STUDY Feasibility study is a means to check whether the proposed system is correct or not. The results of this study arte used to make decision.
Writing for “Innovations in Family Medicine Education”
BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007
Chapter Six Training Evaluation.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Kirkpatrick’s Evaluating Training programs
SPIRIT OF HR.in TRAINING EVALUATION.
MODEL FOR COMBINED EVALUATION AND RECOGNITION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Train the Trainer Your Name.
Assessments and the Kirkpatrick Model
Training Evaluation Chapter 6
Basic concepts curriculum Curriculum development Curriculum analysis Curriculum evaluation Elements of curriculum Educational objectives content.
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

TRAINING EVALUATION WHAT? WHAT? WHY? WHY? HOW? HOW? SO WHAT? SO WHAT?

Definition Any attempt to obtain information (feedback) on the effects of a training program, and to assess the value of the training in the light of that information Any attempt to obtain information (feedback) on the effects of a training program, and to assess the value of the training in the light of that information A continuum of methodology A continuum of methodology An applied research An applied research Literature suggests the use of formal, systematic, and comprehensive evaluation Literature suggests the use of formal, systematic, and comprehensive evaluation

Evaluation: Part of Planning Training needs analysis Training needs analysis Setting objectives Setting objectives Determining subject content Determining subject content Selecting participants Selecting participants Determining the best schedule Determining the best schedule Selecting appropriate facilities Selecting appropriate facilities

Selecting appropriate instructors Selecting appropriate instructors Selecting and preparing audiovisual aids Selecting and preparing audiovisual aids Coordinating the program Coordinating the program Evaluating the program Evaluating the program

Purpose of Evaluation To decide whether to continue or discontinue training programs To decide whether to continue or discontinue training programs To gain information on how to improve future training programs To gain information on how to improve future training programs To provide feedback to training program stakeholders To provide feedback to training program stakeholders

To assess changes in attitude, knowledge, skills, & impact of training program To assess changes in attitude, knowledge, skills, & impact of training program To justify the existence of HRD section To justify the existence of HRD section

Kirkpatrick: The Four Levels of Training Evaluation Level 1: Reaction Level 2: Learning Level 3: Behavior Level 4: Results

Evaluating Reaction A measure of participant reactions to show their satisfaction levels A measure of participant reactions to show their satisfaction levels Satisfactions toward training variables such as administration, program, facilities, teaching, etc. Satisfactions toward training variables such as administration, program, facilities, teaching, etc. Positive or favorable reactions are desirable Positive or favorable reactions are desirable

Guidelines for Evaluating Reaction Determine what you want to find out Determine what you want to find out Design a form that will quantify reactions Design a form that will quantify reactions Encourage written comments/suggestions Encourage written comments/suggestions Get 100% immediate response Get 100% immediate response Develop acceptable standards Develop acceptable standards Communicate findings as appropriate Communicate findings as appropriate

Evaluating Learning Educational program involves change in attitude, knowledge or skills Educational program involves change in attitude, knowledge or skills The objective of training program must change at least one element The objective of training program must change at least one element

Guidelines for Evaluating Learning Use a control group if practical Use a control group if practical Evaluate pre and post Evaluate pre and post Use appropriate instruments Use appropriate instruments Get 100% response Get 100% response Use the findings to take appropriate action Use the findings to take appropriate action

Evaluating Behavior Practice in workplace Practice in workplace Application of learned knowledge, skills & attitude Application of learned knowledge, skills & attitude Transfer of training Transfer of training Depends on many factors such as time, facilities, organizational climate, etc. Depends on many factors such as time, facilities, organizational climate, etc.

Guidelines for Evaluating Behavior Use a control group if practical Use a control group if practical Allow time for behavior change to take place Allow time for behavior change to take place Evaluate pre and post Evaluate pre and post Get data from various resources Get data from various resources Get 100% response or a sampling Get 100% response or a sampling Repeat the evaluation at appropriate times Repeat the evaluation at appropriate times Consider cost versus benefits Consider cost versus benefits

Evaluating Results Impact of training program Impact of training program Personal, family, society, organizational, & nation Personal, family, society, organizational, & nation Increased production, improved quality, increased sales, higher profit, decreased costs, reduced complaints, reduced turnover, etc. Increased production, improved quality, increased sales, higher profit, decreased costs, reduced complaints, reduced turnover, etc. Indirect & long term Indirect & long term

Guidelines for Evaluating Results Use a control group if practical Use a control group if practical Allow time for results to be achieved Allow time for results to be achieved Measure pre and post Measure pre and post Repeat the measurement at appropriate times Repeat the measurement at appropriate times Consider cost versus benefits Consider cost versus benefits Be satisfied with evidence if proof is not possible Be satisfied with evidence if proof is not possible

Instruments, Analysis, Reporting, Acting of Evaluation Findings Observation with check lists, questionnaire, observation, interview, documents, pencil and paper test, performance test Observation with check lists, questionnaire, observation, interview, documents, pencil and paper test, performance test Measurement of Central Tendency – mean mode, median, range, % Measurement of Central Tendency – mean mode, median, range, % Memo, detail report, oral and written Memo, detail report, oral and written Respond by stakeholders Respond by stakeholders